Skip to content

Translating Habituation Research to Interventions for Pediatric Obesity

Translating Habituation Research to Interventions for Pediatric Obesity

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01208870
Acronym
EAT
Enrollment
94
Registered
2010-09-24
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2020-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Habituation, Pediatric Obesity

Brief summary

The purpose of this center grant is to translate basic behavioral science on habituation theory into clinical intervention using a vertical hierarchical approach from laboratory studies to field studies to the clinical intervention to improve weight loss outcomes in pediatric obesity treatment.

Detailed description

Habituation is one factor that may be related to excess energy intake. Research has shown that the rate of habituation is inversely related to the amount of food consumed and slower habituation may be a factor that is relevant to obesity, as overweight youth and adults habituate slower and consume more energy than their peers. Habituation is a basic form of learning that is observed in many response systems. We believe that habituation is an important process that mediates food regulation during a meal and across meals. However, there has been no research in children that translates basic research on habituation to food into clinical interventions for pediatric obesity. In the first phase, we will implement a series of laboratory studies to assess the effects of stimulus specificity and variety and the simultaneous reduction of variety for high energy density foods on short (within meal) and long-term (across meal) habituation. The second phase is designed to implement a series of field studies that will extend basic research from the first phase as well as define the optimal interval for reducing variety to facilitate long-term habituation to high energy density foods in the natural environment. The third phase is designed to develop and pilot test a family-based behavioral intervention for children that incorporates findings from phase2 into a clinical intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVariety Group

The intervention will consist of our traditional family based weight control intervention with elements of reducing variety of high energy dense foods for the variety group.

The intervention will consist of our traditional family based weight control intervention.

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH
State University of New York at Buffalo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children ages 8-12 years of age * At or above 85th BMI percentile * Children must eat almost all meals with the exception of school lunch with the family. * Overweight parent

Exclusion criteria

* Children who do not like the study foods, who are allergic to the study foods or who are on special diets and cannot consume the study foods. * Families with children with a co-morbid psychiatric diagnosis or parents who are depressed, have schizophrenia, substance abuse or a history of eating disorders. * The parent and child must not have any physical restrictions that would preclude them from making the requisite behavioral changes. * Children must be able to read at a 3rd grade reading level and must be able to demonstrate the ability to keep dietary and activity records in a stimulated interview.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Child Body CompositionBaseline to 6 monthsChild percent overweight difference from baseline to 6 month. The formula used to derive weight loss percentage was weight lost at 6 months divided by starting weight, multiplied by 100.
Change Parent Body CompositionBaseline to 6 monthsParent Body Mass Index (kg/m\^2) difference from baseline to 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Dietary Intake of CaloriesBaseline to 6 monthsEnergy intake was calculated for parents and children as the different from baseline to six months of calories consumed. The first pilot used the calories generated from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) report however the second pilot used calories from 24 hour recalls based on the Center of Disease Control data base or food labels.
Change in Parent Delay DiscountingBaseline to 6 monthsKirby, small, medium and large reinforcers. The Kirby monetary choice questionnaire will be used to measure implusivity in parents and children. Participants are presented with a set of 27 choices between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. An estimate of the participant's discounting rate parameter can be made from the pattern of choices and participants who discount the value of the delayed rewards more steeply are said to be more impulsive as measured in K-values. (0.25 impulsive to 0.00016 not impulsive)
Change in Child Delay DiscountingBaseline to 6 monthsKirby, small, medium and large reinforcers. The Kirby monetary choice questionnaire will be used to measure impulsivity in parents and children. Participants are presented with a set of 27 choices between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. An estimate of the participant's discounting rate parameter can be made from the pattern of choices and participants who discount the value of the delayed rewards more steeply are said to be more impulsive as measured in higher K-values (0.25 vs 0.00016).
Changes in Variety MeasuresBaseline to 6 monthsVariety of high energy density foods (RED) and low energy density foods (GREEN) were calculated from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) for pilot 1 and 24 hour recalls (24-HR) for pilot 2. High energy dense food or Red foods are low in nutrient density. Most Red foods come from the Fats, Oils and Sweets groups and are to be used sparingly. Modified foods from the Fats, Oils, and Sweets group are still considered to be Red foods, even if their energy level is low. These foods contribute little nutrients to the diet and compete for consumption of healthier foods. Green foods are high in nutrient density and low in energy density. Most Green foods come from the fruit and vegetable groups. Serving sizes were based off the serving sizes used in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) common serving sizes. Coding was based on the serving sizes of the specified food items and used to calculate the changes from baseline to six months.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment in the Western New York area targeted obese and overweight families through pediatric offices and the local community during 2011-2013.

Pre-assignment details

Interested eligible families are oriented, consented, screened, and offered to start the study. There were 94 participants (47 parents and 47 children) eligible to start and 4 participants (2 parents and 2 children) declined before starting the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental Group
Traditional family based weight control program with components from habituation theory incorporated into the treatment. Habituation theory and Pediatric Obesity: The intervention will consist of our traditional family based weight control intervention with elements of habituation theory included for the experimental group.
46
Nutrition Education Control
Traditional family based weight control program, without components of habituation theory incorporated. Habituation theory and Pediatric Obesity: The intervention will consist of our traditional family based weight control intervention with elements of habituation theory included for the experimental group.
44
Total90

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental GroupNutrition Education ControlTotal
Age, Customized
Child Age n=23 Experimental n=22 Control
10.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
10.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
10.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
Age, Customized
Parent Age n=23 Experimental, n=22 Control
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
43.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
Child percent overweight (%)77.1 Percent overweight based on BMI charts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40
71.8 Percent overweight based on BMI charts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.2
74.5 Percent overweight based on BMI charts
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.6
Child z-Body Mass Index2.2 [1] z-BMI see description
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
2.2 [1] z-BMI see description
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
2.2 [1] z-BMI see description
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
46 Participants42 Participants88 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Parent Body Mass Index (kg/m^2)38.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
37.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
38.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Parent Weight (lb.)236.8 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.7
232.5 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.2
234.7 pounds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants13 Participants19 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
34 Participants28 Participants62 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants44 participants90 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants33 Participants68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 460 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Change of Child Body Composition

Child percent overweight difference from baseline to 6 month. The formula used to derive weight loss percentage was weight lost at 6 months divided by starting weight, multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Children that completed the reported measures. Two children did not complete the body composition measures from the experimental groups and four children from the control group did not complete this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupChange of Child Body Composition-16.1 percentage of weightStandard Error 13.5
Nutrition Education ControlChange of Child Body Composition-13.3 percentage of weightStandard Error 9.6
Primary

Change Parent Body Composition

Parent Body Mass Index (kg/m\^2) difference from baseline to 6 months

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Parents

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupChange Parent Body Composition-3.6 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.5
Nutrition Education ControlChange Parent Body Composition-3.1 kg/m^2Standard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Change in Child Delay Discounting

Kirby, small, medium and large reinforcers. The Kirby monetary choice questionnaire will be used to measure impulsivity in parents and children. Participants are presented with a set of 27 choices between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. An estimate of the participant's discounting rate parameter can be made from the pattern of choices and participants who discount the value of the delayed rewards more steeply are said to be more impulsive as measured in higher K-values (0.25 vs 0.00016).

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Children that completed this measure at pre and post time points. Eleven children did not complete the post measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupChange in Child Delay DiscountingSmall reinforcer0.017 k valueStandard Deviation 0.071
Experimental GroupChange in Child Delay DiscountingMedium reinforcer0.030 k valueStandard Deviation 0.073
Experimental GroupChange in Child Delay DiscountingLarge reinforcer0.038 k valueStandard Deviation 0.082
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Child Delay DiscountingSmall reinforcer0.006 k valueStandard Deviation 0.06
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Child Delay DiscountingMedium reinforcer0.025 k valueStandard Deviation 0.095
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Child Delay DiscountingLarge reinforcer0.021 k valueStandard Deviation 0.06
Secondary

Change in Dietary Intake of Calories

Energy intake was calculated for parents and children as the different from baseline to six months of calories consumed. The first pilot used the calories generated from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) report however the second pilot used calories from 24 hour recalls based on the Center of Disease Control data base or food labels.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Parents and children, three families did not complete the dietary measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupChange in Dietary Intake of CaloriesChild change in calorie intake from FFQ-716.5 caloriesStandard Deviation 1046.6
Experimental GroupChange in Dietary Intake of CaloriesParent change in calorie intake from FFQ-916.0 caloriesStandard Deviation 719.8
Experimental GroupChange in Dietary Intake of CaloriesParent change in calorie intake from 24 hr recall-690.4 caloriesStandard Deviation 488.3
Experimental GroupChange in Dietary Intake of CaloriesChild change in calorie intake from 24 hr recall-432.4 caloriesStandard Deviation 396.1
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Dietary Intake of CaloriesParent change in calorie intake from 24 hr recall-501.9 caloriesStandard Deviation 488
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Dietary Intake of CaloriesChild change in calorie intake from FFQ-730.6 caloriesStandard Deviation 765.6
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Dietary Intake of CaloriesParent change in calorie intake from FFQ-962.2 caloriesStandard Deviation 764.6
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Dietary Intake of CaloriesChild change in calorie intake from 24 hr recall-230.3 caloriesStandard Deviation 501.5
Secondary

Change in Parent Delay Discounting

Kirby, small, medium and large reinforcers. The Kirby monetary choice questionnaire will be used to measure implusivity in parents and children. Participants are presented with a set of 27 choices between smaller immediate rewards and larger delayed rewards. An estimate of the participant's discounting rate parameter can be made from the pattern of choices and participants who discount the value of the delayed rewards more steeply are said to be more impulsive as measured in K-values. (0.25 impulsive to 0.00016 not impulsive)

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Parents that completed this measure pre and post. Ten parents did not complete this post measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupChange in Parent Delay DiscountingSmall reinforcer0.003 k valueStandard Deviation 0.023
Experimental GroupChange in Parent Delay DiscountingMedium reinforcer-0.005 k valueStandard Deviation 0.033
Experimental GroupChange in Parent Delay DiscountingLarge reinforcer-0.003 k valueStandard Deviation 0.017
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Parent Delay DiscountingSmall reinforcer0.032 k valueStandard Deviation 0.067
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Parent Delay DiscountingMedium reinforcer0.020 k valueStandard Deviation 0.059
Nutrition Education ControlChange in Parent Delay DiscountingLarge reinforcer0.024 k valueStandard Deviation 0.069
Secondary

Changes in Variety Measures

Variety of high energy density foods (RED) and low energy density foods (GREEN) were calculated from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) for pilot 1 and 24 hour recalls (24-HR) for pilot 2. High energy dense food or Red foods are low in nutrient density. Most Red foods come from the Fats, Oils and Sweets groups and are to be used sparingly. Modified foods from the Fats, Oils, and Sweets group are still considered to be Red foods, even if their energy level is low. These foods contribute little nutrients to the diet and compete for consumption of healthier foods. Green foods are high in nutrient density and low in energy density. Most Green foods come from the fruit and vegetable groups. Serving sizes were based off the serving sizes used in United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) common serving sizes. Coding was based on the serving sizes of the specified food items and used to calculate the changes from baseline to six months.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Parents and children were measured, three families did not complete the dietary measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from FFQ-12.5 food itemsStandard Deviation 16.1
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Fruit variety from FFQ-6.3 food itemsStandard Deviation 34.7
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Vegetable variety from FFQ-0.0 food itemsStandard Deviation 21.4
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Fat, Oil, Sweets variety from FFQ-24.3 food itemsStandard Deviation 17.3
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Fruit variety from FFQ16.7 food itemsStandard Deviation 27.1
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Vegetable variety from FFQ13.5 food itemsStandard Deviation 19.2
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from 24-HR-9.7 food itemsStandard Deviation 5.9
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Fruit variety from 24-HR0.5 food itemsStandard Deviation 1.6
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Vegetable variety from 24-HR0.4 food itemsStandard Deviation 0.8
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from 24-HR-11.2 food itemsStandard Deviation 4.4
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Fruit variety from 24-HR1.0 food itemsStandard Deviation 1.6
Experimental GroupChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Vegetable variety from 24-HR-0.1 food itemsStandard Deviation 1.6
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Fruit variety from 24-HR0.5 food itemsStandard Deviation 1.2
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from FFQ-16.7 food itemsStandard Deviation 18
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from 24-HR-3.7 food itemsStandard Deviation 5.9
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Fruit variety from FFQ-11.3 food itemsStandard Deviation 19.1
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Fats, Oils, Sweets variety from 24-HR-1.2 food itemsStandard Deviation 9.8
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Vegetable variety from FFQ-8.0 food itemsStandard Deviation 16.2
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Fruit variety from 24-HR0.4 food itemsStandard Deviation 0.8
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Fat, Oil, Sweets variety from FFQ-22.2 food itemsStandard Deviation 17.6
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Vegetable variety from 24-HR0.3 food itemsStandard Deviation 0.5
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Fruit variety from FFQ20.3 food itemsStandard Deviation 27.2
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresChild Vegetable variety from 24-HR-0.3 food itemsStandard Deviation 0.5
Nutrition Education ControlChanges in Variety MeasuresParent Vegetable variety from FFQ16.5 food itemsStandard Deviation 18.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026