Bone Substitutes
Conditions
Keywords
Cranial bone reconstruction, composite
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to study composites of bioactive glass and methylmetacrylate with glass fibre reinforcement in cranial bone defect reconstruction.
Detailed description
Traditional skull and facial bone reconstructions with hard tissues have a long history with good clinical outcomes. However, they have certain disadvantages. The benefits of synthetic materials are the avoidance of donor-site morbidity and scars, but also shorter hospitalization time, lower expenses and known composition. Custom-made skull bone implant can produced based on patients clinical need utilizing rapid prototyping technologies. This will result in very high accuracy of the form of the skull defect. Polymethylmetacrylate (PMMA) is one of the most widely used alloplastic material in surgery. Bioactive glass S53P4 (BAG) particles have been used in various clinical indications. BAG was added to composite implant of PMMA with glass fibre reinforcement to enhance bone ingrowth to implant, and to utilize BAG's antimicrobial effects. Ten patients cranial defects are treated with composite implants.
Interventions
Subjects receiving composite implants
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients with cranial bone defect larger than 4x4 cm after trauma or tumor surgery * patient signs written study consent
Exclusion criteria
* patient is unlikely to adhere to study procedures * patient has a disease or condition that in the opinion of investigator is contraindicating participation * patient is participating another medical device or drug trial
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical success | 3 years | Clinical success is evaluated using clinical and radiographic examination, and blood count. |
Countries
Finland