Skip to content

A Study of Bevacizumab in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Participants With Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

A Multi Centre, Pilot Phase II Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab + Gemcitabine + Carboplatin as First Line Treatment for Patients Diagnosed With Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01201265
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-09-14
Start date
2011-02-28
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2016-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This multicenter study will assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first line treatment in participants with triple negative metastatic breast cancer. Participants will receive bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg intravenously (iv) every 3 weeks, plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 iv) and carboplatin (iv to an area under curve \[AUC\]=2) on Days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. Anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression.

Interventions

DRUGBevacizumab

15 mg/kg iv every 3 weeks

DRUGCarboplatin

to an AUC = 2, on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle

DRUGGemcitabine

1000 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female participants, \>/= 18 years of age * Metastatic breast cancer * Estrogen receptor-, progesterone- and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative disease * Treatment-naïve for metastatic breast cancer * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 * Adequate hematological, renal and liver function * Patients should have received Anthracyclines and Taxanes in the adjuvant setting * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (per institutional standard of care) during treatment and until 6 months after the last administration of investigational products

Exclusion criteria

* Prior first line treatment for metastatic breast cancer * Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis * Uncontrolled hypertension (\> 170/95 mmHg) * Evidence of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy or hemorrhage at baseline * Other malignancy within the last 5 years, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or squamous carcinoma of the skin, or adequately controlled limited basal cell skin cancer. * Prior therapy with gemcitabine or carboplatin in the metastatic setting. Participants having received gemcitabine or carboplatin as part of adjuvant therapy are eligible, if recurrence was first documented \>6 months after the last exposure to the drug(s) * Requirement of chronic use of immunosuppressive agents * HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days).Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated in days from the date of registration until the earliest date of documented disease progression or death. The median PFS time with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. The progression-free survival was assessed utilizing computer tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/bone scans and X-ray and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1. Progression of disease is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)Clinical benefit response was defined as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). CBR was assessed using Recist v.1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time to Progression (TTP)From the date of registration until the disease progression (up to 1541 days).Duration of time to progression (TTP) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to progression was calculated in days from the date of registration until the earliest date of documented disease progression.
Overall Survival (OS)From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)Overall survival was measured from the date of the first study drug dose to the date of death from any cause. The median overall survival time with 95%CI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall ResponseFrom the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). ORR was summarized using number and percentage along with two-sided 95% Pearson-Clopper CI. The overall response rate was assessed utilizing the RECIST v. 1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline, cycle 6The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire incorporates 9 multi scale items: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social); 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea & vomiting); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. It contains 30 questions. The score for each item and the overall score ranges from 0 to 100. A high overall scale and subscale scores represent improved health status. However, in case of symptoms, higher scores suggest increased perception of these symptoms.
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Baseline, Cycle 6, 12 of treatmentChange from baseline in SBP was analyzed by overall response (CR+PR, SD+PD).
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline, Cycle 6, 12 of treatmentChange from baseline in DBP was analyzed by overall response (CR+PR, SD+PD).
Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)Up to 28 days after termination of study treatment (approximately 1569 days)An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

Countries

India

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Participants received a combination therapy of bevacizumab 15 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous every 3 weeks with carboplatin recommended dose (area under curve \[AUC\]= 2) along with gemcitabine 1000 mg/ metre square (m\^2) on days 1 and 8 of each 3 week cycle.
40
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath14
Overall StudyDisease Progression4
Overall StudyInsufficient Therapeutic Response3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.68
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated in days from the date of registration until the earliest date of documented disease progression or death. The median PFS time with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. The progression-free survival was assessed utilizing computer tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/bone scans and X-ray and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1. Progression of disease is defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions compared to the smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions.

Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days).

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All ParticipantsProgression-free Survival (PFS)255 days
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

Change from baseline in DBP was analyzed by overall response (CR+PR, SD+PD).

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 6, 12 of treatment

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, n signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline; CR+PR (n= 19)80.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.65
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Change at cycle 6; CR+PR (n=14)-4.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.83
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Change at cycle 12; CR+PR (n=5)-2.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.83
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Baseline; SD+PD (n= 18)78.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.58
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Change at cycle 6; SD+PD (n=13)2.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.92
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)Change at cycle 12; SD+PD (n=4)7.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 12.58
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)

Change from baseline in SBP was analyzed by overall response (CR+PR, SD+PD).

Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 6, 12 of treatment

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, n signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Baseline; CR+PR (n= 19)124.8 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12.86
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Change at cycle 6; CR+PR (n=14)-4.6 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12.16
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Change at cycle 12; CR+PR at cycle 12 (n=5)-4.0 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 18.17
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Baseline; SD+PD (n= 18)123.6 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 6.82
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Change at cycle 6; SD+PD at cycle 6 (n=13)0.2 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12.68
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)Change at cycle 12; SD+PD at cycle 12 (n=4)-6.3 millimetre of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 17.97
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)

The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire incorporates 9 multi scale items: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social); 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea & vomiting); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. It contains 30 questions. The score for each item and the overall score ranges from 0 to 100. A high overall scale and subscale scores represent improved health status. However, in case of symptoms, higher scores suggest increased perception of these symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline, cycle 6

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment. Here, n signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; physical (n=40)69.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.963
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; physical (n=28)-8.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.154
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; role (n=40)71.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.311
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; role (n=28)-5.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.705
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; cognitive (n=40)74.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.745
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; cognitive (n=28)-4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.444
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; emotional (n=40)61.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.396
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; emotional (n=28)-15.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.929
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; social (n=40)65.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.33
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; social (n=28)-8.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.026
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; fatigue (n=40)42.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.026
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; fatigue (n=28)8.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.785
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; pain (n=40)34.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.428
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; pain (n=28)13.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.744
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; nausea and vomiting (n=40)16.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.326
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; nausea and vomiting (n=28)2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.082
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Baseline; global health & QOL (n=40)58.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.75
All ParticipantsChange From Baseline to Cycle 6 in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-30)Change at Cycle 6; global health & QOL (n=28)-3.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.191
Secondary

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)

An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

Time frame: Up to 28 days after termination of study treatment (approximately 1569 days)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsNumber of Participants With an Adverse Event (AE)24 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was measured from the date of the first study drug dose to the date of death from any cause. The median overall survival time with 95%CI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All ParticipantsOverall Survival (OS)475.0 days
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)

Clinical benefit response was defined as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD). CBR was assessed using Recist v.1.1. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.

Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Clinical Benefit Response (CBR)92.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Response

The overall response rate (ORR) was defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR). ORR was summarized using number and percentage along with two-sided 95% Pearson-Clopper CI. The overall response rate was assessed utilizing the RECIST v. 1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression or death (up to 1541 days)

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Response50.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP)

Duration of time to progression (TTP) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The time to progression was calculated in days from the date of registration until the earliest date of documented disease progression.

Time frame: From the date of registration until the disease progression (up to 1541 days).

Population: Efficacy analysis population included all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment and with at least one efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All ParticipantsTime to Progression (TTP)269.0 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026