Skip to content

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Head and Neck Cancer Pain (HNC) (TENS & HNC)

The Influence of TENS on Mucositis Pain and Function in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Double Blind Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01194466
Enrollment
41
Registered
2010-09-03
Start date
2011-05-15
Completion date
2012-08-14
Last updated
2019-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head Cancer, Neck Cancer, Pain

Keywords

Head and Neck Cancer, Oral Cancer, Laryngeal Cancer, Oropharyngeal Cancer, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Oral Mucositis, Pain, Function, TENS, Functional Pain, Non-pharamcologic, Quality of Life

Brief summary

The overall goal of this study is to examine the effect of a single dose of TENS on mucositis pain and function secondary to head and neck radiation therapies. Oral mucositis is an extremely debilitating, unpreventable condition (inflammation, ulcers, bleeding in the mouth, nose, and throat) that causes significant pain, functional impairment, and diminished quality of life. Head and neck cancers pose specific challenges to effective pain management and past studies suggest the use of effective non-pharmacologic strategies such as TENS may be particularly beneficial for avoiding sources of acute and chronic pain, thereby improving quality of life. The investigators hypothesize that a single dose of TENS will decrease pain and improve function and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. This project is particularly innovative because it is the first known study to examine the efficacy of TENS, an established safe, inexpensive and easy-to-use non-pharmacologic pain management intervention, for treating acute oral mucositis pain. The investigators research translates bench (animal model) science to human subjects using an interdisciplinary approach to pain management. Establishing whether TENS is effective for reducing mucositis pain is a critical first step toward establishing an effective, non-pharmacologic pain relief intervention for mucositis.

Interventions

DEVICETranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)

Four adhesive electrodes (1.375in x 1.375in) will be placed bilaterally on the: 1) temporomandibular joint (1/3rd of distance between ear and nose); and 2) upper neck area (2cm from spine, i.e., Cervical 1 and 2).

Sponsors

Jennifer E. Lee
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis * Oral mucositis diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

* TENS use ≤ 5 years * Pacemaker * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain Intensity in Head/Neck Cancer Area: 10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)The change in VAS pain score was assessed within one study visit for each of the 3 study TENS conditionsParticipants rated 0-10 pain intensity in head/neck cancer area using one number (where their disease was located) by a vertical line on a horizontal 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 no pain to 10 worst possible pain. Possible scores ranged from 0-10 (10=worse pain). VAS was assessed two times each visit: (1) Pre-VAS: start of visit, (2) Post-VAS: end of the visit. The outcome measure was each person's change in pain: Pre-VAS minus Post-VAS, to create VAS change score. An average of all participants' VAS change score was calculated for each TENS condition (Active, Placebo, No TENS) and used as the dependent measure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo controlled study was conducted between May 2011 and August 2012 at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (Clinical-Trials.gov identifier, NCT01194466)

Pre-assignment details

Study exclusion criteria were (1) TENS use within 5 years, (2) conditions precluding TENS use (pacemaker, nickel allergy), (3) pain intensity less than 1 of 10 with rest or swallowing, (4) sensory impairment (could not identify sharp and dull stimuli on face), and/or (5) inability to read, write, or follow directions.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants' characteristics, prior to first treatment
41
Total41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
38 Participants
Age, Continuous57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
34 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
41 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 410 / 410 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 410 / 410 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Pain Intensity in Head/Neck Cancer Area: 10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Participants rated 0-10 pain intensity in head/neck cancer area using one number (where their disease was located) by a vertical line on a horizontal 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 no pain to 10 worst possible pain. Possible scores ranged from 0-10 (10=worse pain). VAS was assessed two times each visit: (1) Pre-VAS: start of visit, (2) Post-VAS: end of the visit. The outcome measure was each person's change in pain: Pre-VAS minus Post-VAS, to create VAS change score. An average of all participants' VAS change score was calculated for each TENS condition (Active, Placebo, No TENS) and used as the dependent measure.

Time frame: The change in VAS pain score was assessed within one study visit for each of the 3 study TENS conditions

Population: The sample was adults (18 or greater) years old with oropharyngeal or laryngeal cancer.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active TENSChange in Pain Intensity in Head/Neck Cancer Area: 10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-1.4 change units on a VAS scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Placebo TENSChange in Pain Intensity in Head/Neck Cancer Area: 10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-0.6 change units on a VAS scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
No TENSChange in Pain Intensity in Head/Neck Cancer Area: 10cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)0.1 change units on a VAS scaleStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026