Skip to content

A Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Versus Aspheric Non-Toric Lens Implantation

A Randomized, Prospective, Multi-Center, Patient-Masked, Bilateral Comparison of Aspheric Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation Versus Aspheric Non-Toric Lens Implantation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01225926
Enrollment
24
Registered
2010-10-21
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2013-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Keywords

Intraocular Lens, Toric

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare uncorrected distance visual acuity measurement in pseudophakic subjects with bilateral implantation of an AcrySof IQ Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) versus bilateral implantation of an AcrySof IQ IOL.

Interventions

DEVICEIQ SN60WF

Commercially available, acrylic, monofocal IOL intended to provide visual correction over the lifetime of the cataract patient

Commercially available, acrylic, multifocal IOL intended to provide visual correction over the lifetime of the cataract patient

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to understand and sign an informed consent; * Willing and able to attend post-operative examinations per protocol schedule; * In good ocular health, with the exception of cataracts; * Age-related cataracts in both eyes that require extraction followed by implantation of an intraocular lens; * Pre-operative corneal cylinder of greater than or equal to 0.75 diopter as determined by auto keratometry; * In good ocular health, with the exception of cataracts; * Free of diseases/conditions listed in the precautions of the AcrySof® Toric and AcrySof® IQ package inserts; * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous corneal surgery; * Corneal abnormality that would prevent stable and reliable visual acuity and refractive measures; * Planned multiple procedures during cataract/IOL implantation surgery; * Ocular disease and/or condition that may compromise study results; * Ocular trauma, infections or nasolacrimal drainage system malfunction within 3 months of enrolment; * Pregnant or planning pregnancy during course of study; * Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to enrolment; * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (Monocular UCDVA) at Month 3Month 3Uncorrected visual acuity (i.e., visual acuity measured without spectacles or other visual corrective devices) was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts at 100% contrast and measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Each eye was assessed, and both eyes contributed to the mean. LogMAR 0.00 is equivalent of 20/20 and LogMAR 1.0 is equivalent of 20/200. A more negative logMAR value would indicate a greater improvement in visual acuity.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from one study center located in Russia.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Toric T3 - T9
AcrySof IQ Toric IOL surgically implanted in the capsular bag of the eye following cataract removal. Both eyes were implanted, with the second eye implanted at least 1 week after and within 1 month of the first eye.
12
IQ SN60WF
AcrySof IQ IOL surgically implanted in the capsular bag of the eye following cataract removal. Both eyes were implanted, with the second eye implanted at least 1 week after and within 1 month of the first eye.
12
Total24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicToric T3 - T9IQ SN60WFTotal
Age Continuous48.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.64
55.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.52
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.63
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants4 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (Monocular UCDVA) at Month 3

Uncorrected visual acuity (i.e., visual acuity measured without spectacles or other visual corrective devices) was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts at 100% contrast and measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). Each eye was assessed, and both eyes contributed to the mean. LogMAR 0.00 is equivalent of 20/20 and LogMAR 1.0 is equivalent of 20/200. A more negative logMAR value would indicate a greater improvement in visual acuity.

Time frame: Month 3

Population: Per protocol: All subjects who received IOLs in both eyes and followed the protocol with no major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Toric T3 - T9Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (Monocular UCDVA) at Month 30.089 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1212
IQ SN60WFMonocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (Monocular UCDVA) at Month 30.225 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1503

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026