Skip to content

PUFAs and Left Ventricular Function in Heart Failure

Effects of n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) on Left Ventricular Function and Functional Capacity in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01223703
Acronym
CS-PUFA-02
Enrollment
133
Registered
2010-10-19
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2012-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Heart Failure

Keywords

n-3 PUFAs, Heart Failure, Dilated cardiomyopathy, Ejection Fraction, Exercise Capacity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that n-3 PUFAs improve left ventricular systolic function in patients with stable chronic HF secondary to nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM).

Detailed description

The results of the GISSI-HF trial indicate that in patients with chronic HF on evidence-based medical therapy and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-IV, long term treatment with n-3 PUFAs 1 g daily reduces mortality and hospitalizations for cardiovascular reasons. Several potential mechanisms may underlie the beneficial effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in HF patients, including, but not limited to, antiarrhythmic, and hemodynamic actions. The current investigation was therefore designed to test the hypothesis that treatment with n-3 PUFAs improves LV systolic function expressed as EF in patients with stable chronic HF secondary to a nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM). Additionally, we sought to determine if n-3 PUFAs also exert positive effects on LV diastolic function assessed by echocardiography; functional capacity assessed by cardiopulmonary stress testing (CPET); and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class.

Interventions

1.0 g gelatin capsules containing 850 to 882 mg of EPA and DHA ethyl esters in the average ratio EPA/DHA of 0.9:1.5 The treatment dose was five capsules daily for the first month followed by two capsules daily for the rest of the study.

DRUGPlacebo

1.0 g gelatin capsules containing olive oil. The treatment dose was five capsules daily for the first month followed by two capsules daily for the rest of the study

Sponsors

Università degli Studi di Brescia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with a diagnosis of non ischemic cardiomyopathy (the absence of coronary artery disease,defined as the absence of stenosis \> 50%, was confirmed by angiography performed at the time of the diagnostic workup of the cardiomyopathy) * LV systolic dysfunction (defined as an EF \< 45%) * Stable clinical conditions with minimal or no symptoms for at least three month * Evidence-based medical treatment at maximum tolerated target doses for at least six month

Exclusion criteria

* presence of symptoms or evidence of CAD diagnosed through noninvasive tests; * peripheral arterial disease; * presence of congenital or primary valvular heart disease; * persistent atrial fibrillation; * inability to perform bicycle ergometry for noncardiac causes; * moderately to severely reduced functional capacity; * NYHA functional class IV; * poor acoustic windows limiting the ability to assess echocardiographic measurements; * chronic lung disease; * advanced renal disease (eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m2); * advanced liver disease; * any disease limiting life expectancy to one year or less; * contraindications to study drugs; * concomitant participation in other research studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Left Ventricular (LV) Systolic Function Expressed as Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Between Baseline and 12-month Follow-upone yearThe primary end point of the study was the change in LV systolic function expressed as LVEF between baseline and 12-month follow-up. The following parameters were measured according to the professional standards defined by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Echocardiography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LV Diastolic Functionone yearChange in LV diastolic function assessed by echocardiography: mitral diastolic inflow velocities (peak velocity of early ventricular filling \[E-wave\], peak velocity of late ventricular filling \[A-wave\], E/A ratio, and E-wave deceleration time), diastolic function score (graded on a scale from 1 to 4) were used.
Functional Capacity (Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake, VO2)one yearChange in functional capacity expressed as a peak oxygen uptake (VO2), that was acquired breath-by-breath by pneumotachograph (with bidirectional differential pressure) during cardiopulmonary exercize testing.
Change in Mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Between Baseline and 12th Month Follow up.one yearNYHA class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs, etc... NYHA class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. NYHA class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m). Comfortable only at rest NYHA class IV: Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Potential participants were recruited consecutively from the Heart Failure (HF) outpatient clinic of the University of Brescia. The first patient was enrolled on November 5, 2007, and the last patient completed the study on June 30, 2009.

Pre-assignment details

458 patients were assessed for eligibility. 235 patients were excluded: 251 not meeting inclusion criteria; 74 refused to participate. A total of 133 patients took part in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
n-3 PUFAs
1.0 g gelatin capsules containing 850 to 882 mg of EPA and DHA ethyl esters in the average ratio EPA/DHA of 0.9:1.5 The treatment dose was five capsules daily for the first month followed by two capsules daily for the rest of the study.
67
Placebo
1.0 g gelatin capsules containing olive oil. The treatment dose was five capsules daily for the first month followed by two capsules daily for the rest of the study
66
Total133

Baseline characteristics

Characteristicn-3 PUFAsPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants56 Participants120 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 670 / 66
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Left Ventricular (LV) Systolic Function Expressed as Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Between Baseline and 12-month Follow-up

The primary end point of the study was the change in LV systolic function expressed as LVEF between baseline and 12-month follow-up. The following parameters were measured according to the professional standards defined by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Echocardiography

Time frame: one year

Population: A sample of 65 patients in each group was calculated to have 80% power to detect such 0.5 effect size with p\<0.05 (2-tailed) at the Student t test for unpaired data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
n-3 PUFAsChange in Left Ventricular (LV) Systolic Function Expressed as Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Between Baseline and 12-month Follow-upbaseline36 ejection fraction (percentage)Standard Deviation 7
n-3 PUFAsChange in Left Ventricular (LV) Systolic Function Expressed as Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Between Baseline and 12-month Follow-up12th month follow up39 ejection fraction (percentage)Standard Deviation 6
PlaceboChange in Left Ventricular (LV) Systolic Function Expressed as Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Between Baseline and 12-month Follow-upbaseline37 ejection fraction (percentage)Standard Deviation 6
PlaceboChange in Left Ventricular (LV) Systolic Function Expressed as Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Between Baseline and 12-month Follow-up12th month follow up35 ejection fraction (percentage)Standard Deviation 6
Comparison: null hypothesis is no difference n3 PUFA administration and placebo. To demonstrate an effect size of 0.5 in LVEF, a sample of 65 patients in each group was calculated to have 80% power to detect such 0.5 effect size with alpha=0.05 (2-tailed) at the Student t test.~for unpaired data.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Between Baseline and 12th Month Follow up.

NYHA class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs, etc... NYHA class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. NYHA class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m). Comfortable only at rest NYHA class IV: Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
n-3 PUFAsChange in Mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Between Baseline and 12th Month Follow up.baseline2.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
n-3 PUFAsChange in Mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Between Baseline and 12th Month Follow up.12th month1.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
PlaceboChange in Mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Between Baseline and 12th Month Follow up.12th month2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
PlaceboChange in Mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Between Baseline and 12th Month Follow up.baseline2.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Secondary

Functional Capacity (Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake, VO2)

Change in functional capacity expressed as a peak oxygen uptake (VO2), that was acquired breath-by-breath by pneumotachograph (with bidirectional differential pressure) during cardiopulmonary exercize testing.

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
n-3 PUFAsFunctional Capacity (Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake, VO2)baseline19.5 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.8
n-3 PUFAsFunctional Capacity (Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake, VO2)12th month20.7 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.3
PlaceboFunctional Capacity (Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake, VO2)baseline18.3 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.4
PlaceboFunctional Capacity (Change in Peak Oxygen Uptake, VO2)12th month17.4 ml/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.2
Secondary

LV Diastolic Function

Change in LV diastolic function assessed by echocardiography: mitral diastolic inflow velocities (peak velocity of early ventricular filling \[E-wave\], peak velocity of late ventricular filling \[A-wave\], E/A ratio, and E-wave deceleration time), diastolic function score (graded on a scale from 1 to 4) were used.

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
n-3 PUFAsLV Diastolic FunctionE/A 12 month0.84 E/A ratioStandard Deviation 0.19
n-3 PUFAsLV Diastolic FunctionE/A baseline0.89 E/A ratioStandard Deviation 0.29
PlaceboLV Diastolic FunctionE/A 12 month0.98 E/A ratioStandard Deviation 0.4
PlaceboLV Diastolic FunctionE/A baseline0.90 E/A ratioStandard Deviation 0.37
p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026