Prostate Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Drug therapy
Brief summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed following Docetaxel-based therapy
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Each participant must meet all of the following inclusion criteria: * Voluntary written consent * Male 18 years or older * Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma * Radiograph-documented metastatic disease * Progressive disease * Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration * Progressive disease during or following 1 or 2 regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy, 1 of which must have included docetaxel. Must have received greater than or equal to (\>=) 360 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) of docetaxel within a 6-month period. Participants who were clearly intolerant to docetaxel or develop progressive disease before receiving \>= 360 mg/m\^2 are also eligible if they have received at least 225 mg/m\^2 of docetaxel within a 6-month period and meet the other study entry criteria. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2 * Even if surgically sterilized, participants must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR Abstain from heterosexual intercourse * Screening laboratory values as specified in protocol * Stable medical condition * Life expectancy of 6 months or more * Participants who have had up to 2 prior chemotherapy treatments are eligible to participate
Exclusion criteria
Participants meeting any of the following
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival | Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years) | Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years) | rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12 | Week 12 | The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. |
| Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58) | — |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58) | — |
| Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58) | — |
| Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58) | — |
| Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58) | ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (\>50% of waking hours \[hrs\]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair \>50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Cycle 59 Day 58 | — |
| Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58) | — |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25 | The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12 | Week 12 | The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25 | The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline. |
| Best PSA Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25 | The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline. |
| Time to PSA Progression | Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years) | Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA. |
| Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58) | A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (\<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as \>=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood. |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years) | Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes. |
| Time to Pain Progression | Baseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years) | Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was \>= 4 with a \>= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \>= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \<= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use. |
| Time to Pain Response | Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years) | Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A \>= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Number of Participants With Best Pain Response | Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years) | Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a \>=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants took part in the study at 260 investigative sites in North America, Europe, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, and Taiwan from 15 November 2010 to 29 February 2016.
Pre-assignment details
Male participants with a historical diagnosis of metastatic-castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed during or following docetaxel-based therapy were enrolled in 1 of 2 treatment groups: Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg or Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone Orteronel placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) and prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study. | 365 |
| Orteronel + Prednisone Orteronel 400 mg, tablets, orally, BID and prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study. In Japan only, participants were administered with orteronel 300 mg, tablets, orally, BID and prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study. | 734 |
| Total | 1,099 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 202 | 391 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Study termination by sponsor | 0 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Unblinded due to futility | 135 | 251 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 26 | 86 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Orteronel + Prednisone | Placebo + Prednisone | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 69.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.82 | 69.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.95 | 69.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.86 |
| Body mass index (BMI) | 27.73 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.37 | 27.14 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.491 | 27.54 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.418 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 107 Participants | 45 Participants | 152 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 588 Participants | 302 Participants | 890 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 39 Participants | 18 Participants | 57 Participants |
| Height | 172.52 centimeter (cm) STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.156 | 171.33 centimeter (cm) STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.675 | 172.12 centimeter (cm) STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.35 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 4 participants | 1 participants | 5 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 77 participants | 48 participants | 125 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 18 participants | 9 participants | 27 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 12 participants | 1 participants | 13 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown or Not Reported | 3 participants | 1 participants | 4 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 620 participants | 305 participants | 925 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 8 participants | 1 participants | 9 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 66 participants | 28 participants | 94 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Austria | 14 participants | 5 participants | 19 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belarus | 4 participants | 6 participants | 10 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 12 participants | 1 participants | 13 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Brazil | 82 participants | 37 participants | 119 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Bulgaria | 3 participants | 1 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 21 participants | 11 participants | 32 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Chile | 7 participants | 5 participants | 12 participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 6 participants | 5 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Colombia | 4 participants | 0 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Croatia | 3 participants | 0 participants | 3 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czech Republic | 1 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Estonia | 2 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Finland | 7 participants | 4 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 44 participants | 35 participants | 79 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 35 participants | 11 participants | 46 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Greece | 38 participants | 22 participants | 60 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 7 participants | 2 participants | 9 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ireland | 6 participants | 3 participants | 9 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Israel | 9 participants | 5 participants | 14 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 14 participants | 7 participants | 21 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 33 participants | 17 participants | 50 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Korea, Republic Of | 18 participants | 15 participants | 33 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Lithuania | 22 participants | 9 participants | 31 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 4 participants | 1 participants | 5 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 12 participants | 6 participants | 18 participants |
| Region of Enrollment New Zealand | 6 participants | 6 participants | 12 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 17 participants | 5 participants | 22 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Portugal | 8 participants | 8 participants | 16 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Romania | 12 participants | 0 participants | 12 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 2 participants | 2 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Serbia | 3 participants | 1 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Singapore | 1 participants | 1 participants | 2 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Slovakia | 10 participants | 5 participants | 15 participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Africa | 14 participants | 4 participants | 18 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 25 participants | 16 participants | 41 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Sweden | 16 participants | 10 participants | 26 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 2 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan, Province Of China | 7 participants | 7 participants | 14 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 75 participants | 32 participants | 107 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 54 participants | 26 participants | 80 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 734 Participants | 365 Participants | 1099 Participants |
| Weight | 82.77 kilogram (kg) STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.2 | 79.85 kilogram (kg) STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.183 | 81.80 kilogram (kg) STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.249 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 341 / 363 | 703 / 732 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 148 / 363 | 384 / 732 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival
Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.
Time frame: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Overall Survival | 15.3 months |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Overall Survival | 17.1 months |
Best PSA Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Population: Best PSA response was not evaluated due to change in planned analysis.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 345 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 719 participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Cycle 59 Day 58
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 1 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 3 participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | 0 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings | 1 participants |
Number of Participants With Best Pain Response
Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a \>=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Best Pain Response | 72 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Best Pain Response | 166 participants |
Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)
A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (\<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as \>=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.
Time frame: Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline: Favorable; EOT: Favorable | 27 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Favorable | 8 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline: Favorable; EOT: Unfavorable | 30 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Unfavorable | 92 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline: Favorable; EOT: Unfavorable | 40 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline: Favorable; EOT: Favorable | 63 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Unfavorable | 141 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) | Baseline: Unfavorable; EOT: Favorable | 23 participants |
Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Digestive enzymes | 9 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Renal function analyses | 13 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Liver function analyses | 14 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Tissue enzyme analyses NEC | 16 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Coagulation and bleeding analyses | 1 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Mineral and electrolyte analyses | 5 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | White blood cell analyses | 4 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Carbohydrate tolerance analyses-including diabetes | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Urinary tract function analyses NEC | 1 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Platelet analyses | 3 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Cholesterol analyses | 1 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Red blood cell analyses | 2 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Protein analyses not elsewhere classified (NEC) | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Vascular tests NEC (including blood pressure) | 3 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Adrenal cortex tests | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Metabolism tests NEC | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Skeletal and cardiac muscle analyses | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Triglyceride analyses | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Urinalysis NEC | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Vitamin analyses | 0 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Triglyceride analyses | 1 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Digestive enzymes | 140 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Cholesterol analyses | 4 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Renal function analyses | 41 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Metabolism tests NEC | 2 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Liver function analyses | 38 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Red blood cell analyses | 3 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Tissue enzyme analyses NEC | 30 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Vitamin analyses | 1 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Coagulation and bleeding analyses | 17 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Protein analyses not elsewhere classified (NEC) | 3 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Mineral and electrolyte analyses | 9 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Skeletal and cardiac muscle analyses | 2 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | White blood cell analyses | 8 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Vascular tests NEC (including blood pressure) | 2 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Carbohydrate tolerance analyses-including diabetes | 8 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Urinalysis NEC | 1 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Urinary tract function analyses NEC | 5 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Adrenal cortex tests | 2 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel | Platelet analyses | 4 participants |
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Hypertension | 21 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Hypotension | 8 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Pyrexia | 18 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Hypertension | 83 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Hypotension | 31 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Pyrexia | 51 participants |
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Weight decreased | 32 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Weight increased | 7 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Weight decreased | 107 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Weight increased | 6 participants |
Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (\>50% of waking hours \[hrs\]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair \>50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.
Time frame: Baseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Population: Safety population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 2 | 53 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 3 | 5 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 3 | 22 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 1 | 70 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 4 | 7 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 4 | 1 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 1 | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 0 | 3 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 2 | 10 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 2 | 13 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 3 | 10 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 1 | 103 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 4 | 0 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 0 | 56 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 4 | 3 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 2 | 47 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 4 | 3 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 0 | 112 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 3 | 18 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 0 | 10 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 1 | 179 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 2 | 113 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 3 | 39 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 4 | 11 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 1 | 6 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 2 | 25 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 3 | 18 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 1 | 121 participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12 | 9.9 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12 | 24.9 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12
The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12 | 2.83 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12 | 9.66 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline.
Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 4 (n= 283; 559) | 12.72 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 16 (n= 34; 107) | 23.53 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 10 (n= 102; 267) | 22.55 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 19 (n= 24; 68) | 20.83 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 22 (n= 14; 36) | 28.57 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 7 (n= 163; 403) | 18.40 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 25 (n= 8; 16) | 25.00 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 13 (n= 55; 171) | 23.64 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 25 (n= 8; 16) | 62.50 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 4 (n= 283; 559) | 32.74 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 7 (n= 163; 403) | 38.21 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 10 (n= 102; 267) | 36.70 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 13 (n= 55; 171) | 40.94 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 16 (n= 34; 107) | 44.86 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 22 (n= 14; 36) | 52.78 participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 19 (n= 24; 68) | 42.65 participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Time frame: Cycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 13 (n=55; 171) | 7.27 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 19 (n=24; 68) | 4.17 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 10 (n=102; 267) | 6.86 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 22 (n=14; 36) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 16 (n=34; 107) | 5.88 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 25 (n=8; 16) | 0.00 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 7 (n=163; 403) | 4.91 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 25 (n=8; 16) | 43.75 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 7 (n=163; 403) | 14.89 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 10 (n=102; 267) | 14.23 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 13 (n=55; 171) | 15.20 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 16 (n=34; 107) | 19.63 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 19 (n=24; 68) | 23.53 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 22 (n=14; 36) | 27.78 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12
The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12 | 9.9 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12 | 8.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes.
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Population: Response per RECIST-evaluable population was defined as a subset of participants who had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 at baseline.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 2.7 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 17.1 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12
Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12 | 9.0 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12 | 12.1 percentage of participants |
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | 5.7 months |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | 8.3 months |
Time to Pain Progression
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was \>= 4 with a \>= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \>= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \<= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use.
Time frame: Baseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Time to Pain Progression | 22.0 months |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Time to Pain Progression | 24.2 months |
Time to Pain Response
Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A \>= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Time to Pain Response | NA months |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Time to Pain Response | NA months |
Time to PSA Progression
Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA.
Time frame: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone | Time to PSA Progression | 2.9 months |
| Orteronel + Prednisone | Time to PSA Progression | 5.5 months |