Skip to content

Comparison Study of Standard Care Against Combination of Growth Factors Agents for Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

REGIME: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Prolonged Treatment With Darbepoetin Alpha, With or Without Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor, Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01196715
Acronym
REGIME
Enrollment
360
Registered
2010-09-08
Start date
2010-11-01
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2025-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Keywords

Quality of Life, Erythroid response, disease progression, survival, Overall erythroid response at 24 weeks, Quality of life at 24 weeks, Quality of life at 12, 36 and 52 weeks, Overall erythroid response at 12 and 52 weeks, Incidence of disease progression, Overall Survival

Brief summary

REGIME is comparing two treatments, with Darbepoetin Alpha (DA) and Filgrastim (Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor, G-CSF), to the standard treatment for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). After giving Informed Consent patients will undergo a number of tests to confirm eligibility. Once eligibility is confirmed patients will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatments group: A: Darbepoetin Alpha (DA), B: Darbepoetin Alpha and Filgrastim (DA+G-CSF), C: Blood transfusion only. Patients will be required to attend the clinic once a month for 24 weeks. After 24 weeks if a patient has reacted favorably to the treatment they may continue on the treatment regime up to 52 weeks. After week 24 all patients will be required to attend the clinic twice more, at week 36 and 52. Patients will be followed for a further 5 years to record loss of response, transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and/or Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts and death.

Interventions

DRUGDarbepoetin alpha

Aranesp 500 mcg vials once every 2 weeks.

DRUGFilgrastim

300 mcg vials twice a week, 3-4 days apart

PROCEDUREBlood Red Cell Transfusion

Red cell transfusion support to achieve a predicted post-transfusion haemoglobin of 11.0 to 12.0 g/dl at a quantity and frequency such that the minimum haemoglobin is never below 8.0 g/dl or such that the patient is never excessively symptomatic, according to local transfusion guidelines/policy.

Sponsors

Cancer Research UK
CollaboratorOTHER
Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males and females aged over 18 years, (no upper age limit) 2. ECOG performance status 0-2 3. Life expectancy more than 6 months 4. A confirmed diagnosis of MDS - WHO type: * refractory anaemia (RA) * hypoplastic RA ineligible for/or failed immunosuppressive therapy (ALG, cyclosporine) * refractory anaemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) * refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia * myelodysplastic syndrome unclassifiable 5. IPSS low or Int-1, but with BM blasts less than 5% 6. A haemoglobin concentration of less than 10g/dl and/or red cell transfusion dependence 7. Able to understand the implications of participation in the Trial and give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. MDS with bone marrow blasts greater or equal than 5% 2. Myelodysplastic syndrome associated with del(5q)(q31-33) syndrome 3. Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (monocytes greater than1.0x109/l) 4. Therapy-related MDS 5. Splenomegaly, with spleen greater or equal than 5 cm from left costal margin 6. Platelets less than 30x109/l 7. Uncorrected haematinic deficiency. Patient deplete to iron, B12 and folate according to local lab ranges 8. Women who are pregnant or lactating. 9. Females of childbearing potential and all males must be willing to use an effective method of contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) for the duration of the study and for up to 3 months after the last dose of study medication. Note: Subjects are not considered of child bearing potential if they are surgically sterile (they have undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or they are postmenopausal 10. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to starting the study. 11. Uncontrolled hypertension, previous venous thromboembolism, or uncontrolled cardiac or pulmonary disease 12. Previous serious adverse events to the study medications or its components 13. Patients who have had previous therapy with ESAs ± G-CSF within 4 weeks of study entry 14. Patients currently receiving experimental therapy, e.g. with thalidomide, or who are participating in another CTIMP. 15. Medical or psychiatric illness, which makes the patient unsuitable or unable to give informed consent. 16. Patients with malignancy requiring active treatment (except hormonal therapy). 17. Patients with a history of seizures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life - To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care aloneweeks 0To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone
Haemoglobin response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care aloneweek 0To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone
Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care aloneweek 4To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessmentevery weekTo assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026