Skip to content

PET/CT Evaluation of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer

Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-Computed Tomography (CT) PET/CT Evaluation of Treatment Response in Breast Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01222416
Enrollment
50
Registered
2010-10-18
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2017-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to develop Positron Emission Tomography (PET) - Computed Tomography (CT) PET/CT imaging methods for looking at the effects of chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Interventions

RADIATIONRadiopharmaceutical Administration [18F]-FDG

Adult dose: (0.15 mCi/kg ranging from 3 to 16 mCi,route IV. Time interval between administration and scanning: 60 +/- 10minutes post-injection.

RADIATIONRadiopharmaceutical: [18F]-FLT

Adult dose: (0.15 mCi/kg ranging from 3 to 16 mCi), route = IV, Time interval between administration and scanning: 60 +/- 10minutes post-injection.

Sponsors

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have histologically proven breast cancer * Subjects are being considered for preoperative chemotherapy * Subjects must be ≥ 18 years old. Sensor Sub-Study Only * Palpable subcutaneous or known disease with one surface \<1cm below surface of skin. * A subset of patients who have a mass located on any surface of the breast that is accessible for Lucerno sensor placement will have additional testing.

Exclusion criteria

* Children will be excluded from this study. * Pregnant women and women who are breast feeding will be excluded from this study. (The Vanderbilt University Medical Center radiology PET Procedure Screening Form will be used to identify and exclude subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding. A urine pregnancy test/or serum beta HCG will also be performed for women of child bearing potential). * Patients who are acutely ill who are deemed by their treating physician as not suitable candidates for this study. * Intraluminal lesions will be excluded from the sensor sub-study. * Non biopsy proven malignancy will be excluded from this study. * Palpable subcutaneous or known disease with one surface \>1cm below surface of skin will be excluded from the sensor sub-study. * Draining or exposed malignant tumor will be excluded from the sensor sub-study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Difference in the Change (Pre and End-treatment) of Standard Uptake Value (SUV) Between Pathological Non-responders and Responders (pCR)up to 6 months (1 scan prior to chemotherapy and 2 scans prior to surgery)The quantitative measures of standard uptake value (SULpeak and SULmax, prone and supine position) from PET were obtained. SUV = (Tracer activity in tissue)/(Injected radiotracer dose/patient weight or lean body mass) with unit microcuries/g/(millicuries/kg) (no unit after simplification). The SUV was averaged over the tumor regions. These averages were computed for each patient at each time point. All patients were were planned to be scanned three times: prior to treatment, during treatment and at the end of treatment. The change of SUV was calculated as the end of treatment value minus the pre-treatment value. Then the difference in the change between the responders and non-responders were estimated using Wilcoxon rank sum test. The pseudomedians and nonparametric confidence intervals for the difference (change of non-responders minus the change of responders) were reported for parameters SULpeak and SULmax measured for different positions. Pathological response were measured at the

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Compare and Combine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRIs) (Obtained From Study BRE0588) and Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Methods to Develop a Robust Assessment of Tumor Status.48 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This trial opened to accrual on 10/13/2010 and closed to accrual on 4/14/2015.

Pre-assignment details

No participants were enrolled onto the Fluorodeoxythymidine PET/CT (FLT-PET/CT) arm because this trial closed to accrual early due to slow accrual.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT)
A PET/CT scan prior to the initiation of therapy, and then two additional scans following the initiation of therapy. Each patient will have up to three scans in a 6 month time frame. Radiopharmaceutical Administration \[18F\]-FDG: Adult dose: (0.15 mCi/kg ranging from 3 to 16 mCi,route IV. Time interval between administration and scanning: 60 +/- 10minutes post-injection.
50
Fluorodeoxythymidine PET/CT (FLT-PET/CT)
A PET/CT scan prior to the initiation of therapy, and then two additional scans following the initiation of therapy. Each patient will have up to three scans in a 6 month time frame. Radiopharmaceutical: \[18F\]-FLT: Adult dose: (0.15 mCi/kg ranging from 3 to 16 mCi), route = IV, Time interval between administration and scanning: 60 +/- 10minutes post-injection.
0
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event40
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall Studyineligible;metastasis30
Overall Studymissed view/scan10
Overall Studyscheduling60
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalFluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT)Fluorodeoxythymidine PET/CT (FLT-PET/CT)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
46 Participants46 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
48 Participants48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants37 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

The Difference in the Change (Pre and End-treatment) of Standard Uptake Value (SUV) Between Pathological Non-responders and Responders (pCR)

The quantitative measures of standard uptake value (SULpeak and SULmax, prone and supine position) from PET were obtained. SUV = (Tracer activity in tissue)/(Injected radiotracer dose/patient weight or lean body mass) with unit microcuries/g/(millicuries/kg) (no unit after simplification). The SUV was averaged over the tumor regions. These averages were computed for each patient at each time point. All patients were were planned to be scanned three times: prior to treatment, during treatment and at the end of treatment. The change of SUV was calculated as the end of treatment value minus the pre-treatment value. Then the difference in the change between the responders and non-responders were estimated using Wilcoxon rank sum test. The pseudomedians and nonparametric confidence intervals for the difference (change of non-responders minus the change of responders) were reported for parameters SULpeak and SULmax measured for different positions. Pathological response were measured at the

Time frame: up to 6 months (1 scan prior to chemotherapy and 2 scans prior to surgery)

Population: 19 Patients had the scanned data at two time points: prior treatment and at the end of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT)The Difference in the Change (Pre and End-treatment) of Standard Uptake Value (SUV) Between Pathological Non-responders and Responders (pCR)Difference in SULpeak change, prone1.23 microcuries/g/(millicuries/kg)
Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT)The Difference in the Change (Pre and End-treatment) of Standard Uptake Value (SUV) Between Pathological Non-responders and Responders (pCR)Difference in SULmax change, prone2.12 microcuries/g/(millicuries/kg)
Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT)The Difference in the Change (Pre and End-treatment) of Standard Uptake Value (SUV) Between Pathological Non-responders and Responders (pCR)Difference in SULpeak change, supine1.89 microcuries/g/(millicuries/kg)
Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (FDG-PET/CT)The Difference in the Change (Pre and End-treatment) of Standard Uptake Value (SUV) Between Pathological Non-responders and Responders (pCR)Difference in SULmax change, supine2.88 microcuries/g/(millicuries/kg)
Secondary

Compare and Combine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRIs) (Obtained From Study BRE0588) and Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Methods to Develop a Robust Assessment of Tumor Status.

Time frame: 48 months

Population: There were insufficient number of patients who had both MRI and PET performed to allow for meaningful statistical comparisons.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026