Biliary Dyskinesia, Cholecystitis, Cholelithiasis, Gallstones
Conditions
Keywords
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Quality of life, Biliary Cholic, Chronic Cholecystitis, Symptomatic Cholelithiasis
Brief summary
This study will compare Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) cholecystectomy to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), focusing on patient-reported outcomes and cost.
Detailed description
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is accepted as a form of surgical treatment. Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC) is well tolerated, with a low complication risk and high patient satisfaction; thus a SILS procedure needs to be at least equivalent to be a justifiable replacement, and should not result in higher costs.
Interventions
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patient recommended to undergo cholecystectomy * Patient age 18-80 * Patient competent to give his/her own informed consent * Patient speaks English without the need for an interpreter
Exclusion criteria
* Additional procedures planned during same surgery * Patient deemed inappropriate for TLC or SILS cholecystectomy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Cost associated with performance of the procedure and post-operative care until discharge | 4 weeks |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Pain scale reported by patient at discharge, 24 and 48 hours | 24 hours and 48 hours |
| Amount of pain medicine required during 48 hours after surgery | 48 hours |
| Major and minor gastrointestinal surgical complications, including conversion | 4 weeks |
| Quality of Life | 2 weeks and 4 weeks |
Countries
United States