Skip to content

A Study in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LY2127399 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Had an Inadequate Response to One or More TNF-α Inhibitors (FLEX V)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01202773
Acronym
FLEX V
Enrollment
456
Registered
2010-09-16
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2018-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to help answer if LY2127399 is safe and effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in participants with an inadequate response to one or more tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. This study is comprised of 2 periods: Period 1: 24-week blinded treatment Period 2: 48-week post-treatment follow-up

Interventions

Administered Subcutaneously (SC)

Administered SC

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of RA of more than 6 months and less than 15 years * At least 8 tender and swollen joints * An abnormally high C-reactive protein (CRP) level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) * Positive for rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody * Previously treated with biologic TNF-α inhibitor therapy (infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab, etanercept, adalimumab) and stopped treatment due to insufficient efficacy or intolerance * Regular use of at least 1 conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), with a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to study start * Woman must not be pregnant, breastfeeding, or become pregnant during the study

Exclusion criteria

* Use of unstable doses of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in the past 6 weeks * Steroid injection or intravenous (IV) infusion in the last 6 weeks * Use of more than 10 milligrams/day (mg/day) of oral steroids in the last 6 weeks * History of a serious reaction to other biological DMARDs * Use of an oral calcineurin inhibitor (for example, cyclosporin or tacrolimus) in the last 8 weeks * Surgery on a joint or other major surgery less than 2 months ago, or plans to have joint surgery or major surgery during the study * Active fibromyalgia, juvenile chronic arthritis, spondyloarthropathy, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriatic arthritis, or other systemic inflammatory condition except RA * Cervical cancer or squamous skin cancer within the past 3 years, or other cancer within the past 5 years * Received a live vaccine received within the past 12 weeks (for example, vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and chicken pox, and nasal-spray flu vaccines) * Hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * A serious bacterial infection (for example, pneumonia or cellulitis) within 3 months or a serious bone or joint infection within 6 months * Symptoms of herpes zoster or herpes simplex within the last month * Active or latent tuberculosis (TB) * Current symptoms of a serious disorder or illness * Use of an investigational drug within the last month

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) ResponseBaseline through Week 24ACR Responder Index: composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ACR20 Responder: a ≥20% improvement from baseline in both 68 tender joint counts (TJC) and 66 swollen joint counts (SJC) and a ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 criteria: participant's and physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (which measured participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities), joint pain, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response = (number of ACR20 responders / number of participants treated) \* 100. All NR at Week 16, as well as all participants who discontinued study treatment at any time for any reason, were defined as NR starting at that time-point and going forward, including Week 24 endpoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
American College of Rheumatology Percent Improvement (ACR-N)Baseline through Week 24ACR-N is a continuous measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional outcomes in RA that characterizes percentage (%) of improvement in disease activity from baseline based on ACR core set. This index was calculated as minimum of either a) % change in TJC, b) % change in SJC, or c) the median % change of remaining 5 ACR core criteria: If ≥3 components of the 5 ACR core criteria were missing, then c) was set to missing; if any of 3 components a), b), or c) were missing, then ACR-N was set to missing. Percentage of improvement was truncated to range of -100 to 100 to minimize impact of outliers (greater values indicate greater % improvement) and negative scores indicate a decline. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline Disease Activity Score based on 28 joint counts -CRP (DAS28-CRP) as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count)Baseline, Week 24Tender joint count is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count)Baseline, Week 24Swollen joint count is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Assessment of Pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)]Baseline, Week 24Participant's assessment of their current arthritis pain using VAS ranged from 0 millimeters (mm) (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). A decrease in pain score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)Baseline, Week 24Participant's assessment of their current arthritis disease activity using VAS ranged from 0 mm (no arthritis activity) to 100 mm (extremely active arthritis). A decrease in disease activity score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)Baseline, Week 24Physician's assessment of the participant's current arthritis disease activity using VAS ranged from 0 mm (no arthritis activity) to 100 mm (extremely active arthritis). A decrease in disease activity score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)Baseline, Week 24The HAQ-DI questionnaire assesses the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty \[0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do)\] when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and performing other daily activities. Scores for each functional area were averaged to calculate HAQ-DI scores, which ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A decrease in HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein Level (DAS28-CRP)Baseline, Week 24Disease Activity Score (DAS) modified to include 28 joint count (DAS28) consisted of composite score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), CRP (milligrams per liter), and participant's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (participant global VAS). DAS28-CRP=0.56\*square root (sqrt)(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*participant global VAS+0.96. Scores ranged from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity and remission is DAS28-CRP \<2.6. A decrease in DAS28-CRP indicated an improvement in participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseBaseline through Week 24EULAR Responder index categorizes clinical response based on improvement since baseline in DAS28-CRP. DAS28-CRP=0.56\*sqrt(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*participant global VAS+0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. High disease activity: DAS28-CRP \>5.1, low disease activity: DAS28-CRP \<3.2, and remission: DAS28-CRP \<2.6. Participants are categorized as EULAR responders or NR based on improvement of DAS28-CRP scores from baseline. EULAR DAS28-CRP responder index defines a good (absolute: \<3.2 or \>1.2 improvement from baseline), moderate (absolute: 3.2-5.1 or 0.6-1.2 improvement from baseline), or no response (absolute: \>5.1 or \<0.6 improvement from baseline). Percentage of participants with DAS28-CRP based EULAR response = ( number of participants with specific response) / (number of participants analyzed in the group) \* 100.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) ResponseBaseline through Week 24ACR Responder Index: composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures of RA. ACR50 Responder: had a ≥50% improvement from baseline in both 68 TJC and 66 SJC and a ≥50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 criteria: participant's (Pt's) and physician's global assessment of disease activity, HAQ-DI (measured Pts' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities), joint pain, and CRP. Percentage of Pt achieving ACR50 response = \[number (No.) of ACR50 responders / No. of Pts treated\]\*100. ACR70 Responder: had a ≥70% improvement from baseline in both TJC and SJC and a ≥70% improvement in at least 3 of same 5 criteria for ACR50. Percentage of Pts achieving ACR70 response = (No. of ACR70 responders / No. of Pts treated)\*100. All NR at Week 16, as well as all Pts who discontinued study treatment at any time for any reason, were defined as NR starting at that time-point and going forward, including Week 24 endpoint.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresBaseline, Week 24The BFI is a brief participant-reported questionnaire for the rapid assessment of fatigue severity and the impact of fatigue on daily functioning in the past 24 hours. The BFI contains 10 items; however, the first item is not included in the scoring of the scale as it asks about usual fatigue over the past week with the participant answering 'yes' or 'no'. The remaining 9 items assess fatigue severity (3 items) and impact of fatigue on daily functioning (6 items) using an 11-point numeric scale, with 0 = no fatigue and 10 = fatigue as bad as you can imagine. The fatigue impact subscale score is the average of the non-missing responses to 6 items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. If more than 3 items within the fatigue impact subscale were not answered by a participant, the subscale is set to missing. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresBaseline, Week 24The BPI-SF is a self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the worst pain, least pain, average pain experienced during the past 24 hours and pain based on the pain right now, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). Pain interference score is the average of the responses in the past 24 hours to 7 items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life \[each item scored from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]. If more than 3 items of the Pain Interference Score are not answered by a participant, the score is set to missing. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Duration of Morning Stiffness (Minutes)Baseline, Week 24The Investigator asks participants about the duration of their morning stiffness (in minutes) in and around the joints and records the duration. The Investigator should ask participants about duration of morning stiffness on the day prior to the study visit to capture actual symptoms. If morning stiffness duration is longer than 12 hours (720 minutes), it was truncated to 720 minutes for statistical presentations and analyses.LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Time to ACR20 ResponseBaseline through Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Absolute B Cell CountsBaseline, Week 24Cell-surface marker cluster designation (CD) 3 negative, CD20 positive (CD3-CD20+) defines total mature B cells. B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 is an activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B cells. Baseline B cell count is the average of the values on or prior to the date of first injection of study treatment, including unscheduled visits. A positive or negative change indicated an increase or decrease, respectively in B cell count. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsBaseline, Week 24Immunoglobulin (Ig), or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Change from baseline in serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels are reported. A negative change indicated a decrease in Ig levels. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Population Pharmacokinetics (PK): Constant ClearanceBaseline through Week 24Population estimate of constant clearance as determined by population PK analysis. A 2-compartment model was used in PK modeling. Constant clearance is the PK parameter which describes the linear elimination of LY2127399 from serum.
Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-LY2127399 AntibodiesBaseline through Week 24Participants with treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) were participants who had any sample from baseline up to and through Week 52 that was a 4-fold increase (2-dilution increase) in immunogenicity titer over baseline titer, or participants who tested negative at baseline and positive post-baseline (at titer of ≥1:20). Percentage of participants with ADA = (number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA) / (number of participants assessed) \* 100.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRPBaseline, Week 24CRP is an indicator of inflammation. A negative change indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresBaseline, Week 24SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, 2 component scores (CS), physical CS (PCS) and mental CS (MCS). Domain scores calculated by summing each item for each domain and transforming scores into 0-100 scale; higher scores indicated better health status. If \< 50% of the questions within a domain were answered, the raw score were not calculated. PCS score consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. MCS score consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Both PCS and MCS range from 0-100 with higher score indicating better mental or physical health. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment, region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Study had a treatment period (Weeks 0-24) and a post-treatment follow-up period (24-48 weeks in length). All participants were assessed for nonresponse at Week 16 with non-responders (NR) defined as participants with \<20% improvement from baseline in both tender and swollen joint counts.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
120 mg LY2127399
A loading dose of 240 mg (2 injections of 120 mg) of LY2127399 followed by maintenance dosing of 120 mg of LY2127399 administered SC Q4W for 24 weeks. At Week 16, responders received 1 injection of 120 mg of LY2127399 and 1 injection of placebo, followed by 120 mg of LY2127399 Q4W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period. For blinding purposes, participants alternated injections of LY2127399 and injections of placebo Q2W. At Week 16, NR received 1 injection of 90 mg of LY2127399 and 1 injection of placebo, followed by 90 mg of LY2127399 Q2W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period.
153
90 mg LY2127399
A loading dose of 180 mg of LY2127399 (2 injections of 90 mg) followed by maintenance dosing of 90 mg of LY2127399 administered SC Q2W for 24 weeks. At Week 16, both responders and NR received 1 injection of 90 mg of LY2127399 and 1 injection of placebo, followed by 90 mg of LY2127399 Q2W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period.
148
Placebo
A loading dose of 2 injections of placebo followed by maintenance dosing of 1 injection of placebo administered SC Q2W for 24 weeks. At Week 16, responders received 2 injections of placebo, followed by 1 injection of placebo Q2W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period. At Week 16, NR received a loading dose of 180 mg of LY2127399 (2 injections of 90 mg), followed by 90 mg of LY2127399 Q2W for the rest of the 24-week treatment period.
155
Total456

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event455
Overall StudyEntry Criteria Not Met201
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy549
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up122
Overall StudyPhysician Decision200
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11610
Overall StudySponsor Decision192023
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1365

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic120 mg LY212739990 mg LY2127399PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
39 Participants36 Participants33 Participants108 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
93 Participants95 Participants101 Participants289 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
21 Participants17 Participants21 Participants59 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
8 Participants9 Participants6 Participants23 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants9 Participants13 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
14 Participants16 Participants18 Participants48 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
119 Participants108 Participants112 Participants339 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
5 Participants4 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
7 Participants7 Participants7 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
10 Participants7 Participants12 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
3 Participants4 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
14 Participants14 Participants14 Participants42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
3 Participants2 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
89 Participants90 Participants89 Participants268 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
124 Participants126 Participants131 Participants381 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants22 Participants24 Participants75 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
71 / 15351 / 14761 / 15410 / 2311 / 3316 / 376 / 4311 / 3614 / 440 / 31 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1536 / 1476 / 1541 / 232 / 331 / 371 / 431 / 363 / 440 / 30 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response

ACR Responder Index: composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ACR20 Responder: a ≥20% improvement from baseline in both 68 tender joint counts (TJC) and 66 swollen joint counts (SJC) and a ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 criteria: participant's and physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (which measured participants' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities), joint pain, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response = (number of ACR20 responders / number of participants treated) \* 100. All NR at Week 16, as well as all participants who discontinued study treatment at any time for any reason, were defined as NR starting at that time-point and going forward, including Week 24 endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable ACR20 responder data. If participant's CRP was missing, last post-baseline value was used. If ACR was missing after carrying forward CRP, last post-baseline ACR response was used. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
120 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response17.6 percentage of participants
90 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response24.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response20.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

American College of Rheumatology Percent Improvement (ACR-N)

ACR-N is a continuous measure of clinical, laboratory, and functional outcomes in RA that characterizes percentage (%) of improvement in disease activity from baseline based on ACR core set. This index was calculated as minimum of either a) % change in TJC, b) % change in SJC, or c) the median % change of remaining 5 ACR core criteria: If ≥3 components of the 5 ACR core criteria were missing, then c) was set to missing; if any of 3 components a), b), or c) were missing, then ACR-N was set to missing. Percentage of improvement was truncated to range of -100 to 100 to minimize impact of outliers (greater values indicate greater % improvement) and negative scores indicate a decline. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline Disease Activity Score based on 28 joint counts -CRP (DAS28-CRP) as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable ACR-N data. Modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399American College of Rheumatology Percent Improvement (ACR-N)-9.03 percentage of improvementStandard Error 4
90 mg LY2127399American College of Rheumatology Percent Improvement (ACR-N)-8.03 percentage of improvementStandard Error 4.11
PlaceboAmerican College of Rheumatology Percent Improvement (ACR-N)-12.72 percentage of improvementStandard Error 4
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Absolute B Cell Counts

Cell-surface marker cluster designation (CD) 3 negative, CD20 positive (CD3-CD20+) defines total mature B cells. B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 is an activated-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B cells. Baseline B cell count is the average of the values on or prior to the date of first injection of study treatment, including unscheduled visits. A positive or negative change indicated an increase or decrease, respectively in B cell count. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable CD3-CD20+ B cell counts. mLOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Absolute B Cell Counts-55.3 cells/microliter (cells/µL)Standard Error 9.9
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Absolute B Cell Counts-65.8 cells/microliter (cells/µL)Standard Error 10.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Absolute B Cell Counts3.2 cells/microliter (cells/µL)Standard Error 9.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact Scores

The BFI is a brief participant-reported questionnaire for the rapid assessment of fatigue severity and the impact of fatigue on daily functioning in the past 24 hours. The BFI contains 10 items; however, the first item is not included in the scoring of the scale as it asks about usual fatigue over the past week with the participant answering 'yes' or 'no'. The remaining 9 items assess fatigue severity (3 items) and impact of fatigue on daily functioning (6 items) using an 11-point numeric scale, with 0 = no fatigue and 10 = fatigue as bad as you can imagine. The fatigue impact subscale score is the average of the non-missing responses to 6 items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life. If more than 3 items within the fatigue impact subscale were not answered by a participant, the subscale is set to missing. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable BFI data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Now-0.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Usual-0.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Worst-0.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresGeneral Activity-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresMood-0.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresWalking Ability-0.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresNormal Work-0.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresRelations with Other People-0.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresEnjoyment of Life-0.53 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue Impact Subscale-0.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresEnjoyment of Life-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Now-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresWalking Ability-0.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresMood-0.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Usual-0.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue Impact Subscale-0.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresRelations with Other People-0.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Worst-0.65 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresNormal Work-0.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresGeneral Activity-0.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresRelations with Other People-0.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresGeneral Activity-0.52 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresMood-0.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresWalking Ability-0.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresEnjoyment of Life-0.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresNormal Work-0.42 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Now-0.60 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue Impact Subscale-0.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Usual-0.56 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Individual Items and Impact ScoresFatigue - Worst-0.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference Scores

The BPI-SF is a self-reported scale that measures the severity of pain based on the worst pain, least pain, average pain experienced during the past 24 hours and pain based on the pain right now, with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as severe as you can imagine). Pain interference score is the average of the responses in the past 24 hours to 7 items: general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life \[each item scored from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes)\]. If more than 3 items of the Pain Interference Score are not answered by a participant, the score is set to missing. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable BPI-SF scores. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Worst-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Least-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Average-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Now-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresGeneral Activity-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresMood-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresWalking Ability-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresNormal Work-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresRelations with Other People-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresSleep-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresEnjoyment of Life-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain Interference Score-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain Interference Score-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Worst-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresWalking Ability-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresRelations with Other People-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Least-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresMood-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresEnjoyment of Life-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Average-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresNormal Work-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresGeneral Activity-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Now-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresSleep-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Now-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresGeneral Activity-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresSleep-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresMood-0.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresWalking Ability-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresNormal Work-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresEnjoyment of Life-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Worst-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Least-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresRelations with Other People-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain - Average-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) Individual Items and Interference ScoresPain Interference Score-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP

CRP is an indicator of inflammation. A negative change indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable CRP data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP2.91 milligrams/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.83
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP0.95 milligrams/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP2.93 milligrams/liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.81
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein Level (DAS28-CRP)

Disease Activity Score (DAS) modified to include 28 joint count (DAS28) consisted of composite score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), CRP (milligrams per liter), and participant's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (participant global VAS). DAS28-CRP=0.56\*square root (sqrt)(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*participant global VAS+0.96. Scores ranged from 1.0 to 9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity and remission is DAS28-CRP \<2.6. A decrease in DAS28-CRP indicated an improvement in participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable DAS28-CRP data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein Level (DAS28-CRP)-0.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein Level (DAS28-CRP)-0.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein Level (DAS28-CRP)-0.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Duration of Morning Stiffness (Minutes)

The Investigator asks participants about the duration of their morning stiffness (in minutes) in and around the joints and records the duration. The Investigator should ask participants about duration of morning stiffness on the day prior to the study visit to capture actual symptoms. If morning stiffness duration is longer than 12 hours (720 minutes), it was truncated to 720 minutes for statistical presentations and analyses.LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable morning stiffness data; mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Duration of Morning Stiffness (Minutes)-20.6 minutesStandard Error 11.5
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Duration of Morning Stiffness (Minutes)-1.0 minutesStandard Error 11.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Duration of Morning Stiffness (Minutes)-18.0 minutesStandard Error 11.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

The HAQ-DI questionnaire assesses the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty \[0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do)\] when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and performing other daily activities. Scores for each functional area were averaged to calculate HAQ-DI scores, which ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A decrease in HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable HAQ-DI data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)-0.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)-0.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)-0.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary Scores

SF-36 is a health-related survey that assesses participant's quality of life and consists of 36 questions covering 8 health domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical problems and emotional problems, general health, mental health, social functioning, vitality, 2 component scores (CS), physical CS (PCS) and mental CS (MCS). Domain scores calculated by summing each item for each domain and transforming scores into 0-100 scale; higher scores indicated better health status. If \< 50% of the questions within a domain were answered, the raw score were not calculated. PCS score consisted of physical functioning, bodily pain, role-physical, and general health scales. MCS score consisted of social functioning, vitality, mental health, and role-emotional scales. Both PCS and MCS range from 0-100 with higher score indicating better mental or physical health. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment, region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable SF-36 domain and summary scores. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresPhysical Functioning1.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresBodily Pain2.36 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresRole Limitations due to Physical Problems1.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresRole Limitations due to Emotional Problems1.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresGeneral Health Perception1.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresMental Health0.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresSocial Function2.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresVitality2.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresPCS2.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresMCS1.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresPCS1.83 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresPhysical Functioning1.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.82
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresMental Health1.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.88
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresGeneral Health Perception0.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresBodily Pain2.95 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.78
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresMCS1.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresVitality2.40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresRole Limitations due to Physical Problems2.08 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.75
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresSocial Function1.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.91
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresRole Limitations due to Emotional Problems2.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresVitality2.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresRole Limitations due to Emotional Problems1.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresGeneral Health Perception1.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresMental Health0.98 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresPCS1.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresSocial Function1.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresPhysical Functioning1.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresMCS1.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresBodily Pain1.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Domain and Summary ScoresRole Limitations due to Physical Problems0.35 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.72
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Assessment of Pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)]

Participant's assessment of their current arthritis pain using VAS ranged from 0 millimeters (mm) (no pain) to 100 mm (worst possible pain). A decrease in pain score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable participant's assessment of pain data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Assessment of Pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)]-9.89 mmStandard Error 2.1
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Assessment of Pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)]-9.15 mmStandard Error 2.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Assessment of Pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)]-5.76 mmStandard Error 2.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)

Participant's assessment of their current arthritis disease activity using VAS ranged from 0 mm (no arthritis activity) to 100 mm (extremely active arthritis). A decrease in disease activity score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable participant's global assessment of disease activity data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)-11.29 mmStandard Error 2.14
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)-8.72 mmStandard Error 2.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)-7.12 mmStandard Error 2.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)

Physician's assessment of the participant's current arthritis disease activity using VAS ranged from 0 mm (no arthritis activity) to 100 mm (extremely active arthritis). A decrease in disease activity score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable physician's global assessment of disease activity data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)-15.90 mmStandard Error 2.16
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)-16.38 mmStandard Error 2.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS)-13.17 mmStandard Error 2.13
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) Levels

Immunoglobulin (Ig), or antibodies, are large proteins used by the immune system to identify and neutralize foreign particles such as bacteria and viruses. Their normal blood levels indicate proper immune status. Change from baseline in serum immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels are reported. A negative change indicated a decrease in Ig levels. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable serum Ig data. mLOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgG-0.955 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.161
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgA-0.330 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.049
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgM-0.273 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.043
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgG-0.978 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.163
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgA-0.324 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.05
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgM-0.239 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.044
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgA0.003 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.049
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgM-0.019 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.042
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) LevelsIgG0.058 grams/liter (g/L)Standard Error 0.158
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count)

Swollen joint count is the number of swollen joints determined for each participant by examination of 66 joints. Joints were classified as either swollen or not swollen. Swelling was defined as palpable fluctuating synovitis of the joint. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable swollen joint count data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count)-6.02 joint countsStandard Error 0.98
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count)-5.64 joint countsStandard Error 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count)-5.41 joint countsStandard Error 0.98
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count)

Tender joint count is the number of tender and painful joints determined for each participant by examination of 68 joints. Joints were assessed by pressure and joint manipulation on physical examination. Participants were asked for pain sensations on these manipulations and watched for spontaneous pain reactions. Any positive response on pressure, movement, or both was translated into a single tender-versus-nontender dichotomy. LS means were calculated using ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable tender joint count data. mBOCF was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count)-6.37 joint countsStandard Error 1.4
90 mg LY2127399Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count)-6.08 joint countsStandard Error 1.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count)-6.56 joint countsStandard Error 1.38
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-LY2127399 Antibodies

Participants with treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (ADA) were participants who had any sample from baseline up to and through Week 52 that was a 4-fold increase (2-dilution increase) in immunogenicity titer over baseline titer, or participants who tested negative at baseline and positive post-baseline (at titer of ≥1:20). Percentage of participants with ADA = (number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA) / (number of participants assessed) \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug with an evaluable baseline ADA result and a post-baseline ADA result. Participants missing an evaluable baseline result with all negative post-baseline results were included. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
120 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-LY2127399 Antibodies3.9 percentage of participants
90 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants Developing Anti-LY2127399 Antibodies4.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Developing Anti-LY2127399 Antibodies3.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) Response

ACR Responder Index: composite of clinical, laboratory, and functional measures of RA. ACR50 Responder: had a ≥50% improvement from baseline in both 68 TJC and 66 SJC and a ≥50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 criteria: participant's (Pt's) and physician's global assessment of disease activity, HAQ-DI (measured Pts' perceived degree of difficulty performing daily activities), joint pain, and CRP. Percentage of Pt achieving ACR50 response = \[number (No.) of ACR50 responders / No. of Pts treated\]\*100. ACR70 Responder: had a ≥70% improvement from baseline in both TJC and SJC and a ≥70% improvement in at least 3 of same 5 criteria for ACR50. Percentage of Pts achieving ACR70 response = (No. of ACR70 responders / No. of Pts treated)\*100. All NR at Week 16, as well as all Pts who discontinued study treatment at any time for any reason, were defined as NR starting at that time-point and going forward, including Week 24 endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable ACR50 or ACR70 responder data. If participant's CRP was missing, last post-baseline value was used. If ACR was missing after carrying forward CRP, last post-baseline ACR response was used. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
120 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) ResponseACR507.2 percentage of participants
120 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) ResponseACR702.6 percentage of participants
90 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) ResponseACR505.4 percentage of participants
90 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) ResponseACR702.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) ResponseACR503.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) and 70% (ACR70) ResponseACR700.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response

EULAR Responder index categorizes clinical response based on improvement since baseline in DAS28-CRP. DAS28-CRP=0.56\*sqrt(TJC28)+0.28\*sqrt(SJC28)+0.36\*natural log(CRP+1)+0.014\*participant global VAS+0.96. DAS28-CRP scores range from 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. High disease activity: DAS28-CRP \>5.1, low disease activity: DAS28-CRP \<3.2, and remission: DAS28-CRP \<2.6. Participants are categorized as EULAR responders or NR based on improvement of DAS28-CRP scores from baseline. EULAR DAS28-CRP responder index defines a good (absolute: \<3.2 or \>1.2 improvement from baseline), moderate (absolute: 3.2-5.1 or 0.6-1.2 improvement from baseline), or no response (absolute: \>5.1 or \<0.6 improvement from baseline). Percentage of participants with DAS28-CRP based EULAR response = ( number of participants with specific response) / (number of participants analyzed in the group) \* 100.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: All randomized participants with evaluable EULAR response data. Modified Last Observation Carried Forward (mLOCF) was used to impute missing post-baseline values. Data after Week 16 for Week 16 NR were not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
120 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseModerate36.2 percentage of participants
120 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseGood11.8 percentage of participants
120 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseNo response52.0 percentage of participants
90 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseModerate36.3 percentage of participants
90 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseGood9.6 percentage of participants
90 mg LY2127399Percentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseNo response54.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseGood8.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseNo response55.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With DAS28-CRP Based European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) ResponseModerate36.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Population Pharmacokinetics (PK): Constant Clearance

Population estimate of constant clearance as determined by population PK analysis. A 2-compartment model was used in PK modeling. Constant clearance is the PK parameter which describes the linear elimination of LY2127399 from serum.

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of LY2127399 with evaluable LY2127399 PK data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
120 mg LY2127399Population Pharmacokinetics (PK): Constant Clearance4.16 milliliters/hour (mL/h)Standard Error 3.58
Secondary

Time to ACR20 Response

Time frame: Baseline through Week 24

Population: Zero participants analyzed. Time to ACR20 data not collected for analysis.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026