Skip to content

Decision-making and Emotion Recognition in Essential Tremor

Decision-making and Emotion Recognition in Essential Tremor

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01223144
Acronym
EMOTREM
Enrollment
39
Registered
2010-10-18
Start date
2010-09-01
Completion date
2011-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Keywords

Cognition, orbitofrontal cortex, Iowa Gambling Task, facial emotion recognition

Brief summary

The present study aims at investigating cognitive functions requiring orbitofrontal control, namely decision-making and facial emotion recognition. The investigators hypothesize that decision-making and facial emotion recognition are impaired in patients with essential tremor (ET) due to frontal lobe dysfunction which may have consequences in daily social life.

Detailed description

Beyond tremor, ET patients display a wide spectrum of clinical abnormalities such as ataxia, deafness, olfactory disturbances, cognitive dysfunction and personality changes. Cognitive dysfunction mainly consists in a dysexecutive syndrome. Personality changes are characterized by increased harm avoidance. These findings suggest a complex modification in frontal lobe function in ET patients, including aspects of dorsolateral and orbitofrontal control. Previous studies have exclusively focused on dorsolateral prefrontal control, while orbitofrontal aspects remain to be elucidated. Orbitofrontal areas are involved in processing emotion and reward, as well as normal social behavior. Dysfunction in these regions may have direct consequences in daily social life. We hypothesize that decision-making and facial emotion recognition are impaired in ET patients due to frontal lobe dysfunction which may have consequences in daily social life. The first aspect can be assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task, a simple paradigm that simulates real-life decision-making. Briefly, players are given four decks of cards, a loan of $ 2,000 and asked to play so they can lose the least amount of money and win the most. Turning each card carries an immediate reward and sometimes an unpredictable penalty. Decks A and B are the most disadvantageous leading to an overall loss of money, while decks C and D are the most advantageous with an overall gain of money. In contrast to control subjects, patients with damage of the orbitofrontal or ventromedian cortex continue to perseverate with the bad decks, sometimes even though they know that they are losing money overall. The second aspect, i.e. the recognition of facial emotion can be assessed in a simple paradigm where patients have to choose the best fitting response among six facial expressions (happiness, sadness, fear, surprise, disgust and anger) that are presented in random order. All study subjects will be tested with the Benton Visual Retention Test to exclude impairment in visual perception, visual memory or visuoconstructive abilities. Performances in the Iowa Gambling Task and the facial emotion recognition test will be compared between ET patients and controls. All study subjects will also be tested with the following battery: Modified Card Sorting Test, Stroop, Trail Making Test and Verbal Fluency, Beck Depression Inventory and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. These tests will allow assessing the impact of executive function, depression and memory loss on performances in the Iowa Gambling Task and the facial emotion recognition test. Finally, performances in the Iowa Gambling Task and the facial emotion recognition test will be related to sex, age, disease duration and tremor severity.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIowa Gambling Task and Ekman facial recognition test

Iowa Gambling Task: mean number of cards chosen from decks with low (A+B) and high gain (C+D). Ekman facial recognition test: mean number of faces correctly recognized (60 images with 6 different expressions: happiness, sadness, fear, surprise, disgust and anger).

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient: * Age over 18 years * Patient diagnosed as having essential tremor * Written informed consent * Patient covered by the French health insurance system * Control: * Age over 18 years * No diagnosis of essential tremor * Written informed consent * Subject covered by the French health insurance system

Exclusion criteria

* Patient: * Dementia (MMSE\<24) or other known illness which could impact motor and cognitive performances * Patient unable to give written informed consent * Control: * Same

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of the performance in the Iowa Gambling Task and the Ekman facial recognition test1 day (duration of study)Comparison of the performance in the Iowa Gambling Task and the Ekman facial recognition test between patients and age- and sex-matched controls. * Iowa Gambling Task: mean number of cards chosen from decks with low (A+B) and high gain (C+D). * Ekman facial recognition test: mean number of faces correctly recognized (60 images with 6 different expressions: happiness, sadness, fear, surprise, disgust and anger).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Risk anticipation as assessed by the number of advantageous minus disadvantageous choices in the Iowa Gambling Task.1 day (duration of study)Risk anticipation as assessed by the number of advantageous minus disadvantageous choices in the Iowa Gambling Task.
Assessment of the relation between the primary outcome measures and age, sex, disease duration, as well as tremor severity.1 day (duration of study)Assessment of the relation between the primary outcome measures and age, sex, disease duration, as well as tremor severity. Tremor severity is evaluated by the revised WHIGET tremor rating scale (severity score 0-36 points).
Assessment of the relation between the primary outcome measures and executive function and depression.1 day (duration of study)Executive function Number of categories in the Modified Card Sorting Test Time in seconds and number of errors in the Trail Making Test Time in seconds and number of errors in the Stroop Test Verbal Fluency score Mattis Dementia Rating scale score (0-144 points) Depression is evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory (0-63 points)

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWassilios Meissner, MD, PhD

University Hospital Bordeaux, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026