Habituation, Pediatric Obesity
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this center grant is to translate basic behavioral science on habituation theory into clinical intervention using a vertical hierarchical approach from laboratory studies to field studies to the clinical intervention to improve weight loss outcomes in pediatric obesity treatment.
Detailed description
Habituation is one factor that may be related to excess energy intake. Research has shown that the rate of habituation is inversely related to the amount of food consumed and slower habituation may be a factor that is relevant to obesity, as overweight youth and adults habituate slower and consume more energy than their peers. Habituation is a basic form of learning that is observed in many response systems. We believe that habituation is an important process that mediates food regulation during a meal and across meals. However, there has been no research in children that translates basic research on habituation to food into clinical interventions for pediatric obesity. In the first phase, we will implement a series of laboratory studies to assess the effects of stimulus specificity and variety and the simultaneous reduction of variety for high energy density foods on short (within meal) and long-term (across meal) habituation. The second phase is designed to implement a series of field studies that will extend basic research from the first phase as well as define the optimal interval for reducing variety to facilitate long-term habituation to high energy density foods in the natural environment. The third phase is designed to develop and pilot test a family-based behavioral intervention for children that incorporates findings from phase2 into a clinical intervention.
Interventions
The intervention will consist of our traditional family based weight control intervention with elements of reducing variety of high energy dense foods for the variety group.
The intervention will consist of our traditional family based weight control intervention.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Children ages 8-12 years of age * At or above 85th BMI percentile * Children must eat almost all meals with the exception of school lunch with the family. * Overweight parent
Exclusion criteria
* Children who do not like the study foods, who are allergic to the study foods or who are on special diets and cannot consume the study foods. * Families with children with a co-morbid psychiatric diagnosis or parents who are depressed, have schizophrenia, substance abuse or a history of eating disorders. * The parent and child must not have any physical restrictions that would preclude them from making the requisite behavioral changes. * Children must be able to read at a 3rd grade reading level and must be able to demonstrate the ability to keep dietary and activity records in a stimulated interview.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Child Body Composition | Baseline to 6 months | Child percent overweight difference from baseline to 6 month. The formula used to derive weight loss percentage was weight lost at 6 months divided by starting weight, multiplied by 100. |
| Change Parent Body Composition | Baseline to 6 months | Parent Body Mass Index (kg/m\^2) difference from baseline to 6 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Baseline to 6 months | Energy intake was calculated for parents and children as the different from baseline to six months of calories consumed. The first pilot used the calories generated from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) report however the second pilot used calories from 24 hour recalls based on the Center of Disease Control data base or food labels. |
| Change in Parent Delay Discounting | Baseline to 6 months | Kirby, small, medium and large reinforcers. The Kirby monetary choice questionnaire will be used to measure implusivity in parents and children. Participants are presented with a set of 27 choices between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. An estimate of the participant's discounting rate parameter can be made from the pattern of choices and participants who discount the value of the delayed rewards more steeply are said to be more impulsive as measured in K-values. (0.25 impulsive to 0.00016 not impulsive) |
| Change in Child Delay Discounting | Baseline to 6 months | Kirby, small, medium and large reinforcers. The Kirby monetary choice questionnaire will be used to measure impulsivity in parents and children. Participants are presented with a set of 27 choices between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. An estimate of the participant's discounting rate parameter can be made from the pattern of choices and participants who discount the value of the delayed rewards more steeply are said to be more impulsive as measured in higher K-values (0.25 vs 0.00016). |
| Changes in Variety Measures | Baseline to 6 months | Variety of high energy density foods (RED) and low energy density foods (GREEN) were calculated from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) for pilot 1 and 24 hour recalls (24-HR) for pilot 2. High energy dense food or Red foods are low in nutrient density. Most Red foods come from the Fats, Oils and Sweets groups and are to be used sparingly. Modified foods from the Fats, Oils, and Sweets group are still considered to be Red foods, even if their energy level is low. These foods contribute little nutrients to the diet and compete for consumption of healthier foods. Green foods are high in nutrient density and low in energy density. Most Green foods come from the fruit and vegetable groups. Serving sizes were based off the serving sizes used in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) common serving sizes. Coding was based on the serving sizes of the specified food items and used to calculate the changes from baseline to six months. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment in the Western New York area targeted obese and overweight families through pediatric offices and the local community during 2011-2013.
Pre-assignment details
Interested eligible families are oriented, consented, screened, and offered to start the study. There were 94 participants (47 parents and 47 children) eligible to start and 4 participants (2 parents and 2 children) declined before starting the study.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Experimental Group Traditional family based weight control program with components from habituation theory incorporated into the treatment.
Habituation theory and Pediatric Obesity: The intervention will consist of our traditional family based weight control intervention with elements of habituation theory included for the experimental group. | 46 |
| Nutrition Education Control Traditional family based weight control program, without components of habituation theory incorporated.
Habituation theory and Pediatric Obesity: The intervention will consist of our traditional family based weight control intervention with elements of habituation theory included for the experimental group. | 44 |
| Total | 90 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Experimental Group | Nutrition Education Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized Child Age n=23 Experimental n=22 Control | 10.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 | 10.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 | 10.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 |
| Age, Customized Parent Age n=23 Experimental, n=22 Control | 43.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 | 43.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 | 43.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 |
| Child percent overweight (%) | 77.1 Percent overweight based on BMI charts STANDARD_DEVIATION 40 | 71.8 Percent overweight based on BMI charts STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.2 | 74.5 Percent overweight based on BMI charts STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.6 |
| Child z-Body Mass Index | 2.2 [1] z-BMI see description STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 | 2.2 [1] z-BMI see description STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 | 2.2 [1] z-BMI see description STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 46 Participants | 42 Participants | 88 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Parent Body Mass Index (kg/m^2) | 38.9 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 | 37.2 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 | 38.1 kg/m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 |
| Parent Weight (lb.) | 236.8 pounds STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.7 | 232.5 pounds STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.2 | 234.7 pounds STANDARD_DEVIATION 47 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 6 Participants | 13 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 4 Participants | 3 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 34 Participants | 28 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 46 participants | 44 participants | 90 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 35 Participants | 33 Participants | 68 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 22 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 46 | 0 / 44 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 46 | 0 / 44 |
Outcome results
Change of Child Body Composition
Child percent overweight difference from baseline to 6 month. The formula used to derive weight loss percentage was weight lost at 6 months divided by starting weight, multiplied by 100.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Children that completed the reported measures. Two children did not complete the body composition measures from the experimental groups and four children from the control group did not complete this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Change of Child Body Composition | -16.1 percentage of weight | Standard Error 13.5 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change of Child Body Composition | -13.3 percentage of weight | Standard Error 9.6 |
Change Parent Body Composition
Parent Body Mass Index (kg/m\^2) difference from baseline to 6 months
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Parents
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Change Parent Body Composition | -3.6 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change Parent Body Composition | -3.1 kg/m^2 | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
Change in Child Delay Discounting
Kirby, small, medium and large reinforcers. The Kirby monetary choice questionnaire will be used to measure impulsivity in parents and children. Participants are presented with a set of 27 choices between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. An estimate of the participant's discounting rate parameter can be made from the pattern of choices and participants who discount the value of the delayed rewards more steeply are said to be more impulsive as measured in higher K-values (0.25 vs 0.00016).
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Children that completed this measure at pre and post time points. Eleven children did not complete the post measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Change in Child Delay Discounting | Small reinforcer | 0.017 k value | Standard Deviation 0.071 |
| Experimental Group | Change in Child Delay Discounting | Medium reinforcer | 0.030 k value | Standard Deviation 0.073 |
| Experimental Group | Change in Child Delay Discounting | Large reinforcer | 0.038 k value | Standard Deviation 0.082 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Child Delay Discounting | Small reinforcer | 0.006 k value | Standard Deviation 0.06 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Child Delay Discounting | Medium reinforcer | 0.025 k value | Standard Deviation 0.095 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Child Delay Discounting | Large reinforcer | 0.021 k value | Standard Deviation 0.06 |
Change in Dietary Intake of Calories
Energy intake was calculated for parents and children as the different from baseline to six months of calories consumed. The first pilot used the calories generated from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) report however the second pilot used calories from 24 hour recalls based on the Center of Disease Control data base or food labels.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Parents and children, three families did not complete the dietary measures.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Child change in calorie intake from FFQ | -716.5 calories | Standard Deviation 1046.6 |
| Experimental Group | Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Parent change in calorie intake from FFQ | -916.0 calories | Standard Deviation 719.8 |
| Experimental Group | Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Parent change in calorie intake from 24 hr recall | -690.4 calories | Standard Deviation 488.3 |
| Experimental Group | Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Child change in calorie intake from 24 hr recall | -432.4 calories | Standard Deviation 396.1 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Parent change in calorie intake from 24 hr recall | -501.9 calories | Standard Deviation 488 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Child change in calorie intake from FFQ | -730.6 calories | Standard Deviation 765.6 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Parent change in calorie intake from FFQ | -962.2 calories | Standard Deviation 764.6 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Dietary Intake of Calories | Child change in calorie intake from 24 hr recall | -230.3 calories | Standard Deviation 501.5 |
Change in Parent Delay Discounting
Kirby, small, medium and large reinforcers. The Kirby monetary choice questionnaire will be used to measure implusivity in parents and children. Participants are presented with a set of 27 choices between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. An estimate of the participant's discounting rate parameter can be made from the pattern of choices and participants who discount the value of the delayed rewards more steeply are said to be more impulsive as measured in K-values. (0.25 impulsive to 0.00016 not impulsive)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Parents that completed this measure pre and post. Ten parents did not complete this post measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Change in Parent Delay Discounting | Small reinforcer | 0.003 k value | Standard Deviation 0.023 |
| Experimental Group | Change in Parent Delay Discounting | Medium reinforcer | -0.005 k value | Standard Deviation 0.033 |
| Experimental Group | Change in Parent Delay Discounting | Large reinforcer | -0.003 k value | Standard Deviation 0.017 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Parent Delay Discounting | Small reinforcer | 0.032 k value | Standard Deviation 0.067 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Parent Delay Discounting | Medium reinforcer | 0.020 k value | Standard Deviation 0.059 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Change in Parent Delay Discounting | Large reinforcer | 0.024 k value | Standard Deviation 0.069 |
Changes in Variety Measures
Variety of high energy density foods (RED) and low energy density foods (GREEN) were calculated from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) for pilot 1 and 24 hour recalls (24-HR) for pilot 2. High energy dense food or Red foods are low in nutrient density. Most Red foods come from the Fats, Oils and Sweets groups and are to be used sparingly. Modified foods from the Fats, Oils, and Sweets group are still considered to be Red foods, even if their energy level is low. These foods contribute little nutrients to the diet and compete for consumption of healthier foods. Green foods are high in nutrient density and low in energy density. Most Green foods come from the fruit and vegetable groups. Serving sizes were based off the serving sizes used in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) common serving sizes. Coding was based on the serving sizes of the specified food items and used to calculate the changes from baseline to six months.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Parents and children were measured, three families did not complete the dietary measures.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from FFQ | -12.5 food items | Standard Deviation 16.1 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Fruit variety from FFQ | -6.3 food items | Standard Deviation 34.7 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Vegetable variety from FFQ | -0.0 food items | Standard Deviation 21.4 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Fat, Oil, Sweets variety from FFQ | -24.3 food items | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Fruit variety from FFQ | 16.7 food items | Standard Deviation 27.1 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Vegetable variety from FFQ | 13.5 food items | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from 24-HR | -9.7 food items | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Fruit variety from 24-HR | 0.5 food items | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Vegetable variety from 24-HR | 0.4 food items | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from 24-HR | -11.2 food items | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Fruit variety from 24-HR | 1.0 food items | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Experimental Group | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Vegetable variety from 24-HR | -0.1 food items | Standard Deviation 1.6 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Fruit variety from 24-HR | 0.5 food items | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from FFQ | -16.7 food items | Standard Deviation 18 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from 24-HR | -3.7 food items | Standard Deviation 5.9 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Fruit variety from FFQ | -11.3 food items | Standard Deviation 19.1 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from 24-HR | -1.2 food items | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Vegetable variety from FFQ | -8.0 food items | Standard Deviation 16.2 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Fruit variety from 24-HR | 0.4 food items | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Fat, Oil, Sweets variety from FFQ | -22.2 food items | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Vegetable variety from 24-HR | 0.3 food items | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Fruit variety from FFQ | 20.3 food items | Standard Deviation 27.2 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Child Vegetable variety from 24-HR | -0.3 food items | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Nutrition Education Control | Changes in Variety Measures | Parent Vegetable variety from FFQ | 16.5 food items | Standard Deviation 18.5 |