Skip to content

Comparison of Two Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Treatment Regimens in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Not Achieving HbA1c Treatment Targets on OADs Alone

An Open Labelled, Randomised, Parallel Trial; Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Two Different Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Treatment Initiation Regimens Followed by Intensification in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Achieving Glycaemic Targets on OADs Alone in Iran

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01215435
Enrollment
245
Registered
2010-10-06
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2014-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to compare the glycaemic control when subjects initiate a biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment followed by an intensified treatment if treatment target of HbA1c below 7% is not reached by OAD (oral anti-diabetic drugs) alone.

Interventions

DRUGbiphasic insulin aspart 30

Administered subcutaneously (under the skin) once daily, before breakfast. The trial has 3 treatment phases for both treatment arms

Sponsors

Novo Nordisk A/S
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for a minimum of 6 months prior to Visit 1 * HbA1c at least 7.0 % - maximum 11 % at screening * Subject is insulin naïve (short-term insulin treatment of up to 14 days is allowed) * An antidiabetic regimen that has been stable for at least 3 months prior to screening * An antidiabetic regimen that includes a minimum of 2 OADs * OADs dosed at least 50% of the maximum recommended dose

Exclusion criteria

* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial product(s) or related products * Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant or are not using adequate contraceptive methods (adequate contraceptive measures as required by local law or practice) * The receipt of any investigational medicinal product within one month prior to this trial * Suffer from a life threatening disease (cancer) * Cardiac disease: class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF), unstable angina, and or any myocardial infarction (treated or untreated) within 6 months prior to screening * Hepatic insufficiency (Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) above 2 times the central laboratory's upper reference limit) * Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine above 1.6 mg/dl for males; 1.4 mg/dl for females * Recurrent hypoglycaemia or hypoglycaemic unawareness * Anemia (haemoglobin below 10 mg/dl)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 11Week 0, Week 11Estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c after 11 weeks of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) From Baseline to Week 36Week 0, Week 36Estimated mean change from baseline in FPG after 36 weeks of treatment
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic EpisodesWeek 0 to Week 36A hypoglycaemic episode will be defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode is on or after the first day of trial product, and no later than the last day on trial product.

Countries

Iran

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial was conducted at 5 sites in Iran

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were on a stable antidiabetic regimen which includes a minimum of 2 OADs, daily for at least 3 months prior to screening. OAD doses were at least 50 percent of the maximum recommended dose.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pre-breakfast BIAsp 30
Subjects were started on BIAsp 30 (a biphasic formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp) in which 30% is soluble and the remaining 70% is protaminized insulin aspart) subcutaneously once daily (OD) pre-breakfast. Then they were intensified to twice daily (BID) or thrice daily (TID) if glycaemic control is not achieved, within three 12 weeks of treatment phases by titrating according to SMBG levels.
122
Pre-dinner BIAsp 30
Subjects were started on BIAsp 30 (a biphasic formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp) in which 30% is soluble and the remaining 70% is protaminized insulin aspart) subcutaneously once daily (OD) pre-dinner. Then they were intensified to BID or TID if glycaemic control is not achieved, within three 12 weeks of treatment phases by titrating according to SMBG levels.
123
Total245

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up30
Overall StudyProtocol Violation20
Overall StudyUnclassified55
Overall StudyWithdrawal Criteria811

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPre-breakfast BIAsp 30Pre-dinner BIAsp 30Total
Age, Continuous55.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.32
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.32
55.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.82
Fasting plasma glucose (FPG)192.7 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 68.56
199.3 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 63.8
196.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 66.16
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)9.1 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07
9.2 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
9.2 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.04
Sex: Female, Male
Female
72 Participants74 Participants146 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants49 Participants99 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 12219 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1224 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 11

Estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c after 11 weeks of treatment

Time frame: Week 0, Week 11

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) includes all randomised subjects and missing data was imputed using baseline observation carried forward (BOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pre-breakfast BIAsp 30Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 11-1.04 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Error 0.1
Pre-dinner BIAsp 30Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 11-0.90 percentage of glycosylated haemoglobinStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: H0: D \> 0.4% against H1: D ≤ 0.4% where D is the mean treatment difference for change in HbA1c (pre-breakfast OD minus pre-dinner OD)p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.4, 0.13]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Change in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) From Baseline to Week 36

Estimated mean change from baseline in FPG after 36 weeks of treatment

Time frame: Week 0, Week 36

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) includes all randomised subjects and missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pre-breakfast BIAsp 30Change in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) From Baseline to Week 36-61.57 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.5
Pre-dinner BIAsp 30Change in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) From Baseline to Week 36-58.43 mg/dLStandard Deviation 4.48
p-value: 0.621595% CI: [-15.65, 9.37]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes

A hypoglycaemic episode will be defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode is on or after the first day of trial product, and no later than the last day on trial product.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 36

Population: Safety analysis set includes all subjects who received at least one dose of the trial product.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pre-breakfast BIAsp 30Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes1181 episodes
Pre-dinner BIAsp 30Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes953 episodes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026