Skip to content

Study Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel (TAK-700) Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer That Has Progressed During or Following Docetaxel-based Therapy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01193257
Enrollment
1099
Registered
2010-09-01
Start date
2010-11-15
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2018-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Drug therapy

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed following Docetaxel-based therapy

Interventions

Orteronel tablets

DRUGPrednisone

Prednisone tablets

Orteronel placebo-matching tablets

Sponsors

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Each participant must meet all of the following inclusion criteria: * Voluntary written consent * Male 18 years or older * Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma * Radiograph-documented metastatic disease * Progressive disease * Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration * Progressive disease during or following 1 or 2 regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy, 1 of which must have included docetaxel. Must have received greater than or equal to (\>=) 360 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) of docetaxel within a 6-month period. Participants who were clearly intolerant to docetaxel or develop progressive disease before receiving \>= 360 mg/m\^2 are also eligible if they have received at least 225 mg/m\^2 of docetaxel within a 6-month period and meet the other study entry criteria. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2 * Even if surgically sterilized, participants must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR Abstain from heterosexual intercourse * Screening laboratory values as specified in protocol * Stable medical condition * Life expectancy of 6 months or more * Participants who have had up to 2 prior chemotherapy treatments are eligible to participate

Exclusion criteria

Participants meeting any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalBaseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12Week 12The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12Week 12Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsBaseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsBaseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightBaseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58)ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (\>50% of waking hours \[hrs\]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair \>50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsCycle 59 Day 58
Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelBaseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12Week 12The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Best PSA Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Time to PSA ProgressionBaseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA.
Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58)A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (\<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as \>=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.
Percentage of Participants With Objective ResponseBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes.
Time to Pain ProgressionBaseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was \>= 4 with a \>= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \>= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \<= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use.
Time to Pain ResponseBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A \>= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Participants With Best Pain ResponseBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a \>=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12Week 12The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 260 investigative sites in North America, Europe, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, and Taiwan from 15 November 2010 to 29 February 2016.

Pre-assignment details

Male participants with a historical diagnosis of metastatic-castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed during or following docetaxel-based therapy were enrolled in 1 of 2 treatment groups: Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg or Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo + Prednisone
Orteronel placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) and prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study.
365
Orteronel + Prednisone
Orteronel 400 mg, tablets, orally, BID and prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study. In Japan only, participants were administered with orteronel 300 mg, tablets, orally, BID and prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study.
734
Total1,099

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath202391
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up23
Overall StudyStudy termination by sponsor03
Overall StudyUnblinded due to futility135251
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2686

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOrteronel + PrednisonePlacebo + PrednisoneTotal
Age, Continuous69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82
69.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.95
69.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.86
Body mass index (BMI)27.73 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.37
27.14 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.491
27.54 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.418
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
107 Participants45 Participants152 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
588 Participants302 Participants890 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
39 Participants18 Participants57 Participants
Height172.52 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.156
171.33 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.675
172.12 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.35
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 participants1 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
77 participants48 participants125 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
18 participants9 participants27 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
12 participants1 participants13 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
620 participants305 participants925 participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
8 participants1 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
66 participants28 participants94 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
14 participants5 participants19 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belarus
4 participants6 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
12 participants1 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
82 participants37 participants119 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
21 participants11 participants32 participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
7 participants5 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
China
6 participants5 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
3 participants0 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
7 participants4 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
44 participants35 participants79 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
35 participants11 participants46 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
38 participants22 participants60 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
7 participants2 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
6 participants3 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
9 participants5 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
14 participants7 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
33 participants17 participants50 participants
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic Of
18 participants15 participants33 participants
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
22 participants9 participants31 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
4 participants1 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
12 participants6 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
6 participants6 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
17 participants5 participants22 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
8 participants8 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
12 participants0 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
2 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
10 participants5 participants15 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
14 participants4 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
25 participants16 participants41 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
16 participants10 participants26 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan, Province Of China
7 participants7 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
75 participants32 participants107 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
54 participants26 participants80 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
734 Participants365 Participants1099 Participants
Weight82.77 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2
79.85 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.183
81.80 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.249

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
341 / 363703 / 732
serious
Total, serious adverse events
148 / 363384 / 732

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + PrednisoneOverall Survival15.3 months
Orteronel + PrednisoneOverall Survival17.1 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio is based on a stratified Cox's proportional hazard regression model with stratification factors region (North America, Europe and Rest of World) and brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score at screening (\[less than or equal to\] \<=4, greater than \[\>\] 4) with treatment as a factor in the model. A hazard ratio less than 1 for the treatment indicates better prevention of the death in the Orteronel arm as compared to placebo arm.p-value: 0.1208595% CI: [0.739, 1.036]Log Rank
Secondary

Best PSA Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.

Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25

Population: Best PSA response was not evaluated due to change in planned analysis.

Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)345 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)719 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

Time frame: Cycle 59 Day 58

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings1 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings0 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings1 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Pain Response

Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a \>=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Best Pain Response72 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Best Pain Response166 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)

A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (\<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as \>=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.

Time frame: Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline: Favorable; EOT: Favorable27 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Favorable8 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline: Favorable; EOT: Unfavorable30 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Unfavorable92 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline: Favorable; EOT: Unfavorable40 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline: Favorable; EOT: Favorable63 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Unfavorable141 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)Baseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Favorable23 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelDigestive enzymes9 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelRenal function analyses13 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelLiver function analyses14 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelTissue enzyme analyses NEC16 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelCoagulation and bleeding analyses1 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelMineral and electrolyte analyses5 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelWhite blood cell analyses4 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelCarbohydrate tolerance analyses-including diabetes0 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelUrinary tract function analyses NEC1 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelPlatelet analyses3 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelCholesterol analyses1 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelRed blood cell analyses2 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelProtein analyses not elsewhere classified (NEC)0 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelVascular tests NEC (including blood pressure)3 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelAdrenal cortex tests0 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelMetabolism tests NEC0 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelSkeletal and cardiac muscle analyses0 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelTriglyceride analyses0 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelUrinalysis NEC0 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelVitamin analyses0 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelTriglyceride analyses1 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelDigestive enzymes140 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelCholesterol analyses4 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelRenal function analyses41 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelMetabolism tests NEC2 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelLiver function analyses38 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelRed blood cell analyses3 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelTissue enzyme analyses NEC30 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelVitamin analyses1 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelCoagulation and bleeding analyses17 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelProtein analyses not elsewhere classified (NEC)3 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelMineral and electrolyte analyses9 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelSkeletal and cardiac muscle analyses2 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelWhite blood cell analyses8 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelVascular tests NEC (including blood pressure)2 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelCarbohydrate tolerance analyses-including diabetes8 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelUrinalysis NEC1 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelUrinary tract function analyses NEC5 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelAdrenal cortex tests2 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone PanelPlatelet analyses4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsHypertension21 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsHypotension8 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsPyrexia18 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsHypertension83 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsHypotension31 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsPyrexia51 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightWeight decreased32 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightWeight increased7 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightWeight decreased107 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightWeight increased6 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (\>50% of waking hours \[hrs\]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair \>50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58)

Population: Safety population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 253 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 35 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 322 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 170 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 47 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 41 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 10 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 03 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 210 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 213 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 310 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 1103 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 40 participants
Placebo + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 056 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 43 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 247 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 43 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 0112 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 318 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 010 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 1179 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 2113 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 339 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 411 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 16 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 225 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 318 participants
Orteronel + PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 1121 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12

The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 129.9 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 1224.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: P-values test for odds ratio equal to 1.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12

The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 122.83 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 129.66 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline.

Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25

Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 4 (n= 283; 559)12.72 participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 16 (n= 34; 107)23.53 participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 10 (n= 102; 267)22.55 participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 19 (n= 24; 68)20.83 participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 22 (n= 14; 36)28.57 participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 7 (n= 163; 403)18.40 participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 25 (n= 8; 16)25.00 participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 13 (n= 55; 171)23.64 participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 25 (n= 8; 16)62.50 participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 4 (n= 283; 559)32.74 participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 7 (n= 163; 403)38.21 participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 10 (n= 102; 267)36.70 participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 13 (n= 55; 171)40.94 participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 16 (n= 34; 107)44.86 participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 22 (n= 14; 36)52.78 participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 19 (n= 24; 68)42.65 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.

Time frame: Cycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25

Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 13 (n=55; 171)7.27 percentage of participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 19 (n=24; 68)4.17 percentage of participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 10 (n=102; 267)6.86 percentage of participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 22 (n=14; 36)0.00 percentage of participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 16 (n=34; 107)5.88 percentage of participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 25 (n=8; 16)0.00 percentage of participants
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 7 (n=163; 403)4.91 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 25 (n=8; 16)43.75 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 7 (n=163; 403)14.89 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 10 (n=102; 267)14.23 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 13 (n=55; 171)15.20 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 16 (n=34; 107)19.63 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 19 (n=24; 68)23.53 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 22 (n=14; 36)27.78 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12

The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 129.9 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 128.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Population: Response per RECIST-evaluable population was defined as a subset of participants who had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Objective Response2.7 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Objective Response17.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12

Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 129.0 percentage of participants
Orteronel + PrednisonePercentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 1212.1 percentage of participants
Comparison: P-values test for odds ratio equal to 1.p-value: 0.12778Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + PrednisoneRadiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)5.7 months
Orteronel + PrednisoneRadiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)8.3 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio is based on a stratified Cox's proportional hazard regression model with stratification factors region (North America, Europe and Rest of World) and brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score at screening (\<=4, \>4) with treatment as a factor in the model. A hazard ratio less than 1 for the treatment indicates better prevention of the death in the Orteronel arm as compared to placebo arm.p-value: 0.0003895% CI: [0.653, 0.885]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was \>= 4 with a \>= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \>= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \<= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use.

Time frame: Baseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + PrednisoneTime to Pain Progression22.0 months
Orteronel + PrednisoneTime to Pain Progression24.2 months
Secondary

Time to Pain Response

Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A \>= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + PrednisoneTime to Pain ResponseNA months
Orteronel + PrednisoneTime to Pain ResponseNA months
Secondary

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA.

Time frame: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + PrednisoneTime to PSA Progression2.9 months
Orteronel + PrednisoneTime to PSA Progression5.5 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026