Skip to content

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Extended Release Hydromorphone (Exalgo) in Patients With Neuropathic Pain

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Extended Release Hydromorphone (Exalgo) in Patients With Neuropathic Pain: An Open Label Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01207596
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-09-23
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2012-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

Pain, Neuropathy, Neuropathic Pain, Hydromorphone

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if Exalgo (r) is beneficial for the patients with neuropathic pain.

Detailed description

Neuropathic pain state is usually refractory to most analgesic regimens and requires polypharmacy for symptomatic relief. Current treatment options for neuropathic pain include both oral and topical medications. Most commonly prescribed oral treatments include antidepressants (eg, amitriptyline, desipramine, and duloxetine), antiepileptics (eg, gabapentin, pregabalin), and opiates such as tramadol and morphine. Current topical treatments include the lidocaine patch and the capsaicin patch. Many patients have inadequate pain relief in spite of these treatment options. Currently, there are no treatments available for treatment of neuropathy itself other than treating the underlying cause and addressing the symptomatic relief for pain. Current drug therapies for neuropathic pain provide inadequate pain relief and undesirable side effects including sedation and cognitive dysfunction. It is not uncommon to use a combination of agents for the treatment of neuropathic pain to minimize the side effects. Although treating the mild to moderate pain may be relatively easy, it is very challenging for severe neuropathic pain. Although the use of opiates for neuropathic pain is well accepted, it remains controversial because of the potential for abuse and diversion.

Interventions

DRUGHydromorphone

Oral hydromorphone extended release, once daily

Sponsors

International Clinical Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. individuals with chronic pain of more than 6 months duration 2. pain is determined to be secondary to a documented neuropathy 3. patients who are tolerant of opiates (60 mg of morphine or equivalent for at least one week) 4. male or female patients aged 18-75 yrs and have signed a written informed consent form and privacy statement 5. female patients of child-bearing potential must be using an acceptable form of birth control

Exclusion criteria

1. pregnant or lactating women 2. allergy to morphine or its derivatives 3. history of alcohol or substance abuse in the last 3 yrs 4. participation in any other clinical trial in the last 30 days 5. uncontrolled pain 6. patient who is deemed to be medically unstable by principal investigator 7. history of severe lung disease or asthma that is deemed medically significant by principal investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) ScaleBaseline visit to Week 12 or last visitThe primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to end of study on question #5 (average pain) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain on the average, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #4: the Number That Best Describes Your Pain at Its Least in the Last 24 HoursBaseline visit to Week 12 or last visitChange from baseline to end of study on question #4 (least pain) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain at its least in the last 24 hours, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Change From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #6: the Number That Tells How Much Pain You Have Right NowBaseline visit to Week 12 or last visitChange from baseline to end of study on question #4 (current pain) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that tells how much pain you have right now, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Change From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #3: the Number That Best Describes Your Pain at Its Worst in the Last 24 HoursBaseline visit to Week 12 or last visitChange from baseline to end of study on question #3 (worst pain) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)Baseline visit to 12 weeks visitThe PQAS is a 20-item scale that quantifies the quality and intensity of neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain; scores range from 1 to 200, with higher scores indicating more severe pain
Global Assessment of Treatment SatisfactionBaseline visit to Week 12 or last visitPatients were asked to rate their global assessment of treatment satisfaction, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study
Sleep Quality Assessment (SQA)Baseline visit to Week 12 or last visitSleep Quality Assessment (SQA) scale, asking patients to assess the degree that pain has interfered with their sleep in the last 24 hours (where 0 = does not interfere and 10 = completely interferes)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hydromorphone
Received once-daily OROS hydromorphone ER, individually titrated, available in 8, 12, and 16-mg tablet strengths
30
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHydromorphone
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
22 Participants
Age Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale

The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to end of study on question #5 (average pain) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain on the average, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline visit to Week 12 or last visit

Population: LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HydromorphoneChange From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.55
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #3: the Number That Best Describes Your Pain at Its Worst in the Last 24 Hours

Change from baseline to end of study on question #3 (worst pain) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline visit to Week 12 or last visit

Population: LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HydromorphoneChange From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #3: the Number That Best Describes Your Pain at Its Worst in the Last 24 Hours-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #4: the Number That Best Describes Your Pain at Its Least in the Last 24 Hours

Change from baseline to end of study on question #4 (least pain) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain at its least in the last 24 hours, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline visit to Week 12 or last visit

Population: LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HydromorphoneChange From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #4: the Number That Best Describes Your Pain at Its Least in the Last 24 Hours-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #6: the Number That Tells How Much Pain You Have Right Now

Change from baseline to end of study on question #4 (current pain) of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that tells how much pain you have right now, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.

Time frame: Baseline visit to Week 12 or last visit

Population: LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HydromorphoneChange From Baseline in the Average Pain Over the Last 24 Hrs on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale Question #6: the Number That Tells How Much Pain You Have Right Now-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
Secondary

Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction

Patients were asked to rate their global assessment of treatment satisfaction, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study

Time frame: Baseline visit to Week 12 or last visit

Population: LOCF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HydromorphoneGlobal Assessment of Treatment SatisfactionVery satisfied38.5 percentage of patients
HydromorphoneGlobal Assessment of Treatment SatisfactionSatisfied42.3 percentage of patients
HydromorphoneGlobal Assessment of Treatment SatisfactionDissatisfied15.4 percentage of patients
HydromorphoneGlobal Assessment of Treatment SatisfactionVery dissatisfied3.8 percentage of patients
Secondary

Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)

The PQAS is a 20-item scale that quantifies the quality and intensity of neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain; scores range from 1 to 200, with higher scores indicating more severe pain

Time frame: Baseline visit to 12 weeks visit

Population: LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HydromorphonePain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)-24.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.9
Secondary

Sleep Quality Assessment (SQA)

Sleep Quality Assessment (SQA) scale, asking patients to assess the degree that pain has interfered with their sleep in the last 24 hours (where 0 = does not interfere and 10 = completely interferes)

Time frame: Baseline visit to Week 12 or last visit

Population: LOCF

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HydromorphoneSleep Quality Assessment (SQA)-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026