Chronic Pain
Conditions
Keywords
moderate to severe pain, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis
Brief summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of hydrocodone extended-release tablets when used over a 12-month period in patients with chronic pain, as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory results, vital signs measurements, electrocardiogram results, physical examination findings, pure tone audiometry, and concomitant medication usage.
Detailed description
This was a Phase 3, open-label, nonrandomized study that consisted of a screening period, an open label titration period, and a 52 week, long term, open-label treatment period in patients with chronic pain. Patients were eligible to participate in this study if they had completed study C33237/3079 (NCT01240863) (these patients are hereafter referred to as rollover patients) or if they had not participated in study 3079 (these patients are hereafter referred to as either new opioid naïve or new opioid experienced patients).
Interventions
Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets were administered at doses of 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg orally every 12 hours. During the open-label titration period, doses were adjusted until a stable pain control was achieved. In general, the dose of hydrocodone extended release tablets could be adjusted for efficacy or tolerability, as necessary, at any time during the open-label treatment period; however, participants were required to visit the study center before increasing the dose of study drug.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol. * The patient has either completed Cephalon study 3079 or has chronic pain of at least 3 months duration prior to entering this study associated with any of the following conditions: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with other painful conditions may qualify for the study with permission from the Cephalon medical monitor or designee. * Those patients who completed the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (study 3079) and are willing to re-titrate study drug to an effective dose of hydrocodone extended-release tablets are eligible to enter this study. * The patient is able to speak English, willing to provide written informed consent, and sign a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study. * The patient is 18 through 80 years of age (inclusive) at the time of entering this or the previous study (study 3079). * Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who were enrolled in study 3079 but did not complete the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study may not be enrolled into this study. * The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to the study drug or its excipients. * The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse. * The patient has a medical or psychiatric condition/disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data. * The patient is taking a total (i.e., including around-the clock \[ATC\] and rescue medications) of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone or equivalent for 14 days prior to screening. * The patient has a history of suicidality. * The patient has a diagnosis of chronic headache or migraine as the primary painful condition under study. * The patient is expected to have surgery during the study and it is anticipated that the surgery will alleviate the patient's pain. * The patient is pregnant or lactating. * The patient has active malignancy. * The patient has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). * In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values. * The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with potent synthetic opioids. * The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the previous 30 days (excluding those who participated in study 3079). * The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug. * The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data. * The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the chronic pain currently being treated. * The patient has a positive urine drug screen (UDS) for an illicit substance or medication not prescribed by the physician currently treating the chronic pain. * The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periods | Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to no response at 3 consecutive test frequencies. |
| Participants With Adverse Experiences | Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period | An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes. |
| Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Day 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period | Data represents participants with PCS abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: * alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>=3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 6-43 U/L * aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>=3 times ULN. Normal range is 9-36 U/L * blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>=10.71 mmol/L * creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * white blood cell count: \<=3.0\*10\^9/L * hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * urine blood (hemoglobin): \>=2 unit increase from baseline * urine glucose: \>=2 unit increase from baseline |
| Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period | Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria * Pulse - high: \>=120 and increase of \>= 15 beats/minute from baseline * Pulse - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 beats/minute * Systolic blood pressure - high: \>=180 and increase \>=20 mmHg * Systolic blood pressure - low: \<=90 and decrease \>=20 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - high: \>=105 and increase of \>=15 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 mmHg |
| Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment period | A 12-lead ECG was conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52 or at the last postbaseline observation. For rollover participants, the ECG performed at the final visit of study 3079 served as the 1st ECG in study 3080. A qualified physician was responsible for interpreting the ECG. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared with baseline was considered an adverse event. For overall results, the worst postbaseline finding for the participant was summarized. Results below are formatted as Baseline ECG result - Overall ECG result. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment Period | SOAPP-R is a clinician-rated scale used to assess each patient's risk of developing aberrant drug use behaviors while on long term opioid therapy. SOAPP-R consists of 24 questions that address 8 concepts: substance abuse history, medication related behaviors, antisocial behaviors/history, psychosocial problems, psychiatric history, physician patient relationship factors, emotional attachment to pain medications, and personal care and lifestyle issues (Butler et al 2008). Each question is answered using a 5 point Likert-like scale, with 0=never, 1=seldom, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often for a total range of 0-96. The higher the overall score, the greater the probability the patient is at risk for displaying aberrant behaviors consistent with drug use. An overall score of 18 or higher is considered positive for predicting aberrant drug related behavior, therefore the reported risk categories are * \<18 and * \<=18. Results indicate timeframe followed by risk cat |
| Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52 | The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (21 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as 1 point, and points were added to calculate the total score. All but 1 of the 21 items (the provider's impression) was used in calculating the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). Participants with a total score of 3 or greater were classified as exhibiting inappropriate opioid use during the study. |
| Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52 | The COMM was a clinician-rated scale developed as a brief self-report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long-term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior. |
| Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52 | The PGA of the method of pain control consisted of a asking patients a single question to assess their method of pain control during the previous 24 hours as either poor, fair, good, or excellent (Rothman et al 2009). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
365 patients with chronic pain were screened for enrollment into this study: 25 patients were excluded on the basis of exclusion criteria, 6 withdrew consent, 2 were lost to follow up before the baseline visit, 1 patient did not meet an inclusion criteria, and 1 patient had an opioid violation because of self increasing analgesic medication.
Pre-assignment details
330 enrolled patients came from 61 centers in the US: 166 rolled-over from study 3079, 52 were new opioid-naïve participants and 112 were new opioid-experienced participants. One enrolled patient was withdrawn before taking any study drug.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Hydrocodone ER Participants were titrated (or re-titrated for roll-over participants) at escalating dosages of hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours until deemed successful for managing their pain during the open-label titration period. Once a successful dose was identified, participants entered the 52 week open-label treatment period in which hydrocodone ER was administered at th3 successful dose (15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg) every 12 hours. | 330 |
| Total | 330 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Open-label Titration Period | Adverse Event | 23 |
| Open-label Titration Period | Enrolled but not treated | 1 |
| Open-label Titration Period | Lack of Efficacy | 3 |
| Open-label Titration Period | Lost to Follow-up | 2 |
| Open-label Titration Period | Noncompliance with study drug admin | 1 |
| Open-label Titration Period | Noncompliance with study procedures | 2 |
| Open-label Titration Period | Protocol Violation | 1 |
| Open-label Titration Period | Starting physical therapy | 1 |
| Open-label Titration Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Adverse Event | 39 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Lack of Efficacy | 2 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Lost to Follow-up | 7 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Moved out of area | 2 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Negative urine drug screen when on treat | 1 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Noncompliance with study drug admin | 7 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Noncompliance with study procedures | 6 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Out of window | 1 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Physician Decision | 2 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Protocol Violation | 15 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Starting physical therapy | 1 |
| Open-label Treatment Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 19 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Hydrocodone ER |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 54.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.51 |
| Body Mass Index | 33.1 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.38 |
| Duration on Opioid Therapy | 4.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.27 |
| Duration Since Diagnosis | 12.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.54 |
| Height | 169.7 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.57 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 66 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic or Latino | 10 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Non-Hispanic and non-Latino | 319 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Pacific Islander | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 260 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 197 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 133 Participants |
| Type of Pain Back pain | 103 Participants |
| Type of Pain Complex regional pain syndrome | 3 Participants |
| Type of Pain Diabetic peripheral neuropathy | 12 Participants |
| Type of Pain Low back pain | 113 Participants |
| Type of Pain Neck pain | 10 Participants |
| Type of Pain Osteoarthritis | 82 Participants |
| Type of Pain Other | 2 Participants |
| Type of Pain Postherpetic neuralgia | 0 Participants |
| Type of Pain Rheumatoid arthritis | 2 Participants |
| Type of Pain Traumatic injury | 3 Participants |
| Weight | 95.6 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.97 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 47 / 52 | 83 / 112 | 109 / 165 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 4 / 52 | 16 / 112 | 7 / 165 |
Outcome results
Participants With Adverse Experiences
An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Time frame: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Population: Safety analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Death | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Serious adverse event | 4 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Any adverse event | 51 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Treatment-related adverse event | 41 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Withdrawals from treatment due to adverse event | 18 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Death | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Serious adverse event | 16 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Treatment-related adverse event | 69 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Any adverse event | 98 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Withdrawals from treatment due to adverse event | 24 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Death | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Any adverse event | 135 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Treatment-related adverse event | 63 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Serious adverse event | 7 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Withdrawals from treatment due to adverse event | 20 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Serious adverse event | 27 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Treatment-related adverse event | 173 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Any adverse event | 284 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Death | 2 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Adverse Experiences | Withdrawals from treatment due to adverse event | 62 Participants |
Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status
Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to no response at 3 consecutive test frequencies.
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periods
Population: Safety analysis set. The endpoint value is from the post-titration safety set (n=42, 92, 157, 291)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value during study | 10 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value at endpoint | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value during open-label titration period | 4 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value during study | 30 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value at endpoint | 8 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value during open-label titration period | 14 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value during open-label titration period | 4 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value during study | 36 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value at endpoint | 13 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value during study | 76 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value at endpoint | 23 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status | >=1 CS value during open-label titration period | 22 Participants |
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria * Pulse - high: \>=120 and increase of \>= 15 beats/minute from baseline * Pulse - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 beats/minute * Systolic blood pressure - high: \>=180 and increase \>=20 mmHg * Systolic blood pressure - low: \<=90 and decrease \>=20 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - high: \>=105 and increase of \>=15 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 mmHg
Time frame: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Population: Safety analysis set. One rollover participant did not have vital signs values.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Pulse - high | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Pulse - low | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Systolic blood pressure - high | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Systolic blood pressure - low | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Diastolic blood pressure - high | 3 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Diastolic blood pressure - low | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Diastolic blood pressure - low | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Systolic blood pressure - low | 4 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Pulse - high | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Systolic blood pressure - high | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Pulse - low | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Diastolic blood pressure - high | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Pulse - low | 5 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Systolic blood pressure - high | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Systolic blood pressure - low | 7 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Diastolic blood pressure - low | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Diastolic blood pressure - high | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Pulse - high | 0 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Diastolic blood pressure - high | 6 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Diastolic blood pressure - low | 6 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Pulse - low | 6 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Systolic blood pressure - low | 11 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Pulse - high | 2 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status | Systolic blood pressure - high | 3 Participants |
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status
Data represents participants with PCS abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: * alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>=3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 6-43 U/L * aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>=3 times ULN. Normal range is 9-36 U/L * blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>=10.71 mmol/L * creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * white blood cell count: \<=3.0\*10\^9/L * hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * urine blood (hemoglobin): \>=2 unit increase from baseline * urine glucose: \>=2 unit increase from baseline
Time frame: Day 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Population: Posttitration Safety Analysis set. The posttitration safety analysis set included all patients who successfully completed the open label titration period and received 1 or more doses of study drug treatment in the open label treatment period.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | White blood cell count | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Uric acid | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Creatinine | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Urine glucose | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Urine blood | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | AST | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Hematocrit | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Hemoglobin | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | BUN | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | ALT | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | AST | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | ALT | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | BUN | 3 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Creatinine | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Uric acid | 4 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | White blood cell count | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Hemoglobin | 3 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Hematocrit | 6 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Urine blood | 4 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Urine glucose | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | BUN | 5 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | White blood cell count | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | ALT | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Hemoglobin | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | AST | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Hematocrit | 6 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Urine glucose | 5 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Creatinine | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Urine blood | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Uric acid | 3 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Creatinine | 2 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Urine blood | 7 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Hematocrit | 14 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | White blood cell count | 1 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | AST | 2 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | ALT | 3 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | BUN | 8 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Hemoglobin | 7 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Uric acid | 8 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status | Urine glucose | 9 Participants |
Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status
A 12-lead ECG was conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52 or at the last postbaseline observation. For rollover participants, the ECG performed at the final visit of study 3079 served as the 1st ECG in study 3080. A qualified physician was responsible for interpreting the ECG. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared with baseline was considered an adverse event. For overall results, the worst postbaseline finding for the participant was summarized. Results below are formatted as Baseline ECG result - Overall ECG result.
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment period
Population: Post-titration Safety analysis set. Only those participants with both baseline and visit electrocardiogram findings were summarized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Normal baseline - Normal overall | 18 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Normal baseline - Abnormal overall | 8 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Abnormal baseline - Normal overall | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Abnormal baseline - Abnormal overall | 15 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Normal baseline - Abnormal overall | 17 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Abnormal baseline - Normal overall | 7 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Abnormal baseline - Abnormal overall | 32 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Normal baseline - Normal overall | 33 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Abnormal baseline - Normal overall | 18 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Normal baseline - Abnormal overall | 35 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Abnormal baseline - Abnormal overall | 54 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Normal baseline - Normal overall | 43 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Abnormal baseline - Abnormal overall | 101 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Normal baseline - Abnormal overall | 60 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Normal baseline - Normal overall | 94 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status | Abnormal baseline - Normal overall | 25 Participants |
Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status
The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (21 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as 1 point, and points were added to calculate the total score. All but 1 of the 21 items (the provider's impression) was used in calculating the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). Participants with a total score of 3 or greater were classified as exhibiting inappropriate opioid use during the study.
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
Population: Post-titration Safety Analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 12 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | End of Titration | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 4 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 8 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 16 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 20 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 24 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 28 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 32 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 36 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 40 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 44 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 48 | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 52 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Endpoint | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 16 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 28 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Endpoint | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 40 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 52 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 32 | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 4 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 36 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 12 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 20 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 8 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | End of Titration | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 44 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 24 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 48 | 0.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 16 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 12 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 48 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 20 | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 24 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Endpoint | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 28 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 32 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 52 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 36 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 40 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | End of Titration | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 44 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 4 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 8 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Endpoint | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 24 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 4 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline | 0.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 48 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 20 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 44 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | End of Titration | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 12 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 32 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 16 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 36 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 52 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 28 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 8 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 40 | 0.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status
The COMM was a clinician-rated scale developed as a brief self-report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long-term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior.
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
Population: Post titration Safety Analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 40 | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.21 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Endpoint | 3.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.74 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 52 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.39 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 24 | 2.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.66 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 44 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline | 5.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.29 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 16 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.98 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 48 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.57 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 36 | 2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.44 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | End of Titration | 3.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.37 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 12 | 3.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.12 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 20 | 2.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 32 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.84 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 4 | 3.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.06 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 8 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.44 |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 28 | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 32 | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.07 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 8 | 3.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.12 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 12 | 4.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.99 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 48 | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.98 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 16 | 4.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.84 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 36 | 3.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.35 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 20 | 3.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.78 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Endpoint | 4.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.41 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 28 | 3.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.66 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline | 5.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.61 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 24 | 3.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.14 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 44 | 2.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.86 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | End of Titration | 4.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.66 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 52 | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 4 | 3.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 40 | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 20 | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 24 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.04 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 28 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.91 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 32 | 2.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.62 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 52 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.05 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 36 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Endpoint | 2.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.25 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline | 3.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | End of Titration | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 44 | 2.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.41 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 4 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.83 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 8 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.96 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 12 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.71 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 16 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 48 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.19 |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 40 | 2.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.97 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 12 | 3.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.28 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 40 | 2.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.09 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 44 | 2.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.06 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 48 | 2.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.37 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 52 | 2.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.04 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Endpoint | 3.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.78 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Baseline | 4.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.31 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | End of Titration | 3.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.26 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 4 | 2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.21 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 8 | 2.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.36 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 36 | 2.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.22 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 16 | 2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.53 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 20 | 2.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.13 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 24 | 2.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.42 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 28 | 2.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.09 |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status | Week 32 | 2.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.69 |
Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status
The PGA of the method of pain control consisted of a asking patients a single question to assess their method of pain control during the previous 24 hours as either poor, fair, good, or excellent (Rothman et al 2009).
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52
Population: Full analysis set included all patients in the safety analysis set who had at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment. Participants contributing to each time point are listed in the time point label.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Poor | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Good | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Poor | 18 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Fair | 14 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Excellent | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Fair | 5 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Good | 20 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Excellent | 13 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Poor | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Fair | 3 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Good | 17 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Excellent | 8 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Poor | 3 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Fair (n=42, 92, 157, 291) | 7 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Good | 21 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Excellent | 11 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Poor | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Poor | 2 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Excellent | 13 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Fair | 55 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Good | 52 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Fair | 9 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Excellent | 3 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Excellent | 10 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Good | 54 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Good | 36 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Fair (n=42, 92, 157, 291) | 21 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Good | 18 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Poor | 10 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Excellent | 15 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Fair | 17 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Poor | 6 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Excellent | 21 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Poor | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Fair | 27 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Fair (n=42, 92, 157, 291) | 27 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Good | 94 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Excellent | 27 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Excellent | 29 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Poor | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Fair | 18 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Good | 93 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Good | 62 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Fair | 71 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Poor | 8 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Poor | 49 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Good | 29 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Excellent | 3 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Excellent | 53 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Good | 48 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Fair | 140 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Excellent | 55 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Fair | 49 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Fair (n=42, 92, 157, 291) | 55 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Poor | 5 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Poor | 77 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Poor | 17 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 4: Good | 168 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Baseline: Excellent | 7 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Good | 115 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Endpoint: Good | 166 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Fair | 30 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Poor | 4 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status | Week 52: Excellent | 39 Participants |
Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)
SOAPP-R is a clinician-rated scale used to assess each patient's risk of developing aberrant drug use behaviors while on long term opioid therapy. SOAPP-R consists of 24 questions that address 8 concepts: substance abuse history, medication related behaviors, antisocial behaviors/history, psychosocial problems, psychiatric history, physician patient relationship factors, emotional attachment to pain medications, and personal care and lifestyle issues (Butler et al 2008). Each question is answered using a 5 point Likert-like scale, with 0=never, 1=seldom, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often for a total range of 0-96. The higher the overall score, the greater the probability the patient is at risk for displaying aberrant behaviors consistent with drug use. An overall score of 18 or higher is considered positive for predicting aberrant drug related behavior, therefore the reported risk categories are * \<18 and * \<=18. Results indicate timeframe followed by risk cat
Time frame: End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment Period
Population: Safety analysis set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-Label Titration: >=18 | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-Label Titration: <18 | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 4: >=18 | 1 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 4: <18 | 39 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 24: >=18 | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Naïve Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 24: <18 | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 24: <18 | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 4: <18 | 73 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-Label Titration: >=18 | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 4: >=18 | 12 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-Label Titration: <18 | 0 Participants |
| New Opioid Experienced Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 24: >=18 | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-Label Titration: <18 | 2 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 4: >=18 | 3 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 4: <18 | 134 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 24: <18 | 1 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 24: >=18 | 0 Participants |
| Rollover Subpopulation | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-Label Titration: >=18 | 0 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 24: >=18 | 0 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 24: <18 | 1 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-Label Titration: <18 | 2 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 4: <18 | 246 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | End of Open-Label Titration: >=18 | 0 Participants |
| Total Hydrocodone ER | Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) | Week 4: >=18 | 16 Participants |