Prostate Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in the treatment of men with progressive, chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Interventions
Orteronel will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Patients will also receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and have a testosterone concentration of \<50 ng/dL.
Placebo will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Additionally, all patients will receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and a testosterone concentration of \<50 ng/dL.
Prednisone will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Patients will also receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and have a testosterone concentration of \<50 ng/dL.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Each patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria: * Voluntary written consent * Male patients 18 years or older * Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma * Radiograph-documented metastatic disease * Progressive disease * Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration * Either absence of pain or pain not requiring use of any opioid or narcotic analgesia in the 2 weeks prior to study entry * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 * Even if surgically sterilized, patients must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR abstain from heterosexual intercourse * Meet screening laboratory values as specified in protocol * Stable medical condition
Exclusion criteria
Patients meeting any of the following
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | Baseline until radiographic disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years) | rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first objective evidence of radiographic disease progression assessed by independent central radiology review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radionuclide bone scans at regularly scheduled visits. Radiographic disease progression in bone required a confirmatory scan. Radiographic disease progression in soft tissue did not require a confirmatory scan for purposes of analysis. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by independent central radiology review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease and Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines for bone disease. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were censored at their last assessment. |
| Overall Survival | Baseline until death (up to 4.7 years) | Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Pain Progression | Baseline until End of treatment (EOT) (approximately up to 4.7 years) | Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was \>=4 with a \>=2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \>=4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \<=3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use. BPI-SF was an 11-item questionnaire, designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Total score ranged from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference. |
| Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58) | — |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3 | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58) | Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 (Death) events=death related to an AE. |
| Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58) | — |
| Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58) | — |
| Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years) | ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (\>50 percent of waking hours \[hrs\]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair \>50 percent of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58) | — |
| Worst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction | Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58) | Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in cardiac ejection fraction at any measured time point. |
| Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation | Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58) | — |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 12 | Week 12 | The PSA50 is defined as a decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline. |
| Time to SRE | Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58) | Time to SRE is defined as the time from randomization to SRE, or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. SRE is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37 | The PSA50 is defined as a decline of PSA by 50 percent from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12 | Week 12 | The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37 | The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline. |
| Time to PSA Progression | Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.7 years) | Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25 percent and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, compared to baseline PSA. |
| Time to Docetaxel Chemotherapy | Baseline until start of docetaxel chemotherapy (up to 4.7 years) | Time to docetaxel based chemotherapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of docetaxel based chemotherapy for prostate cancer, regardless of whether the participant received concurrent orteronel or not. Deaths due to disease progression prior to Docetaxel based chemotherapy were considered as events. |
| Time to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy | Baseline until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (up to 4.7 years) | Time to subsequent antineoplastic therapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of any alternate antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer. Deaths due to disease progression prior to antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer are considered as events. Otherwise, time to next therapy is censored at the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive or the data cutoff date, whichever is earlier. |
| Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years) | Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter or short axis of lymph nodes. |
| Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status | Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years) | Global health status deterioration is defined as a drop greater than 16 points from the baseline assessment, confirmed at least 3 weeks later, on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) index after the score has been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions, where question 1 to 28 can be answered with 1: Not at all, 2: A little, 3: Quite a bit, 4: Very much and question 29 to 30 with 1: Very poor to 7: Excellent. For subscales a high score from 0-100 indicates: high global quality of life, high level of functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) or a high level of symptoms (fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, financial difficulties). |
| Percentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE) | Baseline up to EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years) | Skeletal related (SRE) event is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence. |
| Percentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 12 | Week 12 | A favorable CTC count was defined as less than \<5 counts per 7.5 milliliter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood. |
Countries
Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants took part in the study at 324 investigative sites in North America, Europe, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Hong Kong, Peru, Puerto Rico, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, and Taiwan from 19 October 2010 to 7 April 2016.
Pre-assignment details
Male participants who were chemotherapy-naive and had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with documented progressive metastatic disease were enrolled in 1 of 2 treatment groups to receive Orteronel 400 milligram (mg) + Prednisone 5 mg or Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg Orteronel placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) and Prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID for up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study. | 779 |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg Orteronel 400 mg, tablets, orally, BID and Prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID for up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study. In Japan, participants were administered with Orteronel 300 mg, tablets, orally, BID and Prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID for up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study. | 781 |
| Total | 1,560 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 6 | 15 |
| Overall Study | Other | 303 | 278 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 79 | 97 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 71.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.22 | 71.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.19 | 70.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.26 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | 28.19 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.69 | 28.09 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.651 | 28.28 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 197 Participants | 90 Participants | 107 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 1341 Participants | 672 Participants | 669 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 22 Participants | 17 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Height | 173.02 centimeter STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.675 | 172.77 centimeter STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.485 | 173.26 centimeter STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.858 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 22 participants | 10 participants | 12 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 89 participants | 51 participants | 38 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 44 participants | 19 participants | 25 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 3 participants | 2 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 32 participants | 15 participants | 17 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown or Not Reported | 15 participants | 12 participants | 3 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 1355 participants | 670 participants | 685 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 54 participants | 27 participants | 27 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Austria | 24 participants | 12 participants | 12 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belarus | 16 participants | 6 participants | 10 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 39 participants | 18 participants | 21 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Brazil | 91 participants | 41 participants | 50 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Bulgaria | 12 participants | 6 participants | 6 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 44 participants | 22 participants | 22 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Chile | 40 participants | 20 participants | 20 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Colombia | 9 participants | 3 participants | 6 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Croatia | 6 participants | 5 participants | 1 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czech Republic | 31 participants | 13 participants | 18 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Estonia | 6 participants | 2 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Finland | 13 participants | 9 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 121 participants | 66 participants | 55 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 69 participants | 29 participants | 40 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Greece | 39 participants | 23 participants | 16 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hong Kong | 4 participants | 1 participants | 3 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 7 participants | 3 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ireland | 24 participants | 11 participants | 13 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Israel | 18 participants | 14 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 18 participants | 10 participants | 8 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 40 participants | 22 participants | 18 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Latvia | 26 participants | 12 participants | 14 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Lithuania | 37 participants | 19 participants | 18 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 16 participants | 7 participants | 9 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 73 participants | 35 participants | 38 participants |
| Region of Enrollment New Zealand | 51 participants | 25 participants | 26 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Peru | 16 participants | 6 participants | 10 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 4 participants | 0 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Portugal | 8 participants | 4 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Puerto Rico | 2 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Romania | 33 participants | 20 participants | 13 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 11 participants | 6 participants | 5 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Singapore | 7 participants | 5 participants | 2 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Slovakia | 20 participants | 9 participants | 11 participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Africa | 10 participants | 6 participants | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 26 participants | 14 participants | 12 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Sweden | 17 participants | 11 participants | 6 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 18 participants | 10 participants | 8 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan, Province Of China | 22 participants | 12 participants | 10 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Ukraine | 48 participants | 25 participants | 23 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 95 participants | 42 participants | 53 participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 295 participants | 147 participants | 148 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 1560 Participants | 779 Participants | 781 Participants |
| Weight | 84.57 kilogram STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.071 | 84.04 kilogram STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.846 | 85.09 kilogram STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.286 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 721 / 770 | 757 / 784 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 321 / 770 | 380 / 784 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival
Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.
Time frame: Baseline until death (up to 4.7 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Overall Survival | 29.5 months |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Overall Survival | 29.9 months |
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first objective evidence of radiographic disease progression assessed by independent central radiology review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radionuclide bone scans at regularly scheduled visits. Radiographic disease progression in bone required a confirmatory scan. Radiographic disease progression in soft tissue did not require a confirmatory scan for purposes of analysis. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by independent central radiology review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease and Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines for bone disease. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were censored at their last assessment.
Time frame: Baseline until radiographic disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | 8.7 months |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) | 13.8 months |
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAE | 733 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Serious Adverse Events (SAE) | 321 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | TEAE | 769 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Serious Adverse Events (SAE) | 380 participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 130 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 163 participants |
Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation | Investigations | 215 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | 114 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 204 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | 107 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation | Investigations | 399 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 336 participants |
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Hypertension | 76 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Pyrexia | 26 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Hypotension | 12 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Hypertension | 98 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Pyrexia | 41 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs | Hypotension | 26 participants |
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Weight increased | 36 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Weight decreased | 47 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Weight decreased | 119 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight | Weight increased | 10 participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3
Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 (Death) events=death related to an AE.
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3 | Grade 3 or higher TEAE | 405 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3 | Grade 5 (Death) | 78 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3 | Grade 3 or higher TEAE | 537 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3 | Grade 5 (Death) | 77 participants |
Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (\>50 percent of waking hours \[hrs\]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair \>50 percent of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.
Time frame: Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)
Population: Safety population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 2 | 47 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 0 | 6 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 1 | 162 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 1 | 177 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 2 | 57 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 3 | 22 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 3 | 28 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 0 | 251 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 4 | 2 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 2 | 1 participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 4 | 7 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 2; Overall: 2 | 1 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 4 | 6 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 0 | 200 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 1 | 237 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 2 | 66 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 3 | 15 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 0; Overall: 4 | 7 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 1 | 147 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 2 | 60 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 3 | 26 participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Baseline: 1; Overall: 0 | 6 participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 12
The PSA50 is defined as a decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 12 | 24.6 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 12 | 42.6 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12
The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12 | 5.4 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12 | 16.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA50 is defined as a decline of PSA by 50 percent from baseline.
Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37
Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 4 (n= 687, 672) | 28.09 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 19 (n= 228, 272) | 37.72 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 10 (n= 438, 450) | 36.99 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 22 (n= 184, 211) | 33.15 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 31 (n= 35, 39) | 34.29 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 25 (n= 109, 119) | 35.78 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 13 (n= 344, 382) | 37.21 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 7 (n= 541, 540) | 34.94 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 34 (n= 22, 18) | 36.36 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 16 (n= 286, 303) | 34.27 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 37 (n= 7, 5) | 71.43 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 28 (n= 67, 77) | 44.78 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 37 (n= 7, 5) | 40.00 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 28 (n= 67, 77) | 48.05 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 4 (n= 687, 672) | 49.70 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 7 (n= 541, 540) | 54.81 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 10 (n= 438, 450) | 56.00 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 13 (n= 344, 382) | 53.14 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 16 (n= 286, 303) | 54.13 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 19 (n= 228, 272) | 52.94 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 22 (n= 184, 211) | 54.03 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 25 (n= 109, 119) | 46.22 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 31 (n= 35, 39) | 48.72 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 34 (n= 22, 18) | 38.89 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline.
Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37
Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 4 (n= 687, 672) | 5.39 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 7 (n= 541, 540) | 8.69 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 10 (n= 438, 450) | 11.64 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 13 (n= 344, 382) | 12.79 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 16 (n= 286, 303) | 12.24 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 19 (n= 228, 272) | 12.72 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 22 (n= 184, 211) | 10.87 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 25 (n= 109, 119) | 11.01 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 28 (n= 67, 77) | 16.42 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 31 (n= 35, 39) | 8.57 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 34 (n= 22, 18) | 4.55 percentage of participants |
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 37 (n= 7, 5) | 14.29 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 19 (n= 228, 272) | 26.10 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 4 (n= 687, 672) | 16.67 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 28 (n= 67, 77) | 27.27 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 37 (n= 7, 5) | 20.00 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 7 (n= 541, 540) | 22.22 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 22 (n= 184, 211) | 28.44 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 10 (n= 438, 450) | 26.44 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 34 (n= 22, 18) | 22.22 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 13 (n= 344, 382) | 26.18 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 25 (n= 109, 119) | 21.01 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 16 (n= 286, 303) | 25.74 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study | Cycle 31 (n= 35, 39) | 12.82 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 12
A favorable CTC count was defined as less than \<5 counts per 7.5 milliliter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 12 | 9.1 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 12 | 15.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter or short axis of lymph nodes.
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)
Population: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) evaluable population included all participants who had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 at the baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 15.2 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Objective Response | 34.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE)
Skeletal related (SRE) event is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence.
Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)
Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE) | 10.9 percentage of participants |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Percentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE) | 8.6 percentage of participants |
Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status
Global health status deterioration is defined as a drop greater than 16 points from the baseline assessment, confirmed at least 3 weeks later, on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) index after the score has been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions, where question 1 to 28 can be answered with 1: Not at all, 2: A little, 3: Quite a bit, 4: Very much and question 29 to 30 with 1: Very poor to 7: Excellent. For subscales a high score from 0-100 indicates: high global quality of life, high level of functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) or a high level of symptoms (fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, financial difficulties).
Time frame: Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)
Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status | 10.7 months |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status | 8.3 months |
Time to Docetaxel Chemotherapy
Time to docetaxel based chemotherapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of docetaxel based chemotherapy for prostate cancer, regardless of whether the participant received concurrent orteronel or not. Deaths due to disease progression prior to Docetaxel based chemotherapy were considered as events.
Time frame: Baseline until start of docetaxel chemotherapy (up to 4.7 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to Docetaxel Chemotherapy | 19.0 months |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to Docetaxel Chemotherapy | 23.0 months |
Time to Pain Progression
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was \>=4 with a \>=2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \>=4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \<=3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use. BPI-SF was an 11-item questionnaire, designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Total score ranged from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference.
Time frame: Baseline until End of treatment (EOT) (approximately up to 4.7 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to Pain Progression | NA months |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to Pain Progression | NA months |
Time to PSA Progression
Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25 percent and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, compared to baseline PSA.
Time frame: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.7 years)
Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to PSA Progression | 5.59 months |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to PSA Progression | 8.3 months |
Time to SRE
Time to SRE is defined as the time from randomization to SRE, or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. SRE is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence.
Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to SRE | 9.0 months |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to SRE | 13.9 months |
Time to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy
Time to subsequent antineoplastic therapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of any alternate antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer. Deaths due to disease progression prior to antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer are considered as events. Otherwise, time to next therapy is censored at the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive or the data cutoff date, whichever is earlier.
Time frame: Baseline until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (up to 4.7 years)
Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy | 13.9 months |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Time to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy | 17.2 months |
Worst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction
Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in cardiac ejection fraction at any measured time point.
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)
Population: Safety population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg | Worst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction | -3.8 percent ejection fraction | Standard Deviation 6.93 |
| Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg | Worst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction | -4.8 percent ejection fraction | Standard Deviation 7 |