Skip to content

Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate With the GreenLight XPS™ Laser System vs TURP for the Treatment of BPH

A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study Comparing Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate With the GreenLight XPS™ Laser System and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01218672
Enrollment
291
Registered
2010-10-11
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2020-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

BPH, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Brief summary

The study compares procedural and post procedural outcomes for photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement causing bladder outlet obstruction. The study requires use of the CE marked GreenLight XPS™ Laser System (GreenLight XPS) or a CE marked monopolar or bipolar loop TURP system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Detailed description

The study will compare procedural and post procedural outcomes for photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement causing bladder outlet obstruction. The study requires use of the CE marked GreenLight XPS™ Laser System (GreenLight XPS) or a CE marked monopolar or bipolar loop TURP system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that PVP is not inferior to TURP.

Interventions

DEVICEPhotoselective Vaporization of the Prostate

GreenLight XPS laser console GreenLight XPS consists of a 532 nm laser console capable of achieving power outputs between 20W and 180W. Laser technology is used to vaporize tissue for debulking prostatic hyperplasia and improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms. The 532 nm wavelength is in the visible spectrum as green light and is strongly absorbed by oxyhemoglobin. GreenLight XPS will be used in conjunction with the MoXy™ fiber. The fiber features a side firing mechanism delivering up to180W of 532 nm light to vaporize and coagulate the prostate tissue. The fiber is guided to the treatment site by the continuous flow cystoscope, consisting of an inner and outer sheath set, 30ْ forward oblique telescope and visual obturator.

Monopolar and bipolar loop TURP Systems The TURP procedure requires the use of a resectoscope, camera system and irrigation fluid. The system consists of a generator unit and a wire loop with an electrical current running through the loop used to cut prostate tissue and cauterize. Prostate tissue is cut away in small pieces and removed at the end of the procedure using irrigation. There are many manufacturers of TURP systems. Any monopolar and bipolar loop system that carry the CE mark may be used for the study.

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject has provided informed consent and agrees to attend all study visits * Subject has diagnosis of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement causing bladder outlet obstruction * Subject is willing to be randomized * Subject is able to complete self-administered questionnaires * Clinical investigator has documented in the subject's medical record that in his/her judgment the subject is a surgical candidate for either the PVP or the TURP procedure and may be randomized into either arm * Subject is 40 to 80 years of age * Subject has an IPSS score greater than or equal to 12 measured at the baseline visit * Subject has medical record documentation of a maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) less than 15ml/s (If uroflow testing documentation is available within 90 days prior to the informed consent date, and the sample is greater than or equal to 150ml, and the Qmax is less than 15ml/s it may be used for the inclusion/

Exclusion criteria

) * Subject has medical record documentation of a prostate volume of less than or equal to 100g by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) (If TRUS testing documentation is available from less than 180 days prior to the informed consent date and the prostate volume is less than or equal to 100g, it may be used for the inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)6 monthsThe IPSS is a patient-administered 7-question instrument used to classify severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms (BPH). Total scores can range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom From Complications180 daysA complication is defined as a device or procedure-related adverse event meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: Perforation of tissue or a physiologic structure; Required a prolonged or secondary hospitalization; Required surgical or invasive intervention (e.g., breaking of the skin) and excluding urinary catheterization for transient retention lasting less than 7 days and/or IV medications related to anesthesia.
Prostate Volume6 monthsProstate volume measured via transrectal ultrasound
Post Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURP3 weeks post treatmentShort Form Health Survey (SF-36 Acute) collected at 3-week visit. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form, health survey of functional health and well-being scores in a three-section format: Utility Index (score = 0-1 with higher score being better); Physical Component Summary (PCS) comprising of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and overall general health; Mental Component Summary (MCS) comprising of vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each component in the PCS and MCS sections have a score of 1-100 with the higher score being better. The acute version uses a 1-week recall period.
Immediate Post Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURP3 weeksLength of stay calculated as the difference from entering the recovery room date/time to discharge date/time
Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax)6 monthsQmax measured from a void of at least 150 ml in volume.
Tolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline, 12-months, and 24-monthsThe International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) instruments will be collected at baseline and the follow-up visits. The IIEF-5 is a self-administered 5 question instrument that assesses the relevant domains of male sexual function such as erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction with a total possible score of 5-25 (higher score is better). The ICIQ-SFis a self-administered 4-question tool designed for the assessment and quantification of incontinence and its impact on quality of life during the previous 4 weeks with a total score of 0-21 (higher score is worse).
Subject Satisfaction of PVP and TURP3-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-monthsSubject responses to satisfaction with treatment as collected on follow-up visits. Data presented below indicates responses from subjects that would go through study treatment again at each of the defined follow-up visits.
Rate of Retreatment of PVP and TURP2 YearsSubject experiencing a retreatment (removal of tissue via TUPR, PVP, or other intervention) for obstruction after the initial procedure was required
Health Status of PVP and TURPBaseline and 24-monthsThe IPSS, OABq, SF-36 Health Summary and EQ-5D instruments will be scored. IPSS classifies voiding symptoms with scores from 0-35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). The OABq captures overactive bladder symptom bother with scores from 0-100 (lower score is better). The SF-36 is a health survey with scores from 1-100 (higher score is better). EQ-5D assesses health status across a range of conditions and treatments with a score of 0-1 (higher score is better).

Countries

Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Ten subjects were determined to be ineligible for the study procedure and were withdrawn before randomization (i.e., study procedure not performed).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GreenLight XPS
Photoselective vaporization of the prostate using GreenLight XPS laser system. GreenLight XPS vs. TURP: GreenLight XPS laser console GreenLight XPS consists of a 532 nm laser console capable of achieving power outputs between 20W and 180W. Laser technology is used to vaporize tissue for debulking prostatic hyperplasia and improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms. The 532 nm wavelength is in the visible spectrum as green light and is strongly absorbed by oxyhemoglobin.
136
TURP
Monopolar and bipolar Transuretheral resection of the prostate (TURP) The TURP procedure requires the use of a resectoscope, camera system and irrigation fluid. The system consists of a generator unit and a wire loop with an electrical current running through the loop used to cut prostate tissue and cauterize. Prostate tissue is cut away in small pieces and removed at the end of the procedure using irrigation. There are many manufacturers of TURP systems. Any monopolar and bipolar loop system that carry the CE mark may be used for the study.
133
Total269

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTURPGreenLight XPSTotal
Age, Continuous66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
67.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Region of Enrollment
Austria
4 participants who were treated4 participants who were treated8 participants who were treated
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
5 participants who were treated5 participants who were treated10 participants who were treated
Region of Enrollment
France
7 participants who were treated8 participants who were treated15 participants who were treated
Region of Enrollment
Germany
35 participants who were treated28 participants who were treated63 participants who were treated
Region of Enrollment
Italy
10 participants who were treated12 participants who were treated22 participants who were treated
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
12 participants who were treated13 participants who were treated25 participants who were treated
Region of Enrollment
Spain
8 participants who were treated8 participants who were treated16 participants who were treated
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
12 participants who were treated10 participants who were treated22 participants who were treated
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
40 participants who were treated48 participants who were treated88 participants who were treated
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
133 Participants136 Participants269 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
68 / 13657 / 133
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 13625 / 133

Outcome results

Primary

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

The IPSS is a patient-administered 7-question instrument used to classify severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms (BPH). Total scores can range from 0 to 35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic).

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The analysis includes all subjects who received a study treatment and for whom the outcome measure is available. Subjects were analyzed according to treatment received (as-treated analysis).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPSInternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)6.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
TURPInternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Secondary

Freedom From Complications

A complication is defined as a device or procedure-related adverse event meeting at least 1 of the following criteria: Perforation of tissue or a physiologic structure; Required a prolonged or secondary hospitalization; Required surgical or invasive intervention (e.g., breaking of the skin) and excluding urinary catheterization for transient retention lasting less than 7 days and/or IV medications related to anesthesia.

Time frame: 180 days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GreenLight XPSFreedom From Complications87.3 percentage of patients complication free
TURPFreedom From Complications83.3 percentage of patients complication free
Secondary

Health Status of PVP and TURP

The IPSS, OABq, SF-36 Health Summary and EQ-5D instruments will be scored. IPSS classifies voiding symptoms with scores from 0-35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). The OABq captures overactive bladder symptom bother with scores from 0-100 (lower score is better). The SF-36 is a health survey with scores from 1-100 (higher score is better). EQ-5D assesses health status across a range of conditions and treatments with a score of 0-1 (higher score is better).

Time frame: Baseline and 24-months

Population: Table reflects available data at specified time-points

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPSHealth Status of PVP and TURPBaseline IPSS21.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
GreenLight XPSHealth Status of PVP and TURPBaseline OABq44.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.5
GreenLight XPSHealth Status of PVP and TURPBaseline SF-36 Health Summary52.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8
GreenLight XPSHealth Status of PVP and TURPBaseline EQ5D0.843 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.193
GreenLight XPSHealth Status of PVP and TURP24-Month IPSS6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
GreenLight XPSHealth Status of PVP and TURP24-Month OABq15.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
GreenLight XPSHealth Status of PVP and TURP24-Month SF-36 Health Summary52.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
GreenLight XPSHealth Status of PVP and TURP24-Month EQ5D0.875 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.194
TURPHealth Status of PVP and TURP24-Month EQ5D0.857 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
TURPHealth Status of PVP and TURPBaseline IPSS21.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
TURPHealth Status of PVP and TURP24-Month IPSS5.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
TURPHealth Status of PVP and TURPBaseline OABq42.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
TURPHealth Status of PVP and TURP24-Month SF-36 Health Summary53.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
TURPHealth Status of PVP and TURPBaseline SF-36 Health Summary51.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
TURPHealth Status of PVP and TURP24-Month OABq11.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
TURPHealth Status of PVP and TURPBaseline EQ5D0.823 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.219
Secondary

Immediate Post Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURP

Length of stay calculated as the difference from entering the recovery room date/time to discharge date/time

Time frame: 3 weeks

Population: A total of 136 subjects underwent GL-XPS and 133 subjects underwent TURP procedures. Length of Stay data available for 134 GL-XPS and 132 TURP subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPSImmediate Post Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURP65.5 hoursStandard Deviation 63.3
TURPImmediate Post Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURP97.8 hoursStandard Deviation 63.4
Secondary

Maximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax)

Qmax measured from a void of at least 150 ml in volume.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: The analysis includes all subjects who received a study treatment and for whom the outcome measure is available. Subjects were analyzed according to treatment received (as-treated analysis).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPSMaximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax)23.3 ml/sStandard Deviation 10.1
TURPMaximum Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax)24.3 ml/sStandard Deviation 11.4
Secondary

Post Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURP

Short Form Health Survey (SF-36 Acute) collected at 3-week visit. The SF-36 is a multi-purpose, short-form, health survey of functional health and well-being scores in a three-section format: Utility Index (score = 0-1 with higher score being better); Physical Component Summary (PCS) comprising of physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and overall general health; Mental Component Summary (MCS) comprising of vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each component in the PCS and MCS sections have a score of 1-100 with the higher score being better. The acute version uses a 1-week recall period.

Time frame: 3 weeks post treatment

Population: A total of 136 subjects underwent GL-XPS and 133 subjects underwent TURP procedures. The SF36 questionnaire is comprised of three sections; available data is:~SF36 (PCS): 133 GL-XPS, 129 TURP; SF36 (MHS): 134 GL-XPS, 130 TURP; SF36 Utility Index: 125 GL-XPS, 121 TURP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPSPost Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURPSF36 - PCS50.3 scoreStandard Deviation 8.1
GreenLight XPSPost Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURPSF36 - MHS50.0 scoreStandard Deviation 9.7
GreenLight XPSPost Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURPSF36 Utility Index0.7 scoreStandard Deviation 0.1
TURPPost Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURPSF36 - PCS50.5 scoreStandard Deviation 7.3
TURPPost Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURPSF36 - MHS50.0 scoreStandard Deviation 10.9
TURPPost Treatment Outcomes of PVP and TURPSF36 Utility Index0.7 scoreStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Prostate Volume

Prostate volume measured via transrectal ultrasound

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPSProstate Volume23.0 mlStandard Deviation 11.7
TURPProstate Volume20.5 mlStandard Deviation 11.7
Secondary

Rate of Retreatment of PVP and TURP

Subject experiencing a retreatment (removal of tissue via TUPR, PVP, or other intervention) for obstruction after the initial procedure was required

Time frame: 2 Years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GreenLight XPSRate of Retreatment of PVP and TURPMonths 0-64 Participants
GreenLight XPSRate of Retreatment of PVP and TURPMonths 7-126 Participants
GreenLight XPSRate of Retreatment of PVP and TURPMonths 13-244 Participants
TURPRate of Retreatment of PVP and TURPMonths 0-67 Participants
TURPRate of Retreatment of PVP and TURPMonths 7-122 Participants
TURPRate of Retreatment of PVP and TURPMonths 13-241 Participants
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction of PVP and TURP

Subject responses to satisfaction with treatment as collected on follow-up visits. Data presented below indicates responses from subjects that would go through study treatment again at each of the defined follow-up visits.

Time frame: 3-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months

Population: Descriptive statistics including frequency and percentages will be calculated. Results presented below are number of respondents who said Yes.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GreenLight XPSSubject Satisfaction of PVP and TURP116 Participants
TURPSubject Satisfaction of PVP and TURP107 Participants
Secondary

Tolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) instruments will be collected at baseline and the follow-up visits. The IIEF-5 is a self-administered 5 question instrument that assesses the relevant domains of male sexual function such as erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction with a total possible score of 5-25 (higher score is better). The ICIQ-SFis a self-administered 4-question tool designed for the assessment and quantification of incontinence and its impact on quality of life during the previous 4 weeks with a total score of 0-21 (higher score is worse).

Time frame: Baseline, 12-months, and 24-months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPSTolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline IIEF-513.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
GreenLight XPSTolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline ICIQ-UI SF3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
GreenLight XPSTolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)24-Months IIEF-512.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
GreenLight XPSTolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)24-Months ICIQ-UI SF2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
TURPTolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)24-Months ICIQ-UI SF2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
TURPTolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline IIEF-513.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
TURPTolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)24-Months IIEF-513.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
TURPTolerability of PVP and TURP Assessed Using International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF)Baseline ICIQ-UI SF4.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026