Skip to content

Registry Study of Genesys HTA for Treatment of Menorrhagia

Genesys HTA Post Approval Registry A Multi-center, Single-arm, Prospective Registry of the Genesys HTA System for the Treatment of Menorrhagia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01197547
Acronym
Genesys HTA
Enrollment
1014
Registered
2010-09-09
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2021-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Menorrhagia

Keywords

Menorrhagia

Brief summary

This is a clinical registry of an FDA approved device system called the Genesys Hydro ThermAblatorTM (HTA) system (Boston Scientific). The HTA system's intended use is to be inserted, by a trained physician, into the uterus, where it will fill and circulate fluid that is warm enough to change the characteristics of the uterine lining. This is done with the anticipated result of improving menstrual bleeding symptoms. The purpose of this FDA-mandated registry is to obtain clinical experience on the use the Genesys HTA™ system, under normal clinical conditions, and document its safety and technical reliability.

Interventions

DEVICEGenesys HTA

Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation

Sponsors

Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must meet the approved indication for use to be considered for this registry.

Exclusion criteria

* All subjects contraindicated for the treatment of the Genesys HTA System per the Directions for Use will be excluded: 1. The subject is pregnant or wants to be pregnant in the future 2. The subject has known or suspected endometrial carcinoma or premalignant change of the endometrium, such as adenomatous hyperplasia 3. The subject has active pelvic inflammatory disease or pyosalpinx 4. The subject has hydrosalpinx 5. The subject in whom a tight cervical seal cannot be established and maintained around the procedure sheath 6. The subject has an anatomical condition (e.g. history of previous classical cesarean section or transmural myomectomy) or pathologic condition (e.g. long term medical therapy) that could lead to weakening of the myometrium 7. The subject has an intrauterine device in place 8. The subject has an active genital or urinary tract infection (e.g. cervicitis, endometritis, vaginitis, cystitis, etc.) at the time of treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Burn RateDay 1

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical MalfunctionsDay 1A secondary endpoint of the Genesys HTA Post Approval Study is to assess technical complaints (i.e. disposable and hardware issues). Technical complaints are issues related to system components encountered during the procedure such as error messages, problems with the connection, power, early incomplete procedure terminations, or display/user interface, or damage to the unit.
Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)Day 1A secondary endpoint of the Genesys HTA Post Approval Study is to assess Serious Adverse Device Effects. Per the approved protocol, an SADE is an adverse device effect resulting in any of the consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event, or that might have led to any of these consequences if suitable action had not been taken or intervention had not been made, or if circumstances had been less opportune.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Genesys HTA
Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation Genesys HTA: Genesys HTA Endometrial Ablation
1,014
Total1,014

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGenesys HTA
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1013 Participants
Age, Continuous41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
Region of Enrollment
United States
1014 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1014 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 992
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 992

Outcome results

Primary

Burn Rate

Time frame: Day 1

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Genesys HTABurn Rate4 participants
Secondary

Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)

A secondary endpoint of the Genesys HTA Post Approval Study is to assess Serious Adverse Device Effects. Per the approved protocol, an SADE is an adverse device effect resulting in any of the consequences characteristic of a serious adverse event, or that might have led to any of these consequences if suitable action had not been taken or intervention had not been made, or if circumstances had been less opportune.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: 992 - Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genesys HTASerious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)Subjects with at least one Serious adverse event1 number of participants
Genesys HTASerious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)Injury, poisoning and procedural complications1 number of participants
Genesys HTASerious Adverse Device Effect (SADE)Thermal burn1 number of participants
Secondary

Technical Malfunctions

A secondary endpoint of the Genesys HTA Post Approval Study is to assess technical complaints (i.e. disposable and hardware issues). Technical complaints are issues related to system components encountered during the procedure such as error messages, problems with the connection, power, early incomplete procedure terminations, or display/user interface, or damage to the unit.

Time frame: Day 1

Population: 992 patients = ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genesys HTATechnical Malfunctionscomplaint - procedure stopped to prevent injury.6 percent of participants
Genesys HTATechnical MalfunctionsSubjects with At Least One Technical Complaint4.4 percent of participants
Genesys HTATechnical MalfunctionsSubjects with One Technical Complaint3.5 percent of participants
Genesys HTATechnical MalfunctionsSubjects with Two Technical Complaints.9 percent of participants
Genesys HTATechnical MalfunctionsSubjects with Three Technical Complaints0.0 percent of participants
Genesys HTATechnical MalfunctionsSubjects with More Than Three Technical Complaints0.0 percent of participants
Genesys HTATechnical MalfunctionsSubjects with 1+ Component with Tech Comp4.4 percent of participants
Genesys HTATechnical MalfunctionsSubjects with One Component with Technical Complai4.2 percent of participants
Genesys HTATechnical MalfunctionsSubjects with Two Component with Technical Complai.2 percent of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026