Skip to content

Biofeedback-based Motor Learning to Ameliorate Freezing of Gait

Biofeedback-based Motor Learning to Ameliorate Freezing of Gait

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01223781
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-10-19
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2010-10-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gait, Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Freezing, biofeedback, motor learning, freezing of gait in PD

Brief summary

Objective/Rationale: The investigators objective is to demonstrate that an intervention program based on motor learning principles can be applied to train subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) who suffer from freezing to walk in a way that minimizes the occurrence of freezing. Since sufficient motor learning capabilities are preserved in PD, the investigators hypothesize that an intervention program that targets the time periods just prior to an approaching freezing episode can modify the walking strategies so that the episode will now be averted. Project Description: The freezing burden will be quantified in subjects with PD before and after 6 weeks of training. Two types of interventions (20 subjects in each group) will be tested: 1) Open-loop group (OLG); 2) Closed-loop group (CLG). Each session of the OLG training includes walking courses aimed at provoking freezing episodes. The experimenter will trigger an auditory rhythmic stimulation (RAS) in walking conditions likely to invoke freezing (e.g., turning) and the subject will learn to synchronize his/her gait with the auditory cues, i.e., to keep the walking pace and coordination and, as a result, to avoid freezing. Similar principles will apply for the CLG training; however, the RAS will be elicited automatically by a device that recognizes an approaching freezing episode. Relevance to Diagnosis/Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: If even partially successful, the investigators will show, for the first time that freezing of gait is amenable to motor learning and that appropriate training with external cueing can alleviate these motor blockades. While future studies will be needed to further assess long-term efficacy and other important questions about clinical efficacy and the mechanisms involved, this study should go a long way towards improving the investigators understanding of freezing of gait and its amenability to appropriate therapy. Anticipated Outcome: The investigators anticipate that after intensive training, the central nervous system (CNS) of subjects with PD will be able to anticipate impending freezing episodes based on awareness of the environmental conditions (e.g., an approaching turn) and/or based on sub-conscious response to a deteriorating gait pattern. As a result, an automated motor response that paces and coordinates gait will be internally triggered by the CNS and the approaching freezing episode will be averted. The overall freezing burden will therefore decrease in trained subjects.

Detailed description

Overview: This will be a randomized trial to demonstrate the effects of 6-weeks of training with open-loop or triggered, closed-loop cueing. PD+ FOG patients will be studied before and after 6 weeks of training (total of 18 sessions) and one month later (to begin to assess retention). The two intervention groups will receive training sessions designed to enhance implicit motor learning and avoidance of FOG. This will be the first study to assess these novel paradigms. If the results support the hypotheses, further studies will be needed including a placebo-controlled trial. 20 subjects will be included in the feed-forward, open-loop group (OLG) and 20 in the feedback, closed-loop group (CLG) (based on power analysis to provide 80% power at α=0.05). Participants will be recruited on a rolling admission basis (about 2 subjects per week over \ 20 weeks) and will be randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups. Pre, post and retention effects will be tested without knowledge of group assignment. A (repeated measures) mixed models statistical approach will be used to evaluate within and across group effects over time, adjusting for baseline values. The study will be conducted under the auspices of the Laboratory for Gait and Neurodynamics and the Movement Disorders Unit (MDU) at the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. At all times during training and testing, the subjects will be closely monitored by a research assistant to ensure safety.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBiofeedback-based motor learning for PD

Prior to freezing episodes, auditory stimulation is triggered

Sponsors

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1) Have a diagnosis of PD 2) Suffer from the FOG symptom. Subjects must score 2 or more on item #3 of the subjective FOG questionnaire (FOG-Q)and exhibit two or more FOG episodes during a short, functional FOG evaluation procedure that includes FOG-provoking conditions (e.g., turns, doorways) and 5 laps of walking in a figure 8 shaped trajectory 3) Free of serious co-morbidities or acute illness that would make training inappropriate.

Exclusion criteria

1\) Unable to walk unassisted for at least 5 minutes with ample rest. 2)Brain surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of freezing episodes3 daysIn lab examinaiton and then in 3 days of ambulatory monitoring, the nubmer of freezing episodes will be counted before and after the intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
duration of freezing episodes3 daysIn lab examinaiton and then in 3 days of ambulatory monitoring, the duration of freezing episodes will be counted before and after the intervention

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary ContactMeir Plotnik, PhD
meirp@tasmc.health.gov.il972 326974958
Backup ContactJeffrey M Hausdorff, PhD
jhausdor@tasmc.health.gov.il972 326974958

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026