Skip to content

Three Month Clinical Evaluation of the Contamac 74% Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

Three Month Clinical Evaluation of the Contamac 74% Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01197859
Enrollment
57
Registered
2010-09-09
Start date
2008-08-31
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2020-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vision Correction

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the contamac silicone hydrogel contact lens with a predicate device (Cooper Vision Biofinity).

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the Contamac lens in comparison with a currently marketed silicone hydrogel: Biofinity® (CooperVision). This is a 3-month, open-label, bilateral, parallel group, randomised, daily wear study. Approx. two-thirds of the subjects will wear the Contamac Silicone Hydrogel lens in both eyes while the other third will wear control lenses.

Interventions

DEVICEDefinitive Contact Lens

Daily wear contact lens

DEVICEBiofinity

Daily wear contact lens

Sponsors

Contamac Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* existing contact lens wearer * read and signed statement of informed consent * has clear central cornea * requires spherical distance correction

Exclusion criteria

* has worn RGP contact lenses within the last 30 days * is using any ocular medication * has had refractive surgery * has an infectious disease * is pregnant or lactating * is participating in another clinical research study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess performance variables as compared to the predicate device during follow-up visits to demonstrate safety and efficacy.3 monthsThe clinical study will assess the following performance variables as compared to the predicate device during 5 follow-up visits over a 3 month period to demonstrate safety and efficacy: Sphere-cyl Refraction and VA, Keratometry, Comfort, Handling, Symptoms, Over-Refraction and VA, Lens Fit, Lens Deposits, and Slit Lamp Findings.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026