Ischemic Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
Phase 2 Ischemic stroke Safety and efficacy
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of PF-03049423 following multiple dose administration to subjects with ischemic stroke. The study will also evaluate the efficacy of PF-03049423, relative to placebo, in subjects with ischemic stroke following 90 days of therapy. The study will also explore the relationship between PF-03049423 concentration and blood pressure.
Detailed description
The interim analysis for the POC study A9541004 demonstrated futility, and the study was stopped on the 6th of November 2013. There were no signals of serious safety concern.
Interventions
1 mg of PF-03049423 daily for 90 days
Placebo of PF-03049423 daily for 90 days
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of ischemic stroke with an onset within 72 hours prior to start of study agent administration, male or female. * Supratentorial ischemic stroke involving the cortex documented by neurological exam and confirmed by MRI. * Stroke involving upper extremity. * Subjects who received thrombolytic therapy may be enrolled and the use of antiplatelet is acceptable.
Exclusion criteria
* Any other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition besides the stroke. * Women of child bearing potential. * Uncontrolled hypertension.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90 | The complete physical examination included examination of the skin, eyes, ears, throat, neck, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. The limited physical examination included examination of the cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together. |
| Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 90 | The mRS is a 6-point scale of functional recovery. The scale grades participants as having no symptoms (0), minor symptoms (1), minor handicap (2), moderate handicap (3), moderately severe handicap (4), severe handicap (5), or death (6). |
| Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 90 | ECG criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), PR interval: \>=300 milliseconds (msec); \>=25% increase when baseline \>200 msec; or increase \>=50% when baseline \<=200 msec; 2), QRS interval: \>=140 msec; \>=50% increase from baseline; 3), QT interval: \>=500 msec, QTc interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF interval): absolute value \>=450 - \<480 msec, \>=480-\<500 msec, \>=500 msec; absolute change 30 - \<60, \>=60 msec. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together. |
| Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 7 (Baseline) up to follow up (28 days after Day 90) | Data were mapped to Columbia-Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) event codes. C-SSRS assessed if participant experienced: completed suicide (Code 1), suicide attempt (Code 2) (Response of Yes on actual attempt), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (Code 3) (Yes on aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, preparatory acts or behavior), suicidal ideation (Code 4) (Yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act/some intent to act without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent (Code 7) (Yes on Has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior). Number of participants with Yes response for any of above mentioned categories was assessed. \*This was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for it were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together. |
| Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90 | The complete neurological examination included an assessment of the motor, sensory, cranial nerves, reflexes, mental status and associated motor functions. The limited neurological exam could examine the same categories of neurologic assessments as the full examination, but would differ by the depth in the examination. The examination was required to be done to the extent needed to assess the participant for any potential changes in neurological status, as determined by the Investigator, but had to always include an assessment of motor, vision and hearing. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together. |
| Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2) | Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90 | The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) was assessed. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together. |
| Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Day 1 (Baseline) up to follow-up (28 days after Day 90) | Vital signs included blood pressure (BP; supine, sitting and standing) and pulse rate. Vital signs criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), BP: systolic BP (SBP) greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 or 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) change from grand baseline in same posture, systolic less than (\<) 90 mm Hg; diastolic BP (DBP) \>=20 mm Hg change from grand baseline in same posture, diastolic \<50 mm Hg; 2), pulse rate (supine, sitting and standing): \<40 or greater than (\>) 120 beats per minute (bpm); Standing: \<40 or \>140 bpm. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in NIHSS at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The NIHSS is a graded 11-item neurological examination rating speech and language, cognition, visual field deficits, motor and sensory impairments and ataxia used for the clinical assessment of acute stroke therapy. The maximum total score is 42 in a participant with a severe neurological deficit; the minimum score is 0 in a participant without gross neurological deficits. |
| Percentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 90 | The BI is an index of independence to score the ability of a participant with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him or herself. The index rates a participant's ability on the following 10 activities: feeding, moving from wheelchair to bed, personal toilet, getting on and off toilet, bathing self, walking on level surface, ascending and descending stairs, dressing, controlling bowels and controlling bladder. The maximum total score is 100 in a participant without functional impairment; the minimum score is 0 in a participant with major functional impairment. |
| BI at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 90 | The BI is an index of independence to score the ability of a participant with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him or herself. The index rates a participant's ability on the following 10 activities: feeding, moving from wheelchair to bed, personal toilet, getting on and off toilet, bathing self, walking on level surface, ascending and descending stairs, dressing, controlling bowels and controlling bladder. The maximum total score is 100 in a participant without functional impairment; the minimum score is 0 in a participant with major functional impairment. |
| Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in RBANS Naming Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | This test requires the participant to name 10 objects drawn in ink. The tester asked the participant to identify the picture. The participant had 20 seconds to respond to each picture presented. The performance measure was the number of objects named correctly. |
| Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The participant was presented with a page that had lines placed across the page. The participant was required to cross out all the lines on the page using their non-paretic hand after the tester had demonstrated what was required by crossing out the center line. The performance measure for this task was the total number of omissions made expressed as a percentage of the total number of items in the test. The test contains 4 variables: (L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%, and (L-R)/(L+R), where L = number of lines crossed on the left side of the paper; R = number of lines crossed on the right side of the paper. |
| Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test at Day 90 [(L-R)/(L+R)] (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The participant was presented with a page that had lines placed across the page. The participant was required to cross out all the lines on the page using their non-paretic hand after the tester had demonstrated what was required by crossing out the center line. The performance measure for this task was the total number of omissions made expressed as a percentage of the total number of items in the test. The test contains 4 variables: (L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%, and (L-R)/(L+R), where L = number of lines crossed on the left side of the paper; R = number of lines crossed on the right side of the paper. |
| Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Recognition Memory Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | This test assesses the ability to recognize pictures of objects. The participant was presented a series of pictures, a subset of which were the objects presented in the RBANS Naming Sub Test. After each picture was presented, the participant indicated either manually (ie, affirmative head nod) or verbally whether the picture was seen previously. The participant was given 5 seconds per picture to respond. The performance measure for this task was the total number of pictures correctly identified. |
| Gait Velocity Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 90 | The 10-meter walk test requires a 20 meter straight path, with 5 meters for acceleration, 10 meters for steady state walking, and 5 meters for deceleration. Markers were placed at the 5 and 15 meter positions along the path. The participant began to walk at a comfortable pace at 1 end of the path, and continued walking until he/she reached the other end. The rater used a stopwatch to determine how much time it took for the participant to traverse the 10 meter center of the path, starting the stopwatch as soon as the participant's limb crossed the first marker and stopping the stopwatch as soon as the participant's limb crossed the second marker. |
| Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Days 1, 2, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90 | — |
| Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Non-paretic Hand (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute. |
| Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The test uses a reference key, the participant had 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures. Responses could be written or oral. The performance measure for this task was the total number of correct responses. |
| Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic Hand (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute. |
| Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute. |
| Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The participant was required to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort while sitting with shoulder adducted and neutrally roated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral position and wrist between 0 to 30 degrees dorsiflexion and a 0 to 15 degrees ulnar deviation. The participant performed this task 3 times with each hand, starting with the non-paretic hand. The performance measure for this task was the average score measured in pounds of pressure exerted. |
| Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90 | The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The participant was required to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort while sitting with shoulder adducted and neutrally roated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral position and wrist between 0 to 30 degrees dorsiflexion and a 0 to 15 degrees ulnar deviation. The participant performed this task 3 times with each hand, starting with the non-paretic hand. The performance measure for this task was the average score measured in pounds of pressure exerted. |
| Percentage of Participants With mRS (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 90 | The mRS is a 6-point scale of functional recovery. The scale grades participants as having no symptoms (0), minor symptoms (1), minor handicap (2), moderate handicap (3), moderately severe handicap (4), severe handicap (5), or death (6). |
| Percentage of Participants With National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2) | Day 90 | The NIHSS is a graded 11-item neurological examination rating speech and language, cognition, visual field deficits, motor and sensory impairments and ataxia used for the clinical assessment of acute stroke therapy. The maximum total score is 42 in a participant with a severe neurological deficit; the minimum score is 0 in a participant without gross neurological deficits. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause Mortality (Part 2) | The time began from the participant provided informed consent through 28 calendar days post last administration of investigational product. | Deaths regardless causality were reported. |
| Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline) up to follow-up (28 days after Day 90) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. |
| Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 14 | — |
| Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2) | Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90 | NIHSS change of 4 points or greater. |
| Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2) | The time began from the participant provided informed consent through 28 calendar days post last administration of investigational product. | Deaths caused by stroke were reported. |
Countries
Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, India, South Korea, Taiwan, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 181 participants were assigned to study treatment, 178 of which received study treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg Participants received PF-03049423 1 mg once daily for 90 days. | 11 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo Participants received placebo matched to PF-03049423 1 mg once daily for 90 days. | 9 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg Participants received PF-03049423 3 mg once daily for 90 days. | 11 |
| Cohort 2: Placebo Participants received placebo matched to PF-0304942 3 mg once daily for 90 days. | 10 |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg Participants received PF-03049423 6 mg once daily for 90 days. | 70 |
| Cohort 3: Placebo Participants received placebo matched to PF-0304942 6 mg once daily for 90 days. | 67 |
| Total | 178 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Overall Study | Did not meet entrance criteria | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Medication error without adverse event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Other | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Study terminated by sponsor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Cohort 1: Placebo | Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Cohort 2: Placebo | Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Cohort 3: Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 | 64.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 | 69.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 | 65.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 | 64.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 | 65.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 | 65.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 28 Participants | 26 Participants | 70 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 42 Participants | 41 Participants | 108 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 10 / 11 | 7 / 9 | 7 / 11 | 9 / 10 | 50 / 70 | 47 / 67 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 11 | 1 / 9 | 3 / 11 | 1 / 10 | 15 / 70 | 18 / 67 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2)
The total number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities (without regard to baseline abnormality) was assessed. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants evaluated.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2) | 8 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2) | 8 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2) | 10 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2) | 9 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2) | 64 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Any Abnormal Laboratory Test Results (Part 1* and 2) | 56 participants |
Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)
ECG criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), PR interval: \>=300 milliseconds (msec); \>=25% increase when baseline \>200 msec; or increase \>=50% when baseline \<=200 msec; 2), QRS interval: \>=140 msec; \>=50% increase from baseline; 3), QT interval: \>=500 msec, QTc interval using Fridericia's formula (QTcF interval): absolute value \>=450 - \<480 msec, \>=480-\<500 msec, \>=500 msec; absolute change 30 - \<60, \>=60 msec. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 90
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). n=number of evaluable participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,47 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,47 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,47 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,47 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,47 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 14 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 19 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase >=60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 5 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval >=140 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QT interval >=500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 480-500 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval increase >=25%/50%, n=10,7,9,9,52,47 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF interval 450-480 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 14 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QRS interval increase >=50%, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | PR interval >=300 msec, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECGs) Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | QTcF increase 30-60 msec, n=10,9,11,10,69,66 | 11 participants |
Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)
The complete neurological examination included an assessment of the motor, sensory, cranial nerves, reflexes, mental status and associated motor functions. The limited neurological exam could examine the same categories of neurologic assessments as the full examination, but would differ by the depth in the examination. The examination was required to be done to the extent needed to assess the participant for any potential changes in neurological status, as determined by the Investigator, but had to always include an assessment of motor, vision and hearing. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). Participants analyzed indicated those who had neurological examinations done at both baseline and last visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 4 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Neurological Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2)
The complete physical examination included examination of the skin, eyes, ears, throat, neck, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. The limited physical examination included examination of the cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). Participants analyzed indicated those who had physical examinations done at both baseline and last visit.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Significant Change in Physical Examination Findings (Part 1* and 2) | 0 participants |
Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2)
Data were mapped to Columbia-Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) event codes. C-SSRS assessed if participant experienced: completed suicide (Code 1), suicide attempt (Code 2) (Response of Yes on actual attempt), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (Code 3) (Yes on aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, preparatory acts or behavior), suicidal ideation (Code 4) (Yes on wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with methods without intent to act/some intent to act without specific plan or with specific plan and intent), self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent (Code 7) (Yes on Has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior). Number of participants with Yes response for any of above mentioned categories was assessed. \*This was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for it were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Time frame: Day 7 (Baseline) up to follow up (28 days after Day 90)
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). n=number of participants who had C-SSRS assessed at that visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 57 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 53 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 47 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 44 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 53 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 51 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 53 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 44 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 51 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 57 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 47 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 53 | NA participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 51 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 53 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 44 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 47 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 57 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 53 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 44 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 53 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 47 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 51 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 53 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 57 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 57 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 53 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 53 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 47 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 44 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 51 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 60, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 55, 44 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 30, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 60, 47 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 90, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 61, 53 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Follow-up, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 51 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 14, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 59, 53 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Suicidal Behavior and/or Ideation as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) (Part 1* and 2) | Day 7, n=0, 0, 1, 1, 64, 57 | 2 participants |
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2)
Vital signs included blood pressure (BP; supine, sitting and standing) and pulse rate. Vital signs criteria of potential clinical concern were 1), BP: systolic BP (SBP) greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 or 50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) change from grand baseline in same posture, systolic less than (\<) 90 mm Hg; diastolic BP (DBP) \>=20 mm Hg change from grand baseline in same posture, diastolic \<50 mm Hg; 2), pulse rate (supine, sitting and standing): \<40 or greater than (\>) 120 beats per minute (bpm); Standing: \<40 or \>140 bpm. \*This endpoint was a primary endpoint for Part 1 (timeframe Days 1 to 14), as data for this timeframe were not reported separately, Part 1 and 2 data were reported together.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to follow-up (28 days after Day 90)
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo). n=number of evaluable participants.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 8 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 7 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 6 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | NA participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 6 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 6 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 5 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 5 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 5 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 5 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | NA participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 6 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | NA participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | NA participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | NA participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 6 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 16 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 6 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 9 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 23 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 37 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 10 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 26 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 10 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 32 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 13 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 5 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 7 participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 10 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 9 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting DBP <50 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate <40 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine DBP <50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 4 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 26 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 9 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 18 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 22 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing SBP <90 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 1 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate <40 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | NA participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting SBP <90 mm Hg, n=10,8,9,5,55,59 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine pulse rate >120 bpm, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 7 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate <40 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 12 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 11 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Supine SBP <90 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 0 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 6 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 11 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing DBP <50 mm Hg, n=7,7,9,8,49,48 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase: standing DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 3 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Standing pulse rate >140 bpm, n=0,0,0,2,1,0 | NA participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: sitting DBP >=20 mm Hg, n=9,6,9,4,48,44 | 14 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease: standing SBP >=50 mm Hg, n=2,3,3,6,19,22 | 2 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Decrease:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 37 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Increase:supine SBP >=30 mm Hg, n=11,9,11,10,70,67 | 17 participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Met Criteria of Potential Clinical Concern (Part 1* and 2) | Sitting pulse rate >120 bpm, n=1,0,2,0,3,2 | 0 participants |
Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2)
The mRS is a 6-point scale of functional recovery. The scale grades participants as having no symptoms (0), minor symptoms (1), minor handicap (2), moderate handicap (3), moderately severe handicap (4), severe handicap (5), or death (6).
Time frame: Day 90
Population: The Inferential Full Analysis Set (I-FAS) consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). n=number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2) | Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF), n=68, 65 | 42.6 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2) | Observed Cases (OC), n=51, 52 | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2) | Observed Cases (OC), n=51, 52 | 50.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Less Than or Equal to (<=2) at Day 90 (Part 2) | Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF), n=68, 65 | 46.2 percentage of participants |
BI at Day 90 (Part 2)
The BI is an index of independence to score the ability of a participant with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him or herself. The index rates a participant's ability on the following 10 activities: feeding, moving from wheelchair to bed, personal toilet, getting on and off toilet, bathing self, walking on level surface, ascending and descending stairs, dressing, controlling bowels and controlling bladder. The maximum total score is 100 in a participant without functional impairment; the minimum score is 0 in a participant with major functional impairment.
Time frame: Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | BI at Day 90 (Part 2) | 79.151 unit on a scale | Standard Error 3.6248 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | BI at Day 90 (Part 2) | 73.552 unit on a scale | Standard Error 3.8471 |
Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Non-paretic Hand (Part 2)
The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants indicated those participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Non-paretic Hand (Part 2) | 17.797 blocks moved per minute | Standard Error 2.1676 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Non-paretic Hand (Part 2) | 18.313 blocks moved per minute | Standard Error 2.2407 |
Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic Hand (Part 2)
The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants indicated those participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic Hand (Part 2) | 26.881 blocks moved per minute | Standard Error 3.8667 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic Hand (Part 2) | 26.741 blocks moved per minute | Standard Error 3.5627 |
Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)
The B&B test is a measure of manual dexterity. The B&B apparatus consists of a box divided into 2 sections and 1-inch hardwood blocks. The blocks began in the compartment of the test box to the dominant side of the participant. The participant was required to transfer the blocks one at a time to the other side of the box as quickly as possible in 1 minute using the non-paretic hand. The box was then turned so all the blocks were in the same side as the paretic hand. The participant was then required to do the test with his/her paretic hand. The participant was told that if more than 1 block was picked up at a time it was to only count as 1 block. The participant was also told that their fingertips needed to cross the partition for the block to be counted. The performance measure for this task was the number of blocks moved within 1 minute.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants indicated those participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2) | 41.830 percentage change | Standard Error 7.781 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Box and Blocks (B&B) Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2) | 31.041 percentage change | Standard Error 7.1284 |
Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2)
The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The participant was required to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort while sitting with shoulder adducted and neutrally roated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral position and wrist between 0 to 30 degrees dorsiflexion and a 0 to 15 degrees ulnar deviation. The participant performed this task 3 times with each hand, starting with the non-paretic hand. The performance measure for this task was the average score measured in pounds of pressure exerted.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). n=number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2) | Paretic Hand, n=26, 26 | 20.556 pounds | Standard Error 4.1829 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2) | Non-Paretic Hand, n=46, 41 | 12.546 pounds | Standard Error 2.3612 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2) | Paretic Hand, n=26, 26 | 30.886 pounds | Standard Error 3.9964 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic and Non-paretic Hands (Part 2) | Non-Paretic Hand, n=46, 41 | 12.312 pounds | Standard Error 2.5029 |
Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2)
The Hand Grip Strength Test measures the maximum isometric strength of the hand and forearm muscles. The participant was required to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum isometric effort while sitting with shoulder adducted and neutrally roated, elbow flexed at 90 degrees and the forearm in neutral position and wrist between 0 to 30 degrees dorsiflexion and a 0 to 15 degrees ulnar deviation. The participant performed this task 3 times with each hand, starting with the non-paretic hand. The performance measure for this task was the average score measured in pounds of pressure exerted.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants analyzed indicated those participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2) | 23.949 percentage change | Standard Error 5.4499 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Change From Baseline in Hand Grip Strength Test at Day 90 for Paretic to Non-paretic Hand Ratio (Part 2) | 36.761 percentage change | Standard Error 5.1182 |
Change From Baseline in NIHSS at Day 90 (Part 2)
The NIHSS is a graded 11-item neurological examination rating speech and language, cognition, visual field deficits, motor and sensory impairments and ataxia used for the clinical assessment of acute stroke therapy. The maximum total score is 42 in a participant with a severe neurological deficit; the minimum score is 0 in a participant without gross neurological deficits.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Change From Baseline in NIHSS at Day 90 (Part 2) | -6.511 unit on a scale | Standard Error 0.5384 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Change From Baseline in NIHSS at Day 90 (Part 2) | -6.228 unit on a scale | Standard Error 0.5655 |
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test at Day 90 [(L-R)/(L+R)] (Part 2)
The participant was presented with a page that had lines placed across the page. The participant was required to cross out all the lines on the page using their non-paretic hand after the tester had demonstrated what was required by crossing out the center line. The performance measure for this task was the total number of omissions made expressed as a percentage of the total number of items in the test. The test contains 4 variables: (L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%, and (L-R)/(L+R), where L = number of lines crossed on the left side of the paper; R = number of lines crossed on the right side of the paper.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Number of participants analyzed indicated participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test at Day 90 [(L-R)/(L+R)] (Part 2) | 0.083 change in ratio | Standard Error 0.062 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test at Day 90 [(L-R)/(L+R)] (Part 2) | -0.023 change in ratio | Standard Error 0.0625 |
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2)
The participant was presented with a page that had lines placed across the page. The participant was required to cross out all the lines on the page using their non-paretic hand after the tester had demonstrated what was required by crossing out the center line. The performance measure for this task was the total number of omissions made expressed as a percentage of the total number of items in the test. The test contains 4 variables: (L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%, and (L-R)/(L+R), where L = number of lines crossed on the left side of the paper; R = number of lines crossed on the right side of the paper.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). n=number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2) | (R/14) × 100%, n=39, 35 | 16.481 change in percentage of lines crossed | Standard Error 4.3564 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2) | (L+R)/28 × 100%, n=39, 35 | 19.459 change in percentage of lines crossed | Standard Error 4.4433 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2) | (L/14) × 100%, n=39, 35 | 22.824 change in percentage of lines crossed | Standard Error 5.6691 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2) | (R/14) × 100%, n=39, 35 | 15.431 change in percentage of lines crossed | Standard Error 4.3647 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2) | (L+R)/28 × 100%, n=39, 35 | 16.983 change in percentage of lines crossed | Standard Error 4.4551 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Line Cancellation Test [(L+R)/28 × 100%, (L/14) × 100%, (R/14) × 100%)] at Day 90 (Part 2) | (L/14) × 100%, n=39, 35 | 18.950 change in percentage of lines crossed | Standard Error 5.6639 |
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in RBANS Naming Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)
This test requires the participant to name 10 objects drawn in ink. The tester asked the participant to identify the picture. The participant had 20 seconds to respond to each picture presented. The performance measure was the number of objects named correctly.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in RBANS Naming Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | 0.989 objects named correctly | Standard Error 0.3676 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in RBANS Naming Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | 1.324 objects named correctly | Standard Error 0.3666 |
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Recognition Memory Test at Day 90 (Part 2)
This test assesses the ability to recognize pictures of objects. The participant was presented a series of pictures, a subset of which were the objects presented in the RBANS Naming Sub Test. After each picture was presented, the participant indicated either manually (ie, affirmative head nod) or verbally whether the picture was seen previously. The participant was given 5 seconds per picture to respond. The performance measure for this task was the total number of pictures correctly identified.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Recognition Memory Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | -1.135 pictures correctly identified | Standard Error 0.4743 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Recognition Memory Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | 0.144 pictures correctly identified | Standard Error 0.4797 |
Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2)
The test uses a reference key, the participant had 90 seconds to pair specific numbers with given geometric figures. Responses could be written or oral. The performance measure for this task was the total number of correct responses.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline), Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | 13.748 correct responses | Standard Error 1.5321 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Domains of Interest: Change From Baseline in Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding Sub Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | 12.686 correct responses | Standard Error 1.6282 |
Gait Velocity Test at Day 90 (Part 2)
The 10-meter walk test requires a 20 meter straight path, with 5 meters for acceleration, 10 meters for steady state walking, and 5 meters for deceleration. Markers were placed at the 5 and 15 meter positions along the path. The participant began to walk at a comfortable pace at 1 end of the path, and continued walking until he/she reached the other end. The rater used a stopwatch to determine how much time it took for the participant to traverse the 10 meter center of the path, starting the stopwatch as soon as the participant's limb crossed the first marker and stopping the stopwatch as soon as the participant's limb crossed the second marker.
Time frame: Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg). Participants analyzed indicated number of participants included for comparison between active drug and placebo for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Gait Velocity Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | 1.064 meters/second (m/s) | Standard Error 0.104 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Gait Velocity Test at Day 90 (Part 2) | 0.975 meters/second (m/s) | Standard Error 0.1128 |
Percentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2)
The BI is an index of independence to score the ability of a participant with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for him or herself. The index rates a participant's ability on the following 10 activities: feeding, moving from wheelchair to bed, personal toilet, getting on and off toilet, bathing self, walking on level surface, ascending and descending stairs, dressing, controlling bowels and controlling bladder. The maximum total score is 100 in a participant without functional impairment; the minimum score is 0 in a participant with major functional impairment.
Time frame: Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Percentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2) | BI >=95 | 47.1 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Percentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2) | BI=100 | 42.6 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2) | BI >=95 | 40.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Barthel Index (BI) >= 95 and BI =100 at Day 90 (Part 2) | BI=100 | 35.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With mRS (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)
The mRS is a 6-point scale of functional recovery. The scale grades participants as having no symptoms (0), minor symptoms (1), minor handicap (2), moderate handicap (3), moderately severe handicap (4), severe handicap (5), or death (6).
Time frame: Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Percentage of Participants With mRS (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With mRS (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2) | 24.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2)
The NIHSS is a graded 11-item neurological examination rating speech and language, cognition, visual field deficits, motor and sensory impairments and ataxia used for the clinical assessment of acute stroke therapy. The maximum total score is 42 in a participant with a severe neurological deficit; the minimum score is 0 in a participant without gross neurological deficits.
Time frame: Day 90
Population: The I-FAS consisted of participants within the FAS who were randomized to PF-03049423 MTD or highest dose (6 mg) group or the placebo group that was in the same cohort as the MTD or highest dose (6 mg).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Percentage of Participants With National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2) | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Percentage of Participants With National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (0-1) at Day 90 (Part 2) | 26.2 percentage of participants |
Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2)
Time frame: Days 1, 2, 7, 14, 30, 60 and 90
Population: PK concentration population included all participants who were treated with PF-03049423 who had at least 1 measurable concentration. n=participants with concentration above lower limit of quantification at the corresponding sampling time.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (1 hour post dose), n=11, 10, 63 | 5.825 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 4.3514 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 30 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 58 | 5.339 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 3.5712 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (2 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 59 | NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (0 hour predose), n=0, 1, 3 | NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (6 [cohort 3:4] hours post dose), n=9,7,31 | 17.57 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 4.1614 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (6 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 61 | NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (8 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 68 | 7.361 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 2.4032 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (2 hours post dose), n=9, 6, 0 | 17.06 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 7.3799 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (0 hour predose), n=10, 8, 59 | 7.805 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 2.9278 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 90 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 20 | 12.80 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (1 hour post dose), n=9, 7, 0 | 16.47 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 7.1782 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 60 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 27 | 13.25 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 0.7778 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 2 (0 hour, predose), n=11, 11, 67 | 4.521 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1.5265 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 90 (0 hour predose), n=5, 6, 45 | 5.252 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 1.5161 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 60 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 53 | 6.360 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 3.1028 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (0 hour, post dose), n=9, 7, 64 | 8.601 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 2.9609 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (2 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 61 | 7.063 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 3.2729 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 30 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 25 | 11.55 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 2.6234 |
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (1 hour post dose), n=0, 1, 59 | NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 60 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 27 | 47.86 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 7.3296 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (0 hour predose), n=0, 1, 3 | 0.05245 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 0.17397 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (1 hour post dose), n=11, 10, 63 | 17.50 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 12.814 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (2 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 61 | 30.18 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 11.313 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (8 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 68 | 25.39 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 8.6644 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 2 (0 hour, predose), n=11, 11, 67 | 18.05 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 4.7834 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (0 hour, post dose), n=9, 7, 64 | 27.79 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 7.6945 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (1 hour post dose), n=0, 1, 59 | 51.80 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (2 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 59 | 58.10 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (6 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 61 | 51.10 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (0 hour predose), n=10, 8, 59 | 31.13 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 9.8243 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (1 hour post dose), n=9, 7, 0 | 76.71 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 32.657 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (2 hours post dose), n=9, 6, 0 | 70.37 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 14.795 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (6 [cohort 3:4] hours post dose), n=9,7,31 | 58.36 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 11.72 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 30 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 58 | 29.68 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 11.015 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 30 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 25 | 57.08 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 13.99 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 60 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 53 | 24.55 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 5.8206 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 90 (0 hour predose), n=5, 6, 45 | 29.18 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 15.909 |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 90 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 20 | 49.40 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 13.962 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (6 [cohort 3:4] hours post dose), n=9,7,31 | 118.2 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 41.967 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (1 hour post dose), n=0, 1, 59 | 115.9 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 65.329 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 90 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 20 | 82.69 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 29.005 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 30 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 58 | 50.77 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 31.473 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (0 hour, post dose), n=9, 7, 64 | 53.08 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 30.237 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 90 (0 hour predose), n=5, 6, 45 | 47.02 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 24.065 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 30 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 25 | 96.27 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 49.929 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 2 (0 hour, predose), n=11, 11, 67 | 32.07 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 13.776 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (0 hour predose), n=0, 1, 3 | 1.420 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 11.591 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 60 (0 hour predose), n=6, 6, 53 | 49.37 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 33.747 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (8 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 68 | 52.47 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 23.25 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (0 hour predose), n=10, 8, 59 | 53.10 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 28.085 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (2 hours post dose), n=11, 11, 61 | 58.19 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 32.837 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (1 hour post dose), n=9, 7, 0 | NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (6 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 61 | 103.8 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 41.09 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 60 (4 hours post dose), n=2, 5, 27 | 112.1 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 58.56 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 14 (2 hours post dose), n=9, 6, 0 | NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 7 (2 hours post dose), n=0, 1, 59 | 126.3 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 57.759 |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Plasma Concentrations of PF-03049423 (Part 1 and 2) | Day 1 (1 hour post dose), n=11, 10, 63 | 46.76 nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL) | Standard Deviation 36.153 |
All-cause Mortality (Part 2)
Deaths regardless causality were reported.
Time frame: The time began from the participant provided informed consent through 28 calendar days post last administration of investigational product.
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | All-cause Mortality (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | All-cause Mortality (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | All-cause Mortality (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | All-cause Mortality (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | All-cause Mortality (Part 2) | 6 Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | All-cause Mortality (Part 2) | 7 Number of participants |
Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2)
Deaths caused by stroke were reported.
Time frame: The time began from the participant provided informed consent through 28 calendar days post last administration of investigational product.
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2) | 3 Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Mortality Directly Related to Stroke (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2)
NIHSS change of 4 points or greater.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 90
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With Neuro-worsening (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2)
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to Day 14
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Number of Participants With SBP <100 mm Hg or SBP Decline >=30 mm Hg From Immediate Pre-dose Measurement, With or Without Neuro-worsening (Defined as an NIHSS Increase of 4 Points or Greater) Within 2 Hours Post-dose (Part 2) | NA Number of participants |
Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.
Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) up to follow-up (28 days after Day 90)
Population: The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who took any study medication (active or placebo).
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: PF-03049423 1 mg | Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 1: Placebo | Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2) | 1 Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: PF-03049423 3 mg | Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2) | 2 Number of participants |
| Cohort 2: Placebo | Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2) | 0 Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: PF-03049423 6 mg | Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2) | 3 Number of participants |
| Cohort 3: Placebo | Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Resulting in Discontinuation of Study Drug (Part 2) | 5 Number of participants |