Skip to content

Conservative Versus Aggressive Discectomy for Primary Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy

A Prospective Randomized Trails for Primary Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy:Conservative Versus Aggressive Discectomy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01204008
Enrollment
100
Registered
2010-09-17
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2010-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Herniated Disc

Brief summary

Summary: This is a prospective randomize study to compare conservative and aggressive discectomy for treatment of disc herniation with radiculopathy. Study hypothesis: The investigators believe that conservative discectomy could preserve a higher disc space and has a better long-term outcomes.

Detailed description

objectives:to compare the effect of two type surgery(conservative discectomy and aggressive discectomy)on disc herniation with radiculopathy after long-term follow-up. methods:the patients who were confirmed suffer from disc herniation with radiculopathy and failed to nonsurgical treatment will be divided into two groups, and will be follow up 3\ 6 years for seeking the effect on disc space preservation and recurrent. outcome measures:the rate of pain release and patients satisfaction were measured by SF-36,ODI,VAS,score post-OP. the height of disc was measured on X-ray film by the end point.

Interventions

PROCEDUREconservative discectomy

a smaller incision with removal of the disc fragment with little invasion of the disc

PROCEDUREaggressive discectomy

a large open incision with aggressive removal of the disc fragments and curettage of the disc space

Sponsors

Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Duration of symptoms: 6 or more weeks. * Treatments tried: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medical therapy and physical therapy. * Surgical screening: Persistent radicular pain provoked by moderate exercise, sitting, increased abdominal pressure, decreased mobility, list (scoliosis), straight leg raising. * Tests: MRI to confirm diagnosis and level(s).

Exclusion criteria

* Previous lumbar spine surgery. * Not a surgical candidate for any of these reasons: Overall health which makes spinal surgery too life-threatening to be an appropriate alternative, dramatic improvement with conservative care, or inability (for any reason) to undergo surgery within 6 months. * Possible pregnancy. * Active malignancy: A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) is ineligible unless he or she has been treated with a curative intent AND there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years. * Current fracture, infection, and/or deformity (greater than 15 degrees of lumbar scoliosis, using Cobb measure technique) of the spine. * Age less than 18 years. * Cauda Equina syndrome or progressive neurological deficit (usually requiring urgent surgery). * Unavailability for follow-up (planning to move, no telephone, etc.) or inability to complete data surveys. * Symptoms less than 6 weeks. * Patient currently enrolled in any experimental spine related study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
patients satisfaction6 weeks after intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
recurrence rate of disc herniation6 weeks after operation
height of disc space6 weeks after operation
height of disc operation1st year after operation

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactDongsheng Huang, MD.
huangdongshen18@hotmail.com00862081332553

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026