Breast Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This multicenter study will assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first line treatment in participants with triple negative metastatic breast cancer. Participants will receive bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg intravenously (iv) every 3 weeks, plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 iv) and carboplatin (iv to an area under curve \[AUC\]=2) on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. Anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression.
Interventions
15 mg/kg iv every 3 weeks
to an AUC = 2, on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle
1000 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Female participants, \>/= 18 years of age * Metastatic breast cancer * Estrogen receptor-, progesterone- and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative disease * Treatment-naïve for metastatic breast cancer * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 * Adequate hematological, renal and liver function * Patients should have received Anthracyclines and Taxanes in the adjuvant setting * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (per institutional standard of care) during treatment and until 6 months after the last administration of investigational products
Exclusion criteria
* Prior first line treatment for metastatic breast cancer * Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis * Uncontrolled hypertension (\> 170/95 mmHg) * Evidence of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy or hemorrhage at baseline * Other malignancy within the last 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or squamous carcinoma of the skin, or adequately controlled limited basal cell skin cancer. * Prior therapy with gemcitabine or carboplatin in the metastatic setting. Participants having received gemcitabine or carboplatin as part of adjuvant therapy are eligible, if recurrence was first documented \>6 months after the last exposure to the drug(s) * Requirement of chronic use of immunosuppressive agents * HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days). | Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated in days from the date of registration until the earliest date of documented disease progression or death. The median PFS time with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. The progression-free survival was assessed utilizing computer tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/bone scans and X-ray and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1. Progression of disease is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) | From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days) | Clinical benefit response was defined as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). CBR was assessed using Recist v.1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. |
| Time to Progression (TTP) | From the date of registration until the disease progression (up to 1541 days). | Duration of time to progression (TTP) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to progression was calculated in days from the date of registration until the earliest date of documented disease progression. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days) | Overall survival was measured from the date of the first study drug dose to the date of death from any cause. The median overall survival time with 95%CI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Response | From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days) | The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). ORR was summarized using number and percentage along with two-sided 95% Pearson-Clopper CI. The overall response rate was assessed utilizing the RECIST v. 1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
| Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline, cycle 6 | The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire incorporates 9 multi scale items: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social); 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea & vomiting); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. It contains 30 questions. The score for each item and the overall score ranges from 0 to 100. A high overall scale and subscale scores represent improved health status. However, in case of symptoms, higher scores suggest increased perception of these symptoms. |
| Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Baseline, Cycle 6, 12 of treatment | Change from baseline in SBP was analyzed by overall response (CR+PR, SD+PD). |
| Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Baseline, Cycle 6, 12 of treatment | Change from baseline in DBP was analyzed by overall response (CR+PR, SD+PD). |
| Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE) | Up to 28 days after termination of study treatment (approximately 1569 days) | An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. |
Countries
India
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| All Participants Participants received a combination therapy of bevacizumab 15 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous every 3 weeks with carboplatin recommended dose (area under curve \[AUC\]= 2) along with gemcitabine 1000 mg/ metre square (m\^2) on days 1 and 8 of each 3 week cycle. | 40 |
| Total | 40 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 14 |
| Overall Study | Disease Progression | 4 |
| Overall Study | Insufficient Therapeutic Response | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 10 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | All Participants |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 47.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.68 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 40 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 18 / 40 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 17 / 40 |
Outcome results
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated in days from the date of registration until the earliest date of documented disease progression or death. The median PFS time with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. The progression-free survival was assessed utilizing computer tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/bone scans and X-ray and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1. Progression of disease is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.
Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days).
Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 255 days |
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)
Change from baseline in DBP was analyzed by overall response (CR+PR, SD+PD).
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 6, 12 of treatment
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, n signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Baseline; CR+PR (n= 19) | 80.4 mmHg | Standard Deviation 9.65 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Change at cycle 6; CR+PR (n=14) | -4.1 mmHg | Standard Deviation 10.83 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Change at cycle 12; CR+PR (n=5) | -2.0 mmHg | Standard Deviation 14.83 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Baseline; SD+PD (n= 18) | 78.9 mmHg | Standard Deviation 7.58 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Change at cycle 6; SD+PD (n=13) | 2.3 mmHg | Standard Deviation 10.92 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Change at cycle 12; SD+PD (n=4) | 7.5 mmHg | Standard Deviation 12.58 |
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Change from baseline in SBP was analyzed by overall response (CR+PR, SD+PD).
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 6, 12 of treatment
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, n signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Baseline; CR+PR (n= 19) | 124.8 millimetre of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 12.86 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Change at cycle 6; CR+PR (n=14) | -4.6 millimetre of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 12.16 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Change at cycle 12; CR+PR at cycle 12 (n=5) | -4.0 millimetre of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 18.17 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Baseline; SD+PD (n= 18) | 123.6 millimetre of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 6.82 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Change at cycle 6; SD+PD at cycle 6 (n=13) | 0.2 millimetre of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 12.68 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Change at cycle 12; SD+PD at cycle 12 (n=4) | -6.3 millimetre of mercury (mmHg) | Standard Deviation 17.97 |
Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire incorporates 9 multi scale items: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social); 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea & vomiting); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. It contains 30 questions. The score for each item and the overall score ranges from 0 to 100. A high overall scale and subscale scores represent improved health status. However, in case of symptoms, higher scores suggest increased perception of these symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, cycle 6
Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment. Here, n signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; physical (n=40) | 69.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.963 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; physical (n=28) | -8.82 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.154 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; role (n=40) | 71.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.311 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; role (n=28) | -5.36 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.705 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; cognitive (n=40) | 74.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.745 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; cognitive (n=28) | -4.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.444 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; emotional (n=40) | 61.87 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.396 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; emotional (n=28) | -15.78 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.929 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; social (n=40) | 65.42 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.33 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; social (n=28) | -8.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.026 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; fatigue (n=40) | 42.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.026 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; fatigue (n=28) | 8.35 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.785 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; pain (n=40) | 34.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.428 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; pain (n=28) | 13.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.744 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; nausea and vomiting (n=40) | 16.67 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.326 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; nausea and vomiting (n=28) | 2.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.082 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Baseline; global health & QOL (n=40) | 58.55 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.75 |
| All Participants | Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30) | Change at Cycle 6; global health & QOL (n=28) | -3.86 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.191 |
Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Time frame: Up to 28 days after termination of study treatment (approximately 1569 days)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE) | 24 participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was measured from the date of the first study drug dose to the date of death from any cause. The median overall survival time with 95%CI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)
Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Overall Survival (OS) | 475.0 days |
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)
Clinical benefit response was defined as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). CBR was assessed using Recist v.1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)
Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinical Benefit Response (CBR) | 92.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Response
The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). ORR was summarized using number and percentage along with two-sided 95% Pearson-Clopper CI. The overall response rate was assessed utilizing the RECIST v. 1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)
Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Response | 50.0 percentage of participants |
Time to Progression (TTP)
Duration of time to progression (TTP) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to progression was calculated in days from the date of registration until the earliest date of documented disease progression.
Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression (up to 1541 days).
Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| All Participants | Time to Progression (TTP) | 269.0 days |