Skip to content

RCT of Pulp Capping Over Carious Exposure in Adults

Randomized Controlled Trial of Pulp Capping Over Carious Exposures Comparing MTA With Dycal

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01224925
Enrollment
80
Registered
2010-10-20
Start date
2010-10-18
Completion date
2015-12-10
Last updated
2019-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carious Exposure, Human Permanent First and Second Molars, Mature Teeth, Proximal Caries, Healthy Pulp, Reversible Pulpitis

Keywords

carious exposure, pulp capping, MTA, Dycal

Brief summary

This multicentre study was a randomized, controlled, parallel, patient-blinded, two-arm superiority trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio that followed the CONSORT guidelines.The aim of this study was to investigate whether MTA is more effective than a conventional calcium hydroxide liner (Dycal®) as a direct pulp capping material in mature molar teeth with a carious pulpal exposure.

Detailed description

Calcium hydroxide (CH) is considered the standard material for pulp capping with good results in cases with pulpal exposure as a result of dental trauma both in animal and clinical studies. However, in carious exposures, follow-up studies of direct pulp capping performed with CH based materials have shown increasing failure rates and the outcome has been considered uncertain. Direct capping of carious exposures still remains a controversial treatment for mature teeth. A new material, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) was introduced for root end filling material almost two decades ago. It is also suggested for pulp capping. MTA cement has showed good sealing ability and bio-compatibility in animal studies. Results from studies in humans corroborate the results from animal studies. Although the overall results of pulp capping in human studies using MTA are very positive, well designed and controlled clinical studies, especially involving carious exposures on adult teeth are lacking.At the time the present study was launched, there were no RCTs comparing MTA and CH as DPC materials and the histological evaluations have primarily been based on healthy teeth, thus undermining the generalizability of the results to adult patients with carious exposures.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDirect pulp capping with Dycal

Capping over carious exposure with Dycal. Dycal: covered with Fuji IX. After one week, part of the temporary filling was left under the permanent filling

WMTA capping over exposed pulp, wet pellet, Fuji IX. After one week, the entire temporary filling was removed,the cavity was permanently restored with a composite resin material used at the study clinic.

Sponsors

Norwegian Public dental health service
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Tromso
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patient -blinded

Intervention model description

Multicenter study a randomized, controlled, parallel, patient-blinded, two-arm superiority trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-55 years * 1st and 2nd permanent molars * Proximal caries to inner 1/3 of dentin (bite-wing) * Apex closed, no periapical changes (apical radiograph) * No periodontal pockets deeper than 4mm * Medical history non-contributory (incl.pregnancy) * No medication (no antibiotics during last month) * No signs or symptoms more severe than reversible pulpitis * Positive response to electrical pulp test(EPT) or cold test * Written consent Inclusion requires compliance with all the criteria listed

Exclusion criteria

* During the treatment there will be no pulpal exposure * The bleeding of the exposed pulp cannot be controled in 10 minutes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival of Capped Pulps44 monthSurvival was defined as a non-symptomatic tooth that responded to sensibility testing and did not exhibit any periapical changes. Follow-up included pulpal testing and periapical radiograph at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was planned . Patients who come with delay for last checkup where included in the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain 1 Week After Treatment.one weekPain existing immediately postoperatively, during the first week, and at the one-week appointment is recorded.

Countries

Lithuania, Norway

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Four Dental Clinics

Pre-assignment details

Ten subjects were excluded due to a lack of pulpal exposure after the complete removal of caries before assignment to groups

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dycal - Calcium Hydroxide Material
Pulp capping with Dycal Direct pulp capping over carious exposure: Dycal: covered with Fuji IX. After one week,part of the temporary filling was left under the permanent filling
37
WMTA - White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
Pulp capping with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Direct pulp capping: WMTA capping over exposed pulp, wet pellet, Fuji IX. After one week, the entire temporary filling was removed,the cavity was permanently restored with a composite resin material used at the study clinic
33
Total70

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDycal - Calcium Hydroxide MaterialTotalWMTA - White Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
Age, Continuous30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
30.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
30.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Caries depth >2/3 into the dentine8 participants23 participants15 participants
Caries depth 2/3 into the dentine5 participants11 participants6 participants
Cavity type Occlusial2 participants4 participants2 participants
Distal-occlusial11 participants22 participants11 participants
Into the pulp24 participants36 participants12 participants
Lower first molar14 participants19 participants5 participants
Lower second molar6 participants14 participants8 participants
Mesial-occlusial16 participants29 participants13 participants
Mesial-oclusial-distal8 participants15 participants7 participants
Preoperative pain
Pain at baseline -no
19 participants36 participants17 participants
Preoperative pain
Pain at baseline - yes
18 participants34 participants16 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized0 participants0 participants0 participants
Tooth number Upper first molar10 participants23 participants13 participants
Upper second molar7 participants14 participants7 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 370 / 33
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 370 / 33
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 370 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Survival of Capped Pulps

Survival was defined as a non-symptomatic tooth that responded to sensibility testing and did not exhibit any periapical changes. Follow-up included pulpal testing and periapical radiograph at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was planned . Patients who come with delay for last checkup where included in the study.

Time frame: 44 month

Population: Three patients were lost from follow-up in Dycal group, two patients in WMTA group. Intention to treat principle (ITT) was applied; the analysis comprised all allocated cases

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Dycal - Calcium Hydroxide MaterialSurvival of Capped Pulps842 Survival days
WMTA - White Mineral Trioxide AggregateSurvival of Capped Pulps1201 Survival days
Comparison: The power calculation was based on the intention to show a 30% difference in success rates. The following parameters were used (binomial scale): type I error: 5%; expected success rate in the CH group: 55% (based on Barthel et al. 2000); minimal difference between success rates not to be overlooked: 30%; type II error: 5%. The calculations revealed the need for 64 subjects in each group. After adding 20% for eventual drop-outs, we planned to recruit 160 subjects in one year.p-value: <0.0195% CI: [693, 991]Log Rank
p-value: <0.0195% CI: [1068, 1335]Log Rank
Secondary

Postoperative Pain 1 Week After Treatment.

Pain existing immediately postoperatively, during the first week, and at the one-week appointment is recorded.

Time frame: one week

Population: Postoperative pain 1 week after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dycal - Calcium Hydroxide MaterialPostoperative Pain 1 Week After Treatment.8 participants
WMTA - White Mineral Trioxide AggregatePostoperative Pain 1 Week After Treatment.10 participants
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026