Skip to content

Paracétamol PMB by Sublingual et Buccal Routes

Pharmacodynamic Study of 125 mg of Paracetamol Permucosal Administered by Sublingual and Buccal Route

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01206985
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-09-22
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2012-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

Paracetamol, per-oral mucosa PMB, No disease, healthy volunteers

Brief summary

Paracetamol is the analgesic most used, indicated in the symptomatic treatment of fever and pain of mild to moderate. It comes in different dosage forms intended for oral, intravenous and rectal. The per-oral mucosal route is not used for the administration of paracetamol. It is a very interesting way for the rapid absorption of drugs such as nitrates used in angina pectoris, as it seeks a highly vascular area (the floor of the tongue or gingival groove) and allows very rapid action. In addition, the oral administration-oral mucosa, less restrictive than IV administration and faster than oral administration, seek a single medical procedure unattended after dosing, will entail no pain or risk for infections the patient (in contrast to the IV). The investigators tested a new oral dosage form permucosal (at 250mg/ml) of paracetamol and compared at pharmacological (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) with the only dosage form of reference used by the IV route in the protocol Pilot study Pharmacology paracetamol administered oral permucosal PMB. It seems interesting now to reduce the dose by half permucosal to assess how changing the pharmacodynamics of the form permucosal to 125mg/ml. This form will be administered in oral permucosal buccal as well as sublingual (under the pillar of the language) and compared with paracetamol in IV.

Detailed description

Crossover study, double-blind, randomized, controlled versus placebo.

Interventions

Change in pain threshold testing mechanical stimulation (von Frey electronic)

Sponsors

Unither SA
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy volunteers. * Aged over 18 years and not more than 50 years. * Males or female * Values of vital signs before administration of the test products: * PAS between 100-140 mm Hg * PAD between 50-90 mm Hg * Radial pulse between 45-90 beats per minute * Free from any treatment in the 7 days preceding inclusion including no use of analgesics or anti-inflammatories

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to the administration of paracetamol * Medical history and / or surgical judged by the investigator or his representative as being incompatible with the test, especially subjects with neuropathic pain * Pathology evolutionary time of the review for inclusion. * Binge drinking, smoking (more than 10 cigarettes / day), coffee, tea or drinks containing caffeine (equivalent to more than 4 cups per day) or drug abuse. * Subject does not meet the selection criteria regarding their ability to discriminate the sensations resulting from noxious stimuli during psychometric testing. * Topic having all breaches of the oral mucosa (aphtes. ..).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in pain threshold testing mechanical stimulation (von Frey electronic)T0-5min, T0+3min, T0+7min, T0+15min, T0+30min, T0+50min, T0+90min

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of the acceptability of the permucosal product by the subject (evaluation questionnaire).T0+70min
Analysing a Sample of saliva for enzymatic determination (pharmacogenomics analysis)T0-10min

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026