Skip to content

School Influenza Vaccine vs Standard of Care With Nested Trial of 2 Parent Notification Intensities

Monroe COunty School Kids Influenza Prevention Project

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01224301
Acronym
MCSkipp
Enrollment
25366
Registered
2010-10-20
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2012-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Immunizations, Influenza, School Health, Vaccination

Keywords

seasonal influenza vaccine, school-based clinics, economic analysis of school based influenza vaccine delivery, pediatric influenza vaccine rates, Influenza vaccine information for parents

Brief summary

Purpose of the study. The purpose of the project is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and cost effectiveness of providing influenza vaccine in schools to children in grades Kindergarten through 6th grade. Hypothesis 1: School based influenza vaccination (SIV) will increase the overall rate of influenza vaccination in school children. Hypothesis 2: Higher intensity parent notification about school based influenza vaccination does not increase immunization rates compared to low intensity. Hypothesis 3: School based vaccination from the perspective of mass vaccinators is cost neutral.

Detailed description

Background. The ACIP (American Committee on Immunization Practices) has now recommended influenza vaccination for all children 6 months to 18 years of age. While many school-aged children will be vaccinated in the medical home, the large number of children for whom the vaccine is now recommended exceeds the capacity of many primary care settings. Schools have been recommended as potential sites for influenza vaccination, yet little is known about the feasibility, implementation requirements, costs, or effectiveness of school-based influenza vaccination (SIV) programs. This project will implement and rigorously evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, billing and reimbursement components, costs, cost-effectiveness, and overall effectiveness of an SIV program that targets diverse populations and different intensity of interventions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSchool based flu vaccine: Low intensity

Interventions: Parents of children in Low Intensity Notification schools got less than 3 communications from schools describing influenza vaccine and the clinics, and consent forms sent home one.

BEHAVIORALSchool based flu vaccine: High intensity

Interventions: Parents in high intensity schools have 3 or more communications from schools about influenza illness, influenza vaccine, and school based clinics.

Sponsors

University of Rochester
CollaboratorOTHER
Monroe County Department of Public Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 13 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Children in grades K through 5 enrolled in schools that agreed to participate in the randomized trial of school based influenza vaccine

Exclusion criteria

Children and schools not enrolled in school based influenza vaccine program Children in participating schools in grades other than Kindergarten through 5th grade. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Seasonal influenza vaccine rates for children attending schools with and without school-based influenza vaccine delivery as reported in the New York State Immunization Information System (NYSIIS).Year 1 Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 15 2009 to January 15, 2010Number of children with at least one seasonal influenza vaccine given in school compared to number of children with influenza vaccine given elsewhere and number of children with no record of influenza vaccine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of seasonal influenza vaccines received by children enrolled in schools with high vs. low vs. no parental notification.Year 1 Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 15, 2009 to January 15, 2010Vaccine rates among children offered seasonal influenza vaccine in school whose parents got high intensity notification of the program vs those who got low intensity notification. Notification included educational materials, program description, consent forms, phone messages, and varied by type and frequency for schools with High and Low levels of parental notification.
Number of seasonal influenza vaccines received by children enrolled in schools with high vs low vs no parental notification.Year 2: Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 1, 2010 to January 15, 2011Vaccine rates among children offered seasonal influenza vaccine in school whose parents got high intensity notification of the program vs those who got low intensity notification. Notification included educational materials, program description, consent forms, phone messages, and varied by type and frequency for schools with High and Low levels of parental notification.
Costs and incremental cost effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccines delivered in schools compared to cost of influenza vaccines delivered in private practice.Time Frame: (FDAAA) Year 1 Influenza vaccine delivery season: August 15 2009 to January 15, 2010Economic analysis of costs and revenues associated with school-based seasonal influenza vaccine delivered by a mass vaccinator. The project is based on a business model for purchasing/acquiring vaccine from vendors and vaccines for children, and recovering payment from insurance. Costs associated with vaccines administered in school are derived from this clinical trial, School Influenza Vaccine vs Standard of Care, and private practice data are from the literature.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026