Anomia (Word-retrieval Impairment), Post-Stroke Chronic Aphasia
Conditions
Keywords
Intensive language therapy, Anomia, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive electrical brain stimulation can enhance the out of intensive language therapy in chronic aphasia
Detailed description
Stroke is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Given the increasing average lifespan worldwide, the incidence and prevalence of patients with stroke will dramatically increase in the future. One of the most frequent and devastating conditions after stroke is aphasia, which affects language production and comprehension. High-frequent intensive speech-and-language therapy is currently the treatment of choice in chronic aphasia. However, despite its general effectiveness, treatment effect sizes are only low to moderate. Thus, there is a pressing need to explore novel training-adjuvant therapies to enhance treatment efficacy. Moreover, very little is known about the neurobiology of treatment-induced recovery in chronic aphasia. This is the prerequisite to improve existing and/or develop new treatment paradigms. Thus, in the present project we aim to assess whether the outcome of intensive language training can be enhanced by adjuvant non-invasive brain stimulation. We will be using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) that has previously been shown to enhance (a) language and motor learning in healthy subjects and (b) motor recovery in stroke patients. Specifically, in a longitudinal group comparison design, two matched groups of patients with chronic anomia will receive two weeks of intensive language training with or without atDCS. Treatment effects will be assessed immediately after the two week intervention period and several months after the end of the training. We will also use functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to elucidate language network changes in the two groups.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALIntensive language therapy
2 weeks of daily computerized naming training, daily, 3 hours
Sponsors
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* right-handedness * single first time left-hemisphere stroke * fluent- or non-fluent chronic aphasia (more than six months post-stroke) * anomia (PR\>10 and PR\<60 Aachen Aphasia Naming Subtest) * native German Speaker
Exclusion criteria
* more than one stroke * alcoholism, severe psychiatric conditions, other neurological conditions * other non-treated medical problems, severe microangiopathy * pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Boston Naming Test | Change of naming score from baseline (day 1 of study) to immediately after 2-week intervention period (post-testing) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Boston Naming Test | Change of naming score from post-testing (after end of intervention) to 3 months after the intervention (follow-up) | The follow-up will be administered to assess the stability of the treatment gains |
| Naming performance during functional magnetic resonance scanning | Change of naming score from baseline (day 1 of study) to immediately after 2-week intervention period (post-testing) | assessed during overt picture naming task |
| Naming performance during functional magnetic resonance imaging | Change of naming score from post-testing (after end of intervention) to 3 months after the intervention (follow-up) | assessed during overt picture naming task |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Primary ContactMarcus Meinzer, PhD
Backup ContactAgnes Flöel, MD
Outcome results
None listed