Skip to content

Endovenous Ablation With and Without Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam Treatment for Patients With Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence and Visible Varicosities

A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded Study of Endovenous Thermal Ablation With or Without Varisolve™ Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) Treatment for Patients With Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence and Visible Varicosities

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01197833
Acronym
017
Enrollment
117
Registered
2010-09-09
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2021-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence, Visible Varicosities

Keywords

varicose veins, Great saphenous vein, varicosities

Brief summary

Varicose veins are enlarged, noticeably bulging veins, which commonly occur in the legs and may cause discomfort. In this study, patients with varicose veins in the legs will be participating. The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two different doses of an investigational drug, Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) compared to vehicle (inactive solution) when used following an approved heat treatment in subjects with varicose veins.

Interventions

DRUGendovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable microfoam 0.125%

All components except API

DRUGEndovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable microfoam 1.0%

endovenous ablation to target vein, followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 1.0%

DRUGEndovenous ablation+polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%

Endovenous ablation to target vein followed by injection of polidocanol injectable foam 2.0%

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Incompetence of SFJ * Patients who are candidates for ETA \[laser or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)\] * Symptomatic varicose veins * Visible varicose veins * Ability to comprehend and sign an informed consent and complete study questionnaires in English

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who only have telangiectatic or reticular veins (Clinical Finding C1, as assessed by CEAP Classification of Venous Disorders) * Patients who have active ulceration on the leg to be treated (Clinical Finding C6, as assessed by CEAP Classification of Venous Disorders) * Leg obesity impairing the ability to access the vein to be treated and/or to apply post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings * Ultrasonographic or other evidence of current or previous deep vein thrombosis or occlusion * Deep venous reflux unless clinically insignificant in comparison to superficial reflux * Peripheral arterial disease precluding the wearing of post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings * Reduced mobility * History of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or stroke, including evidence of prior DVT on duplex ultrasound * Major surgery, prolonged hospitalization or pregnancy within 3 months of screening * Major co-existing disease (e.g. malignancy; pulmonary disease; renal or hepatic insufficiency; serious skin disease/condition that may compromise the ability of the patient to comply with the compression protocol, etc.) * Known allergic response to polidocanol or heparin, including history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and/or multiple allergic reactions * Current alcohol or drug abuse * Pregnant or lactating women * Women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Independent Photography Review (IPR-V3 Score)IPR-V3 measured at baseline and then at 8 weeksThe Independent Photography Review - Visible Varicose Veins (IPR-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used to assess the appearance of a patient's visible varicose veins. At screening, the site clinician was instructed to review the appearance of the patient's varicose veins in the medial section of each leg (a 'live' assessment), then select an IPR-V3 score (i.e., none=0, mild, moderate, severe or very severe=4) that best represented the appearance of the patient's varicose veins. This assessment took into account the attributes caliber, dilatation, tortuosity, and extent and number of varicosities, and was used to determine patient eligibility. The site clinician used a set of reference photographs (2 example photographs for each score on the scale) to assist with assigning a score to the appearance of the patient's visible varicose veins.
Absolute Change From Baseline in PA-V3 ScorePA-V3 measured at baseline and then at 8 weeksThe Patient Self-assessment of Visible Varicose Veins (PA-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used by patients to evaluate the appearance of their visible varicose veins. On this paper questionnaire, the instructions included a diagram of the medial view of a leg with the area between the ankle and the groin circled. The patient was instructed to choose 1 of 5 response options that best described the appearance of the visible varicose veins of the leg that was treated in the study. The patient was instructed not to consider the appearance of the leg outside the circled area or of any spider veins. Possible responses ranged from Not at all noticeable (a score of 0) to Extremely noticeable (a score of 4)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Endovenous Ablation, Vehicle Placebo
Endovenous ablation followed by vehicle placebo
38
Endovenous Ablation, Polidocanol Injectable Foam, 0.5%
Endovenous ablation followed by polidocanol injectable foam, 0.5%
39
Endovenous Ablation, Polidocanol Injectable Foam 1.0%
endovenous ablation followed by polidocanol injectable foam 1.0%
40
Total117

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEndovenous Ablation, Vehicle PlaceboEndovenous Ablation, Polidocanol Injectable Foam, 0.5%Endovenous Ablation, Polidocanol Injectable Foam 1.0%Total
Age, Continuous54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.05
50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.75
52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.18
BMI29.3 kg^m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.04
27.7 kg^m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.58
28.1 kg^m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.25
28.3 kg^m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.32
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants29 Participants26 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants10 Participants14 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 3829 / 3935 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 390 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Independent Photography Review (IPR-V3 Score)

The Independent Photography Review - Visible Varicose Veins (IPR-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used to assess the appearance of a patient's visible varicose veins. At screening, the site clinician was instructed to review the appearance of the patient's varicose veins in the medial section of each leg (a 'live' assessment), then select an IPR-V3 score (i.e., none=0, mild, moderate, severe or very severe=4) that best represented the appearance of the patient's varicose veins. This assessment took into account the attributes caliber, dilatation, tortuosity, and extent and number of varicosities, and was used to determine patient eligibility. The site clinician used a set of reference photographs (2 example photographs for each score on the scale) to assist with assigning a score to the appearance of the patient's visible varicose veins.

Time frame: IPR-V3 measured at baseline and then at 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Endovenous Ablation, Vehicle PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Independent Photography Review (IPR-V3 Score)-0.80 scoreStandard Error 0.102
Endovenous Ablation, Polidocanol Injectable Foam, 0.5%Absolute Change From Baseline in Independent Photography Review (IPR-V3 Score)-1.30 scoreStandard Error 0.1
Endovenous Ablation, Polidocanol Injectable Foam 1.0%Absolute Change From Baseline in Independent Photography Review (IPR-V3 Score)-1.11 scoreStandard Error 0.097
Primary

Absolute Change From Baseline in PA-V3 Score

The Patient Self-assessment of Visible Varicose Veins (PA-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used by patients to evaluate the appearance of their visible varicose veins. On this paper questionnaire, the instructions included a diagram of the medial view of a leg with the area between the ankle and the groin circled. The patient was instructed to choose 1 of 5 response options that best described the appearance of the visible varicose veins of the leg that was treated in the study. The patient was instructed not to consider the appearance of the leg outside the circled area or of any spider veins. Possible responses ranged from Not at all noticeable (a score of 0) to Extremely noticeable (a score of 4)

Time frame: PA-V3 measured at baseline and then at 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Endovenous Ablation, Vehicle PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in PA-V3 Score-1.59 scoreStandard Error 0.142
Endovenous Ablation, Polidocanol Injectable Foam, 0.5%Absolute Change From Baseline in PA-V3 Score-1.81 scoreStandard Error 0.14
Endovenous Ablation, Polidocanol Injectable Foam 1.0%Absolute Change From Baseline in PA-V3 Score-1.85 scoreStandard Error 0.136

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026