Skip to content

Brain Imaging and Developmental Follow up of Infants Treated With Erythropoietin

Brain Imaging and Developmental Follow up of Infants Treated With Erythropoietin

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01207778
Acronym
BRITE
Enrollment
77
Registered
2010-09-23
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2023-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prematurity

Keywords

brain, development, erythropoietin, neuroprotection, MRI

Brief summary

Approximately 60,000 premature infants are born each year who weigh less than 1,500 grams,many of whom sustain brain damage because of their prematurity. This study is designed to evaluate the long-term developmental effects of one promising neuroprotective treatment,erythropoietin (Epo), when given in the neonatal period. Using detailed neurodevelopmental testing and state-of-the-art brain imaging, we hope to determine whether this is an effective treatment to prevent brain injury associated with prematurity, and to lay the groundwork for further studies to improve the developmental outcome of infants delivered prematurely.

Detailed description

Over twelve percent of infants born less than 1,500 grams (VLBW) sustain brain injury with subsequent developmental delay. Although various neuroprotective strategies have been evaluated, none have been successful. One promising intervention is the use of recombinant erythropoietin (Epo, also known as an erythropoiesis stimulating agent, or ESA). In addition to stimulating red cell production, Epo has been shown to be protective in the developing brain in animal models. We have preliminary data suggesting its efficacy when used in VLBW infants, who are at risk of requiring transfusions, and who are also at risk for brain hemorrhage, hypoxicischemic brain injury, and developmental delay. We are currently performing a multicentered study evaluating hematopoietic and short term developmental effects of ESAs in preterm infants randomized to receive Epo, Darbepoetin alfa (a longer acting ESA), or placebo/ control for the first 10 weeks of age (NCT00334737). The first enrolled infants will reach 42-48 months in January, 2010. While that study evaluates the safety and general short-term developmental effects of ESAs, there is an unprecedented opportunity to study long term effects of ESA in significant detail, including evaluating the long term developmental effects and the underlying mechanism of neurologic improvement with state of the art neuroimaging. This proposal seeks to evaluate longitudinal, long-term developmental effects and underlying neurologic mechanisms of ESAs administered to VLBW infants in the first 10 weeks of life. Our specific hypotheses are: 1\) ESAs administered to preterm infants during the neonatal period improve long-term neurodevelopmental outcome, 2) ESAs affect regional brain structure, neurochemistry and neurologic organization as reflected in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and 3) the blood level of ESA correlates with MR imaging and neurodevelopmental outcome. To test these hypotheses, neurodevelopmental outcome will be assessed through a comprehensive neurodevelopmental assessment at two time points: 42-48 months, and 66-72 months (WPSSI III, Early Child Assessment, Executive Categorization Battery). Brain imaging will be performed concurrent with developmental assessments and includes measures of volume (high resolution volumetric analysis), neurochemistry (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and regional cerebral blood flow (arterial spin labeling). This study is highly clinically relevant due to the long-term developmental and imaging follow up studies that are part of the design, significantly increasing our ability to determine if developmental, functional and anatomical differences exist in infants randomized to ESAs, a relatively new interventional strategy used in preterm infants. This proposal addresses our long-term goal of developing effective treatment strategies for disorders associated with prematurity through an improved understanding of brain-behavioral relationships.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
University of New Mexico
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
36 Months to 72 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

(preterm): * birth weight 500-1,250 grams, gestational age ≤32 weeks * hematocrit ≤55% * ≤48 hours of age * expected to survive greater than 72 hours * consent signed by parent or guardian Inclusion Criteria (term): Former term born infants will be eligible if they have not experienced any episodes of hypoxia, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, prenatal drug exposure, or sepsis.

Exclusion criteria

(former preterms): * hemorrhagic or hemolytic disease * major congenital anomalies (such as trisomy 13, 18 or 21) * major neurologic abnormality such as hydrocephalus or meningomyelocele * complex congenital heart disease * receiving Epo or are enrolled in an Epo study * evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation * clinical seizures are present * congenital thrombotic disease is suspected * systolic blood pressures \>100 mm Hg (while not on pressor support) Infants with minor anomalies such as clinodactyly, single umbilical vessel or patent ductus are not excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Full Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Function42-48 months and 66-72 monthsInfants who received ESAs during their initial hospitalization will perform significantly better on measures of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) full scale IQ, performance IQ, verbal IQ, and executive function. Scores are standardized, 100 is an average score with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores are better. Test scores range from 41 to 160.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Preterm ESA Recipients
children 3.5-4 years of age who received ESAs during hospitalization
39
Preterm Controls
children 3.5-4 years of age who received placebo during hospitalization
14
Term Controls
healthy children 3.5-4 years of age born term
24
Total77

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up033

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPreterm ESA RecipientsPreterm ControlsTerm ControlsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
39 Participants14 Participants24 Participants77 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous47 months48.5 months45.5 months47 months
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants5 Participants14 Participants34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants9 Participants10 Participants43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
8 Participants3 Participants3 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
26 Participants11 Participants20 Participants57 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
39 participants14 participants24 participants77 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants6 Participants14 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants8 Participants10 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 140 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 390 / 140 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 390 / 140 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Full Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Function

Infants who received ESAs during their initial hospitalization will perform significantly better on measures of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) full scale IQ, performance IQ, verbal IQ, and executive function. Scores are standardized, 100 is an average score with a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores are better. Test scores range from 41 to 160.

Time frame: 42-48 months and 66-72 months

Population: Subjects were seen around 4 years and 6 years of age. Initial numbers of subjects seen at 4 years were: Placebo group (14), ESA (39), Term (24). Numbers of subjects ween at 6 years were: Placebo (11), ESA (39), Term (21).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo GroupFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionfull scale IQ at 4 years79 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
Placebo GroupFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionverbal IQ at 4 years83 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Placebo GroupFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionperformance IQ at 4 years79 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Placebo GroupFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionexecutive function91 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Placebo GroupFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionfull scale IQ at 6 years82 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Placebo GroupFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionverbal IQ at 6 years86 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Placebo GroupFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionperformance IQ at 6 years82 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Placebo GroupFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionexecutive function at 6 years92 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
ESA RecipientsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionperformance IQ at 4 years93 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
ESA RecipientsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionperformance IQ at 6 years97 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
ESA RecipientsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionexecutive function100 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
ESA RecipientsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionfull scale IQ at 6 years94 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
ESA RecipientsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionverbal IQ at 6 years93 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
ESA RecipientsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionfull scale IQ at 4 years91 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
ESA RecipientsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionverbal IQ at 4 years92 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18
ESA RecipientsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionexecutive function at 6 years99 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Term ControlsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionperformance IQ at 4 years104 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Term ControlsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionverbal IQ at 4 years101 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Term ControlsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionfull scale IQ at 4 years103 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Term ControlsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionexecutive function105 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Term ControlsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionperformance IQ at 6 years102 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Term ControlsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionverbal IQ at 6 years98 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Term ControlsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionfull scale IQ at 6 years100 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Term ControlsFull Scale IQ, Performance IQ, Verbal IQ, Executive Functionexecutive function at 6 years107 standardized score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026