Skip to content

Study Evaluating The Safety And Efficacy Of PF-03049423 In Subjects With Ischemic Stroke

A Phase 2 Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-03049423 In Subjects With Ischemic Stroke

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01208233
Enrollment
181
Registered
2010-09-23
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2016-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

Phase 2 Ischemic stroke Safety and efficacy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of PF-03049423 following multiple dose administration to subjects with ischemic stroke. The study will also evaluate the efficacy of PF-03049423, relative to placebo, in subjects with ischemic stroke following 90 days of therapy. The study will also explore the relationship between PF-03049423 concentration and blood pressure.

Detailed description

The interim analysis for the POC study A9541004 demonstrated futility, and the study was stopped on the 6th of November 2013. There were no signals of serious safety concern.

Interventions

1 mg of PF-03049423 daily for 90 days

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo of PF-03049423 daily for 90 days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of ischemic stroke with an onset within 72 hours prior to start of study agent administration, male or female. * Supratentorial ischemic stroke involving the cortex documented by neurological exam and confirmed by MRI. * Stroke involving upper extremity. * Subjects who received thrombolytic therapy may be enrolled and the use of antiplatelet is acceptable.

Exclusion criteria

* Any other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition besides the stroke. * Women of child bearing potential. * Uncontrolled hypertension.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90The complete physical examination included examination of the skin, eyes, ears, throat, neck, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. The limited physical examination included examination of the cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 90The mRS is a 6-point scale of functional recovery. The scale grades participants as having no symptoms (0), minor symptoms (1), minor handicap (2), moderate handicap (3), moderately severe handicap (4), severe handicap (5), or death (6).
Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 90ECG criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), PR interval: \>=300 milliseconds (msec); \>=25% increase when baseline \>200 msec; or increase \>=50% when baseline \<=200 msec; 2), QRS interval: \>=140 msec; \>=50% increase from baseline; 3), QT interval: \>=500 msec, QTc interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF interval): absolute value \>=450 - \<480 msec, \>=480-\<500 msec, \>=500 msec; absolute change 30 - \<60, \>=60 msec. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 7 (Baseline) up to follow up (28 days after Day 90)Data were mapped to Columbia-Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) event codes. C-SSRS assessed if participant experienced: completed suicide (Code 1), suicide attempt (Code 2) (Response of Yes on actual attempt), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (Code 3) (Yes on aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, preparatory acts or behavior), suicidal ideation (Code 4) (Yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act/some intent to act without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent (Code 7) (Yes on Has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior). Number of participants with Yes response for any of above mentioned categories was assessed. \*This was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for it were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90The complete neurological examination included an assessment of the motor, sensory, cranial nerves, reflexes, mental status and associated motor functions. The limited neurological exam could examine the same categories of neurologic assessments as the full examination, but would differ by the depth in the examination. The examination was required to be done to the extent needed to assess the participant for any potential changes in neurological status, as determined by the Investigator, but had to always include an assessment of motor, vision and hearing. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) was assessed. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Day 1 (Baseline) up to follow-up (28 days after Day 90)Vital signs included blood pressure (BP; supine, sitting and standing) and pulse rate. Vital signs criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), BP: systolic BP (SBP) greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 or 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) change from grand baseline in same posture, systolic less than (\<) 90 mm Hg; diastolic BP (DBP) \>=20 mm Hg change from grand baseline in same posture, diastolic \<50 mm Hg; 2), pulse rate (supine, sitting and standing): \<40 or greater than (\>) 120 beats per minute (bpm); Standing: \<40 or \>140 bpm. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in NIHSS at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The NIHSS is a graded 11-item neurological examination rating speech and language, cognition, visual field deficits, motor and sensory impairments and ataxia used for the clinical assessment of acute stroke therapy. The maximum total score is 42 in a participant with a severe neurological deficit; the minimum score is 0 in a participant without gross neurological deficits.
Percentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 90The BI is an index of independence to score the ability of a participant with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him or herself. The index rates a participant's ability on the following 10 activities: feeding, moving from wheelchair to bed, personal toilet, getting on and off toilet, bathing self, walking on level surface, ascending and descending stairs, dressing, controlling bowels and controlling bladder. The maximum total score is 100 in a participant without functional impairment; the minimum score is 0 in a participant with major functional impairment.
BI at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 90The BI is an index of independence to score the ability of a participant with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him or herself. The index rates a participant's ability on the following 10 activities: feeding, moving from wheelchair to bed, personal toilet, getting on and off toilet, bathing self, walking on level surface, ascending and descending stairs, dressing, controlling bowels and controlling bladder. The maximum total score is 100 in a participant without functional impairment; the minimum score is 0 in a participant with major functional impairment.
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in RBANS Naming Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90This test requires the participant to name 10 objects drawn in ink. The tester asked the participant to identify the picture. The participant had 20 seconds to respond to each picture presented. The performance measure was the number of objects named correctly.
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The participant was presented with a page that had lines placed across the page. The participant was required to cross out all the lines on the page using their non-paretic hand after the tester had demonstrated what was required by crossing out the center line. The performance measure for this task was the total number of omissions made expressed as a percentage of the total number of items in the test. The test contains 4 variables: (L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%, and (L-R)/(L+R), where L = number of lines crossed on the left side of the paper; R = number of lines crossed on the right side of the paper.
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test at Day 90 [(L-R)/(L+R)] (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The participant was presented with a page that had lines placed across the page. The participant was required to cross out all the lines on the page using their non-paretic hand after the tester had demonstrated what was required by crossing out the center line. The performance measure for this task was the total number of omissions made expressed as a percentage of the total number of items in the test. The test contains 4 variables: (L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%, and (L-R)/(L+R), where L = number of lines crossed on the left side of the paper; R = number of lines crossed on the right side of the paper.
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Recognition Memory Test at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90This test assesses the ability to recognize pictures of objects. The participant was presented a series of pictures, a subset of which were the objects presented in the RBANS Naming Sub Test. After each picture was presented, the participant indicated either manually (ie, affirmative head nod) or verbally whether the picture was seen previously. The participant was given 5 seconds per picture to respond. The performance measure for this task was the total number of pictures correctly identified.
Gait Velocity Test at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 90The 10-meter walk test requires a 20 meter straight path, with 5 meters for acceleration, 10 meters for steady state walking, and 5 meters for deceleration. Markers were placed at the 5 and 15 meter positions along the path. The participant began to walk at a comfortable pace at 1 end of the path, and continued walking until he/she reached the other end. The rater used a stopwatch to determine how much time it took for the participant to traverse the 10 meter center of the path, starting the stopwatch as soon as the participant's limb crossed the first marker and stopping the stopwatch as soon as the participant's limb crossed the second marker.
Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Days 1, 2, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90
Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Non-paretic Hand (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The test uses a reference key, the participant had 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures. Responses could be written or oral. The performance measure for this task was the total number of correct responses.
Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic Hand (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.
Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.
Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The participant was required to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort while sitting with shoulder adducted and neutrally roated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral position and wrist between 0 to 30 degrees dorsiflexion and a 0 to 15 degrees ulnar deviation. The participant performed this task 3 times with each hand, starting with the non-paretic hand. The performance measure for this task was the average score measured in pounds of pressure exerted.
Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The participant was required to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort while sitting with shoulder adducted and neutrally roated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral position and wrist between 0 to 30 degrees dorsiflexion and a 0 to 15 degrees ulnar deviation. The participant performed this task 3 times with each hand, starting with the non-paretic hand. The performance measure for this task was the average score measured in pounds of pressure exerted.
Percentage of Participants With mRS (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 90The mRS is a 6-point scale of functional recovery. The scale grades participants as having no symptoms (0), minor symptoms (1), minor handicap (2), moderate handicap (3), moderately severe handicap (4), severe handicap (5), or death (6).
Percentage of Participants With National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)Day 90The NIHSS is a graded 11-item neurological examination rating speech and language, cognition, visual field deficits, motor and sensory impairments and ataxia used for the clinical assessment of acute stroke therapy. The maximum total score is 42 in a participant with a severe neurological deficit; the minimum score is 0 in a participant without gross neurological deficits.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-cause Mortality (Part 2)The time began from the participant provided informed consent through 28 calendar days post last administration of investigational product.Deaths regardless causality were reported.
Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline) up to follow-up (28 days after Day 90)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 14
Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90NIHSS change of 4 points or greater.
Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)The time began from the participant provided informed consent through 28 calendar days post last administration of investigational product.Deaths caused by stroke were reported.

Countries

Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, India, South Korea, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 181 participants were assigned to study treatment, 178 of which received study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg
Participants received PF-03049423 1 mg once daily for 90 days.
11
Cohort 1: Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to PF-03049423 1 mg once daily for 90 days.
9
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg
Participants received PF-03049423 3 mg once daily for 90 days.
11
Cohort 2: Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to PF-0304942 3 mg once daily for 90 days.
10
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg
Participants received PF-03049423 6 mg once daily for 90 days.
70
Cohort 3: Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to PF-0304942 6 mg once daily for 90 days.
67
Total178

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdverse Event012035
Overall StudyDeath000035
Overall StudyDid not meet entrance criteria211010
Overall StudyMedication error without adverse event000001
Overall StudyOther210001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation000030
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor0000107
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject101142

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgCohort 1: PlaceboCohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgCohort 2: PlaceboCohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgCohort 3: PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
65.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants2 Participants7 Participants3 Participants28 Participants26 Participants70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants7 Participants4 Participants7 Participants42 Participants41 Participants108 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 117 / 97 / 119 / 1050 / 7047 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 111 / 93 / 111 / 1015 / 7018 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)

The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) was assessed. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants evaluated.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)8 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)8 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)10 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)9 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)64 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)56 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)

ECG criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), PR interval: \>=300 milliseconds (msec); \>=25% increase when baseline \>200 msec; or increase \>=50% when baseline \<=200 msec; 2), QRS interval: \>=140 msec; \>=50% increase from baseline; 3), QT interval: \>=500 msec, QTc interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF interval): absolute value \>=450 - \<480 msec, \>=480-\<500 msec, \>=500 msec; absolute change 30 - \<60, \>=60 msec. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 90

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). n=number of evaluable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,672 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,660 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,662 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,660 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,470 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,673 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,470 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,660 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,663 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,660 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,674 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,660 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,664 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,660 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,471 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,470 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,660 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,661 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,662 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,672 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,471 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,6714 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,674 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,660 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,663 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,6619 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,674 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,665 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,673 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,470 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,6714 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,661 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,6611 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)

The complete neurological examination included an assessment of the motor, sensory, cranial nerves, reflexes, mental status and associated motor functions. The limited neurological exam could examine the same categories of neurologic assessments as the full examination, but would differ by the depth in the examination. The examination was required to be done to the extent needed to assess the participant for any potential changes in neurological status, as determined by the Investigator, but had to always include an assessment of motor, vision and hearing. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). Participants analyzed indicated those who had neurological examinations done at both baseline and last visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)1 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)1 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)0 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)0 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)4 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)

The complete physical examination included examination of the skin, eyes, ears, throat, neck, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. The limited physical examination included examination of the cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). Participants analyzed indicated those who had physical examinations done at both baseline and last visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)1 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)1 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)0 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)0 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)2 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)

Data were mapped to Columbia-Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) event codes. C-SSRS assessed if participant experienced: completed suicide (Code 1), suicide attempt (Code 2) (Response of Yes on actual attempt), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (Code 3) (Yes on aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, preparatory acts or behavior), suicidal ideation (Code 4) (Yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act/some intent to act without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent (Code 7) (Yes on Has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior). Number of participants with Yes response for any of above mentioned categories was assessed. \*This was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for it were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.

Time frame: Day 7 (Baseline) up to follow up (28 days after Day 90)

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). n=number of participants who had C-SSRS assessed at that visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 57NA participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 53NA participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 47NA participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 44NA participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 53NA participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 51NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 53NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 44NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 51NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 57NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 47NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 53NA participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 510 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 530 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 440 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 470 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 570 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 530 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 440 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 530 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 470 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 510 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 530 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 570 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 571 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 531 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 531 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 472 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 442 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 510 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 440 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 470 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 531 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 510 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 530 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 572 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)

Vital signs included blood pressure (BP; supine, sitting and standing) and pulse rate. Vital signs criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), BP: systolic BP (SBP) greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 or 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) change from grand baseline in same posture, systolic less than (\<) 90 mm Hg; diastolic BP (DBP) \>=20 mm Hg change from grand baseline in same posture, diastolic \<50 mm Hg; 2), pulse rate (supine, sitting and standing): \<40 or greater than (\>) 120 beats per minute (bpm); Standing: \<40 or \>140 bpm. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to follow-up (28 days after Day 90)

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). n=number of evaluable participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,678 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0NA participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,590 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,590 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,672 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,480 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,20 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,440 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,442 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,443 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,672 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0NA participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,677 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,441 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,221 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,674 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,443 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,480 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,20 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,480 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,442 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,444 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,673 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,676 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,444 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0NA participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,676 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,591 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,441 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,672 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,590 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,441 participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,480 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,590 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,591 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,20 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,442 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,676 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,480 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,480 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,445 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,442 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,675 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,672 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,675 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,675 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0NA participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,446 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,20 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,221 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,443 participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0NA participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,672 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,440 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,220 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2NA participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,00 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2NA participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,00 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,590 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,480 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,590 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,481 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,673 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,440 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,672 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,442 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,674 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,442 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,673 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,441 participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,482 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,593 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,676 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6716 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,481 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,226 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,449 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,592 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,673 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,4423 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,223 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6737 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,00 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,20 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6710 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,4426 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,00 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,2210 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,20 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,221 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6732 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6713 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,675 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,671 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,447 participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,4410 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,449 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,591 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,221 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,674 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6726 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,679 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,4418 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6722 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,481 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0NA participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,592 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,677 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,20 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,4412 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,2211 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,670 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,446 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,2211 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,483 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,223 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0NA participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,4414 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,222 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6737 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,6717 participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,20 participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2)

The mRS is a 6-point scale of functional recovery. The scale grades participants as having no symptoms (0), minor symptoms (1), minor handicap (2), moderate handicap (3), moderately severe handicap (4), severe handicap (5), or death (6).

Time frame: Day 90

Population: The Inferential Full Analysis Set (I-FAS) consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). n=number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPercentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2)Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF), n=68, 6542.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPercentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2)Observed Cases (OC), n=51, 5247.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2)Observed Cases (OC), n=51, 5250.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2)Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF), n=68, 6546.2 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.496280% CI: [0.41, 1.31]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.251780% CI: [0.29, 1.07]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

BI at Day 90 (Part 2)

The BI is an index of independence to score the ability of a participant with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him or herself. The index rates a participant's ability on the following 10 activities: feeding, moving from wheelchair to bed, personal toilet, getting on and off toilet, bathing self, walking on level surface, ascending and descending stairs, dressing, controlling bowels and controlling bladder. The maximum total score is 100 in a participant without functional impairment; the minimum score is 0 in a participant with major functional impairment.

Time frame: Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgBI at Day 90 (Part 2)79.151 unit on a scaleStandard Error 3.6248
Cohort 1: PlaceboBI at Day 90 (Part 2)73.552 unit on a scaleStandard Error 3.8471
p-value: 0.211880% CI: [-0.15, 11.348]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Non-paretic Hand (Part 2)

The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants indicated those participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgChange From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Non-paretic Hand (Part 2)17.797 blocks moved per minuteStandard Error 2.1676
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Non-paretic Hand (Part 2)18.313 blocks moved per minuteStandard Error 2.2407
Comparison: Non-paretic handp-value: 0.850180% CI: [-4.026, 2.995]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic Hand (Part 2)

The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants indicated those participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgChange From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic Hand (Part 2)26.881 blocks moved per minuteStandard Error 3.8667
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic Hand (Part 2)26.741 blocks moved per minuteStandard Error 3.5627
Comparison: Paretic handp-value: 0.971680% CI: [-4.972, 5.254]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)

The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants indicated those participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgChange From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)41.830 percentage changeStandard Error 7.781
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)31.041 percentage changeStandard Error 7.1284
Comparison: Paretic to non-paretic hand ratio (%)p-value: 0.141780% CI: [1.401, 20.177]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2)

The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The participant was required to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort while sitting with shoulder adducted and neutrally roated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral position and wrist between 0 to 30 degrees dorsiflexion and a 0 to 15 degrees ulnar deviation. The participant performed this task 3 times with each hand, starting with the non-paretic hand. The performance measure for this task was the average score measured in pounds of pressure exerted.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). n=number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgChange From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2)Paretic Hand, n=26, 2620.556 poundsStandard Error 4.1829
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgChange From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2)Non-Paretic Hand, n=46, 4112.546 poundsStandard Error 2.3612
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2)Paretic Hand, n=26, 2630.886 poundsStandard Error 3.9964
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2)Non-Paretic Hand, n=46, 4112.312 poundsStandard Error 2.5029
Comparison: Paretic handp-value: 0.061180% CI: [-17.351, -3.31]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Non-paretic handp-value: 0.943380% CI: [-4.011, 4.48]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)

The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The participant was required to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort while sitting with shoulder adducted and neutrally roated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral position and wrist between 0 to 30 degrees dorsiflexion and a 0 to 15 degrees ulnar deviation. The participant performed this task 3 times with each hand, starting with the non-paretic hand. The performance measure for this task was the average score measured in pounds of pressure exerted.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants analyzed indicated those participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgChange From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)23.949 percentage changeStandard Error 5.4499
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)36.761 percentage changeStandard Error 5.1182
Comparison: Paretic to non-paretic hand ratio (%)p-value: 0.065480% CI: [-21.668, -3.957]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NIHSS at Day 90 (Part 2)

The NIHSS is a graded 11-item neurological examination rating speech and language, cognition, visual field deficits, motor and sensory impairments and ataxia used for the clinical assessment of acute stroke therapy. The maximum total score is 42 in a participant with a severe neurological deficit; the minimum score is 0 in a participant without gross neurological deficits.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgChange From Baseline in NIHSS at Day 90 (Part 2)-6.511 unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.5384
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline in NIHSS at Day 90 (Part 2)-6.228 unit on a scaleStandard Error 0.5655
p-value: 0.675980% CI: [-1.156, 0.589]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test at Day 90 [(L-R)/(L+R)] (Part 2)

The participant was presented with a page that had lines placed across the page. The participant was required to cross out all the lines on the page using their non-paretic hand after the tester had demonstrated what was required by crossing out the center line. The performance measure for this task was the total number of omissions made expressed as a percentage of the total number of items in the test. The test contains 4 variables: (L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%, and (L-R)/(L+R), where L = number of lines crossed on the left side of the paper; R = number of lines crossed on the right side of the paper.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants analyzed indicated participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test at Day 90 [(L-R)/(L+R)] (Part 2)0.083 change in ratioStandard Error 0.062
Cohort 1: PlaceboDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test at Day 90 [(L-R)/(L+R)] (Part 2)-0.023 change in ratioStandard Error 0.0625
Comparison: (L R)/(L+R)p-value: 0.151280% CI: [0.011, 0.201]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)

The participant was presented with a page that had lines placed across the page. The participant was required to cross out all the lines on the page using their non-paretic hand after the tester had demonstrated what was required by crossing out the center line. The performance measure for this task was the total number of omissions made expressed as a percentage of the total number of items in the test. The test contains 4 variables: (L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%, and (L-R)/(L+R), where L = number of lines crossed on the left side of the paper; R = number of lines crossed on the right side of the paper.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). n=number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)(R/14) × 100%, n=39, 3516.481 change in percentage of lines crossedStandard Error 4.3564
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)(L+R)/28 × 100%, n=39, 3519.459 change in percentage of lines crossedStandard Error 4.4433
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)(L/14) × 100%, n=39, 3522.824 change in percentage of lines crossedStandard Error 5.6691
Cohort 1: PlaceboDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)(R/14) × 100%, n=39, 3515.431 change in percentage of lines crossedStandard Error 4.3647
Cohort 1: PlaceboDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)(L+R)/28 × 100%, n=39, 3516.983 change in percentage of lines crossedStandard Error 4.4551
Cohort 1: PlaceboDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)(L/14) × 100%, n=39, 3518.950 change in percentage of lines crossedStandard Error 5.6639
Comparison: (L+R)/28 × 100%p-value: 0.6580% CI: [-4.547, 9.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: (L/14) × 100%p-value: 0.567180% CI: [-4.834, 12.583]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: (R/14) × 100%p-value: 0.84380% CI: [-5.771, 7.87]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in RBANS Naming Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)

This test requires the participant to name 10 objects drawn in ink. The tester asked the participant to identify the picture. The participant had 20 seconds to respond to each picture presented. The performance measure was the number of objects named correctly.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in RBANS Naming Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)0.989 objects named correctlyStandard Error 0.3676
Cohort 1: PlaceboDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in RBANS Naming Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)1.324 objects named correctlyStandard Error 0.3666
p-value: 0.42680% CI: [-0.874, 0.205]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Recognition Memory Test at Day 90 (Part 2)

This test assesses the ability to recognize pictures of objects. The participant was presented a series of pictures, a subset of which were the objects presented in the RBANS Naming Sub Test. After each picture was presented, the participant indicated either manually (ie, affirmative head nod) or verbally whether the picture was seen previously. The participant was given 5 seconds per picture to respond. The performance measure for this task was the total number of pictures correctly identified.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Recognition Memory Test at Day 90 (Part 2)-1.135 pictures correctly identifiedStandard Error 0.4743
Cohort 1: PlaceboDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Recognition Memory Test at Day 90 (Part 2)0.144 pictures correctly identifiedStandard Error 0.4797
p-value: 0.012880% CI: [-1.929, -0.629]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)

The test uses a reference key, the participant had 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures. Responses could be written or oral. The performance measure for this task was the total number of correct responses.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)13.748 correct responsesStandard Error 1.5321
Cohort 1: PlaceboDomains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)12.686 correct responsesStandard Error 1.6282
p-value: 0.554180% CI: [-1.252, 3.375]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Gait Velocity Test at Day 90 (Part 2)

The 10-meter walk test requires a 20 meter straight path, with 5 meters for acceleration, 10 meters for steady state walking, and 5 meters for deceleration. Markers were placed at the 5 and 15 meter positions along the path. The participant began to walk at a comfortable pace at 1 end of the path, and continued walking until he/she reached the other end. The rater used a stopwatch to determine how much time it took for the participant to traverse the 10 meter center of the path, starting the stopwatch as soon as the participant's limb crossed the first marker and stopping the stopwatch as soon as the participant's limb crossed the second marker.

Time frame: Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgGait Velocity Test at Day 90 (Part 2)1.064 meters/second (m/s)Standard Error 0.104
Cohort 1: PlaceboGait Velocity Test at Day 90 (Part 2)0.975 meters/second (m/s)Standard Error 0.1128
p-value: 0.471380% CI: [-0.07, 0.248]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2)

The BI is an index of independence to score the ability of a participant with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him or herself. The index rates a participant's ability on the following 10 activities: feeding, moving from wheelchair to bed, personal toilet, getting on and off toilet, bathing self, walking on level surface, ascending and descending stairs, dressing, controlling bowels and controlling bladder. The maximum total score is 100 in a participant without functional impairment; the minimum score is 0 in a participant with major functional impairment.

Time frame: Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPercentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2)BI >=9547.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPercentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2)BI=10042.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2)BI >=9540.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2)BI=10035.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: BI \>=95, LOCF was used to impute missing data.p-value: 0.421380% CI: [0.81, 2.54]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: BI=100, LOCF was used to impute missing data.p-value: 0.27680% CI: [0.92, 2.98]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With mRS (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)

The mRS is a 6-point scale of functional recovery. The scale grades participants as having no symptoms (0), minor symptoms (1), minor handicap (2), moderate handicap (3), moderately severe handicap (4), severe handicap (5), or death (6).

Time frame: Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPercentage of Participants With mRS (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With mRS (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)24.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: LOCF was used to impute missing data.p-value: 0.95180% CI: [0.54, 1.76]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)

The NIHSS is a graded 11-item neurological examination rating speech and language, cognition, visual field deficits, motor and sensory impairments and ataxia used for the clinical assessment of acute stroke therapy. The maximum total score is 42 in a participant with a severe neurological deficit; the minimum score is 0 in a participant without gross neurological deficits.

Time frame: Day 90

Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPercentage of Participants With National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)25.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)26.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: LOCF was used to impute missing data.p-value: 0.723480% CI: [0.48, 1.51]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)

Time frame: Days 1, 2, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90

Population: PK concentration population included all participants who were treated with PF-03049423 who had at least 1 measurable concentration. n=participants with concentration above lower limit of quantification at the corresponding sampling time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (1 hour post dose), n=11, 10, 635.825 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 4.3514
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 30 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 585.339 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 3.5712
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (2 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 59NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (0 hour predose), n=0, 1, 3NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (6 [cohort 3:4] hours post dose), n=9,7,3117.57 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 4.1614
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (6 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 61NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (8 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 687.361 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2.4032
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (2 hours post dose), n=9, 6, 017.06 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7.3799
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (0 hour predose), n=10, 8, 597.805 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2.9278
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 90 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 2012.80 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 0
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (1 hour post dose), n=9, 7, 016.47 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7.1782
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 60 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 2713.25 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 0.7778
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 2 (0 hour, predose), n=11, 11, 674.521 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1.5265
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 90 (0 hour predose), n=5, 6, 455.252 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 1.5161
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 60 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 536.360 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 3.1028
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (0 hour, post dose), n=9, 7, 648.601 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2.9609
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (2 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 617.063 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 3.2729
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 30 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 2511.55 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 2.6234
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (1 hour post dose), n=0, 1, 59NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 60 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 2747.86 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7.3296
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (0 hour predose), n=0, 1, 30.05245 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 0.17397
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (1 hour post dose), n=11, 10, 6317.50 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 12.814
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (2 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 6130.18 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 11.313
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (8 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 6825.39 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 8.6644
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 2 (0 hour, predose), n=11, 11, 6718.05 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 4.7834
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (0 hour, post dose), n=9, 7, 6427.79 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 7.6945
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (1 hour post dose), n=0, 1, 5951.80 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (2 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 5958.10 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (6 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 6151.10 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (0 hour predose), n=10, 8, 5931.13 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 9.8243
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (1 hour post dose), n=9, 7, 076.71 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 32.657
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (2 hours post dose), n=9, 6, 070.37 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 14.795
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (6 [cohort 3:4] hours post dose), n=9,7,3158.36 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 11.72
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 30 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 5829.68 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 11.015
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 30 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 2557.08 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 13.99
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 60 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 5324.55 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 5.8206
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 90 (0 hour predose), n=5, 6, 4529.18 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 15.909
Cohort 1: PlaceboPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 90 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 2049.40 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 13.962
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (6 [cohort 3:4] hours post dose), n=9,7,31118.2 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 41.967
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (1 hour post dose), n=0, 1, 59115.9 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 65.329
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 90 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 2082.69 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 29.005
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 30 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 5850.77 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 31.473
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (0 hour, post dose), n=9, 7, 6453.08 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 30.237
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 90 (0 hour predose), n=5, 6, 4547.02 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 24.065
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 30 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 2596.27 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 49.929
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 2 (0 hour, predose), n=11, 11, 6732.07 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 13.776
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (0 hour predose), n=0, 1, 31.420 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 11.591
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 60 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 5349.37 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 33.747
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (8 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 6852.47 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 23.25
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (0 hour predose), n=10, 8, 5953.10 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 28.085
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (2 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 6158.19 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 32.837
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (1 hour post dose), n=9, 7, 0NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (6 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 61103.8 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 41.09
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 60 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 27112.1 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 58.56
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 14 (2 hours post dose), n=9, 6, 0NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 7 (2 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 59126.3 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 57.759
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgPlasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)Day 1 (1 hour post dose), n=11, 10, 6346.76 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)Standard Deviation 36.153
Other Pre-specified

All-cause Mortality (Part 2)

Deaths regardless causality were reported.

Time frame: The time began from the participant provided informed consent through 28 calendar days post last administration of investigational product.

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgAll-cause Mortality (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboAll-cause Mortality (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgAll-cause Mortality (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboAll-cause Mortality (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgAll-cause Mortality (Part 2)6 Number of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboAll-cause Mortality (Part 2)7 Number of participants
Other Pre-specified

Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)

Deaths caused by stroke were reported.

Time frame: The time began from the participant provided informed consent through 28 calendar days post last administration of investigational product.

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgMortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboMortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgMortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboMortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgMortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)3 Number of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboMortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)

NIHSS change of 4 points or greater.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 14

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgNumber of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboNumber of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgNumber of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboNumber of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgNumber of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboNumber of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)NA Number of participants
Other Pre-specified

Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to follow-up (28 days after Day 90)

Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mgTreatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboTreatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)1 Number of participants
Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mgTreatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)2 Number of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboTreatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)0 Number of participants
Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mgTreatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)3 Number of participants
Cohort 3: PlaceboTreatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)5 Number of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026