Skip to content

Beta Blockers and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease Aortopathy (BAV Study)

Beta Blockers and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease Aortopathy (BAV Study)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01202721
Acronym
BAV
Enrollment
85
Registered
2010-09-16
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2019-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Disease

Keywords

Congenital, Aortic Valve, Bicuspid, Aortopathy, bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether long-term treatment with a beta-blocker (BB) such as atenolol and/or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) such as telmisartan, given to adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease (aortopathy) reduces the widening (dilatation) of the aorta from its baseline size.

Detailed description

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart disease lesion with an estimated 280 000 to 560 000 people affected in the Canada. Dilatation of the ascending aorta is a common feature in patients with BAV and is a result of inherent vascular abnormalities with superimposed effects of age and acquired cardiovascular risk factors. Severe aortic dilatation (\> 50mm) leads to aortic dissection and premature death. Histopathological studies of the aortas in patients with BAVs report similar findings to that of patients with Marfan syndrome. Beta Blocker (BB) therapy and more recently, Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) therapy, have been shown to decrease to rate of aortic dilatation and be of benefit to patients with Marfan syndrome. There is no such data however in patients with BAV and aortopathy. Within the context of a randomized clinical trial, the investigators proposed to test the hypothesis that BB or ARB will reduce the rate of progressive aortic dilatation in adults with BAVs and ascending aortopathy as compared to placebo. Design: Multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial of adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy. Patients who are eligible to take either study medication will be randomly allocated to participate in either the BB (atenolol) vs. placebo arm, or the ARB (telmisartan) vs. placebo arm. Patients who are ineligible for the BB arm will be assigned to the ARB vs. placebo arm and patients who are ineligible for the ARB arm will be assigned to the BB vs. placebo arm. Within each arm, all participants will be randomized to take either placebo or active medication. The atenolol arm will be up-titrated to100mg/day and the telmisartan arm will be up-titrated to 80 mg/day, or to the maximum tolerated dose.

Interventions

DRUGAtenolol

Atenolol or matching placebo 25 mg up-titrated to 100 mg

DRUGTelmisartan

Telmisartan or matching placebo 40 mg up-titrated to 80mg.

Sponsors

Population Health Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age =\> 18 years * Men and women with BAV and ascending aorta measuring \> 37mm. * Written informed consent General Study

Exclusion criteria

1. History of cardiac diseases, such as * Symptomatic aortic stenosis or aortic regurgitation referred for surgical intervention or asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation based on current guidelines * Uncontrolled heart failure, right ventricular failure due to pulmonary hypertension * Cardiogenic shock 2. Systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg 3. History of drug sensitivity, contraindication or adverse reaction to both BB and ARB. Participants who are able to tolerate only a BB will be allocated to the BB vs. placebo arm, and participants who are able to tolerate only an ARB will be allocated to the ARB vs. placebo arm, assuming no other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Size, as Evaluated by MRIThe difference between baseline measures (2012-2013) and Year 3 measure (2015-2016)The primary analyses include the evaluation of the effects of monotherapy (atenolol vs. placebo, telmisartan vs. placebo) on the change in aortic root size measured at 3 years. Change is measured in centimeters squared (final measurement - baseline measurement). Original outcome measure time frame was scheduled for 5 years, however due to poor study participant and site recruitment study was closed early and final outcome measures taken at approximately 3 years.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Change in Ascending Aorta Size Evaluated by Transthoracic Echocardiography (TEE)The difference between baseline measures (2012-2013) and Year 3 measure (2015-2016)Rate of change in ascending aorta size evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography (ECHO) at 3 years. Change is measured in centimeters squared (final measurement - baseline measurement). Time frame was scheduled for 5 years, however due to poor study participant and site recruitment study was closed early and final outcome measures taken at approximately 3 years.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Atenolol
Atenolol 25 mg up-titrated to 100 mg.
18
Telmisartan
Telmisartan 40 mg up-titrated to 80mg
26
Atenolol Placebo
Participants randomized to receive Atenolol placebo
14
Telmisartan Placebo
Participants randomized to receive Telmisartan placebo
27
Total85

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAtenololTelmisartanAtenolol PlaceboTelmisartan PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black African
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
European
15 Participants23 Participants12 Participants26 Participants76 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native North American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
South Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants7 Participants8 Participants7 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants19 Participants6 Participants20 Participants58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 260 / 140 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1813 / 2610 / 1418 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 182 / 261 / 142 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Size, as Evaluated by MRI

The primary analyses include the evaluation of the effects of monotherapy (atenolol vs. placebo, telmisartan vs. placebo) on the change in aortic root size measured at 3 years. Change is measured in centimeters squared (final measurement - baseline measurement). Original outcome measure time frame was scheduled for 5 years, however due to poor study participant and site recruitment study was closed early and final outcome measures taken at approximately 3 years.

Time frame: The difference between baseline measures (2012-2013) and Year 3 measure (2015-2016)

Population: Intention to treat analysis method followed: patients completed final visit over the phone where aortic root size cannot be measured; patients refused a final visit, or patient's information was received through a third party. Patients missing primary outcome measures still followed for other analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtenololChange From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Size, as Evaluated by MRI.6 centimeters squaredStandard Deviation 1.4
TelmisartanChange From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Size, as Evaluated by MRI.4 centimeters squaredStandard Deviation 1.3
Atenolol PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Size, as Evaluated by MRI.7 centimeters squaredStandard Deviation 0.8
Telmisartan PlaceboChange From Baseline in Ascending Aorta Size, as Evaluated by MRI1 centimeters squaredStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Rate of Change in Ascending Aorta Size Evaluated by Transthoracic Echocardiography (TEE)

Rate of change in ascending aorta size evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography (ECHO) at 3 years. Change is measured in centimeters squared (final measurement - baseline measurement). Time frame was scheduled for 5 years, however due to poor study participant and site recruitment study was closed early and final outcome measures taken at approximately 3 years.

Time frame: The difference between baseline measures (2012-2013) and Year 3 measure (2015-2016)

Population: Discrepancy exists between participant flow numbers and patients analyzed for the following reasons: patients completed final visit over the phone where aortic root size cannot be measured; patients refused a final visit, patient's information was received through a third party. Pt's not removed as they are still included in other analyses

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AtenololRate of Change in Ascending Aorta Size Evaluated by Transthoracic Echocardiography (TEE)-.9 centimetres squaredStandard Deviation 3.2
TelmisartanRate of Change in Ascending Aorta Size Evaluated by Transthoracic Echocardiography (TEE)-.2 centimetres squaredStandard Deviation 4.5
Atenolol PlaceboRate of Change in Ascending Aorta Size Evaluated by Transthoracic Echocardiography (TEE)-1.6 centimetres squaredStandard Deviation 4.3
Telmisartan PlaceboRate of Change in Ascending Aorta Size Evaluated by Transthoracic Echocardiography (TEE).3 centimetres squaredStandard Deviation 2.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026