Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

A 12-Month, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 15 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01223365
Enrollment
330
Registered
2010-10-19
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2017-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Pain

Keywords

moderate to severe pain, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of hydrocodone extended-release tablets when used over a 12-month period in patients with chronic pain, as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory results, vital signs measurements, electrocardiogram results, physical examination findings, pure tone audiometry, and concomitant medication usage.

Detailed description

This was a Phase 3, open-label, nonrandomized study that consisted of a screening period, an open label titration period, and a 52 week, long term, open-label treatment period in patients with chronic pain. Patients were eligible to participate in this study if they had completed study C33237/3079 (NCT01240863) (these patients are hereafter referred to as rollover patients) or if they had not participated in study 3079 (these patients are hereafter referred to as either new opioid naïve or new opioid experienced patients).

Interventions

Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets were administered at doses of 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg orally every 12 hours. During the open-label titration period, doses were adjusted until a stable pain control was achieved. In general, the dose of hydrocodone extended release tablets could be adjusted for efficacy or tolerability, as necessary, at any time during the open-label treatment period; however, participants were required to visit the study center before increasing the dose of study drug.

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol. * The patient has either completed Cephalon study 3079 or has chronic pain of at least 3 months duration prior to entering this study associated with any of the following conditions: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with other painful conditions may qualify for the study with permission from the Cephalon medical monitor or designee. * Those patients who completed the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (study 3079) and are willing to re-titrate study drug to an effective dose of hydrocodone extended-release tablets are eligible to enter this study. * The patient is able to speak English, willing to provide written informed consent, and sign a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study. * The patient is 18 through 80 years of age (inclusive) at the time of entering this or the previous study (study 3079). * Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who were enrolled in study 3079 but did not complete the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study may not be enrolled into this study. * The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to the study drug or its excipients. * The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse. * The patient has a medical or psychiatric condition/disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data. * The patient is taking a total (i.e., including around-the clock \[ATC\] and rescue medications) of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone or equivalent for 14 days prior to screening. * The patient has a history of suicidality. * The patient has a diagnosis of chronic headache or migraine as the primary painful condition under study. * The patient is expected to have surgery during the study and it is anticipated that the surgery will alleviate the patient's pain. * The patient is pregnant or lactating. * The patient has active malignancy. * The patient has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). * In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values. * The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with potent synthetic opioids. * The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the previous 30 days (excluding those who participated in study 3079). * The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug. * The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data. * The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the chronic pain currently being treated. * The patient has a positive urine drug screen (UDS) for an illicit substance or medication not prescribed by the physician currently treating the chronic pain. * The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient StatusBaseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periodsPure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to no response at 3 consecutive test frequencies.
Participants With Adverse ExperiencesDay 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment periodAn adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusDay 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment periodData represents participants with PCS abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: * alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>=3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 6-43 U/L * aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>=3 times ULN. Normal range is 9-36 U/L * blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>=10.71 mmol/L * creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * white blood cell count: \<=3.0\*10\^9/L * hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * urine blood (hemoglobin): \>=2 unit increase from baseline * urine glucose: \>=2 unit increase from baseline
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDay 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment periodData represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria * Pulse - high: \>=120 and increase of \>= 15 beats/minute from baseline * Pulse - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 beats/minute * Systolic blood pressure - high: \>=180 and increase \>=20 mmHg * Systolic blood pressure - low: \<=90 and decrease \>=20 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - high: \>=105 and increase of \>=15 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 mmHg
Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusBaseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment periodA 12-lead ECG was conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52 or at the last postbaseline observation. For rollover participants, the ECG performed at the final visit of study 3079 served as the 1st ECG in study 3080. A qualified physician was responsible for interpreting the ECG. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared with baseline was considered an adverse event. For overall results, the worst postbaseline finding for the participant was summarized. Results below are formatted as Baseline ECG result - Overall ECG result.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment PeriodSOAPP-R is a clinician-rated scale used to assess each patient's risk of developing aberrant drug use behaviors while on long term opioid therapy. SOAPP-R consists of 24 questions that address 8 concepts: substance abuse history, medication related behaviors, antisocial behaviors/history, psychosocial problems, psychiatric history, physician patient relationship factors, emotional attachment to pain medications, and personal care and lifestyle issues (Butler et al 2008). Each question is answered using a 5 point Likert-like scale, with 0=never, 1=seldom, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often for a total range of 0-96. The higher the overall score, the greater the probability the patient is at risk for displaying aberrant behaviors consistent with drug use. An overall score of 18 or higher is considered positive for predicting aberrant drug related behavior, therefore the reported risk categories are * \<18 and * \<=18. Results indicate timeframe followed by risk cat
Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (21 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as 1 point, and points were added to calculate the total score. All but 1 of the 21 items (the provider's impression) was used in calculating the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). Participants with a total score of 3 or greater were classified as exhibiting inappropriate opioid use during the study.
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52The COMM was a clinician-rated scale developed as a brief self-report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long-term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior.
Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52The PGA of the method of pain control consisted of a asking patients a single question to assess their method of pain control during the previous 24 hours as either poor, fair, good, or excellent (Rothman et al 2009).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

365 patients with chronic pain were screened for enrollment into this study: 25 patients were excluded on the basis of exclusion criteria, 6 withdrew consent, 2 were lost to follow up before the baseline visit, 1 patient did not meet an inclusion criteria, and 1 patient had an opioid violation because of self increasing analgesic medication.

Pre-assignment details

330 enrolled patients came from 61 centers in the US: 166 rolled-over from study 3079, 52 were new opioid-naïve participants and 112 were new opioid-experienced participants. One enrolled patient was withdrawn before taking any study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hydrocodone ER
Participants were titrated (or re-titrated for roll-over participants) at escalating dosages of hydrocodone ER tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg every 12 hours until deemed successful for managing their pain during the open-label titration period. Once a successful dose was identified, participants entered the 52 week open-label treatment period in which hydrocodone ER was administered at th3 successful dose (15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg) every 12 hours.
330
Total330

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Open-label Titration PeriodAdverse Event23
Open-label Titration PeriodEnrolled but not treated1
Open-label Titration PeriodLack of Efficacy3
Open-label Titration PeriodLost to Follow-up2
Open-label Titration PeriodNoncompliance with study drug admin1
Open-label Titration PeriodNoncompliance with study procedures2
Open-label Titration PeriodProtocol Violation1
Open-label Titration PeriodStarting physical therapy1
Open-label Titration PeriodWithdrawal by Subject5
Open-label Treatment PeriodAdverse Event39
Open-label Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy2
Open-label Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up7
Open-label Treatment PeriodMoved out of area2
Open-label Treatment PeriodNegative urine drug screen when on treat1
Open-label Treatment PeriodNoncompliance with study drug admin7
Open-label Treatment PeriodNoncompliance with study procedures6
Open-label Treatment PeriodOut of window1
Open-label Treatment PeriodPhysician Decision2
Open-label Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation15
Open-label Treatment PeriodStarting physical therapy1
Open-label Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject19

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHydrocodone ER
Age, Continuous54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.51
Body Mass Index33.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.38
Duration on Opioid Therapy4.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.27
Duration Since Diagnosis12.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.54
Height169.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.57
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
66 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic and non-Latino
319 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
260 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
197 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
133 Participants
Type of Pain
Back pain
103 Participants
Type of Pain
Complex regional pain syndrome
3 Participants
Type of Pain
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
12 Participants
Type of Pain
Low back pain
113 Participants
Type of Pain
Neck pain
10 Participants
Type of Pain
Osteoarthritis
82 Participants
Type of Pain
Other
2 Participants
Type of Pain
Postherpetic neuralgia
0 Participants
Type of Pain
Rheumatoid arthritis
2 Participants
Type of Pain
Traumatic injury
3 Participants
Weight95.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.97

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
47 / 5283 / 112109 / 165
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 5216 / 1127 / 165

Outcome results

Primary

Participants With Adverse Experiences

An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

Time frame: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesDeath0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesSerious adverse event4 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesAny adverse event51 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesTreatment-related adverse event41 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesWithdrawals from treatment due to adverse event18 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesDeath1 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesSerious adverse event16 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesTreatment-related adverse event69 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesAny adverse event98 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesWithdrawals from treatment due to adverse event24 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesDeath1 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesAny adverse event135 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesTreatment-related adverse event63 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesSerious adverse event7 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesWithdrawals from treatment due to adverse event20 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesSerious adverse event27 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesTreatment-related adverse event173 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesAny adverse event284 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesDeath2 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Adverse ExperiencesWithdrawals from treatment due to adverse event62 Participants
Primary

Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status

Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to no response at 3 consecutive test frequencies.

Time frame: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periods

Population: Safety analysis set. The endpoint value is from the post-titration safety set (n=42, 92, 157, 291)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value during study10 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value at endpoint2 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value during open-label titration period4 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value during study30 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value at endpoint8 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value during open-label titration period14 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value during open-label titration period4 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value during study36 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value at endpoint13 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value during study76 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value at endpoint23 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status>=1 CS value during open-label titration period22 Participants
Primary

Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status

Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria * Pulse - high: \>=120 and increase of \>= 15 beats/minute from baseline * Pulse - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 beats/minute * Systolic blood pressure - high: \>=180 and increase \>=20 mmHg * Systolic blood pressure - low: \<=90 and decrease \>=20 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - high: \>=105 and increase of \>=15 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - low: \<=50 and decrease of \>=15 mmHg

Time frame: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period

Population: Safety analysis set. One rollover participant did not have vital signs values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusPulse - high0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusPulse - low1 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusSystolic blood pressure - high1 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusSystolic blood pressure - low0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDiastolic blood pressure - high3 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDiastolic blood pressure - low1 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDiastolic blood pressure - low2 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusSystolic blood pressure - low4 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusPulse - high2 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusSystolic blood pressure - high0 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusPulse - low0 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDiastolic blood pressure - high0 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusPulse - low5 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusSystolic blood pressure - high2 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusSystolic blood pressure - low7 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDiastolic blood pressure - low3 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDiastolic blood pressure - high3 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusPulse - high0 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDiastolic blood pressure - high6 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusDiastolic blood pressure - low6 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusPulse - low6 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusSystolic blood pressure - low11 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusPulse - high2 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant StatusSystolic blood pressure - high3 Participants
Primary

Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status

Data represents participants with PCS abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: * alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>=3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 6-43 U/L * aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>=3 times ULN. Normal range is 9-36 U/L * blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>=10.71 mmol/L * creatinine: \>=177 μmol/L * uric acid: M\>=625, F\>=506 μmol/L * white blood cell count: \<=3.0\*10\^9/L * hemoglobin: M\<=115, F\<=95 g/dL * hematocrit: M\<0.37, F\<0.32 L/L * urine blood (hemoglobin): \>=2 unit increase from baseline * urine glucose: \>=2 unit increase from baseline

Time frame: Day 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period

Population: Posttitration Safety Analysis set. The posttitration safety analysis set included all patients who successfully completed the open label titration period and received 1 or more doses of study drug treatment in the open label treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusWhite blood cell count0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUric acid1 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusCreatinine0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUrine glucose2 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUrine blood1 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusAST0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusHematocrit2 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusHemoglobin1 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusBUN0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusALT0 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusAST2 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusALT2 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusBUN3 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusCreatinine1 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUric acid4 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusWhite blood cell count1 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusHemoglobin3 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusHematocrit6 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUrine blood4 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUrine glucose2 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusBUN5 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusWhite blood cell count0 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusALT1 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusHemoglobin3 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusAST0 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusHematocrit6 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUrine glucose5 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusCreatinine1 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUrine blood2 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUric acid3 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusCreatinine2 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUrine blood7 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusHematocrit14 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusWhite blood cell count1 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusAST2 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusALT3 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusBUN8 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusHemoglobin7 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUric acid8 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant StatusUrine glucose9 Participants
Primary

Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status

A 12-lead ECG was conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52 or at the last postbaseline observation. For rollover participants, the ECG performed at the final visit of study 3079 served as the 1st ECG in study 3080. A qualified physician was responsible for interpreting the ECG. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared with baseline was considered an adverse event. For overall results, the worst postbaseline finding for the participant was summarized. Results below are formatted as Baseline ECG result - Overall ECG result.

Time frame: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment period

Population: Post-titration Safety analysis set. Only those participants with both baseline and visit electrocardiogram findings were summarized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusNormal baseline - Normal overall18 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusNormal baseline - Abnormal overall8 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusAbnormal baseline - Normal overall0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusAbnormal baseline - Abnormal overall15 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusNormal baseline - Abnormal overall17 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusAbnormal baseline - Normal overall7 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusAbnormal baseline - Abnormal overall32 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusNormal baseline - Normal overall33 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusAbnormal baseline - Normal overall18 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusNormal baseline - Abnormal overall35 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusAbnormal baseline - Abnormal overall54 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusNormal baseline - Normal overall43 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusAbnormal baseline - Abnormal overall101 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusNormal baseline - Abnormal overall60 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusNormal baseline - Normal overall94 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERShifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant StatusAbnormal baseline - Normal overall25 Participants
Secondary

Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status

The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (21 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as 1 point, and points were added to calculate the total score. All but 1 of the 21 items (the provider's impression) was used in calculating the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). Participants with a total score of 3 or greater were classified as exhibiting inappropriate opioid use during the study.

Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52

Population: Post-titration Safety Analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 120.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEnd of Titration0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 40.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 80.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 160.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 200.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 240.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 280.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 320.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 360.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 400.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 440.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 480.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 520.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEndpoint0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 160.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 280.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEndpoint0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 400.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 520.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.23
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 320.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 40.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 360.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 120.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 200.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 80.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEnd of Titration0.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 440.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 240.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 480.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 160.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 120.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 480.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 200.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 240.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEndpoint0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 280.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 320.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 520.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 360.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 400.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEnd of Titration0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 440.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 40.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Rollover SubpopulationAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 80.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEndpoint0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 240.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 40.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.42
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline0.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 480.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 200.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 440.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEnd of Titration0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 120.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.39
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 320.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.41
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 160.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.47
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 360.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 520.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 280.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 80.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Total Hydrocodone ERAddiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 400.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status

The COMM was a clinician-rated scale developed as a brief self-report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long-term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior.

Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52

Population: Post titration Safety Analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 402.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEndpoint3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.74
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 522.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 242.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.66
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 442.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.29
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 162.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 482.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 362.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEnd of Titration3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 123.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 202.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 322.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 43.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 82.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 282.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 322.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.07
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 83.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.12
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 124.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.99
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 483.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.98
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 164.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.84
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 363.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.35
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 203.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEndpoint4.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.41
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 283.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.66
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.61
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 243.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.14
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 442.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.86
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEnd of Titration4.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.66
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 523.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 43.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 403.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 202.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 242.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.04
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 282.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 322.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 522.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.05
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 362.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEndpoint2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEnd of Titration2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 442.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.41
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 42.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 82.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.96
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 122.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 162.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 482.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.19
Rollover SubpopulationCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 402.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 123.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 402.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 442.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 482.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.37
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 522.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.04
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEndpoint3.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusBaseline4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.31
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusEnd of Titration3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.26
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 42.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.21
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 82.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.36
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 362.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 162.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.53
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 202.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.13
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 242.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.42
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 282.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
Total Hydrocodone ERCurrent Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant StatusWeek 322.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
Secondary

Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status

The PGA of the method of pain control consisted of a asking patients a single question to assess their method of pain control during the previous 24 hours as either poor, fair, good, or excellent (Rothman et al 2009).

Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52

Population: Full analysis set included all patients in the safety analysis set who had at least 1 postbaseline efficacy assessment. Participants contributing to each time point are listed in the time point label.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Poor2 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Good1 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Poor18 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Fair14 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Excellent1 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Fair5 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Good20 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Excellent13 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Poor0 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Fair3 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Good17 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Excellent8 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Poor3 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Fair (n=42, 92, 157, 291)7 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Good21 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Excellent11 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Poor1 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Poor2 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Excellent13 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Fair55 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Good52 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Fair9 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Excellent3 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Excellent10 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Good54 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Good36 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Fair (n=42, 92, 157, 291)21 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Good18 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Poor10 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Excellent15 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Fair17 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Poor6 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Excellent21 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Poor2 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Fair27 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Fair (n=42, 92, 157, 291)27 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Good94 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Excellent27 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Excellent29 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Poor2 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Fair18 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Good93 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Good62 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Fair71 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Poor8 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Poor49 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Good29 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Excellent3 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Excellent53 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Good48 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Fair140 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Excellent55 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Fair49 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Fair (n=42, 92, 157, 291)55 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Poor5 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Poor77 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Poor17 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 4: Good168 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusBaseline: Excellent7 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Good115 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusEndpoint: Good166 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Fair30 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Poor4 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant StatusWeek 52: Excellent39 Participants
Secondary

Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)

SOAPP-R is a clinician-rated scale used to assess each patient's risk of developing aberrant drug use behaviors while on long term opioid therapy. SOAPP-R consists of 24 questions that address 8 concepts: substance abuse history, medication related behaviors, antisocial behaviors/history, psychosocial problems, psychiatric history, physician patient relationship factors, emotional attachment to pain medications, and personal care and lifestyle issues (Butler et al 2008). Each question is answered using a 5 point Likert-like scale, with 0=never, 1=seldom, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often for a total range of 0-96. The higher the overall score, the greater the probability the patient is at risk for displaying aberrant behaviors consistent with drug use. An overall score of 18 or higher is considered positive for predicting aberrant drug related behavior, therefore the reported risk categories are * \<18 and * \<=18. Results indicate timeframe followed by risk cat

Time frame: End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment Period

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-Label Titration: >=180 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-Label Titration: <180 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 4: >=181 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 4: <1839 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 24: >=180 Participants
New Opioid Naïve SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 24: <180 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 24: <180 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 4: <1873 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-Label Titration: >=180 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 4: >=1812 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-Label Titration: <180 Participants
New Opioid Experienced SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 24: >=180 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-Label Titration: <182 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 4: >=183 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 4: <18134 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 24: <181 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 24: >=180 Participants
Rollover SubpopulationParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-Label Titration: >=180 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 24: >=180 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 24: <181 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-Label Titration: <182 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 4: <18246 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)End of Open-Label Titration: >=180 Participants
Total Hydrocodone ERParticipants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)Week 4: >=1816 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026