Skip to content

Milnacipran in the Treatment of Widespread, Non-Joint Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Milnacipran in the Treatment of Widespread, Non-Joint Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01207453
Enrollment
49
Registered
2010-09-23
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2014-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Keywords

Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Milnacipran, Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether milnacipran reduces widespread, non-joint pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The investigators will conduct a double-blind randomized crossover trial in subjects with RA to test the hypothesis that milnacipran improves widespread, non-joint pain. The investigators will also use data from the trial to determine whether response to milnacipran is associated with pain-modulating mechanisms from the central nervous system. The investigators hypothesize that response to milnacipran will be greater among patients with impaired central pain mechanisms than among patients with intact central pain modulating mechanisms.

Detailed description

Despite the development of effective medications to treat inflammation, pain remains a priority for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The pain that persists despite anti-inflammatory treatment is usually widespread and non-articular; it may lead to diminished quality of life and high medical, psychological and social costs. To develop better treatments for pain and prevent disability, it is critical to obtain a better understanding of widespread, non-joint pain in RA. Milnacipran is a selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI). No studies have examined the effect of SNRIs on pain in RA. However, several studies have examined the role of SNRIs in fibromyalgia and related pain conditions. Treatment with milnacipran has been associated with improvements in clinical pain severity in Phase 2 and Phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials of fibromyalgia patients. In animal models, milnacipran appears to moderate the pain-inducing effects of inflammation and central sensitization. Thus milnacipran may be an ideal drug to treat pain in RA. A clinical trial of an SNRI in the treatment of widespread, non-joint pain in RA will provide more information regarding pain mechanisms and may lead to more targeted, effective ways of treating pain in RA.

Interventions

DRUGMilnacipran

Milnacipran comes in 50 mg tablets and is taken orally. Participants will gradually be increased to a target dose of 50 mg twice daily.

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
24 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 24 years or older * Primary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis from a board-certified rheumatologist * Willing to maintain stable doses of concurrent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or other acceptable medications or therapies for the duration of the study * Brief Pain Inventory Average Pain \>= 4 at the screening visit * Widespread Pain Index \>= 5 at the screening visit * Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary fibromyalgia * Diagnosis of cold sensitive conditions such as Raynaud's syndrome, cryoglobulinemia and paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria * Diagnosis of psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder and shared psychotic disorder * Patients being treated with SSRIs, MAO inhibitors or tricyclic, tetracyclic or atypical antidepressants for pain may participate in this study if they are washed off these medications before study entry. Patients currently receiving therapy with SSRIs or tricyclic, tetracyclic or atypical antidepressants for depression may be washed off these medications before study entry pending permission of the prescribing physician and if they have never received a diagnosis of major depressive disorder or had a history of suicidal ideation. * Patients on thioridazine or MAO inhibitors * Patients taking codeine or other opioids/opiates. Patients who are taking medications such as pregabalin (Lyrica) and gabapentin (Neurontin) for pain may be enrolled in this study. * Known hypersensitivity to milnacipran * Patients with a significant risk of suicide as assessed by the Beck depression inventory form * Patients with a history of suicide * Pregnant or breast-feeding women * Patients with an actively pending worker's compensation claim or auto no-fault claim; patients with current worker's compensation, auto no-fault compensation, or litigation; or any patient with significant secondary gain issues per discretion of the researchers. * Patients with myocardial infarction within the past 12 months, active cardiac disease (chest pain or evidence of ischemia on stress test), acute congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization in the past 12 months, clinically significant cardiac rhythm or conduction abnormalities requiring hospitalization in the past 12 months * Patients with severe liver impairment (AST or ALT \> 3 times the upper limit of normal) * For patients 2-3 times the upper limit of normal, we will obtain enrollment permission from the patient's hepatologist and monitor values at each study visit. If values increase above 3 times the upper limit of normal, the patient will be discontinued from the study. * For patients 1-2 times the upper limit of normal, we will obtain enrollment permission from the patient's physician and monitor per request of the physician. * Patients with severe or end stage renal disease, defined as a GFR \< 15 ml/min or on dialysis * Patients with a recent (≤ 12 months) history of seizures. * Patients with uncontrolled narrow-angle glaucoma. * Patients who have been treated with an experimental agent within the last three months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) ChangeBaseline to 6 weeksA measure of change in scores on the BPI short form, a 24-hr average pain item, from baseline to 6 weeks, The BPI short form scores ranges from 0-10, with 10 being the worst pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom Intensity Scale (SIS)Baseline to 6 weeksA measure of the change in SIS score from baseline to 6 weeks. The SIS score ranges from 0-9.75, with high scores being worse indicating more widespread pain and fatigue.
Thumbnail Pain ThresholdBaseline to 6 weeksA measure of the change in thumbnail pain threshold from baseline to 6 weeks. Thumbnail pain threshold was determined by applying pressure to a subjectt's thumbnail until the subject felt pain. The difference between the average thumbnail pain threshold (an average for the right and left thumbs) at baseline was compared to that at 6 months. Pain threshold was measured in kg/cm\^2. The difference in threshold could range from 0-11 kg/cm\^2. A higher difference between thresholds indicates improved pain sensitivity.
Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)Baseline to 6 weeksCPM is defined as the difference between pain threshold A (measured after a conditioning stimulus activates pathways that inhibit pain) and pain threshold B (measured before the conditioning stimulus is applied). The conditioning stimulus was immersion of the hand in a cold water bath. Pressure pain threshold was assessed at the trapezius muscle initially. Subjects were then instructed to immerse their hand in a water bath for 30 seconds. At 20 seconds, pressure pain threshold at the trapezius was assessed again. We defined the magnitude of subjects' CPM as the difference in pressure pain threshold between baseline and 20 seconds after cold water immersion. This difference was compared to that measured at 6 weeks. The scale for the difference in CPM ranged from 0-11 kg/cm\^2, with 0 indicating no change in CPM between 6 weeks and baseline and 11 indicating the maximum possible change. A greater change in CPM between baseline and 6 weeks is indicative of improvements in CPM.
Wrist Pain ThresholdBaseline to 6 weeksA measure of the change in wrist pain threshold from baseline to 6 weeks. Wrist pain threshold was determined by applying pressure to a subject's wrist until the subject felt pain. The difference between the average wrist pain threshold (an average for the right and left wrists) at baseline was compared to that at 6 months. Pain threshold was measured in kg/cm\^2. The difference in threshold could range from 0-11 kg/cm\^2. A higher difference between thresholds indicates improved pain sensitivity.
Knee Pain ThresholdBaseline to 6 weeksA measure of the change in knee pain threshold from baseline to 6 weeks. Knee pain threshold was determined by applying pressure to a subject's knee until the subject felt pain. The difference between the average knee pain threshold (an average for the right and left knees) at baseline was compared to that at 6 months. Pain threshold was measured in kg/cm\^2. The difference in threshold could range from 0-11 kg/cm\^2. A higher difference between thresholds indicates improved pain sensitivity.
Trapezius Pain ThresholdBaseline to 6 weeksA measure of the change in trapezius pain threshold from baseline to 6 weeks. Trapezius pain threshold was determined by applying pressure to a subject's trapezius muscle until the subject felt pain. The difference between the average trapezius pain threshold (an average for the right and left trapezii) at baseline was compared to that at 6 months. Pain threshold was measured in kg/cm\^2. The difference in threshold could range from 0-11 kg/cm\^2. A higher difference between thresholds indicates improved pain sensitivity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

49 patients signed the informed consent document. 8 patients did not meet inclusion criteria and failed screening. 41 patients were randomized and received \>= 1 dose of the study drug/placebo. Seven patients stopped participation due to adverse events, and 2 were lost to follow-up. 32 patients completed the study and were analyzed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Milnacipran and Then Placebo
Participants first received 6 weeks of milnacipran (titrated up to full dose of 50 mg twice daily). This was followed by a 3-week wash-out. Participants then received 6 weeks of placebo.
23
Placebo and Then Milnacipran
Participants first received 6 weeks of placebo. This was followed by a 3-week wash-out. After the wash-out period, participants then received 6 weeks of milnacipran (titrated up to full dose of 50 mg twice daily).
18
Total41

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
2nd InterventionAdverse Event12
2nd InterventionLost to Follow-up10
First InterventionAdverse Event21
WashoutAdverse Event10
WashoutLost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMilnacipran and Then PlaceboPlacebo and Then MilnacipranTotal
Age, Continuous
Age
56.39 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.35
58.50 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.79
57.32 Year
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.34
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants15 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 418 / 411 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 411 / 410 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Change

A measure of change in scores on the BPI short form, a 24-hr average pain item, from baseline to 6 weeks, The BPI short form scores ranges from 0-10, with 10 being the worst pain.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboBrief Pain Inventory (BPI) ChangeBaseline5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboBrief Pain Inventory (BPI) Change6 weeks4.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboBrief Pain Inventory (BPI) ChangeChange-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
MilnacipranBrief Pain Inventory (BPI) ChangeBaseline5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
MilnacipranBrief Pain Inventory (BPI) Change6 weeks4.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
MilnacipranBrief Pain Inventory (BPI) ChangeChange-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.p-value: 0.42Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using linear mixed models.p-value: 0.37Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)

CPM is defined as the difference between pain threshold A (measured after a conditioning stimulus activates pathways that inhibit pain) and pain threshold B (measured before the conditioning stimulus is applied). The conditioning stimulus was immersion of the hand in a cold water bath. Pressure pain threshold was assessed at the trapezius muscle initially. Subjects were then instructed to immerse their hand in a water bath for 30 seconds. At 20 seconds, pressure pain threshold at the trapezius was assessed again. We defined the magnitude of subjects' CPM as the difference in pressure pain threshold between baseline and 20 seconds after cold water immersion. This difference was compared to that measured at 6 weeks. The scale for the difference in CPM ranged from 0-11 kg/cm\^2, with 0 indicating no change in CPM between 6 weeks and baseline and 11 indicating the maximum possible change. A greater change in CPM between baseline and 6 weeks is indicative of improvements in CPM.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)Baseline0.8 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)6 Weeks0.9 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.3
PlaceboChange in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)Change0.1 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.2
MilnacipranChange in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)Baseline0.8 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.1
MilnacipranChange in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)6 Weeks0.9 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.1
MilnacipranChange in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)Change0.1 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.5
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.p-value: 0.39Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using linear mixed models.p-value: 0.96Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Knee Pain Threshold

A measure of the change in knee pain threshold from baseline to 6 weeks. Knee pain threshold was determined by applying pressure to a subject's knee until the subject felt pain. The difference between the average knee pain threshold (an average for the right and left knees) at baseline was compared to that at 6 months. Pain threshold was measured in kg/cm\^2. The difference in threshold could range from 0-11 kg/cm\^2. A higher difference between thresholds indicates improved pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboKnee Pain ThresholdBaseline7.0 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3.1
PlaceboKnee Pain Threshold6 weeks7.3 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3.1
PlaceboKnee Pain ThresholdChange0.3 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.8
MilnacipranKnee Pain ThresholdBaseline6.9 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3.2
MilnacipranKnee Pain Threshold6 weeks7.3 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3.2
MilnacipranKnee Pain ThresholdChange0.3 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.4
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.p-value: 0.72Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using linear mixed models.p-value: 0.82Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Symptom Intensity Scale (SIS)

A measure of the change in SIS score from baseline to 6 weeks. The SIS score ranges from 0-9.75, with high scores being worse indicating more widespread pain and fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSymptom Intensity Scale (SIS)Baseline5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboSymptom Intensity Scale (SIS)6 weeks4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
PlaceboSymptom Intensity Scale (SIS)Change-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
MilnacipranSymptom Intensity Scale (SIS)Baseline5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
MilnacipranSymptom Intensity Scale (SIS)6 weeks4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
MilnacipranSymptom Intensity Scale (SIS)Change-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.p-value: 0.89Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using linear mixed models.p-value: 0.83Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Thumbnail Pain Threshold

A measure of the change in thumbnail pain threshold from baseline to 6 weeks. Thumbnail pain threshold was determined by applying pressure to a subjectt's thumbnail until the subject felt pain. The difference between the average thumbnail pain threshold (an average for the right and left thumbs) at baseline was compared to that at 6 months. Pain threshold was measured in kg/cm\^2. The difference in threshold could range from 0-11 kg/cm\^2. A higher difference between thresholds indicates improved pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboThumbnail Pain ThresholdBaseline5.8 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3
PlaceboThumbnail Pain Threshold6 weeks5.8 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboThumbnail Pain ThresholdChange-0.02 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.4
MilnacipranThumbnail Pain ThresholdBaseline5.3 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 2.7
MilnacipranThumbnail Pain Threshold6 weeks6.0 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 2.8
MilnacipranThumbnail Pain ThresholdChange0.7 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.4
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.p-value: 0.04Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using linear mixed models.p-value: 0.04Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Trapezius Pain Threshold

A measure of the change in trapezius pain threshold from baseline to 6 weeks. Trapezius pain threshold was determined by applying pressure to a subject's trapezius muscle until the subject felt pain. The difference between the average trapezius pain threshold (an average for the right and left trapezii) at baseline was compared to that at 6 months. Pain threshold was measured in kg/cm\^2. The difference in threshold could range from 0-11 kg/cm\^2. A higher difference between thresholds indicates improved pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboTrapezius Pain ThresholdBaseline4.9 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 2.8
PlaceboTrapezius Pain Threshold6 Weeks5.5 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3.1
PlaceboTrapezius Pain ThresholdChange0.6 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.5
MilnacipranTrapezius Pain ThresholdBaseline5.1 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3.1
MilnacipranTrapezius Pain Threshold6 Weeks5.5 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3.1
MilnacipranTrapezius Pain ThresholdChange0.4 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.3
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.p-value: 0.89Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using linear mixed models.p-value: 0.44Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Wrist Pain Threshold

A measure of the change in wrist pain threshold from baseline to 6 weeks. Wrist pain threshold was determined by applying pressure to a subject's wrist until the subject felt pain. The difference between the average wrist pain threshold (an average for the right and left wrists) at baseline was compared to that at 6 months. Pain threshold was measured in kg/cm\^2. The difference in threshold could range from 0-11 kg/cm\^2. A higher difference between thresholds indicates improved pain sensitivity.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboWrist Pain ThresholdBaseline5.3 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 2.7
PlaceboWrist Pain Threshold6 weeks5.9 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 3
PlaceboWrist Pain ThresholdChange0.6 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.6
MilnacipranWrist Pain ThresholdBaseline5.0 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 2.4
MilnacipranWrist Pain Threshold6 weeks5.9 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 2.9
MilnacipranWrist Pain ThresholdChange0.9 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.5
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.p-value: 0.35Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: The difference between the change measured during placebo versus the change during milnacipran treatment. Calculated using linear mixed models.p-value: 0.34Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026