Skip to content

Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Apremilast (CC-10004) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01194219
Acronym
ESTEEM 1
Enrollment
844
Registered
2010-09-02
Start date
2010-09-09
Completion date
2016-11-22
Last updated
2022-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plaque Psoriasis

Keywords

Plaque Psoriasis

Brief summary

This study evaluated the effects of an called apremilast. Apremilast works by lowering some of the chemicals that affect psoriasis and therefore improves the symptoms of psoriasis. The purpose of this study was to test apremilast and compare its effects to placebo (an inactive substance which contains no medicine but is in the same form as the drug). This study was able to test for efficacy (improvement of signs and symptoms) and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Interventions

DRUGApremilast
DRUGPlacebo

Identical matching placebo

DRUGTopical treatments or phototherapy

At week 32, participants considered partial responders or non-responders had the option of adding topical therapies and/or phototherapy to their treatment regimen.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females, ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent document 2. Diagnosis of chronic plaque psoriasis for at least 12 months prior to Screening a. Have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis at Screening and Baseline 3. Must meet all laboratory criteria 4. Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and Baseline. FCBP who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use 2 forms of contraception as described by the Study Doctor while on study medication and for at least 28 days after taking the last dose of study medication 5. Male subjects (including those who have had a vasectomy) who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use barrier contraception (latex condom or any nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural \[animal\] membrane \[eg, polyurethane\]) while on study medication and for a least 28 days after the last dose of study medication.

Exclusion criteria

1. Other than psoriasis, history of any clinically significant (as determined by the Investigator) or other major uncontrolled disease. . 2. Pregnant or breast feeding 3. History of allergy to any component of the study drug 4. Hepatitis B surface antigen positive at Screening 5. Anti-hepatitis C antibody positive at Screening 6. Active tuberculosis (TB) or a history of incompletely treated TB 7. Clinically significant abnormality on 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening 8. Clinically significant abnormal chest x-ray 9. History of positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or have congenital or acquired immunodeficiency 10. Active substance abuse or a history of substance abuse within 6 months prior to Screening 11. Bacterial infections requiring treatment with oral or injectable antibiotics, or significant viral or fungal infections, within 4 weeks of Screening 12. Malignancy or history of malignancy (except for treated \[ie, cured\] basal cell or squamous cell in situ skin carcinomas and treated \[ie, cured\] cervical intraepithelial neoplasia \[CIN\] or carcinoma in situ of the cervix with no evidence of recurrence within the previous 5 years) 13. Psoriasis flare or rebound within 4 weeks prior to Screening 14. Evidence of skin conditions that would interfere with clinical assessments 15. Topical therapy within 2 weeks of randomization 16. Systemic therapy for psoriasis within 4 weeks prior to randomization 17. Use of phototherapy within 4 weeks prior to randomization (ie, Ultraviolet B (UVB), psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) 18. Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, or certolizumab pegol within 12 weeks prior to randomization 19. Alefacept, briakinumab, or ustekinumab within 24 weeks prior to randomization 20. Use of any investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to randomization 21. Prolonged sun exposure or use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet (UV) light sources 22. Prior treatment with apremilast

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From BaselineBaseline to Week 16PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16Baseline and Week 16BSA was a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA percent change from baseline (Visit 2 Week 0) was determined at each visit of the study, which is calculated as 100\*(visit BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA (%).
Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16Baseline to Week 16Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. These values for each anatomic region are summed to yield the PASI score. The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. PASI score percent change from baseline was calculated as 100\* (visit score - baseline score)/baseline score (%).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From BaselineBaseline to Week 16A participant was classified as having at least a 50% improvement in PASI score from baseline, which was equivalent to a percent change from baseline ranging from -100% to -50%. PASI score is based on an assessment of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling), and the percent area affected as observed on the day of examination.
Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16The Pruritus Visual Analog Scores (VAS) were used to measure the amount of itching and discomfort a participant experiences. Participant's Assessment of Pruritus (Itch) asked: On average, how much itch have you had because of your condition in the past week? All VAS values range from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom or disease. Change from baseline was calculated for the VAS scale, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16Baseline to Week 16DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best.
Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MSC) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16Baseline to Week 16The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From BaselineBaseline to Week 16The sPGA was a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator factored in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and did not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign was averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score.
Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Loss of PASI-75 Response (Loss of Effect) at Week 32 During the Re-Randomized Treatment Withdrawal PhaseWeek 32 to Week 52Time to loss was the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the first assessment where loss of PASI-75 was observed (event); or the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the last PASI assessment in the Weeks 32-52 interval prior to addition of protocol-prohibited medication/therapy, or resumption of APR 30 BID, or discontinuation, or Week 52 if no loss (censored).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseWeek 0 to Week 16; mean duration of exposure was 14.8 weeks and 15.0 weeks for subjects randomized to placebo and apremilast respectively.An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose.
Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Week 0 to Week 260; mean exposure to apremilast 30 mg BID during the Apremilast-exposure Period up to Week 260 was 97.83 weeksThe Apremilast-exposure Period started on the date of the first dose of apremilast (Week 0 for participants originally randomized to apremilast or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo) to the last dose of apremilast. Adverse events that started after 28 days of initiating placebo and before resuming apremilast treatment in the Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Weeks 32 to 52) were excluded in the Apremilast-exposure Period. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose.
Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseWeeks 0 to Week 16Psoriasis flare was defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention, or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. Note categories below. \[1\] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis) started on or after the first dose date and on or before the last dose date within the phase. \[2\] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis, Rebound psoriasis) started after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase. \[3\] PASI \>= 125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase and were not included in \[1\] and/or \[2\].
Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the During the Apremilast-exposure Period Through Week 260Week 0 to Week 260Psoriasis flare was defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention, or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. Note categories below. \[1\] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis) started on or after the first dose date and on or before the last dose date within the phase. \[2\] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis, Rebound psoriasis) started after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase. \[3\] PASI \>= 125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase and were not included in \[1\] and/or \[2\].
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Both a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI and sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction at Week 16 From BaselineBaseline to Week 16PASI-75 response was the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. See Outcome Measure #1 for further description. sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. See OCM #2 for further description.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 76 study centers in 8 countries

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Apremilast
Participants were initially randomized to apremilast (APR) 30 mg tablets twice daily (BID) during the Placebo-controlled Phase (Weeks 0-16)
562
Placebo
Participants were initially randomized to identically matching placebo (PBO) tablets twice daily BID during the Placebo-controlled Phase (Weeks 0-16)
282
Total844

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009
Long-Term Extension Weeks 52 to 260Adverse Event000000002514
Long-Term Extension Weeks 52 to 260Death0000000011
Long-Term Extension Weeks 52 to 260Lack of Efficacy000000008149
Long-Term Extension Weeks 52 to 260Lost to Follow-up000000002410
Long-Term Extension Weeks 52 to 260Miscellaneous00000000112
Long-Term Extension Weeks 52 to 260Noncompliance with IP0000000094
Long-Term Extension Weeks 52 to 260Protocol Violation0000000030
Long-Term Extension Weeks 52 to 260Withdrawal by Subject000000006632
Maintenance Phase Weeks16-32Adverse Event0089000000
Maintenance Phase Weeks16-32Lack of Efficacy003715000000
Maintenance Phase Weeks16-32Lost to Follow-up0090000000
Maintenance Phase Weeks16-32Non-compliance with Study Drug0021000000
Maintenance Phase Weeks16-32Other0021000000
Maintenance Phase Weeks16-32Protocol Violation0001000000
Maintenance Phase Weeks16-32Withdrawal by Subject00123000000
Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16Adverse Event23500000000
Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16Death0100000000
Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16Lack of Efficacy2700000000
Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16Lost to Follow-up7900000000
Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16Miscellaneous1100000000
Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16Noncompliance with study drug7000000000
Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16Protocol Violation7100000000
Placebo-Controlled Phase Weeks 0-16Withdrawal by Subject12900000000
Randomized Withdrawal Phase-Weeks 32-52Adverse Event0000016500
Randomized Withdrawal Phase-Weeks 32-52Lack of Efficacy000011353300
Randomized Withdrawal Phase-Weeks 32-52Lost to Follow-up0000125000
Randomized Withdrawal Phase-Weeks 32-52Non-compliance with Study Drug0000102000
Randomized Withdrawal Phase-Weeks 32-52Other0000001000
Randomized Withdrawal Phase-Weeks 32-52Protocol Violation0000000100
Randomized Withdrawal Phase-Weeks 32-52Withdrawal by Subject00001012600

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalApremilast
Age, Continuous46.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.72
46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.95
45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.07
Duration of Plaque Psoriasis
10 to < 20 years
73 years232 years159 years
Duration of Plaque Psoriasis
<10 years
85 years235 years150 years
Duration of Plaque Psoriasis
≥ 20 years
122 years375 years253 years
Duration of Plaque Psoriasis
Missing
2 years2 years0 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
5 participants7 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
16 participants44 participants28 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
10 participants28 participants18 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 participants6 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
250 participants757 participants507 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
88 Participants271 Participants183 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
194 Participants573 Participants379 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
90 / 282260 / 56010 / 77503 / 804
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 28212 / 5602 / 7774 / 804

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/ApremilastPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline33.1 percentage of participants
Placebo (PBO)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) at Week 16 From Baseline5.3 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [23.1, 32.5]Chi-squared
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16

The Pruritus Visual Analog Scores (VAS) were used to measure the amount of itching and discomfort a participant experiences. Participant's Assessment of Pruritus (Itch) asked: On average, how much itch have you had because of your condition in the past week? All VAS values range from 0 to 100. Higher scores correspond to more severe symptom or disease. Change from baseline was calculated for the VAS scale, where change = visit value - baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value are included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/ApremilastChange From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16-31.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Placebo (PBO)Change From Baseline in Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16-7.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.85
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-28.7, -19.8]ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value are included

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/ApremilastChange From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16-6.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Placebo (PBO)Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.4, -3.6]ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MSC) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16

The SF-36 was a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). Scores from the 8 scales, PCS and MCS were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population, with 50 as the average and 10 as the standard deviation, higher scores indicating better health. For norm based scores, change from baseline were calculated for the 8 scales and the two summary scales, where change = visit value - baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value are included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/ApremilastChange From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MSC) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 162.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.371
Placebo (PBO)Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MSC) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 at Week 16-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.529
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.81, 4.35]ANCOVA
Secondary

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Loss of PASI-75 Response (Loss of Effect) at Week 32 During the Re-Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase

Time to loss was the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the first assessment where loss of PASI-75 was observed (event); or the time between the re-randomization date and the date of the last PASI assessment in the Weeks 32-52 interval prior to addition of protocol-prohibited medication/therapy, or resumption of APR 30 BID, or discontinuation, or Week 52 if no loss (censored).

Time frame: Week 32 to Week 52

Population: Analysis population consisted of participants who were re-randomized to placebo or apremilast 30mg BID at Week 32.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo/ApremilastKaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Loss of PASI-75 Response (Loss of Effect) at Week 32 During the Re-Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase17.7 Weeks
Placebo (PBO)Kaplan Meier Estimate of Time to Loss of PASI-75 Response (Loss of Effect) at Week 32 During the Re-Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase5.1 Weeks
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.768, 3.969]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the During the Apremilast-exposure Period Through Week 260

Psoriasis flare was defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention, or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. Note categories below. \[1\] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis) started on or after the first dose date and on or before the last dose date within the phase. \[2\] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis, Rebound psoriasis) started after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase. \[3\] PASI \>= 125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase and were not included in \[1\] and/or \[2\].

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 260

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of IP; apremilast participants as treated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the During the Apremilast-exposure Period Through Week 260Participants with any psoriasis flare [1]35 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the During the Apremilast-exposure Period Through Week 260Participants with any psoriasis rebound [2]12 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the During the Apremilast-exposure Period Through Week 260PASI ≥ 125% of Baseline score after last dose [3]26 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled Phase

Psoriasis flare was defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention, or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. Note categories below. \[1\] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis) started on or after the first dose date and on or before the last dose date within the phase. \[2\] Psoriasis adverse events (ie, preferred term as Guttate psoriasis, Psoriasis, Pustular psoriasis, Rebound psoriasis) started after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase. \[3\] PASI \>= 125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for participants who discontinued within the phase and were not included in \[1\] and/or \[2\].

Time frame: Weeks 0 to Week 16

Population: Included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of Investigational Product (IP).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled PhasePASI ≥ 125% of Baseline score after last dose [3]3 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseParticipants with any psoriasis rebound [2]1 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseParticipants with any psoriasis flare [1]7 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseParticipants with any psoriasis rebound [2]1 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled PhasePASI ≥ 125% of Baseline score after last dose [3]3 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With a Psoriasis Flare or Rebound During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseParticipants with any psoriasis flare [1]6 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260

The Apremilast-exposure Period started on the date of the first dose of apremilast (Week 0 for participants originally randomized to apremilast or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo) to the last dose of apremilast. Adverse events that started after 28 days of initiating placebo and before resuming apremilast treatment in the Randomized Treatment Withdrawal Phase (Weeks 32 to 52) were excluded in the Apremilast-exposure Period. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 260; mean exposure to apremilast 30 mg BID during the Apremilast-exposure Period up to Week 260 was 97.83 weeks

Population: The apremilast subjects as treated population, which includes all participants who were randomized to (at Week 0) or treated with (at Week 16) apremilast 30 mg BID, and received at least one dose of apremilast after randomization or Week 16.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Any At TEAE675 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Any Drug-Related TEAE372 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Any Severe TEAE78 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Any Serious TEAE74 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Any Serious Drug-Related TEAE12 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Any TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption107 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Any TEAE Leading to Drug withdrawal98 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period Through Week 260Any TEAE Leading to Death3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled Phase

An AE was any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. An AE is a treatment emergent AE if the AE start date is on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16; mean duration of exposure was 14.8 weeks and 15.0 weeks for subjects randomized to placebo and apremilast respectively.

Population: Safety population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of Investigational Product (IP)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE388 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Drug-Related TEAE224 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Severe TEAE20 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious TEAE12 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious Drug-Related TEAE4 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE leading to Drug Interruption37 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE leading to drug withdrawal29 participants
Placebo/ApremilastNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Death1 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Death1 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE157 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious Drug-Related TEAE0 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Drug-Related TEAE58 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE leading to drug withdrawal9 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Severe TEAE9 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE leading to Drug Interruption13 participants
Placebo (PBO)Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious TEAE8 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline

A participant was classified as having at least a 50% improvement in PASI score from baseline, which was equivalent to a percent change from baseline ranging from -100% to -50%. PASI score is based on an assessment of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling), and the percent area affected as observed on the day of examination.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/ApremilastPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline58.7 Percentage of Participants
Placebo (PBO)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the PASI Score (PASI-50) at Week 16 From Baseline17.0 Percentage of Participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [35.7, 47.7]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline

The sPGA was a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator factored in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and did not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign was averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/ApremilastPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline21.7 percentage of participants
Placebo (PBO)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With At Least 2 Points Reduction From Baseline3.9 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [13.7, 21.9]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Both a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI and sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-75 response was the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. See Outcome Measure #1 for further description. sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear), 1 (almost clear), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. See OCM #2 for further description.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo/ApremilastPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Both a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI and sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction at Week 16 From Baseline20.3 percentage of participants
Placebo (PBO)Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Both a 75% Improvement (Response) in the PASI and sPGA Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction at Week 16 From Baseline3.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [12.8, 20.7]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16

BSA was a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA percent change from baseline (Visit 2 Week 0) was determined at each visit of the study, which is calculated as 100\*(visit BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA (%).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value were included. Last observation carried forward imputation was used.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/ApremilastPercent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-47.77 percent changeStandard Error 1.634
Placebo (PBO)Percent Change From Baseline in Percent of Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Week 16-6.99 percent changeStandard Error 2.317
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-46.34, -35.21]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16

Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The total qualitative score (sum of erythema, thickness, and scaling scores) is multiplied by the degree of involvement for each anatomic region and then multiplied by a constant. These values for each anatomic region are summed to yield the PASI score. The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement is missing. PASI score percent change from baseline was calculated as 100\* (visit score - baseline score)/baseline score (%).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all participants who were randomized per protocol. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized APR 30 BID or placebo for the FAS. Last observation carried forward imputation was used. Participants with a baseline value and at least 1 postbaseline value are included .

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo/ApremilastPercent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16-52.1 percent changeStandard Error 1.37
Placebo (PBO)Percent Change From Baseline in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 16-16.8 percent changeStandard Error 1.94
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-39.9, -30.6]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026