Skip to content

Oronasopharyngeal Suction Versus Simple Nose and Mouth Wiping in Term Newborns

Newborn Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oronasopharyngeal Suction Versus Simple Nose and Mouth Wiping in Term Newborns

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01197807
Acronym
TermWIPE
Enrollment
506
Registered
2010-09-09
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2012-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium, Resuscitation

Keywords

Suctioning, Wiping, Neonate, Resuscitation

Brief summary

Until recently, bulb or catheter oronasopharyngeal suctioning (ONPS) of all the infants, including vigorous infants in the delivery room, has been featured as a standard of newborn care. The 5th edition of the Newborn Resuscitation Program (NRP) has minimized the recommendation for routine suctioning of infants following delivery, provided they are not depressed or in need of immediate resuscitation. However, this new alternative recommendation was based on a small randomized trial and other lower level evidence rather than evidence from larger trials. The NRP Textbook cautions against vigorous suctioning because of the resultant apnea or bradycardia. Furthermore, suctioning may delay other more important steps of resuscitation. Thus, it is necessary to compare the alternative recommended practice, i.e. simple wiping of the mouth, to determine if it has equivalent efficacy and a favorable side effect profile compared to suctioning.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBulb Suctioning

Bulb suctioning of the mouth then the nose immediately following delivery

PROCEDUREWiping

Gentle wiping of mouth then nose with a soft cloth immediately following delivery

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Minutes to 1 Minutes
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inborn neonates at the UAB hospital with gestational age greater than or equal to 35 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

* Major birth anomalies or where a decision to institute comfort care only has been made antenatally * Significant resuscitation efforts are anticipated prior to delivery * Nonvigorous infants with meconium stained amniotic fluid

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean respiratory rate over the first 24 hours of life24 hours after birthRespiratory rates measured every 8 hours during the first 24 hours after birth

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of newborns with tachypnea24 hoursNumber of newborns with tachypnea as defined by respiratory rate greater than 60 breaths per minute
Need for delivery room resuscitation1 hour after birthNeed for delivery room resuscitation including suctioning, intubation, positive pressure ventilation, chest compressions, and/or medication
Apgar Scores at one minute of age1 minute of ageIndependent assignment of Apgar Scores at one minute of age
Oxygen saturations prior to discharge from hospital5 days of ageMeasurements of oxygen saturations in the well baby nursery prior to discharge home
Apgar score at 5 minutes of age5 minutes of ageIndependent assignment of Apgar score at 5 minutes of age
Admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit1 hour after birthNeeding admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026