Skip to content

A Study of Erlotinib [Tarceva] as Monotherapy or Intermittent Dosing With Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. (TALISMAN)

A Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib or Intermittent Dosing of Erlotinib and Docetaxel in Male Former-smokers With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Squamous NSCLC in Second-line Setting After Failure on Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01204697
Enrollment
74
Registered
2010-09-17
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2015-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This randomized parallel group study will assess the efficacy and safety of erlotinib \[Tarceva\], as monotherapy or intermittent dosing with docetaxel, in second-line setting in former-smoker male patients with advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive either Tarceva (150 mg/day orally) as monotherapy or 4 cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks) plus Tarceva (150 mg/day orally, days 2-16 each cycle) followed by Tarceva monotherapy. Anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression.

Interventions

DRUGdocetaxel

75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles

DRUGerlotinib [Tarceva]

150 mg/day orally, days 2-16 each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles; 150 mg/day orally thereafter

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male patients, \>/=18 years of age * former smoker (smoked \>/= 100 cigarettes in his lifetime and quit \>12 months before enrollment) * locally advanced (stage IIIb), metastatic (stage IV) or recurrent squamous non-small cell lung cancer * prior platinum-based therapy for advanced NSCLC * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1

Exclusion criteria

* uncontrolled symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases * prior therapy against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) * \>1 prior chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC * radiotherapy \<28 days prior to enrollment * history of melanoma at any time, or another malignancy in the last 5 years except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or surgically cured malignant neoplasias with a disease-free interval of \>5 years * not fully treated eye inflammation or infection, or predisposing conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Free From Disease Progression or Death at 6 MonthsMonth 6According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1, progressive Disease (PD) is defined as: for Target Lesions - At least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression). For Non-Target Lesions - Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization until death, assessed up to 18 monthsOverall survival (OS) was defined as the interval (in days) between the date of randomization and death from any cause. Participants alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. OS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 monthsProgression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the interval (in days) between the date of randomization and the first documentation of progressive disease or death from any cause. Participants alive and progression-free were considered as censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessment, but known to be alive, were censored at the time of randomization. PFS (days) = (Date of Event - Date of Randomization) + 1. PFS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Detailed definition of PD is provided in Outcome Measure 1.
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 monthsBest overall response (complete response \[CR\]/partial response \[PR\]) was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression (PD). Best response in this trial was defined as the best response observed at any post-treatment visits. According to RECIST Version 1.1, CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis less than \[\<\] 10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.
Percentage of Participants With Disease ControlFrom randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 monthsDisease control was defined as PR, CR, or SD. Participants who did not achieve a CR or PR or SD were counted as non-responders in the analysis of disease control. According to RECIST Version 1.1, SD was defined as not qualifying for CR, PR, and PD. Detailed definitions of CR and PR are provided in Outcome Measure 4.
Duration of Response (DoR)From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 monthsDuration of response (DoR) was defined as the interval (in days) from first documentation of a response (CR/PR depending on which occurred first) to the date of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause. Participants presenting a response were considered as censored at the date of the last assessment with a documentation of non-progression. DoR (days) = (Date of PD/death - Date of CR/PR) + 1. Assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. DoR was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Detailed definitions of CR and PR are provided in Outcome Measure 4.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Erlotinib
Participants received erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/day orally as monotherapy, up to PD, death, or unacceptable toxicity.
36
Docetaxel and Erlotinib
Participants received docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m\^2 as an intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle, and erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg/day orally from Day 2 to Day 16 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles, administered in absence of PD, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Following the 4 cycles, erlotinib 150 mg/day was administered orally as monotherapy up to PD, death or unacceptable toxicity.
37
Total73

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath2627
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up34
Overall StudyRandomized, but not treated01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDocetaxel and ErlotinibTotalErlotinib
Age, Continuous65.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
67.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
68.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants72 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 3635 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 3610 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Free From Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months

According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1, progressive Disease (PD) is defined as: for Target Lesions - At least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression). For Non-Target Lesions - Unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).

Time frame: Month 6

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Participants Free From Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months8.3 percentage of participants
Docetaxel and ErlotinibPercentage of Participants Free From Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months8.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DoR)

Duration of response (DoR) was defined as the interval (in days) from first documentation of a response (CR/PR depending on which occurred first) to the date of the first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause. Participants presenting a response were considered as censored at the date of the last assessment with a documentation of non-progression. DoR (days) = (Date of PD/death - Date of CR/PR) + 1. Assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. DoR was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Detailed definitions of CR and PR are provided in Outcome Measure 4.

Time frame: From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months

Population: FAS population. Here, number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who had a best overall response of CR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibDuration of Response (DoR)NA months
Docetaxel and ErlotinibDuration of Response (DoR)8.69 months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval (in days) between the date of randomization and death from any cause. Participants alive at the time of the analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. OS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From randomization until death, assessed up to 18 months

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibOverall Survival (OS)5.61 months
Docetaxel and ErlotinibOverall Survival (OS)8.95 months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)

Best overall response (complete response \[CR\]/partial response \[PR\]) was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression (PD). Best response in this trial was defined as the best response observed at any post-treatment visits. According to RECIST Version 1.1, CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis less than \[\<\] 10 mm). No new lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)2.8 percentage of participants
Docetaxel and ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)8.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control

Disease control was defined as PR, CR, or SD. Participants who did not achieve a CR or PR or SD were counted as non-responders in the analysis of disease control. According to RECIST Version 1.1, SD was defined as not qualifying for CR, PR, and PD. Detailed definitions of CR and PR are provided in Outcome Measure 4.

Time frame: From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With Disease Control41.7 percentage of participants
Docetaxel and ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With Disease Control37.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free Survival (PFS) was defined as the interval (in days) between the date of randomization and the first documentation of progressive disease or death from any cause. Participants alive and progression-free were considered as censored at the date of the last tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression-free. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessment, but known to be alive, were censored at the time of randomization. PFS (days) = (Date of Event - Date of Randomization) + 1. PFS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Detailed definition of PD is provided in Outcome Measure 1.

Time frame: From randomization until progressive disease or death, assessed up to 18 months

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibProgression-free Survival (PFS)2.33 months
Docetaxel and ErlotinibProgression-free Survival (PFS)2.82 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026