Skip to content

Yoga and Aerobic Exercise in Psychosis

The Impacts of Yoga and Aerobic Exercise on Neuro-cognitive Function and Symptoms in Early Psychosis - A Single-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01207219
Acronym
YEP
Enrollment
140
Registered
2010-09-22
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2014-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychotic Disorder

Keywords

psychosis, yoga, aerobic exercise, memory, attention, neuro cognition

Brief summary

The current study aims to evaluate the impacts of yoga and aerobic exercise on neuro-cognitive function, symptoms and brain changes in early psychosis. A total of 120 female subjects who aging from 18-55 years old, and diagnosed with psychotic disorders within the past 5 years, will be randomized into 3 groups: 1) yoga therapy, 2) aerobic exercise, and 3) waitlist group as the control. All groups will try to be kept consistent with their medication with no more than 25% change in their entry level dosage for at least six weeks. The primary outcomes of the present study will be neuro-cognitive changes; the secondary outcomes will be changes of brain structure and function.

Detailed description

STUDY OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE The present study aims to: 1. Compare the effects of a 12-week integrated yoga therapy and 12-week aerobic exercise program (walking and cycling) on cognitive functions, brain structures and function in female psychosis patients. 2. Compare the changes in physical fitness, clinical symptoms, body-perception, drug adherence, quality of life, and medicational side-effects. Descriptive data acquired from this study will contribute to a better understanding of the research implications and clinical applications of yoga and aerobic exercise. SUBJECTS This is a single-blinded, randomized, prospective study using psychopathological assessments, self-rating scales and imaging techniques. In this study, only female psychosis patients will be recruited from the Early Assessment Service for Young People with Psychosis Program (EASY) in Hong Kong, aiming to examine if there is any gender difference in comparison to the study by Pajonk et al. (2007), which selected only male subjects. Ideally, patients taking Benzodiazepine and anti-depressants will be excluded because of the influence of these drugs on the cognitive test results and hippocampal volume. If it is deemed impractical to completely exclude these patients, all subjects will at least be tried to keep consistent with their antipsychotic dosages, by not permitting more than a 25% change in dose in the first 6 weeks after commencement of the intervention. According to the data presented in the previous study (F. G. Pajonk et al., 2010), and using the statistical significant level 0.05 and the power 0.80, we calculated the sample size for cognitive assessment is 96 (32 each arm) and for brain imaging the sample required will be 48 (16 each arm) (Noordzij et al., 2010). Considering the drop-out rate will be around 30%, we aim to recruit 120 patients (40 each arm) with half of them (20 each arm) undergoing MRI scanning. PROCEDURES Subjects will be screened by the clinicians in outpatient units in Hong Kong. They will be asked to sign the consent form when they agree to attend the study. Afterwards, they will be randomly divided into their respective intervention group. Each subject will be given a subject number, which will correspond to the group assignment. There will be two sessions of assessments. In the first session, all 120 subjects will be assessed by an investigator for their cognitive function, severity of symptoms, physical fitness, body-perception, drug adherence, quality of life, and medication side-effects. In the second session, the first 20 subjects recruited into each group will undergo a structural MRI and functional MRI (resting) scan at baseline. Following the 12-week intervention, the subjects will repeat the same assessments and MRI scan as in the pre-intervention. Patients in waitlist will be provided another 3-month yoga or exercise course according to their willing after the waiting period. All the patients will be followed up for 18 months to assess the long-term effects of both interventions in cognition and symptoms. For the nature of the study, it is difficult to keep patients blind to group allocation, so that the study can hardly be a double-blinded trial but a single-blinded one. Two investigators will do the yoga training and aerobic exercise without knowing the assessment results. Two research assistants will be well-trained and recruited to do the assessment, and remains blind to treatment allocation. INTERVENTION PROGRAMS Yoga therapy: The yoga therapy consists of breathing control (10 minutes), body postures (40-45 minutes), and relaxation (5 minutes). The yoga therapy will be carried out three times per week for around 60 minutes at each session. The yoga class will be operated with a size of about 5-10 participants according to the general small-group size with one instructor in the commercial yoga studios in Hong Kong. The body postures used in the present study are designed to cover all body parts to give the body an overall strength and stretching. Aerobic exercise: The aerobic exercise program will include walking on a treadmill (15-20 minutes), and stationary cycling (25-30 minutes), followed by cool-down stretching afterwards (5 minutes). The aerobic exercise program will also take place three times per week for around 45-55 minutes at each session. The heart rate will be continuously monitored during exercise by a portable recorder aiming to maintain the heart rate in the range of 50-60% of the maximum VO2 value, yielding an exercise exertion level which is considered as a moderate intensity. The aerobic training session will be operated with a size of no more than 10 participants. Discontiuation: yoga and aerobic exercise will be terminated if the subject reports any uncomfortable symptoms or loses interests in continuing. Discontinuation or non-participation will not affect the usual medical treatment and care, which they receive in the clinical settings. MEASURES The primary outcomes will be the cognitive tests (memory and attention). Severity of symptoms, physical fitness, and imaging data will be the secondary outcomes. For those patients who drop out during the study will be arranged to an additional assessment session at the withdrawal according to the willingness of the participants. Data of these drop-out patients will be used in the final analysis with the intention-to-treat (ITT) method. All measurements will be taken at baseline, 12 weeks (upon completion of intervention program) and at 18 months for all 120 subjects. MRI will be carried out at baseline and at 12 weeks for the first 60 subjects recruited. I. Cognitive Functioning 1. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS): The current study uses Information sub-test and Digit-Symbol-Coding sub-test. 2. Hong Kong List Learning Test (HKLLT): is a validated Chinese list-learning test (Chan et al., 2000). It provides assessments of the processes and organizational strategies involved in verbal learning. 3. Digit Span Test: is a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. (Wechsler, 1981) It includes digit-span forwards (DF) and digit-span backwards (DB) tests. 3\. Letter Cancellation Test: subjects are asked to cancel the letter C and E as quickly as possible. Time, number of error and omission items will be recorded (Lezak, Howieson, & Loring, 1995). 4\. Stroop Color and Word Test: Assessment of cognitive flexibility, resistance to interference from outside stimuli, and the ability to suppress a prepotent verbal response. (Stroop, 1935) 5. Subjective Cognitive Impairment Scale (SCIS): A 31-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess the subjective daily life cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. II. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) The first 20 subjects recruited into each group will be scanned using a 3T scanner (Philips Achieva 3-Tesla Quasar). A T1-weighted, MPRAGE sequence (TE=3.2ms, TR=7.5ms, flip angle=7°, FOV 240mm×240 mm) of 155 consecutive slices will be acquired at sagittal view with a voxel size of 1mm×1mm×1 mm. A T2\*-weighted EPI sequence will be used for functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) resting (TR/TE=2000/32ms, 32 slices) with a voxel size of 3x3x4mm. III. Physical Fitness: 1. VO2 max (oxygen consumption): is the maximum capacity of an individual's body to transport and utilize oxygen during incremental exercise, which reflects the physical fitness of the individual. 2. Body Mass Index (BMI). 3. Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA): assesses the body composition and bone density by passing a very low-level x-ray signal through the body. 4. Sit-and-Reach test: is a common measure of flexibility, and specifically measures the flexibility of the lower back and hamstring muscles. 5. Standing Balance Test: ask the person to stand on one foot for as long as possible. The test will be conducted with the person having their arms on their waist. Repeat the test on the other leg. 6. Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (Olmsted, Carcia, Hertel, & Shultz, 2002): The SEBT is performed with the subject standing at the center of a grid placed on the floor, with 8 lines extending at 45。 increment from the center of the grid. The subject is asked to maintain a single-leg stance while reaching with the contralateral leg (reach leg) as far as possible along the appropriate vector. The distance from the center of the grid to the touch point is measured in centimeters. IV. Clinical Assessment 1. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). 2. Calgary Depression Scale (CDS). V. Quality of Life The Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36). VI. Body-perception and Drug adherence measure 1. Figure Rating Scale (FRS): there are seven male/female contour drawings, numbered 1 to 7, in increasing body size from left to right. Subjects are asked to choose one figure drawing that most accurately represents the size of their own bodies and then one that represents their desired figure. 2. Cognitive Attitude towards Body Size: subjects are asked whether they think they are: 1) underweight; 2) of normal weight; or 3) overweight. 3. Compliance Rating Scale (CRS): is used to assess medication adherence. 4. Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-30): assesses the subjects' attitude to the current medication they are taking. VII. Adverse event No current studies reported any physical or mental artifacts of yoga and aerobic exercise. There is some inherent potential risk of injury in any kind of physical activity. All exercises, both yoga and aerobic exercise, will be increased in a progressive manner to minimize this risk. The adverse event of the antipsychotics will be assessed by UKU, which is a new comprehensive rating scale for psychotropic drugs and a cross-sectional study of side effects in neuroleptic-treated patients. STATISTICS The Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 17.0 (SPSS 17.0 statistical package) will be used for the data analysis. Primary outcome variables will be cognition (Hong Kong List Learning Test), and structural imaging data (hippocampal and cingulate cortex volume). A mixed effects model of repeated measure will be used to compare the changes in cognition and clinical symptoms among the three groups. With mixed effects model, all available data of each subject at each time point will be used (R. Gueorguieva & J. H. Krystal, 2004). This strategy was based on the assumption that data were missing at random (Ralitza Gueorguieva & John H Krystal, 2004).With the unstructured covariance structure (Joe et al., 2009), differences between the three intervention groups over time were assessed with a Group x Time interaction term. Primary outcome measures (HKLLT, Digit Span test, Letter Cancellation test) will be first analyzed by including all three groups. For analyses meeting this criterion of statistical significance, follow-up, the priori comparisons of the active intervention groups with the waitlist group were carried out with the same strategy. All tests will be based on two-sided probabilities set at a significance level of 0.05. The Bonferroni correction procedure will be conducted to adjust for the multiple comparisons among groups.The effect size (Cohen's d) will be calculated as well to compare the therapeutic effects of yoga and aerobic exercise among the three groups. Image processing and analysis will be carried out with the software packages FSL4.1, Freesurfer 5.1 and SPM8. The primary outcomes of structural MRI data will be the changes of grey matter in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. The primary outcomes of functional MRI data will be the activity changes in prefrontal cortex and cingulate cortex.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALYoga therapy

3 sessions per week for 12 weeks, total 36 sessions. Each session lasts around one hour.

BEHAVIORALAerobic exercise

3 session per week for 12 weeks, total 36 sessions. Each session lasts around one hour.

Sponsors

The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Females aged from 18 to 55. * Based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) diagnosed to have schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform Psychosis, brief psychotic disorders, psychosis not otherwise specified and delusional disorder. Duration of illness is less than 5 years (including 5 years). * Cantonese-speaking Chinese. * Ability to understand the nature of the study and to give an informed consent. * Fewer than 10 hours of yoga and vigorous aerobic exercise (equivalent to jogging at 10 km/hr) in the previous 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe physical illness (myocardial infarction, hypertension, fracture, spinal problem), seizure disorders, mental retardation or comorbid substance dependence. Heart rate and blood pressure will be measured at the baseline to exclude the patients with abnormal cardiovascular activities. * Unstable psychotic symptoms. * Known pregnancy, or other contraindication to MRI. * A history of brain trauma or organic brain disease. * Known history of intellectual disability or special school attendance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Verbal Acquisitionbaseline and 12 weeksTotal number of corrected encoded words in the first three trials in the random condition of Hong Kong List Learning test.
Verbal Retentionbaseline and 12 weeksThe total number of correctly recalled words after short-term (10 minutes) and long-term (30 minutes) delay in the random condition of Hong Kong List Learning test.
Working Memorybaseline and 12 weeksmeasured by Digit Span backwards test. In this test, the subject was asked to recall a series of numbers in reverse order. The correctly recalled series were scored as 1, and the test contains 14 sequences of numbers. The range of working memory score is from 0 to 14, with higher values representing better outcome.
Attention and Concentrationbaseline and 12 weeksmeasured by Letter Cancellation test Q score. The basic version of the task consists of six 52-character rows in which the target character is randomly interspersed approximately 18 times in each row. Subjects were asked to cancel the letter C and E as quickly as possible. The time to completion, number of error and omission items were recorded. A quality of search index (Q), developed by Geldmacher et al., was applied for the analysis. Q is the ratio of correct number to total number of targets multiplied by the ratio of correct number per second. Higher Q scores represent more efficient performance and better attention and concentration. Q scores could range from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 1 (best possible outcome).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Severity of SymptomsBaseline and 12 weeksPANSS total score is computed by summing the scores of positive, negative and general symptom subscores. The range of PANSS total score is from 30 to 210, range of PANSS positive and negative subscores is from 7 to 49, range of PANSS general symptoms subscore is from 16 to 112, with higher values representing worse outcome. CDS total score is computed by summing the scores of nine items of the scale. The range of CDS total score is from 0 to 27, with higher values representing worse outcome.

Countries

Hong Kong

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment period is from Oct 2010 to Jan 2013 in three outpatient clinics in Hong Kong.

Pre-assignment details

In order to obtain sufficient imaging data for final analysis, a total of 140 patients were recruited and randomized, 16 of them withdrew before starting intervention. Amongst 124 participants, 9 were excluded from final analysis because of changed diagnosis during study period. 95 of 115 participants completed 12-week study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Yoga Therapy
Hatha yoga, three sessions per week for 12 weeks, each session lasted around one hour.
40
Aerobic Exercise
Included walking and cycling, three times per week for 12 weeks, each session lasted around one hour.
37
Waitlist Control Group
Patients in waitlist were treated as usual and acted as the control group.
38
Total115

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall Studychanged diagnosis during study period531
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up686

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalWaitlist Control GroupAerobic ExerciseYoga Therapy
Age, Continuous24.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
25.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
23.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
24.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
Antipsychotic medication dose, Chlorpromazine (CPZ)305 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 244
260 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 211
301 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 245
348 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 268
Calgary Depression Scale (CDS) total score3.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
3.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
3.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
3.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
Diagnosis
Brief psychosis
2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Diagnosis
Delusional disorder
4 participants1 participants2 participants1 participants
Diagnosis
Psychosis not otherwise specified
36 participants15 participants8 participants13 participants
Diagnosis
Schizoaffective disorder
13 participants3 participants6 participants4 participants
Diagnosis
Schizophrenia
59 participants19 participants19 participants21 participants
Diagnosis
Schizophreniform disorder
1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants
Length of illness1.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
1.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
2.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
2.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score46.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
45.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
46.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
46.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
115 Participants38 Participants37 Participants40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Smoking
Current smoker
8 participants1 participants4 participants3 participants
Smoking
Never smoker
106 participants37 participants32 participants37 participants
Smoking
Past smoker
1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants
Substance abuse
No substance abuse
115 participants38 participants37 participants40 participants
Substance abuse
Substance abuse
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Years of education12.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
12.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
12.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
11.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 450 / 400 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 450 / 400 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Attention and Concentration

measured by Letter Cancellation test Q score. The basic version of the task consists of six 52-character rows in which the target character is randomly interspersed approximately 18 times in each row. Subjects were asked to cancel the letter C and E as quickly as possible. The time to completion, number of error and omission items were recorded. A quality of search index (Q), developed by Geldmacher et al., was applied for the analysis. Q is the ratio of correct number to total number of targets multiplied by the ratio of correct number per second. Higher Q scores represent more efficient performance and better attention and concentration. Q scores could range from 0 (worst possible outcome) to 1 (best possible outcome).

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Yoga TherapyAttention and ConcentrationBaseline0.76 Correct number per secondStandard Deviation 0.14
Yoga TherapyAttention and Concentration12 weeks0.84 Correct number per secondStandard Deviation 0.18
Aerobic ExerciseAttention and ConcentrationBaseline0.71 Correct number per secondStandard Deviation 0.22
Aerobic ExerciseAttention and Concentration12 weeks0.77 Correct number per secondStandard Deviation 0.19
Waitlist Control GroupAttention and ConcentrationBaseline0.74 Correct number per secondStandard Deviation 0.15
Waitlist Control GroupAttention and Concentration12 weeks0.73 Correct number per secondStandard Deviation 0.17
Primary

Verbal Acquisition

Total number of corrected encoded words in the first three trials in the random condition of Hong Kong List Learning test.

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Yoga TherapyVerbal AcquisitionBaseline22.8 correctly encoded wordsStandard Deviation 5.8
Yoga TherapyVerbal Acquisition12 weeks29.5 correctly encoded wordsStandard Deviation 6.3
Aerobic ExerciseVerbal AcquisitionBaseline22.0 correctly encoded wordsStandard Deviation 7.8
Aerobic ExerciseVerbal Acquisition12 weeks28.8 correctly encoded wordsStandard Deviation 8.2
Waitlist Control GroupVerbal AcquisitionBaseline22.7 correctly encoded wordsStandard Deviation 7.7
Waitlist Control GroupVerbal Acquisition12 weeks24.8 correctly encoded wordsStandard Deviation 8.2
Comparison: Data analysis was based on the Intention-to-Treatment (ITT) method. Differences between the three intervention groups over time (baseline and 12 weeks) were assessed with a Group x Time interaction term. A priori comparisons of the active intervention groups with the waitlist group were carried out with the same strategy if analyses including all the three groups meet the criterion of statistical significance (P\<0.01).p-value: <0.01Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Verbal Retention

The total number of correctly recalled words after short-term (10 minutes) and long-term (30 minutes) delay in the random condition of Hong Kong List Learning test.

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Yoga TherapyVerbal Retention12 weeks19.4 correctly recorded wordsStandard Deviation 5.9
Yoga TherapyVerbal RetentionBaseline14.9 correctly recorded wordsStandard Deviation 5.7
Aerobic ExerciseVerbal RetentionBaseline15.1 correctly recorded wordsStandard Deviation 5.1
Aerobic ExerciseVerbal Retention12 weeks21.0 correctly recorded wordsStandard Deviation 7.2
Waitlist Control GroupVerbal RetentionBaseline14.5 correctly recorded wordsStandard Deviation 7
Waitlist Control GroupVerbal Retention12 weeks16.6 correctly recorded wordsStandard Deviation 7.3
Primary

Working Memory

measured by Digit Span backwards test. In this test, the subject was asked to recall a series of numbers in reverse order. The correctly recalled series were scored as 1, and the test contains 14 sequences of numbers. The range of working memory score is from 0 to 14, with higher values representing better outcome.

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Yoga TherapyWorking MemoryBaseline6.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Yoga TherapyWorking Memory12 weeks8.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Aerobic ExerciseWorking MemoryBaseline6.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Aerobic ExerciseWorking Memory12 weeks9.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Waitlist Control GroupWorking MemoryBaseline7.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Waitlist Control GroupWorking Memory12 weeks7.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Severity of Symptoms

PANSS total score is computed by summing the scores of positive, negative and general symptom subscores. The range of PANSS total score is from 30 to 210, range of PANSS positive and negative subscores is from 7 to 49, range of PANSS general symptoms subscore is from 16 to 112, with higher values representing worse outcome. CDS total score is computed by summing the scores of nine items of the scale. The range of CDS total score is from 0 to 27, with higher values representing worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Population: One subject in the waitlist control group has not completed all measures both at the baseline and 12 weeks. Measure of clinical severity has been missing in the data set. So that there are 37 subjects' data of clinical severity has been included for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsPANSS total score-Baseline46.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsPANSS total score-12 weeks37.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsPANSS positive subscore-Baseline9.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsPANSS positive subscore-12 weeks8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsPANSS negative subscore-Baseline11.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsPANSS negative subscore-12 weeks8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsPANSS general symptoms-Baseline26.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsPANSS general symptoms-12 weeks20.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsCDS-Baseline3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Yoga TherapySeverity of SymptomsCDS-12 weeks1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsCDS-Baseline3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsPANSS total score-Baseline46.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsPANSS negative subscore-12 weeks9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsPANSS negative subscore-Baseline11.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsPANSS total score-12 weeks39.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsCDS-12 weeks1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsPANSS general symptoms-12 weeks21.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsPANSS positive subscore-Baseline9.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsPANSS general symptoms-Baseline25.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Aerobic ExerciseSeverity of SymptomsPANSS positive subscore-12 weeks8.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsPANSS general symptoms-12 weeks26.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsPANSS positive subscore-12 weeks10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsPANSS negative subscore-Baseline11.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsPANSS negative subscore-12 weeks12.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsCDS-Baseline3.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsPANSS general symptoms-Baseline24.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsPANSS total score-Baseline45.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsCDS-12 weeks4.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsPANSS total score-12 weeks49.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Waitlist Control GroupSeverity of SymptomsPANSS positive subscore-Baseline9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026