Skip to content

Study of Dovitinib Versus Sorafenib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

An Open-label, Randomized, Multi-center, Phase III Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Dovitinib Versus Sorafenib in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Failure of Anti-angiogenic (VEGF-targeted and mTOR Inhibitor) Therapies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01223027
Enrollment
564
Registered
2010-10-18
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2015-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

Dovitinib, TKI, Renal cell cancer, RCC, mRCC

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Dovitinib versus sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

Interventions

DRUGDovitinib

Dovitinib is formulated as an oral gelatin capsule of 100 mg strength and was dosed on a flat scale of 500 mg on a 5 days on/2 days off dosing schedule. Medication labels complied withthe legal requirements of each country and were printed in the local language.

DRUGSorafenib

Sorafenib is formulated as a round, oral, biconvex, red film-coated tablet that contains 200 mg of sorafenib (tosylate). Sorafenib was administered twice daily without food at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after a meal. Sorafenib was supplied according to local practice.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with histological or cytological confirmation of clear cell carcinoma or a component of clear cell * Patients must have received one and only one prior VEGF-targeted therapy and one and only one prior mTOR inhibitor therapy in the metastatic setting. One VEGF targeted therapy (e.g. sunitinib, or pazopanib, or axitinib, or tivozanib or bevacizumab) and one prior mTOR inhibitor therapy (everolimus, or temsirolimus or ridaforolimus) * Prior cytokines therapy and prior vaccines in the adjuvant setting is permitted. * Patients must have had disease progression on or within 6 months of stopping the last therapy. * Patients must have at least one measurable lesion at baseline (by RECIST Criteria Guidelines v1.1) assessed by Computer Tomography (CT) Scan or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). * Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70% * Patients must have the following laboratory values: * Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L * Platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L * Hemoglobin (Hgb) \> 9 g/dL * Serum total bilirubin: ≤ 1.5 x ULN * ALT and AST ≤ 3.0 x ULN (Patients with known liver metastases: AST and ALT ≤ 5.0 x ULN) * Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have previously received sorafenib therapy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. * Patients who have previously received Dovitinib or brivanib in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. * Patients with brain metastases. Radiological imaging (e.g. CT or MRI scan) of the brain is required at screening/baseline * Patients with another primary malignancy within 3 years prior to starting study treatment, with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or non-melanomatous skin cancer, or in-situ carcinoma of the uterine cervix * Patients who have received the last administration of an anticancer targeted small molecule therapy ≤ 2 weeks prior to starting study treatment (e.g. sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, everolimus, temsirolimus), or who have not recovered from the side effects of such therapy * Patients who have received the last administration of nitrosurea or mitomycin-C ≤ 6 weeks prior to starting study treatment, or who have not recovered from the side effects of such therapy * Patients who have undergone major surgery (e.g., intra-thoracic, intra-abdominal or intra-pelvic) ≤ 4 weeks prior to starting study treatment or who have not recovered from side effects of such therapy * Patients with a history of pulmonary embolism (PE), or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months * Patients with concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions which could compromise participation in the study Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Central Radiology ReviewUntil disease progression or discontinuation of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity up to 30-Jun-2014 (discontinuation)Assessed according to RECIST 1.1. PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. If a patient had not progressed or died, on the date of the analysis cut-off or when he/she received any further anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS was censored on the date of last tumor assessment before the cutoff date or the anti-neoplastic therapy date. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median PFS along with 95% confidence intervals was presented by treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator's Radiology ReviewUntil disease progression or discontinuation of treatment due to unacceptable toxicityPFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. The primary analysis for PFS (based on central review) was also to be repeated on FAS considering the Investigator assessments and using the same analytical conventions as the primary analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Radiology ReviewUntil disease progression or discontinuation of treatment due to unacceptable toxicityOverall response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Best overall esponse (BOR) for each patient was determined from the sequence of overall (lesion) responses according to the following rules: CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression where confirmation required or one determination of CR prior to progression where confirmation not required. CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression where confirmation required or one determination of CR prior to progression where confirmation not required. SD = at least one SD assessment (or better) \> 6 weeks after randomization (and not qualifying for CR or PR). PD = progression ≤ 17 weeks after randomization (and not qualifying for CR, PR or SD).
Time to Definitive Worsening of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)from date of randomization to the date of definitive worsening of KPS or to the date of death whichever occurred earlierTime to definitive worsening of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of definitive worsening of KPS or to the date of death whichever occurred earlier. Definitive worsening was defined as a definitive decrease in performance status by at least one Karnofsky category (i.e. at least 10 points less) compared to Baseline. Worsening was considered definitive if no later increase above the defined threshold was observed within the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease in Karnofsky performance status was sufficient to consider it as definitive only if it was the last one available for this patient. Time to definitive worsening of KPS was analyzed at the time of the final analysis for PFS.
Overall Survival (OS)until at least 386 deaths are documented in the clinical database.Overall survival (OS) was the key secondary endpoint and was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, survival was censored on the date of last contact.
Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning (PF) Scale of EORTC QLQ-C30 by at Least 10%from date of randomizationThe EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). Each of the multiitem scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. Each item in the EORTC QLQ-C30 has 4 response categories (1=Not at all, 2= A little, 3= Quite a bit, 4= Very much) with the higher number representing a worse outcome.
Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Quality of Life (QoL) Scale Scores of EORTC QLQ-C30 by at Least 10%from date of randomizationThe EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). Each of the multiitem scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. Each item in the EORTC QLQ-C30 has 4 response categories (1=Not at all, 2= A little, 3= Quite a bit, 4= Very much) with the higher number representing a worse outcome.
Pre-dose Concentration in Plasma in DovitinibWeek 2 Day 5, Week 4 Day 5, Week 6 Day 5Predose concentrations of dovitinib were summarized by visit using PAS. All concentration data was listed by patient and time point using FAS. Mean pre-dose concentrations along with standard deviation (SD) was plotted over time if appropriate.
Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) by at Least 2 Scoresfrom date of randomization, at least 2 score unitsThe Kidney Cancer Symptom Index - Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a validated symptom scale used in studies of patients with kidney cancer. It includes 9-items that assess pain, bone pain, fatigue, lack of energy, shortness of breath, fevers, weight loss, coughing, and blood in urine and responses to each question are answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (e.g., 0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). FKSI-DRS scores range from 0 to 36, where higher scores correspond to better outcomes (eg, fewer symptoms).

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Patients randomized to the dovitinib treatment arm received 500 mg of dovitinib taken orally on 5 days on/2 days off dosing schedule.
284
Sorafenib + BSC
Patients in the sorafenib control arm received 400 mg of sorafenib (2 x 200 mg tablets) taken orally twice daily.
286
Total570

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event2010
Overall StudyDeath4242
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall StudyNew therapy for study indication178
Overall StudyPhysician Decision48
Overall StudyProgressive Disease167183
Overall StudyProtocol Violation21
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor28
Overall StudySubject/guardian decicion1816

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)TotalSorafenib + BSC
Age, Customized
< 65 years
187 Participants352 Participants165 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
97 Participants218 Participants121 Participants
Karnofsky performance score
100 -Normal no complaints; no evidence of disease
83 Participants156 Participants73 Participants
Karnofsky performance score
70 - Cares for self
35 Participants64 Participants29 Participants
Karnofsky performance score
80 - Normal activity with efforts
73 Participants156 Participants83 Participants
Karnofsky performance score
90 - Able to carry on normal activity
93 Participants194 Participants101 Participants
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Risk Criteria (MSKCC) risk group
Favorable
70 Participants135 Participants65 Participants
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Risk Criteria (MSKCC) risk group
Intermediate
156 Participants311 Participants155 Participants
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Risk Criteria (MSKCC) risk group
Missing
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Risk Criteria (MSKCC) risk group
Poor
54 Participants115 Participants61 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
42 Participants82 Participants40 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
3 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
233 Participants465 Participants232 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
5 Participants8 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
71 Participants138 Participants67 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
213 Participants432 Participants219 Participants
Weight74.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.39
75.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.67
75.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.96

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
268 / 280271 / 284
serious
Total, serious adverse events
133 / 280112 / 284

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Central Radiology Review

Assessed according to RECIST 1.1. PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. If a patient had not progressed or died, on the date of the analysis cut-off or when he/she received any further anti-neoplastic therapy, PFS was censored on the date of last tumor assessment before the cutoff date or the anti-neoplastic therapy date. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median PFS along with 95% confidence intervals was presented by treatment group.

Time frame: Until disease progression or discontinuation of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity up to 30-Jun-2014 (discontinuation)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Central Radiology Review3.7 Months
Sorafenib + BSCProgression Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Central Radiology Review3.6 Months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was the key secondary endpoint and was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died, survival was censored on the date of last contact.

Time frame: until at least 386 deaths are documented in the clinical database.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Overall Survival (OS)11.1 Months
Sorafenib + BSCOverall Survival (OS)11.0 Months
Secondary

Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning (PF) Scale of EORTC QLQ-C30 by at Least 10%

The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). Each of the multiitem scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. Each item in the EORTC QLQ-C30 has 4 response categories (1=Not at all, 2= A little, 3= Quite a bit, 4= Very much) with the higher number representing a worse outcome.

Time frame: from date of randomization

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning (PF) Scale of EORTC QLQ-C30 by at Least 10%3.8 Months
Sorafenib + BSCPatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Physical Functioning (PF) Scale of EORTC QLQ-C30 by at Least 10%5.6 Months
Secondary

Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Quality of Life (QoL) Scale Scores of EORTC QLQ-C30 by at Least 10%

The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea, and vomiting), a global health status/QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, anorexia, insomnia and financial impact). Each of the multiitem scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. Each item in the EORTC QLQ-C30 has 4 response categories (1=Not at all, 2= A little, 3= Quite a bit, 4= Very much) with the higher number representing a worse outcome.

Time frame: from date of randomization

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Quality of Life (QoL) Scale Scores of EORTC QLQ-C30 by at Least 10%3.7 Months
Sorafenib + BSCPatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Definitive Deterioration of the Quality of Life (QoL) Scale Scores of EORTC QLQ-C30 by at Least 10%4.5 Months
Secondary

Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) by at Least 2 Scores

The Kidney Cancer Symptom Index - Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) is a validated symptom scale used in studies of patients with kidney cancer. It includes 9-items that assess pain, bone pain, fatigue, lack of energy, shortness of breath, fevers, weight loss, coughing, and blood in urine and responses to each question are answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4 (e.g., 0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). FKSI-DRS scores range from 0 to 36, where higher scores correspond to better outcomes (eg, fewer symptoms).

Time frame: from date of randomization, at least 2 score units

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) by at Least 2 Scores4.9 Months
Sorafenib + BSCPatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index, Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) by at Least 2 Scores6.4 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Radiology Review

Overall response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Best overall esponse (BOR) for each patient was determined from the sequence of overall (lesion) responses according to the following rules: CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression where confirmation required or one determination of CR prior to progression where confirmation not required. CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression where confirmation required or one determination of CR prior to progression where confirmation not required. SD = at least one SD assessment (or better) \> 6 weeks after randomization (and not qualifying for CR or PR). PD = progression ≤ 17 weeks after randomization (and not qualifying for CR, PR or SD).

Time frame: Until disease progression or discontinuation of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Percentage of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Radiology Review3.9 Percentage of Participants
Sorafenib + BSCPercentage of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Radiology Review3.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Pre-dose Concentration in Plasma in Dovitinib

Predose concentrations of dovitinib were summarized by visit using PAS. All concentration data was listed by patient and time point using FAS. Mean pre-dose concentrations along with standard deviation (SD) was plotted over time if appropriate.

Time frame: Week 2 Day 5, Week 4 Day 5, Week 6 Day 5

Population: Pharmacokinetic Analysis Set (PAS) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of dovitinib and had at least one evaluable post-Baseline dovitinib concentration measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Pre-dose Concentration in Plasma in DovitinibWeek 4 Day 5 (n: 202)114.08 ng/mlStandard Deviation 77.884
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Pre-dose Concentration in Plasma in DovitinibWeek 2 Day 5 (n: 205)128.06 ng/mlStandard Deviation 92.571
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Pre-dose Concentration in Plasma in DovitinibWeek 6 Day 5 (n: 170)118.27 ng/mlStandard Deviation 84.246
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator's Radiology Review

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented disease progression or death due to any cause. The primary analysis for PFS (based on central review) was also to be repeated on FAS considering the Investigator assessments and using the same analytical conventions as the primary analysis.

Time frame: Until disease progression or discontinuation of treatment due to unacceptable toxicity

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator's Radiology Review3.9 Months
Sorafenib + BSCProgression Free Survival (PFS) Per Investigator's Radiology Review3.9 Months
Secondary

Time to Definitive Worsening of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)

Time to definitive worsening of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of definitive worsening of KPS or to the date of death whichever occurred earlier. Definitive worsening was defined as a definitive decrease in performance status by at least one Karnofsky category (i.e. at least 10 points less) compared to Baseline. Worsening was considered definitive if no later increase above the defined threshold was observed within the course of the study. A single measure reporting a decrease in Karnofsky performance status was sufficient to consider it as definitive only if it was the last one available for this patient. Time to definitive worsening of KPS was analyzed at the time of the final analysis for PFS.

Time frame: from date of randomization to the date of definitive worsening of KPS or to the date of death whichever occurred earlier

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consited of all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dovitinib + Best Supportive Care (BSC)Time to Definitive Worsening of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)5.1 Months
Sorafenib + BSCTime to Definitive Worsening of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)5.7 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026