Low Tension Glaucoma
Conditions
Keywords
prospective, non-interventional, observational, multi-center, long-term
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of latanoprost monotherapy in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) using a prospective, observational design. Visits were scheduled at 6-month intervals for 24 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP), optic nerve head findings, visual field status, and adverse events were recorded.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
patients with normal-tension glaucoma
Exclusion criteria
none
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Overall Progression of Glaucoma Damage | Month 24 (or last visit) | Overall progression defined as at least 1 of the 6 individual progression of glaucoma damage measures met: increase in horizontal cup to disc ratio and/or vertical cup to disc ratio by at least 0.2; at least 1 post Baseline (BL) optic-disc hemorrhage; decreased rim area (0.2 mm2), rim volume (0.1 mm3), mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)(0.1 mm), progressive visual field deterioration, increase in Aulhorn stage (by at least 1 stage), and/or decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 decibels \[dB\]) |
| Percentage of Participants With Progression of Optic Disc Excavation | Month 24 (or last visit) | Progression (Last Visit minus Baseline) defined as increase in horizontal cup to disc ratio and/or vertical cup to disc ratio by at least 0.2, and/or decrease in at least 1 of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) parameters (deterioration of rim area 0.2 mm2; deterioration of rim volume 0.1 mm3 deterioration or mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness 0.1 mm). |
| Percentage of Participants With Progression of Visual Field | Month 24 (or last visit) | Progression defined as visual field deterioration rated progressive by physician on at least 1 post-baseline visit, and increase in Aulhorn stage (by at least 1 stage) and/or decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 dB (Last Visit minus Baseline). |
| Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit | Mean IOP values measured by applanation tonometry or noncontact method; valid range: 8-40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Only the IOP reading for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. Last visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value of IOP. |
| Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 12 | Month 12 | Response: Yes = had an IOP 24-hour profile; No = did not have an IOP 24-hour profile. |
| Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 24 | Month 24 | Response: Yes = had an IOP 24-hour profile; No = did not have an IOP 24-hour profile. |
| Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 12 | Month 12 | Response: Yes = had IOP 24-hour pressure peak; No = did not have IOP 24-hour pressure peak. |
| Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 24 | Month 24 | Response: Yes = had IOP 24-hour pressure peak; No = did not have IOP 24-hour pressure peak. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Target at Last Visit | Month 24, (or last visit) | Percentage of participants who achieved their IOP target set at baseline. Response: Yes = achieved IOP target at last vist; No = did not achieve IOP target at last visit. |
| Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit | Mean horizontal cup to disc (cup/disc or C/D) ratio measured by slit lamp examination to assess progression of glaucoma; calculated as the ratio of the diameter of the depression (cup) to that of the optical nerve head (disc). Valid range: 0.1-1.0. Only data for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit | Mean vertical cup to disc (cup/disc or C/D) ratio measured by slit lamp examination to assess progression of glaucoma; calculated as the ratio of the diameter of the depression (cup) to that of the optical nerve head (disc). Valid range: 0.1-1.0; a high cup/disc ratio may imply glaucoma. Only data for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 6 | Month 6 | Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 12 | Month 12 | Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 18 | Month 18 | Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 24 | Month 24 | Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Area | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit | Rim area (millimeter \[mm\]2) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.500 to 1.900 mm2. Only the rim area for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Volume | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit | Rim volume (mm3) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.080 to 0.700 mm3. Only the rim volume for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape Measure | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit | Cup shape measure right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging . Valid range: -0.400 to -0.010. Only the cup shape measure for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL Thickness | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit | Mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in millimeters (mm) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.100 to 0.400 mm. Only the RNFL for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. |
| Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Baseline, Month 24 | Values of change in Aulhorn Stage measured by Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Aulhorn stages: no scotoma, Stage I (relative scotomas only), Stage II (absolute scotomas without connection to blind spot), Stage III (absolute scotomas with connection to blind spot), Stage IV (absolute scotomas more than 1 quadrant affected), and Stage V (temporal residual visual field only). If both eyes were treated with Xalantan® the value of right eye was analyzed; otherwise, only the assessment for the eye treated with study medication was used. |
| Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect | Baseline, Month 24 | Change in mean defect right and left eye; valid range: -30 - + 30 decibels (dB). Visual field defect categories: preperimetric glaucoma: ≥ -2 dB; mild damage: \< -2 dB and ≥ -3.3 dB; moderate damage: \< -3.3 dB and ≥ -4.6 dB; and severe damage: \< -4.6 dB. If both eyes were treated with Xalatan® , the value for the right eye was used; otherwise, only the mean defect value for the eye treated with study medication was used. |
| Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24 | Month 24 | Number of participants with Investigator assessments of the efficacy of Xalatan® treatment rated as: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=moderate, 4=insufficient. If study medication was stopped before 24 months, assessment was performed at the time of early termination. |
| Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 24 (or last visit) | Increase in Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio by at least 0.2 (Last Visit minus Baseline). |
| Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Optic Disc Hemorrhage | Month 24 (or last visit) | Participants with at least one post-baseline optic disc hemorrhage. |
| Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Rim Area, Rim Volume, or Mean Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness | Month 24 (or last visit) | Decrease in at least one Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) parameter by: Rim Area 0.2 millimeter (mm)2, Rim Volume 0.1 mm3, or mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) Thickness 0.1 mm, (Last Visit minus Baseline). |
| Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Visual Field Defect-Deterioration | Month 24 (or last visit) | Visual Field Deterioration rated as progressive by physician on at least one post-baseline visit; range: 1= improved 2= stable 3= progressive. If both eyes were treated with Xalatan® the value for the right eye was used; otherwise, only the assessment for the eye treated with study medication was used. |
| Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Aulhorn Stage | Month 24 (or last visit) | Increase in Aulhorn Stage by at least one stage (last visit minus baseline). Three different visual field defect categories defined using Aulhorn stage values 1-5: Aulhorn stage 1 = mild damage, Aulhorn stages 2, 3 = moderate damage, Aulhorn stages 4, 5 =severe damage. |
| Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Mean Defect | Month 24 (or last visit) | Decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 decibels (dB) (Last Visit minus Baseline). |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
In this prospective non-interventional study, participants did not actively participate in the study but were observed in general clinical practice by office-based ophthalmologists.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Xalatan® Once daily as 1 drop (topical application) in the evening | 902 |
| Total | 902 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 13 |
| Overall Study | Death | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 17 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 290 |
| Overall Study | Other | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Xalatan® |
|---|---|
| Age, Customized 18 to 44 years | 68 participants |
| Age, Customized < 18 years | 5 participants 13.1 |
| Age, Customized 45 to 64 years | 281 participants |
| Age, Customized >= 65 years | 528 participants |
| Age, Customized unspecified | 20 participants |
| Cup Shape Measure | -0.12 Cup shape measure STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.09 |
| Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio | 0.53 Ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22 |
| Optic Disc Hemorrhage | 21 Participants |
| Raw Intraocular Pressure | 18.14 mmHg STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.62 |
| Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness | 0.21 mm STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.07 |
| Rim Area | 1.26 mm^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 |
| Rim Volume | 0.30 mm^3 STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14 |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Female | 545 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Male | 347 participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Unspecified | 10 participants |
| Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | 0.56 Ratio STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 24 / 902 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 902 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio
Mean horizontal cup to disc (cup/disc or C/D) ratio measured by slit lamp examination to assess progression of glaucoma; calculated as the ratio of the diameter of the depression (cup) to that of the optical nerve head (disc). Valid range: 0.1-1.0. Only data for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit
Population: PP; N = number of participants with horizontal cup to disc ratio data at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline visit; change analyzed for participants with a non-missing response at baseline and observation. Last Visit: change in participants with a non-missing response at both baseline and at least one post-baseline visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 12 | 0.00 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 18 | 0.01 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 24 | 0.01 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 6 | -0.00 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio | Last Visit | 0.00 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio
Mean vertical cup to disc (cup/disc or C/D) ratio measured by slit lamp examination to assess progression of glaucoma; calculated as the ratio of the diameter of the depression (cup) to that of the optical nerve head (disc). Valid range: 0.1-1.0; a high cup/disc ratio may imply glaucoma. Only data for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit
Population: PP. N = number of participants with vertical cup to disc ratio at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline visit; change analyzed for participants with a non-missing response at baseline and observation. Last Visit: change in vertical cup to disc ratio in participants with a non-missing response at both baseline and at least one post-baseline visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 6 | 0.01 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 12 | 0.01 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 18 | 0.00 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | Month 24 | 0.01 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | Last Visit | 0.00 Ratio | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL Thickness
Mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in millimeters (mm) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.100 to 0.400 mm. Only the RNFL for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit
Population: PP; n = number of participants with a non-missing response at both visits (baseline and observation). Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for RNFL thickness.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL Thickness | Month 6 (n = 47) | -0.00 mm | Standard Deviation 0.03 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL Thickness | Month 12 (n = 67) | -0.01 mm | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL Thickness | Month 18 (n = 63) | -0.00 mm | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL Thickness | Month 24 (n = 69) | 0.00 mm | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL Thickness | Last Visit (n = 110) | 0.00 mm | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Area
Rim area (millimeter \[mm\]2) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.500 to 1.900 mm2. Only the rim area for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit
Population: PP; n = number of participants with a non-missing response at both visits (baseline and observation). Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for rim area.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Area | Month 6 (n = 47) | -0.01 mm2 | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Area | Month 12 (n = 65) | -0.01 mm2 | Standard Deviation 0.15 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Area | Month 18 (n = 63) | -0.02 mm2 | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Area | Month 24 (n = 70) | -0.03 mm2 | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Area | Last Visit (n = 111) | -0.02 mm2 | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Volume
Rim volume (mm3) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.080 to 0.700 mm3. Only the rim volume for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit
Population: PP; n = number of participants with a non-missing response at both visits (baseline and observation). Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for rim volume.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Volume | Month 6 (n = 46) | 0.01 mm3 | Standard Deviation 0.06 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Volume | Month 12 (n = 65) | 0.00 mm3 | Standard Deviation 0.06 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Volume | Month 18 (n = 62) | 0.01 mm3 | Standard Deviation 0.11 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Volume | Month 24 (n = 70) | -0.00 mm3 | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Volume | Last Visit (n = 112) | 0.00 mm3 | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape Measure
Cup shape measure right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging . Valid range: -0.400 to -0.010. Only the cup shape measure for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit
Population: PP; n = number of participants with a non-missing response at both visits (baseline and observation). Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for cup shape measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape Measure | Month 6 (n = 47) | -0.00 Cup shape measure | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape Measure | Month 12 (n = 69) | -0.00 Cup shape measure | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape Measure | Month 18 (n = 65) | -0.00 Cup shape measure | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape Measure | Month 24 (n = 71) | -0.01 Cup shape measure | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape Measure | Last Visit (n = 113) | -0.00 Cup shape measure | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit
Mean IOP values measured by applanation tonometry or noncontact method; valid range: 8-40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Only the IOP reading for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. Last visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value of IOP.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit
Population: Per protocol (PP) analysis set: all participants in the Full Analysis Set (at least 1 dose of Xalatan® and 1 post-baseline IOP measurement) who were treated for ≥18 months; had at least BL and 1 post-BL non-missing efficacy assessments for IOP at least 18 months apart; without ametropy at BL; and without additional glaucoma medication during study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit | Month 6 | -3.20 mmHg | Standard Deviation 3.11 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit | Month 12 | -3.12 mmHg | Standard Deviation 3.35 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit | Month 18 | -3.22 mmHg | Standard Deviation 3.52 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit | Month 24 | -3.43 mmHg | Standard Deviation 3.51 |
| Xalatan® | Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit | Last Visit | -3.34 mmHg | Standard Deviation 3.59 |
Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 12
Response: Yes = had IOP 24-hour pressure peak; No = did not have IOP 24-hour pressure peak.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: PP; N = number of participants with analyzable data at observation. The total number of participants by visit with an IOP peak response of 'Yes' differs from those with numerical values of IOP peaks since 1 of the 2 fields was populated for certain participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 12 | Yes | 6 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 12 | No | 114 Participants |
Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 24
Response: Yes = had IOP 24-hour pressure peak; No = did not have IOP 24-hour pressure peak.
Time frame: Month 24
Population: PP; N = number of participants with analyzable data at observation. The total number of participants by visit with an IOP peak response of 'Yes' differs from those with numerical values of IOP peaks since 1 of the 2 fields was populated for certain participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 24 | Yes | 6 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 24 | No | 101 Participants |
Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 12
Response: Yes = had an IOP 24-hour profile; No = did not have an IOP 24-hour profile.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: PP; N = number of participants with analyzable data at observation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 12 | Yes | 60 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 12 | No | 376 Participants |
Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 24
Response: Yes = had an IOP 24-hour profile; No = did not have an IOP 24-hour profile.
Time frame: Month 24
Population: PP; N = number of participants with analyzable data at observation.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 24 | Yes | 56 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 24 | No | 367 Participants |
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages
Values of change in Aulhorn Stage measured by Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Aulhorn stages: no scotoma, Stage I (relative scotomas only), Stage II (absolute scotomas without connection to blind spot), Stage III (absolute scotomas with connection to blind spot), Stage IV (absolute scotomas more than 1 quadrant affected), and Stage V (temporal residual visual field only). If both eyes were treated with Xalantan® the value of right eye was analyzed; otherwise, only the assessment for the eye treated with study medication was used.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 24
Population: PP; N = number of participants who provided Aulhorn stage values of 1 to 5 at both baseline and month 24 visits.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: -4 | 1 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: -3 | 2 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: -2 | 0 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: -1 | 6 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: 0 | 45 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: +1 | 6 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: +2 | 2 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: +3 | 0 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages | Change in Aulhorn Stage: +4 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect
Change in mean defect right and left eye; valid range: -30 - + 30 decibels (dB). Visual field defect categories: preperimetric glaucoma: ≥ -2 dB; mild damage: \< -2 dB and ≥ -3.3 dB; moderate damage: \< -3.3 dB and ≥ -4.6 dB; and severe damage: \< -4.6 dB. If both eyes were treated with Xalatan® , the value for the right eye was used; otherwise, only the mean defect value for the eye treated with study medication was used.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 24
Population: PP; N = number of participants who provided a Mean Defect value at both Baseline and Month 24 visits.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect | Change in mean defect: < 0dB | 60 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect | Change in mean defect: 0 to < 0.5dB | 31 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect | Change in mean defect: ≥ 0.5dB to < 1.5dB | 17 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect | Change in mean defect: ≥ 1.5dB to < 2.5dB | 12 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect | Change in mean defect: ≥ 2.5dB to < 3.5dB | 6 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect | Change in mean defect: ≥ 3.5dB to < 4.5dB | 5 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect | Change in mean defect: ≥ 4.5dB | 7 Participants |
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Aulhorn Stage
Increase in Aulhorn Stage by at least one stage (last visit minus baseline). Three different visual field defect categories defined using Aulhorn stage values 1-5: Aulhorn stage 1 = mild damage, Aulhorn stages 2, 3 = moderate damage, Aulhorn stages 4, 5 =severe damage.
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; results based on participants with a value for Aulhorn Stage at both Baseline and at least one post-baseline visit. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Aulhorn Stage | 20 Participants |
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio
Increase in Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio by at least 0.2 (Last Visit minus Baseline).
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; results based on participants with both a Baseline and at least one post-baseline visit. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio | 34 Participants |
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Mean Defect
Decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 decibels (dB) (Last Visit minus Baseline).
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; results based on participants with a value for mean defect at both Baseline and at least one post-baseline visit. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Mean Defect | 28 Participants |
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Optic Disc Hemorrhage
Participants with at least one post-baseline optic disc hemorrhage.
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; results based on participants with at least one post-baseline assessment of optic disc hemorrhage. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Optic Disc Hemorrhage | 16 Particpants |
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Rim Area, Rim Volume, or Mean Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness
Decrease in at least one Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) parameter by: Rim Area 0.2 millimeter (mm)2, Rim Volume 0.1 mm3, or mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) Thickness 0.1 mm, (Last Visit minus Baseline).
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; results based on participants with a value of the variable in question at both Baseline and at least one post-baseline visit. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Rim Area, Rim Volume, or Mean Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness | 12 Participants |
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Visual Field Defect-Deterioration
Visual Field Deterioration rated as progressive by physician on at least one post-baseline visit; range: 1= improved 2= stable 3= progressive. If both eyes were treated with Xalatan® the value for the right eye was used; otherwise, only the assessment for the eye treated with study medication was used.
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; results based on participants with at least one post-baseline assessment of change in visual field defect. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Visual Field Defect-Deterioration | 51 Participants |
Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24
Number of participants with Investigator assessments of the efficacy of Xalatan® treatment rated as: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=moderate, 4=insufficient. If study medication was stopped before 24 months, assessment was performed at the time of early termination.
Time frame: Month 24
Population: PP; N = number of participants with a non-missing response at Month 24 visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24 | Very Good | 269 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24 | Good | 147 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24 | Moderate | 24 Participants |
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24 | Insufficient | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 12
Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Month 12
Population: PP; N = number of participants who indicated whether or not they had an optic disc hemorrhage at the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 12 | 6 Participants |
Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 18
Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Month 18
Population: PP; N = number of participants who indicated whether or not they had an optic disc hemorrhage at the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 18 | 9 Participants |
Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 24
Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Month 24
Population: PP; N = number of participants who indicated whether or not they had an optic disc hemorrhage at the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 24 | 5 Participants |
Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 6
Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Time frame: Month 6
Population: PP; N = number of participants who indicated whether or not they had an optic disc hemorrhage at the given visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 6 | 7 Participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Target at Last Visit
Percentage of participants who achieved their IOP target set at baseline. Response: Yes = achieved IOP target at last vist; No = did not achieve IOP target at last visit.
Time frame: Month 24, (or last visit)
Population: PP; n = number of subjects in the Per Protocol Analysis Set with a non-missing response at Last Visit. Last visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value of IOP.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Target at Last Visit | Yes (n = 264) | 56.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Xalatan® | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Target at Last Visit | No (n = 62) | 13.2 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Overall Progression of Glaucoma Damage
Overall progression defined as at least 1 of the 6 individual progression of glaucoma damage measures met: increase in horizontal cup to disc ratio and/or vertical cup to disc ratio by at least 0.2; at least 1 post Baseline (BL) optic-disc hemorrhage; decreased rim area (0.2 mm2), rim volume (0.1 mm3), mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)(0.1 mm), progressive visual field deterioration, increase in Aulhorn stage (by at least 1 stage), and/or decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 decibels \[dB\])
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; to be included in the percentage, participants must have provided a response for at least one of the six individual progression of glaucoma damage measures. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Percentage of Participants With Overall Progression of Glaucoma Damage | 25.8 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Progression of Optic Disc Excavation
Progression (Last Visit minus Baseline) defined as increase in horizontal cup to disc ratio and/or vertical cup to disc ratio by at least 0.2, and/or decrease in at least 1 of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) parameters (deterioration of rim area 0.2 mm2; deterioration of rim volume 0.1 mm3 deterioration or mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness 0.1 mm).
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; to be included in the percentage, participants must have provided a response for at least one of following events: increase in horizontal or vertical cup to disc ratio, or decrease in rim area, rim volume, or mean RNFL thickness. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Percentage of Participants With Progression of Optic Disc Excavation | 11.3 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Progression of Visual Field
Progression defined as visual field deterioration rated progressive by physician on at least 1 post-baseline visit, and increase in Aulhorn stage (by at least 1 stage) and/or decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 dB (Last Visit minus Baseline).
Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)
Population: PP; to be included in the percentage, participants must have had Visual Field Deterioration rated as progressive by the physician on at least 1 post-baseline visit, and at least one measure of increase in Aulhorn Stage by at least 1 stage, and decrease in Mean Defect by at least 2 dB (last visit minus baseline).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Xalatan® | Percentage of Participants With Progression of Visual Field | 3.1 Percentage of Participants |