Skip to content

Different PEG-interferon and Ribavirin Schedules for Chronic Hepatitis C in the Real Clinical Practice.

Improvement of the Surveillance and Control of Liver Disease and Complication Due to Chronic Hepatitis C: Project A) Antiviral Drugs Use, Efficacy, Safety and Costs; Project B) Kinetics of Virological Response.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01195181
Enrollment
506
Registered
2010-09-06
Start date
2005-09-30
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2010-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Antiviral Agents, Chronic Liver Disease, Hepatitis C Virus, Therapeutic Uses, Viral Hepatitis

Keywords

peginterferon alfa 2a and 2b type, ribavirin, chronic hepatitis C, antiviral therapy cost/efficacy, viral kinetics

Brief summary

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection provokes thousands of deaths every year all over the world, being the major cause of progressive liver disease, primary hepatic cancer and liver transplantation. Today, a curative therapy is available, that can eradicate the viral infection and determine the regression of liver fibrosis, also in cirrhotic subjects. The current standard-of-care for HCV chronic infection is combination therapy with peginterferon (P-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV). However, this treatment is not only expensive but determines several side effects, that can reduce drug tolerance and hence, patient adherence to therapy. There are two types of available P-IFN on the market: P-IFN alfa-2a (Pegasys®, F.Hoffmann-La Roche) administered at a flat-dose of 180 mcg/week and P-IFN alfa-2b (PegIntron®, Schering-Plough) given at a weight-based dose of 50 to 150 mcg/week. Since only a single amino acid differentiates these types of IFN, administration strategies depend on their pegilation with molecules of 40 or 12kDa, respectively, that accounts for differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-profile and influences probably also bioactivity. No comparative data are available on the benefits and costs of the licensed Peg-IFN plus RBV for the treatment of HCV infection in the real clinical practice, even if, the benefit and favourable cost-efficacy of this antiviral therapy is well established and of large consensus. Recently, the first randomized controlled mega-trial to compare antiviral therapeutic efficacy in naïve patients with HCV-genotype 1 infection during different regimens of P-IFN alfa-2b (at low and standard-dose) and P-IFN alfa-2a plus RBV, has been published, confirming a similar efficacy, of around 40%, obtained with the three schedules evaluated. In Italy, a regional program on the Surveillance and Control of HCV Infection, set up by the Regional Health Councillorship, has led to the development of a clinical and epidemiological observatory, constituted by a network of liver tertiary centres (Hepatological Cooperative Network of Veneto, HepCoVe). This collaborative group is connected on-line by a common database that, since 2003, has prospectively collected data on a cohort of more than 3000 patients with chronic HCV infection and, among them, of 506 naïve subjects that consecutively underwent combination therapy with P-IFN alfa-2a or alfa-2b plus RBV. The aim of this study was to rationalize and improve the social regional health program on antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C by assessing the different schedules utilization of P-IFN plus RBV as well as the respective therapeutic effectiveness, safety and costs in the real clinical practice (Project A).

Detailed description

(Project B) To evaluate the viral kinetic decay during antiviral combination therapy with P-IFN alfa-2a and 2b type plus ribavirin.

Interventions

DRUGpeginterferon plus ribavirin

peginterferon alfa-2a at 180ug/week (preempt syringe, sc) or peginterferon alfa-2b at 1,5 ug/kg/week (standard dose) or at 1,0 ug/kg/week (lower dose)(preempt pen, sc) for 24 or 48 week in relation to HCV genotype plus ribavirin (capsules, po) at 15mg/kg/daily combination therapy.

Sponsors

Regione Veneto
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Padova
CollaboratorOTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Naive adult subject * active HCV infection (HCV-RNA positive) * histological/biochemical signs of chronic hepatitis or compensated cirrhosis * willingness of treatment

Exclusion criteria

* autoimmune disorders * severe depression or psychiatric disease * previous decompensation of cirrhosis * gastroesophageal bleeding * hepatocellular carcinoma * major disease with a life expectancy of less than 5 years * pregnancy or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of real dose drugs intake in relation to sustained virological response (SVR).Measurement of HCV-RNA at 24° week after therapy withdrawal.Project A) The analysis will describe the efficacy (SVR) and costs of the 3 different antiviral schedules proposed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Description of the profile of the virus decay during antiviral therapy in relation to virological response.Measurement of HCV-RNA during therapy in relation to negativity at 24° week after therapy withdrawal.Project B) The analysis will evaluate the kinetics of virological response obtained with the two peginterferons plus ribavirin by HCV-RNA quantification (Cobas,TaqMan, Roche) at basal time and at 1°,4°,12°,24°,36°,48° week during therapy and at 24° week after therapy withdrawal.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026