Skip to content

Observational Study of the Long-term Effect of Latanoprost in Normal Tension Glaucoma

Prospective, Observational Study to Investigate the Long-term Effect of Xalatan® on Intraocular Pressure (IOP) and on Maintenance of Visual Field in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma (NTG)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01209624
Acronym
NTG-X-PERT
Enrollment
902
Registered
2010-09-27
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2021-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Tension Glaucoma

Keywords

prospective, non-interventional, observational, multi-center, long-term

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of latanoprost monotherapy in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) using a prospective, observational design. Visits were scheduled at 6-month intervals for 24 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP), optic nerve head findings, visual field status, and adverse events were recorded.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

patients with normal-tension glaucoma

Exclusion criteria

none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Overall Progression of Glaucoma DamageMonth 24 (or last visit)Overall progression defined as at least 1 of the 6 individual progression of glaucoma damage measures met: increase in horizontal cup to disc ratio and/or vertical cup to disc ratio by at least 0.2; at least 1 post Baseline (BL) optic-disc hemorrhage; decreased rim area (0.2 mm2), rim volume (0.1 mm3), mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)(0.1 mm), progressive visual field deterioration, increase in Aulhorn stage (by at least 1 stage), and/or decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 decibels \[dB\])
Percentage of Participants With Progression of Optic Disc ExcavationMonth 24 (or last visit)Progression (Last Visit minus Baseline) defined as increase in horizontal cup to disc ratio and/or vertical cup to disc ratio by at least 0.2, and/or decrease in at least 1 of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) parameters (deterioration of rim area 0.2 mm2; deterioration of rim volume 0.1 mm3 deterioration or mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness 0.1 mm).
Percentage of Participants With Progression of Visual FieldMonth 24 (or last visit)Progression defined as visual field deterioration rated progressive by physician on at least 1 post-baseline visit, and increase in Aulhorn stage (by at least 1 stage) and/or decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 dB (Last Visit minus Baseline).
Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by VisitBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last VisitMean IOP values measured by applanation tonometry or noncontact method; valid range: 8-40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Only the IOP reading for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. Last visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value of IOP.
Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 12Month 12Response: Yes = had an IOP 24-hour profile; No = did not have an IOP 24-hour profile.
Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 24Month 24Response: Yes = had an IOP 24-hour profile; No = did not have an IOP 24-hour profile.
Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 12Month 12Response: Yes = had IOP 24-hour pressure peak; No = did not have IOP 24-hour pressure peak.
Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 24Month 24Response: Yes = had IOP 24-hour pressure peak; No = did not have IOP 24-hour pressure peak.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Target at Last VisitMonth 24, (or last visit)Percentage of participants who achieved their IOP target set at baseline. Response: Yes = achieved IOP target at last vist; No = did not achieve IOP target at last visit.
Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc RatioBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last VisitMean horizontal cup to disc (cup/disc or C/D) ratio measured by slit lamp examination to assess progression of glaucoma; calculated as the ratio of the diameter of the depression (cup) to that of the optical nerve head (disc). Valid range: 0.1-1.0. Only data for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc RatioBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last VisitMean vertical cup to disc (cup/disc or C/D) ratio measured by slit lamp examination to assess progression of glaucoma; calculated as the ratio of the diameter of the depression (cup) to that of the optical nerve head (disc). Valid range: 0.1-1.0; a high cup/disc ratio may imply glaucoma. Only data for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 6Month 6Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 12Month 12Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 18Month 18Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 24Month 24Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim AreaBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last VisitRim area (millimeter \[mm\]2) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.500 to 1.900 mm2. Only the rim area for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim VolumeBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last VisitRim volume (mm3) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.080 to 0.700 mm3. Only the rim volume for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape MeasureBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last VisitCup shape measure right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging . Valid range: -0.400 to -0.010. Only the cup shape measure for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL ThicknessBaseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last VisitMean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in millimeters (mm) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.100 to 0.400 mm. Only the RNFL for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesBaseline, Month 24Values of change in Aulhorn Stage measured by Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Aulhorn stages: no scotoma, Stage I (relative scotomas only), Stage II (absolute scotomas without connection to blind spot), Stage III (absolute scotomas with connection to blind spot), Stage IV (absolute scotomas more than 1 quadrant affected), and Stage V (temporal residual visual field only). If both eyes were treated with Xalantan® the value of right eye was analyzed; otherwise, only the assessment for the eye treated with study medication was used.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field DefectBaseline, Month 24Change in mean defect right and left eye; valid range: -30 - + 30 decibels (dB). Visual field defect categories: preperimetric glaucoma: ≥ -2 dB; mild damage: \< -2 dB and ≥ -3.3 dB; moderate damage: \< -3.3 dB and ≥ -4.6 dB; and severe damage: \< -4.6 dB. If both eyes were treated with Xalatan® , the value for the right eye was used; otherwise, only the mean defect value for the eye treated with study medication was used.
Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24Month 24Number of participants with Investigator assessments of the efficacy of Xalatan® treatment rated as: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=moderate, 4=insufficient. If study medication was stopped before 24 months, assessment was performed at the time of early termination.
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc RatioMonth 24 (or last visit)Increase in Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio by at least 0.2 (Last Visit minus Baseline).
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Optic Disc HemorrhageMonth 24 (or last visit)Participants with at least one post-baseline optic disc hemorrhage.
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Rim Area, Rim Volume, or Mean Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) ThicknessMonth 24 (or last visit)Decrease in at least one Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) parameter by: Rim Area 0.2 millimeter (mm)2, Rim Volume 0.1 mm3, or mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) Thickness 0.1 mm, (Last Visit minus Baseline).
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Visual Field Defect-DeteriorationMonth 24 (or last visit)Visual Field Deterioration rated as progressive by physician on at least one post-baseline visit; range: 1= improved 2= stable 3= progressive. If both eyes were treated with Xalatan® the value for the right eye was used; otherwise, only the assessment for the eye treated with study medication was used.
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Aulhorn StageMonth 24 (or last visit)Increase in Aulhorn Stage by at least one stage (last visit minus baseline). Three different visual field defect categories defined using Aulhorn stage values 1-5: Aulhorn stage 1 = mild damage, Aulhorn stages 2, 3 = moderate damage, Aulhorn stages 4, 5 =severe damage.
Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Mean DefectMonth 24 (or last visit)Decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 decibels (dB) (Last Visit minus Baseline).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In this prospective non-interventional study, participants did not actively participate in the study but were observed in general clinical practice by office-based ophthalmologists.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Xalatan®
Once daily as 1 drop (topical application) in the evening
902
Total902

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event13
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy17
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up290
Overall StudyOther4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicXalatan®
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
68 participants
Age, Customized
< 18 years
5 participants
13.1
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
281 participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
528 participants
Age, Customized
unspecified
20 participants
Cup Shape Measure-0.12 Cup shape measure
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.09
Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio0.53 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22
Optic Disc Hemorrhage21 Participants
Raw Intraocular Pressure18.14 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.62
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness0.21 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.07
Rim Area1.26 mm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3
Rim Volume0.30 mm^3
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
545 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
347 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unspecified
10 participants
Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio0.56 Ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.22

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 902
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 902

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio

Mean horizontal cup to disc (cup/disc or C/D) ratio measured by slit lamp examination to assess progression of glaucoma; calculated as the ratio of the diameter of the depression (cup) to that of the optical nerve head (disc). Valid range: 0.1-1.0. Only data for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit

Population: PP; N = number of participants with horizontal cup to disc ratio data at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline visit; change analyzed for participants with a non-missing response at baseline and observation. Last Visit: change in participants with a non-missing response at both baseline and at least one post-baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc RatioMonth 120.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc RatioMonth 180.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc RatioMonth 240.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc RatioMonth 6-0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.07
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Horizontal Cup to Disc RatioLast Visit0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
Primary

Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio

Mean vertical cup to disc (cup/disc or C/D) ratio measured by slit lamp examination to assess progression of glaucoma; calculated as the ratio of the diameter of the depression (cup) to that of the optical nerve head (disc). Valid range: 0.1-1.0; a high cup/disc ratio may imply glaucoma. Only data for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit

Population: PP. N = number of participants with vertical cup to disc ratio at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline visit; change analyzed for participants with a non-missing response at baseline and observation. Last Visit: change in vertical cup to disc ratio in participants with a non-missing response at both baseline and at least one post-baseline visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc RatioMonth 60.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.08
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc RatioMonth 120.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.1
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc RatioMonth 180.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc RatioMonth 240.01 RatioStandard Deviation 0.11
Xalatan®Change From Baseline by Visit in Optic Disc Excavation: Vertical Cup to Disc RatioLast Visit0.00 RatioStandard Deviation 0.12
Primary

Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL Thickness

Mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in millimeters (mm) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.100 to 0.400 mm. Only the RNFL for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit

Population: PP; n = number of participants with a non-missing response at both visits (baseline and observation). Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for RNFL thickness.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL ThicknessMonth 6 (n = 47)-0.00 mmStandard Deviation 0.03
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL ThicknessMonth 12 (n = 67)-0.01 mmStandard Deviation 0.04
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL ThicknessMonth 18 (n = 63)-0.00 mmStandard Deviation 0.05
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL ThicknessMonth 24 (n = 69)0.00 mmStandard Deviation 0.04
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Mean RNFL ThicknessLast Visit (n = 110)0.00 mmStandard Deviation 0.05
Primary

Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Area

Rim area (millimeter \[mm\]2) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.500 to 1.900 mm2. Only the rim area for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit

Population: PP; n = number of participants with a non-missing response at both visits (baseline and observation). Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for rim area.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim AreaMonth 6 (n = 47)-0.01 mm2Standard Deviation 0.11
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim AreaMonth 12 (n = 65)-0.01 mm2Standard Deviation 0.15
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim AreaMonth 18 (n = 63)-0.02 mm2Standard Deviation 0.17
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim AreaMonth 24 (n = 70)-0.03 mm2Standard Deviation 0.16
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim AreaLast Visit (n = 111)-0.02 mm2Standard Deviation 0.16
Primary

Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim Volume

Rim volume (mm3) right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging. Valid range: 0.080 to 0.700 mm3. Only the rim volume for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit

Population: PP; n = number of participants with a non-missing response at both visits (baseline and observation). Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for rim volume.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim VolumeMonth 6 (n = 46)0.01 mm3Standard Deviation 0.06
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim VolumeMonth 12 (n = 65)0.00 mm3Standard Deviation 0.06
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim VolumeMonth 18 (n = 62)0.01 mm3Standard Deviation 0.11
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim VolumeMonth 24 (n = 70)-0.00 mm3Standard Deviation 0.05
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) Parameters: Rim VolumeLast Visit (n = 112)0.00 mm3Standard Deviation 0.08
Primary

Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape Measure

Cup shape measure right and left eye assessed by HRT imaging . Valid range: -0.400 to -0.010. Only the cup shape measure for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit

Population: PP; n = number of participants with a non-missing response at both visits (baseline and observation). Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for cup shape measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape MeasureMonth 6 (n = 47)-0.00 Cup shape measureStandard Deviation 0.02
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape MeasureMonth 12 (n = 69)-0.00 Cup shape measureStandard Deviation 0.04
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape MeasureMonth 18 (n = 65)-0.00 Cup shape measureStandard Deviation 0.05
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape MeasureMonth 24 (n = 71)-0.01 Cup shape measureStandard Deviation 0.04
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Parameters: Cup Shape MeasureLast Visit (n = 113)-0.00 Cup shape measureStandard Deviation 0.05
Primary

Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit

Mean IOP values measured by applanation tonometry or noncontact method; valid range: 8-40 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Only the IOP reading for the eye treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed. Last visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value of IOP.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Last Visit

Population: Per protocol (PP) analysis set: all participants in the Full Analysis Set (at least 1 dose of Xalatan® and 1 post-baseline IOP measurement) who were treated for ≥18 months; had at least BL and 1 post-BL non-missing efficacy assessments for IOP at least 18 months apart; without ametropy at BL; and without additional glaucoma medication during study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by VisitMonth 6-3.20 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.11
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by VisitMonth 12-3.12 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.35
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by VisitMonth 18-3.22 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.52
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by VisitMonth 24-3.43 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.51
Xalatan®Change From Baseline in Raw Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by VisitLast Visit-3.34 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.59
Primary

Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 12

Response: Yes = had IOP 24-hour pressure peak; No = did not have IOP 24-hour pressure peak.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: PP; N = number of participants with analyzable data at observation. The total number of participants by visit with an IOP peak response of 'Yes' differs from those with numerical values of IOP peaks since 1 of the 2 fields was populated for certain participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 12Yes6 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 12No114 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 24

Response: Yes = had IOP 24-hour pressure peak; No = did not have IOP 24-hour pressure peak.

Time frame: Month 24

Population: PP; N = number of participants with analyzable data at observation. The total number of participants by visit with an IOP peak response of 'Yes' differs from those with numerical values of IOP peaks since 1 of the 2 fields was populated for certain participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 24Yes6 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants Per Visit With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) 24-Hour Pressure Peaks: Month 24No101 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 12

Response: Yes = had an IOP 24-hour profile; No = did not have an IOP 24-hour profile.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: PP; N = number of participants with analyzable data at observation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 12Yes60 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 12No376 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 24

Response: Yes = had an IOP 24-hour profile; No = did not have an IOP 24-hour profile.

Time frame: Month 24

Population: PP; N = number of participants with analyzable data at observation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 24Yes56 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With a 24-Hour Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Profile: Month 24No367 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn Stages

Values of change in Aulhorn Stage measured by Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Aulhorn stages: no scotoma, Stage I (relative scotomas only), Stage II (absolute scotomas without connection to blind spot), Stage III (absolute scotomas with connection to blind spot), Stage IV (absolute scotomas more than 1 quadrant affected), and Stage V (temporal residual visual field only). If both eyes were treated with Xalantan® the value of right eye was analyzed; otherwise, only the assessment for the eye treated with study medication was used.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 24

Population: PP; N = number of participants who provided Aulhorn stage values of 1 to 5 at both baseline and month 24 visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: -41 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: -32 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: -20 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: -16 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: 045 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: +16 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: +22 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: +30 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Aulhorn StagesChange in Aulhorn Stage: +40 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field Defect

Change in mean defect right and left eye; valid range: -30 - + 30 decibels (dB). Visual field defect categories: preperimetric glaucoma: ≥ -2 dB; mild damage: \< -2 dB and ≥ -3.3 dB; moderate damage: \< -3.3 dB and ≥ -4.6 dB; and severe damage: \< -4.6 dB. If both eyes were treated with Xalatan® , the value for the right eye was used; otherwise, only the mean defect value for the eye treated with study medication was used.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 24

Population: PP; N = number of participants who provided a Mean Defect value at both Baseline and Month 24 visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field DefectChange in mean defect: < 0dB60 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field DefectChange in mean defect: 0 to < 0.5dB31 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field DefectChange in mean defect: ≥ 0.5dB to < 1.5dB17 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field DefectChange in mean defect: ≥ 1.5dB to < 2.5dB12 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field DefectChange in mean defect: ≥ 2.5dB to < 3.5dB6 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field DefectChange in mean defect: ≥ 3.5dB to < 4.5dB5 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Month 24 in Visual Field DefectChange in mean defect: ≥ 4.5dB7 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Aulhorn Stage

Increase in Aulhorn Stage by at least one stage (last visit minus baseline). Three different visual field defect categories defined using Aulhorn stage values 1-5: Aulhorn stage 1 = mild damage, Aulhorn stages 2, 3 = moderate damage, Aulhorn stages 4, 5 =severe damage.

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; results based on participants with a value for Aulhorn Stage at both Baseline and at least one post-baseline visit. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Aulhorn Stage20 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio

Increase in Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio by at least 0.2 (Last Visit minus Baseline).

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; results based on participants with both a Baseline and at least one post-baseline visit. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Horizontal Cup to Disc Ratio and/or Vertical Cup to Disc Ratio34 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Mean Defect

Decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 decibels (dB) (Last Visit minus Baseline).

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; results based on participants with a value for mean defect at both Baseline and at least one post-baseline visit. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Mean Defect28 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Optic Disc Hemorrhage

Participants with at least one post-baseline optic disc hemorrhage.

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; results based on participants with at least one post-baseline assessment of optic disc hemorrhage. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Optic Disc Hemorrhage16 Particpants
Primary

Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Rim Area, Rim Volume, or Mean Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness

Decrease in at least one Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) parameter by: Rim Area 0.2 millimeter (mm)2, Rim Volume 0.1 mm3, or mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) Thickness 0.1 mm, (Last Visit minus Baseline).

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; results based on participants with a value of the variable in question at both Baseline and at least one post-baseline visit. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Rim Area, Rim Volume, or Mean Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) Thickness12 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Visual Field Defect-Deterioration

Visual Field Deterioration rated as progressive by physician on at least one post-baseline visit; range: 1= improved 2= stable 3= progressive. If both eyes were treated with Xalatan® the value for the right eye was used; otherwise, only the assessment for the eye treated with study medication was used.

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; results based on participants with at least one post-baseline assessment of change in visual field defect. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Individual Progression of Glaucoma Damage: Visual Field Defect-Deterioration51 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24

Number of participants with Investigator assessments of the efficacy of Xalatan® treatment rated as: 1=very good, 2=good, 3=moderate, 4=insufficient. If study medication was stopped before 24 months, assessment was performed at the time of early termination.

Time frame: Month 24

Population: PP; N = number of participants with a non-missing response at Month 24 visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24Very Good269 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24Good147 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24Moderate24 Participants
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Investigator Assessments of Efficacy at Month 24Insufficient2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 12

Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: PP; N = number of participants who indicated whether or not they had an optic disc hemorrhage at the given visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 126 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 18

Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Month 18

Population: PP; N = number of participants who indicated whether or not they had an optic disc hemorrhage at the given visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 189 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 24

Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Month 24

Population: PP; N = number of participants who indicated whether or not they had an optic disc hemorrhage at the given visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 245 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 6

Presence of optic disc hemorrhages assessed by slip lamp examination. Only data for eye were treated with Xalatan® was used; if both eyes were treated, the value of the right eye was analyzed.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: PP; N = number of participants who indicated whether or not they had an optic disc hemorrhage at the given visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Number of Participants With Optic Disc Hemorrhage by Visit: Month 67 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Target at Last Visit

Percentage of participants who achieved their IOP target set at baseline. Response: Yes = achieved IOP target at last vist; No = did not achieve IOP target at last visit.

Time frame: Month 24, (or last visit)

Population: PP; n = number of subjects in the Per Protocol Analysis Set with a non-missing response at Last Visit. Last visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value of IOP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Target at Last VisitYes (n = 264)56.3 Percentage of Participants
Xalatan®Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Target at Last VisitNo (n = 62)13.2 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Progression of Glaucoma Damage

Overall progression defined as at least 1 of the 6 individual progression of glaucoma damage measures met: increase in horizontal cup to disc ratio and/or vertical cup to disc ratio by at least 0.2; at least 1 post Baseline (BL) optic-disc hemorrhage; decreased rim area (0.2 mm2), rim volume (0.1 mm3), mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)(0.1 mm), progressive visual field deterioration, increase in Aulhorn stage (by at least 1 stage), and/or decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 decibels \[dB\])

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; to be included in the percentage, participants must have provided a response for at least one of the six individual progression of glaucoma damage measures. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Percentage of Participants With Overall Progression of Glaucoma Damage25.8 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Progression of Optic Disc Excavation

Progression (Last Visit minus Baseline) defined as increase in horizontal cup to disc ratio and/or vertical cup to disc ratio by at least 0.2, and/or decrease in at least 1 of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) parameters (deterioration of rim area 0.2 mm2; deterioration of rim volume 0.1 mm3 deterioration or mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness 0.1 mm).

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; to be included in the percentage, participants must have provided a response for at least one of following events: increase in horizontal or vertical cup to disc ratio, or decrease in rim area, rim volume, or mean RNFL thickness. Last Visit = last post-baseline visit at which participant provides a value for the relevant outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Percentage of Participants With Progression of Optic Disc Excavation11.3 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Progression of Visual Field

Progression defined as visual field deterioration rated progressive by physician on at least 1 post-baseline visit, and increase in Aulhorn stage (by at least 1 stage) and/or decrease in mean defect by at least 2.5 dB (Last Visit minus Baseline).

Time frame: Month 24 (or last visit)

Population: PP; to be included in the percentage, participants must have had Visual Field Deterioration rated as progressive by the physician on at least 1 post-baseline visit, and at least one measure of increase in Aulhorn Stage by at least 1 stage, and decrease in Mean Defect by at least 2 dB (last visit minus baseline).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Xalatan®Percentage of Participants With Progression of Visual Field3.1 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026