Skip to content

Invasive Revascularization or Not in Intermittent Claudication

Invasive Revascularization or Not in Intermittent Claudication

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01219842
Acronym
IRONIC
Enrollment
159
Registered
2010-10-13
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2021-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intermittent Claudication

Keywords

Intermittent claudication, Health Related Quality of Life, Walking performance, Daily walking capacity

Brief summary

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) often causes exertion pain in the legs, intermittent claudication (CI) affecting\> 10% of individuals\> 65 years. A recent Swedish Health Technology Assessment Report identified only limited evidence for the effectiveness of invasive treatment for IC in patients already on exercise training. The prognosis for the extremity is usually benign and treatment therefore aims at improving quality of life. Invasive treatment can also cause serious complications. Coronary artery disease is common in IC patients increasing the risk with invasive treatment. In spite of these uncertain merits and potential risks, invasive procedures for IC are increasing and 37% of all invasive procedures for PAD in Sweden are performed for IC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the additional effects of modern invasive treatment in patients with intermittent claudication receiving modern best medical treatment (BMT). The primary hypothesis in the study is that invasive treatment in addition to BMT improves health related quality of life and walking performance compared to BMT only.

Interventions

PROCEDUREINVASIVE (INV) treatment

Modern endovascular and/or open revascularisation according to the TASC II recommendations.

Antiplatelet therapy, cilostazol and non-supervised exercise training. Smoking cessation support. Lipid-lowering therapy, diabetes and hypertension treated according to current national guidelines.

Sponsors

Göteborg University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with intermittent claudication (typical symptoms and ABI \<0.9) seeking treatment * Significant aortoiliac- and/or femoropopliteal lesion. * Age 30-80 years

Exclusion criteria

* Invasive treatment contraindicated because of severe intercurrent disease. * Two or more failed vascular reconstructions in the same leg. * Employees unable to work because of intermittent claudication. * Need for open reconstruction below the tibioperoneal trunc. * Thromboembolic etiology (popliteal artery aneurysm; cardiac emboli) * Other disease severely affecting walking performance. * Body weight \> 120 kilograms. * Age \<30 or \> 80 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)24 months with intermistic analysis at 12 monthsAssessed with the patient-reported instruments SF-36, EQ5D and VASCUQOL

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Walking performance on treadmill test24 months with interimistic analysis at 12 monthsGraded treadmill test with progressively increasing speed and inclination.
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)60 monthsAssessed with the patient-reported instruments SF-36, EQ5D and VASCUQOL
six-minutes walk test60 monthsCorridor-based walk test during six minutes walk

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026