Skip to content

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Prospective Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01195285
Enrollment
87
Registered
2010-09-06
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2012-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary Dyskinesia, Cholecystitis, Cholelithiasis, Gallstones

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Quality of life, Biliary Cholic, Chronic Cholecystitis, Symptomatic Cholelithiasis

Brief summary

This study will compare Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) cholecystectomy to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), focusing on patient-reported outcomes and cost.

Detailed description

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is accepted as a form of surgical treatment. Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC) is well tolerated, with a low complication risk and high patient satisfaction; thus a SILS procedure needs to be at least equivalent to be a justifiable replacement, and should not result in higher costs.

Interventions

PROCEDURESingle-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

PROCEDURETraditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TLC)

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Sponsors

Tyco Healthcare Group LP (d/b/a Covidien)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Saint Luke's Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient recommended to undergo cholecystectomy * Patient age 18-80 * Patient competent to give his/her own informed consent * Patient speaks English without the need for an interpreter

Exclusion criteria

* Additional procedures planned during same surgery * Patient deemed inappropriate for TLC or SILS cholecystectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cost associated with performance of the procedure and post-operative care until discharge4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain scale reported by patient at discharge, 24 and 48 hours24 hours and 48 hours
Amount of pain medicine required during 48 hours after surgery48 hours
Major and minor gastrointestinal surgical complications, including conversion4 weeks
Quality of Life2 weeks and 4 weeks

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026