Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of DOTAREM® in MRI of Central Nervous System (CNS) Lesions

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of DOTAREM® in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Patients With Central Nervous System (CNS) Lesions.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01211873
Acronym
SENTIO
Enrollment
416
Registered
2010-09-30
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2019-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Nervous System Diseases, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

Keywords

CNS, Contrast Agent, MRI, Dotarem, Magnevist

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects)and efficacy (how well does it work) of Dotarem® when used in taking images of the brain / spine. The results will be compared to the results of MRI taken without Dotarem.

Detailed description

This is a study involving the use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contrast agents called Dotarem®. The purpose of this study is to look at the safety (what are the side effects) and efficacy (how well does it work) of Dotarem® when used for taking images of the brain and spine. The results of the MRI will be compared to the results of images taken without Dotarem®.

Interventions

DRUGDotarem (gadoterate meglumine)

0.1 mmol/kg by body weight, single IV injection

0.1 mmol/kg by body weight, single IV injection

Sponsors

Guerbet
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult subject and pediatric subjects (aged greater than or equal to two (2) years). * Is referred for a contrast-enhanced MRI of the CNS based on the results of a previous imaging procedure. * Female of childbearing potential patients must have effective contraception (contraceptive pill or intra-uterine device) or be surgically sterilized or post-menopausal (minimum 12 months amenorrhea), or have a documented negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to study MRI. * Has been fully informed about the study, and has consented to participate.

Exclusion criteria

* Having acute or chronic grade IV or V renal insufficiency. * Known class III/IV congestive heart failure. * Suffering from long QT syndrome. * Unstable health condition or circumstances (e.g. suffering from severe claustrophobia). * Having any contraindications to MRI such as a pace-maker, magnetic material or any other conditions that would preclude proximity to a strong magnetic field. * Known allergy to Gadolinium chelates. * Having received any contrast agent within 3 days prior to study contrast administration, or is scheduled to receive any contrast agent within 24 hours after the study contrast administration. * Pregnant, breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant during the trial. * Previously participated in this trial. * Having participated within 30 days in another clinical trial involving an investigational drug. * Any condition which, based on the investigator's clinical judgement, would prevent the patient from completing all trial assessments and visits. * Inability or unwillingness to cooperate with the requirements of this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired Evaluationup to 24 hoursTo demonstrate the superiority of combined unenhanced and Dotarem enhanced MRI (PAIRED) compared to unenhanced MRI (PRE) in terms of lesion visualization. Unenhanced MRI refers to MRI before administration of contrast agent. Enhanced MRI refers to MRI after contrast agent injection. Pre refers to unenhanced MRI. PAIRED refer to combined unenhanced and enhanced MRI. The measure used a specific scale with 3-point levels to assess lesion visualization. At lesion level, the scale range is from 0 through 1 to 2. Score 0 means a worse outcome and score 2 means a better outcome. Patient score is the sum of all lesion scores. Up to 5 of the largest representative lesions were assessed. At patient level, the maximum score is 10, minimum score is 0.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Image Quality Scoreup to 24 hoursImage quality was evaluated for each lesion according to a 3-point scale with the following grades; poor (1), fair (2) or good (3), and an overall score per patient was calculated. At patient level, the maximum score is 3, minimum score is 1. Higher scores mean a better image quality.
Diagnostic Confidence Scoreup to 24 hoursLevel of diagnostic confidence when evaluating the MRI modalities was graded using a 5-point scale as nil (1), poor (2), moderate (3), high (4) and excellent (5).
Number of Lesionsup to 24 hoursThe number of lesions for which observations could be made was calculated for each MRI modality and results are summarized per patient

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First patient First Visit : 16 Sept 2010 Last patient Last Visit : 16 Nov 2011 Locations: radiology departments

Pre-assignment details

Any patient who did not fulfill eligibility criteria was not randomized / assigned to a treatment group.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine)
adults received Magnevist as 1:2 ratio compared to Dotarem
119
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine)
adults received Dotarem as 2:1 ratio compared to Magnevist.
245
Dotarem 2 (Gadoterate Meglumine)
All children were assigned to Dotarem
38
Total402

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMagnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine)Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine)Dotarem 2 (Gadoterate Meglumine)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants38 Participants38 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
30 Participants60 Participants0 Participants90 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
89 Participants185 Participants0 Participants274 Participants
Age, Continuous55.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.43
53.17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.35
9.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.49
49.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
12 participants22 participants14 participants48 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
10 participants20 participants0 participants30 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
5 participants8 participants4 participants17 participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
3 participants5 participants3 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
13 participants30 participants0 participants43 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
20 participants40 participants0 participants60 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
7 participants15 participants0 participants22 participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
14 participants26 participants0 participants40 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
2 participants8 participants0 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
3 participants6 participants0 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants65 participants17 participants112 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants131 Participants22 Participants218 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
54 Participants114 Participants16 Participants184 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 2400 / 1170 / 38
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 2409 / 1178 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2401 / 1171 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

MRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired Evaluation

To demonstrate the superiority of combined unenhanced and Dotarem enhanced MRI (PAIRED) compared to unenhanced MRI (PRE) in terms of lesion visualization. Unenhanced MRI refers to MRI before administration of contrast agent. Enhanced MRI refers to MRI after contrast agent injection. Pre refers to unenhanced MRI. PAIRED refer to combined unenhanced and enhanced MRI. The measure used a specific scale with 3-point levels to assess lesion visualization. At lesion level, the scale range is from 0 through 1 to 2. Score 0 means a worse outcome and score 2 means a better outcome. Patient score is the sum of all lesion scores. Up to 5 of the largest representative lesions were assessed. At patient level, the maximum score is 10, minimum score is 0.

Time frame: up to 24 hours

Population: The primary analysis was performed at the patient level using off-site readings by 3 readers. The number of participants for analysis depended on the number of evaluable cases (PRE and PAIRED) determined by each reader. Only adult participants were included in this data set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationBorder Delineation Blinded Reader 31.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationInternal Morphology Blinded Reader 31.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationBorder Delineation Blinded Reader 21.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.43
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationContrast Enhancement Blinded Reader 10.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationInternal Morphology Blinded Reader 10.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationContrast Enhancement Blinded Reader 20.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.15
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationBorder Delineation Blinded Reader 11.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationContrast Enhancement Blinded Reader 30.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationInternal Morphology Blinded Reader 21.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.24
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationContrast Enhancement Blinded Reader 32.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.44
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationBorder Delineation Blinded Reader 24.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationBorder Delineation Blinded Reader 32.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationInternal Morphology Blinded Reader 13.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationInternal Morphology Blinded Reader 24.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationInternal Morphology Blinded Reader 32.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationContrast Enhancement Blinded Reader 13.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationContrast Enhancement Blinded Reader 23.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDMRI Lesion Visualization (Border Delineation, Internal Morphology and Contrast Enhancement) at Patient Level for Both Pre and Paired EvaluationBorder Delineation Blinded Reader 13.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Diagnostic Confidence Score

Level of diagnostic confidence when evaluating the MRI modalities was graded using a 5-point scale as nil (1), poor (2), moderate (3), high (4) and excellent (5).

Time frame: up to 24 hours

Population: The number of participants for analysis depended on the number of evaluable cases (PRE and PAIRED) determined by each reader. Only adult participants are included in this data set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 33.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 13.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 22.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 24.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 14.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 34.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PREDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 33.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PREDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 13.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PREDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 22.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 24.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.36
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 14.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDDiagnostic Confidence ScoreReader 34.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Image Quality Score

Image quality was evaluated for each lesion according to a 3-point scale with the following grades; poor (1), fair (2) or good (3), and an overall score per patient was calculated. At patient level, the maximum score is 3, minimum score is 1. Higher scores mean a better image quality.

Time frame: up to 24 hours

Population: The number of participants for analysis depended on the number of evaluable cases (PRE and PAIRED) determined by each reader. Only adult participants are included in this data set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREImage Quality ScoreReader 11.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREImage Quality ScoreReader 32.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PREImage Quality ScoreReader 21.72 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDImage Quality ScoreReader 12.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDImage Quality ScoreReader 32.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.11
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDImage Quality ScoreReader 23.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PREImage Quality ScoreReader 21.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.44
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PREImage Quality ScoreReader 11.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PREImage Quality ScoreReader 31.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDImage Quality ScoreReader 12.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDImage Quality ScoreReader 32.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDImage Quality ScoreReader 22.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Number of Lesions

The number of lesions for which observations could be made was calculated for each MRI modality and results are summarized per patient

Time frame: up to 24 hours

Population: The number of participants for analysis depended on the number of evaluable cases (PRE and PAIRED) determined by each reader. Only adult participants are included in this data set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PRENumber of LesionsReader 31.97 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 2.99
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PRENumber of LesionsReader 22.29 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.69
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PRENumber of LesionsReader 11.97 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.16
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDNumber of LesionsReader 32.46 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 4.53
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDNumber of LesionsReader 23.16 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 5.21
Dotarem (Gadoterate Meglumine) - PAIREDNumber of LesionsReader 12.69 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 4.71
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PRENumber of LesionsReader 11.98 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.85
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PRENumber of LesionsReader 22.60 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 5.42
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PRENumber of LesionsReader 32.15 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 3.97
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDNumber of LesionsReader 33.97 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 10.02
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDNumber of LesionsReader 24.50 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 9.95
Magnevist (Gadopentetate Dimeglumine) - PAIREDNumber of LesionsReader 14.19 Number of lesionsStandard Deviation 10.54

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026