Skip to content

Telephone Based Management of Hyperlipidemia

Telephone Based Management of Hyperlipidemia Utilizing a Self Monitoring Testing Device

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01212159
Enrollment
70
Registered
2010-09-30
Start date
2010-11-01
Completion date
2015-08-01
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlipidemia

Keywords

Internet based monitoring system

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that systematic self measurement of blood lipids reduces LDL cholesterol more effectively than standard care. The hypothesis is that cholesterol lowering medication adherence will be improved with self monitoring and reporting of frequent blood lipids and the percentage of patients achieving LDL goal will be greater than without home monitoring.

Detailed description

The study utilizes a telephone reporting system to self report lipid values and provide educational counseling regarding lifestyle modification methods to reduce cardiovascular risk. Study patients will be randomized to receive a home monitoring device and will be instructed on its use. Generic simvastatin will be given to reduce LDL levels in all groups. It is the hypothesis that those study patients receiving a home device will reach target LDL (goal LDL) more frequently than those randomized to usual care( no device).

Interventions

DEVICESelf Monitoring Lipid Analyzer

The device is similar to a glucometer- Utilizing a lancet a small amount of blood is collected in a capillary tube and placed on a hand held monitor that records lipid values.

Sponsors

Temple University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* LDL \> 130mg/dl

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant patients * liver disease * allergic reaction to statins

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LDL Level Change From Baselinebaseline to 6 monthsComparison of serum LDL level between control and intervention subjects

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Medication Compliance6 monthsSelf reported comparison of lipid medication compliance between control and intervention subjects, scale 0-4. Highest compliance value indicated by a score of 4.
LDL Values at Two Week Interval6 weeksParticipant in the self monitored arm reported LDL every two weeks. LDL goal for treatment was 100 mg/dl and subjects were followed every two weeks to observe mean LDL values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
No Self Monitoring Device
Standard or usual care of high LDL including lab lipid profiles after treatment with statin therapy. No device or telemedicine education will be provided
14
Self Monitoring Lipid Analyzer
Self measured blood lipids using a home lipidometer, and telephone reporting of data to the clinical center. Self Monitoring Lipid Analyzer: The device is similar to a glucometer- Utilizing a lancet a small amount of blood is collected in a capillary tube and placed on a hand held monitor that records lipid values.
32
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo Self Monitoring DeviceTotalSelf Monitoring Lipid Analyzer
Age, Continuous56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants29 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants15 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants26 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 participants46 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants33 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants13 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 261 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

LDL Level Change From Baseline

Comparison of serum LDL level between control and intervention subjects

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Self Monitoring DeviceLDL Level Change From Baseline-63.4 mg/dlStandard Deviation 35.5
Self Monitoring Lipid AnalyzerLDL Level Change From Baseline-54.6 mg/dlStandard Deviation 43.2
Comparison: Paired t-test analysis of 6 month change in LDL cholesterol for no monitor and self monitor groups Independent sample t-test to compare ldl change between groupsp-value: 0.391t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

LDL Values at Two Week Interval

Participant in the self monitored arm reported LDL every two weeks. LDL goal for treatment was 100 mg/dl and subjects were followed every two weeks to observe mean LDL values.

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: No self monitoring group had LDL levels only at baseline and 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Self Monitoring Lipid AnalyzerLDL Values at Two Week Intervaltwo week96.3 mg/dlStandard Deviation 47.3
Self Monitoring Lipid AnalyzerLDL Values at Two Week Intervalfour week92.4 mg/dlStandard Deviation 37
Self Monitoring Lipid AnalyzerLDL Values at Two Week Intervalsix week118.6 mg/dlStandard Deviation 37.8
Secondary

Medication Compliance

Self reported comparison of lipid medication compliance between control and intervention subjects, scale 0-4. Highest compliance value indicated by a score of 4.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
No Self Monitoring DeviceMedication Compliance2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Self Monitoring Lipid AnalyzerMedication Compliance2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026