Skip to content

Study Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Chemotherapy-Naive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01193244
Enrollment
1560
Registered
2010-09-01
Start date
2010-10-01
Completion date
2016-04-07
Last updated
2017-05-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in the treatment of men with progressive, chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Interventions

Orteronel will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Patients will also receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and have a testosterone concentration of \<50 ng/dL.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Additionally, all patients will receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and a testosterone concentration of \<50 ng/dL.

DRUGPrednisone

Prednisone will be administered orally twice a day continuously throughout the study. Patients will also receive concomitant gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue therapy unless they have previously undergone orchiectomy and have a testosterone concentration of \<50 ng/dL.

Sponsors

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Each patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria: * Voluntary written consent * Male patients 18 years or older * Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma * Radiograph-documented metastatic disease * Progressive disease * Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration * Either absence of pain or pain not requiring use of any opioid or narcotic analgesia in the 2 weeks prior to study entry * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 * Even if surgically sterilized, patients must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR abstain from heterosexual intercourse * Meet screening laboratory values as specified in protocol * Stable medical condition

Exclusion criteria

Patients meeting any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)Baseline until radiographic disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first objective evidence of radiographic disease progression assessed by independent central radiology review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radionuclide bone scans at regularly scheduled visits. Radiographic disease progression in bone required a confirmatory scan. Radiographic disease progression in soft tissue did not require a confirmatory scan for purposes of analysis. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by independent central radiology review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease and Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines for bone disease. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were censored at their last assessment.
Overall SurvivalBaseline until death (up to 4.7 years)Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Pain ProgressionBaseline until End of treatment (EOT) (approximately up to 4.7 years)Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was \>=4 with a \>=2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \>=4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \<=3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use. BPI-SF was an 11-item questionnaire, designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Total score ranged from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 (Death) events=death related to an AE.
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsBaseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightBaseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (\>50 percent of waking hours \[hrs\]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair \>50 percent of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsBaseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)
Worst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection FractionBaseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in cardiac ejection fraction at any measured time point.
Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or CoagulationBaseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 12Week 12The PSA50 is defined as a decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.
Time to SREBaseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)Time to SRE is defined as the time from randomization to SRE, or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. SRE is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37The PSA50 is defined as a decline of PSA by 50 percent from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12Week 12The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline.
Time to PSA ProgressionBaseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.7 years)Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25 percent and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, compared to baseline PSA.
Time to Docetaxel ChemotherapyBaseline until start of docetaxel chemotherapy (up to 4.7 years)Time to docetaxel based chemotherapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of docetaxel based chemotherapy for prostate cancer, regardless of whether the participant received concurrent orteronel or not. Deaths due to disease progression prior to Docetaxel based chemotherapy were considered as events.
Time to Subsequent Antineoplastic TherapyBaseline until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (up to 4.7 years)Time to subsequent antineoplastic therapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of any alternate antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer. Deaths due to disease progression prior to antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer are considered as events. Otherwise, time to next therapy is censored at the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive or the data cutoff date, whichever is earlier.
Percentage of Participants With Objective ResponseBaseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter or short axis of lymph nodes.
Time to Deterioration in Global Health StatusBaseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)Global health status deterioration is defined as a drop greater than 16 points from the baseline assessment, confirmed at least 3 weeks later, on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) index after the score has been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions, where question 1 to 28 can be answered with 1: Not at all, 2: A little, 3: Quite a bit, 4: Very much and question 29 to 30 with 1: Very poor to 7: Excellent. For subscales a high score from 0-100 indicates: high global quality of life, high level of functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) or a high level of symptoms (fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, financial difficulties).
Percentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE)Baseline up to EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)Skeletal related (SRE) event is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 12Week 12A favorable CTC count was defined as less than \<5 counts per 7.5 milliliter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 324 investigative sites in North America, Europe, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Hong Kong, Peru, Puerto Rico, Israel, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, and Taiwan from 19 October 2010 to 7 April 2016.

Pre-assignment details

Male participants who were chemotherapy-naive and had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with documented progressive metastatic disease were enrolled in 1 of 2 treatment groups to receive Orteronel 400 milligram (mg) + Prednisone 5 mg or Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mg
Orteronel placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) and Prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID for up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study.
779
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg
Orteronel 400 mg, tablets, orally, BID and Prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID for up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study. In Japan, participants were administered with Orteronel 300 mg, tablets, orally, BID and Prednisone 5 mg, tablets, orally, BID for up to Day 28 of each treatment cycle throughout the study.
781
Total1,560

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up615
Overall StudyOther303278
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7997

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlacebo + Prednisone 5 mgOrteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mg
Age, Continuous71.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.22
71.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.19
70.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.26
Body Mass Index (BMI)28.19 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.69
28.09 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.651
28.28 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.73
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
197 Participants90 Participants107 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
1341 Participants672 Participants669 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
22 Participants17 Participants5 Participants
Height173.02 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.675
172.77 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.485
173.26 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.858
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
22 participants10 participants12 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
89 participants51 participants38 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
44 participants19 participants25 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 participants2 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
32 participants15 participants17 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
15 participants12 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
1355 participants670 participants685 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
54 participants27 participants27 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
24 participants12 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belarus
16 participants6 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
39 participants18 participants21 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
91 participants41 participants50 participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
12 participants6 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
44 participants22 participants22 participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
40 participants20 participants20 participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
9 participants3 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
6 participants5 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
31 participants13 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
6 participants2 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
13 participants9 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
121 participants66 participants55 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
69 participants29 participants40 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
39 participants23 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
4 participants1 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
7 participants3 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ireland
24 participants11 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
18 participants14 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
18 participants10 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
40 participants22 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
26 participants12 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Lithuania
37 participants19 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
16 participants7 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
73 participants35 participants38 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
51 participants25 participants26 participants
Region of Enrollment
Peru
16 participants6 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
8 participants4 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Puerto Rico
2 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
33 participants20 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
11 participants6 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
7 participants5 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
20 participants9 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
10 participants6 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
26 participants14 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
17 participants11 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
18 participants10 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan, Province Of China
22 participants12 participants10 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
48 participants25 participants23 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
95 participants42 participants53 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
295 participants147 participants148 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1560 Participants779 Participants781 Participants
Weight84.57 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.071
84.04 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.846
85.09 kilogram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.286

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
721 / 770757 / 784
serious
Total, serious adverse events
321 / 770380 / 784

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: Baseline until death (up to 4.7 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgOverall Survival29.5 months
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgOverall Survival29.9 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio is based on a stratified Cox's proportional hazard regression model with stratification factors of region and radiographic disease progression at baseline with treatment as a factor in the model. A hazard ratio \<1 indicated better prevention of death in the orteronel group compared to the placebo group. From log-rank test stratified by region and radiographic disease progression at baseline.p-value: 0.5975595% CI: [0.838, 1.107]Log Rank
Primary

Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

rPFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first objective evidence of radiographic disease progression assessed by independent central radiology review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radionuclide bone scans at regularly scheduled visits. Radiographic disease progression in bone required a confirmatory scan. Radiographic disease progression in soft tissue did not require a confirmatory scan for purposes of analysis. Radiographic disease progression was evaluated by independent central radiology review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease and Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) guidelines for bone disease. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were censored at their last assessment.

Time frame: Baseline until radiographic disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgRadiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)8.7 months
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgRadiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)13.8 months
Comparison: Hazard ratio is based on a stratified Cox's proportional hazard regression model with stratification factors of region and radiographic disease progression at baseline with treatment as a factor in the model. A hazard ratio less than (\<) 1 indicated better prevention of death in the orteronel group compared to the placebo group. From log-rank test stratified by region and radiographic disease progression at Baseline.p-value: <0.0000195% CI: [0.626, 0.799]Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAE733 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events (SAE)321 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)TEAE769 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Serious Adverse Events (SAE)380 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings130 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings163 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Coagulation

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or CoagulationInvestigations215 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or CoagulationBlood and lymphatic system disorders114 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or CoagulationMetabolism and nutrition disorders204 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or CoagulationBlood and lymphatic system disorders107 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or CoagulationInvestigations399 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or CoagulationMetabolism and nutrition disorders336 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsHypertension76 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsPyrexia26 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsHypotension12 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsHypertension98 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsPyrexia41 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital SignsHypotension26 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightWeight increased36 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightWeight decreased47 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightWeight decreased119 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With TEAEs Related to WeightWeight increased10 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3

Grade 3 (Severe) events=unacceptable or intolerable events, significantly interrupting usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events caused participant to be in imminent danger of death. Grade 5 (Death) events=death related to an AE.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 61 Day 58)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3Grade 3 or higher TEAE405 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3Grade 5 (Death)78 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3Grade 3 or higher TEAE537 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3Grade 5 (Death)77 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (\>50 percent of waking hours \[hrs\]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair \>50 percent of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Population: Safety population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 247 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 06 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 1162 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 1177 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 257 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 322 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 328 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 0251 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 42 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 21 participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 47 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 2; Overall: 21 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 46 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 0200 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 1237 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 266 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 315 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 0; Overall: 47 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 1147 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 260 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 326 participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgNumber of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline: 1; Overall: 06 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 12

The PSA50 is defined as a decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 1224.6 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50) Response at Week 1242.6 percentage of participants
Comparison: Logistic regression model with prognostic factors: region; radiographic disease progression at baseline; age; race; baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score; Gleason score at initial diagnosis; baseline PSA, natural log scale; presence of visceral disease; alkaline phosphatase; lactate dehydrogenase; and hemoglobin. Odds ratio greater than (\>)1 favored orteronel. P-values tested for odds ratio equal to 1.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.724, 2.721]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12

The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 125.4 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 1216.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA50 is defined as a decline of PSA by 50 percent from baseline.

Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37

Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 4 (n= 687, 672)28.09 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 19 (n= 228, 272)37.72 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 10 (n= 438, 450)36.99 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 22 (n= 184, 211)33.15 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 31 (n= 35, 39)34.29 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 25 (n= 109, 119)35.78 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 13 (n= 344, 382)37.21 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 7 (n= 541, 540)34.94 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 34 (n= 22, 18)36.36 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 16 (n= 286, 303)34.27 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 37 (n= 7, 5)71.43 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 28 (n= 67, 77)44.78 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 37 (n= 7, 5)40.00 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 28 (n= 67, 77)48.05 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 4 (n= 687, 672)49.70 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 7 (n= 541, 540)54.81 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 10 (n= 438, 450)56.00 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 13 (n= 344, 382)53.14 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 16 (n= 286, 303)54.13 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 19 (n= 228, 272)52.94 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 22 (n= 184, 211)54.03 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 25 (n= 109, 119)46.22 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 31 (n= 35, 39)48.72 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 34 (n= 22, 18)38.89 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study

The PSA90 is defined as a decline of PSA by 90 percent from baseline.

Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34 and 37

Population: ITT population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 4 (n= 687, 672)5.39 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 7 (n= 541, 540)8.69 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 10 (n= 438, 450)11.64 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 13 (n= 344, 382)12.79 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 16 (n= 286, 303)12.24 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 19 (n= 228, 272)12.72 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 22 (n= 184, 211)10.87 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 25 (n= 109, 119)11.01 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 28 (n= 67, 77)16.42 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 31 (n= 35, 39)8.57 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 34 (n= 22, 18)4.55 percentage of participants
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 37 (n= 7, 5)14.29 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 19 (n= 228, 272)26.10 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 4 (n= 687, 672)16.67 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 28 (n= 67, 77)27.27 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 37 (n= 7, 5)20.00 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 7 (n= 541, 540)22.22 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 22 (n= 184, 211)28.44 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 10 (n= 438, 450)26.44 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 34 (n= 22, 18)22.22 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 13 (n= 344, 382)26.18 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 25 (n= 109, 119)21.01 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 16 (n= 286, 303)25.74 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the StudyCycle 31 (n= 35, 39)12.82 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 12

A favorable CTC count was defined as less than \<5 counts per 7.5 milliliter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 129.1 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Favorable Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC) Levels at Week 1215.4 percentage of participants
Comparison: Logistic regression model with prognostic factors: region; radiographic disease progression at baseline; age; race; baseline ECOG score; Gleason score at initial diagnosis; baseline PSA, natural log scale; presence of visceral disease; alkaline phosphatase; lactate dehydrogenase; and hemoglobin. Odds ratio \> 1 favored orteronel. P-values tested for odds ratio equal to 1.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.235, 2.373]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter or short axis of lymph nodes.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Population: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) evaluable population included all participants who had measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 at the baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Objective Response15.2 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Objective Response34.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE)

Skeletal related (SRE) event is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence.

Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE)10.9 percentage of participants
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgPercentage of Participants With Skeletal Related Events (SRE)8.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status

Global health status deterioration is defined as a drop greater than 16 points from the baseline assessment, confirmed at least 3 weeks later, on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) index after the score has been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions, where question 1 to 28 can be answered with 1: Not at all, 2: A little, 3: Quite a bit, 4: Very much and question 29 to 30 with 1: Very poor to 7: Excellent. For subscales a high score from 0-100 indicates: high global quality of life, high level of functioning (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social) or a high level of symptoms (fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, financial difficulties).

Time frame: Baseline until EOT (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgTime to Deterioration in Global Health Status10.7 months
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgTime to Deterioration in Global Health Status8.3 months
Secondary

Time to Docetaxel Chemotherapy

Time to docetaxel based chemotherapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of docetaxel based chemotherapy for prostate cancer, regardless of whether the participant received concurrent orteronel or not. Deaths due to disease progression prior to Docetaxel based chemotherapy were considered as events.

Time frame: Baseline until start of docetaxel chemotherapy (up to 4.7 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgTime to Docetaxel Chemotherapy19.0 months
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgTime to Docetaxel Chemotherapy23.0 months
Secondary

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was \>=4 with a \>=2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \>=4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was \<=3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use. BPI-SF was an 11-item questionnaire, designed to assess severity and impact of pain on daily functions. Total score ranged from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of less pain or pain interference.

Time frame: Baseline until End of treatment (EOT) (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgTime to Pain ProgressionNA months
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgTime to Pain ProgressionNA months
Comparison: Hazard ratio is based on a stratified Cox's proportional hazard regression model with stratification factors of region and radiographic disease progression at baseline with treatment as a factor in the model. A hazard ratio less than (\<) 1 indicated better prevention of death in the orteronel group compared to the placebo group. From log-rank test stratified by region and radiographic disease progression at baseline.p-value: 0.3390695% CI: [0.688, 1.138]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to PSA Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25 percent and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, compared to baseline PSA.

Time frame: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.7 years)

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgTime to PSA Progression5.59 months
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgTime to PSA Progression8.3 months
Secondary

Time to SRE

Time to SRE is defined as the time from randomization to SRE, or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. SRE is defined as a fracture or spinal cord compression or the need for radiation or surgery at the site of a prostate cancer metastatic lesion that is substantiated by radiographic or pathologic evidence.

Time frame: Baseline up to EOT (Cycle 61 Day 58)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgTime to SRE9.0 months
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgTime to SRE13.9 months
Secondary

Time to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy

Time to subsequent antineoplastic therapy is defined as the time from randomization to the start of any alternate antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer. Deaths due to disease progression prior to antineoplastic therapy for prostate cancer are considered as events. Otherwise, time to next therapy is censored at the date of death or the last date the participant was known to be alive or the data cutoff date, whichever is earlier.

Time frame: Baseline until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (up to 4.7 years)

Population: The ITT population included all participants who were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgTime to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy13.9 months
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgTime to Subsequent Antineoplastic Therapy17.2 months
Secondary

Worst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction

Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in cardiac ejection fraction at any measured time point.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days or EOT whichever is later (approximately up to Cycle 61 Day 58)

Population: Safety population where baseline and post-baseline assessments were available. Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo + Prednisone 5 mgWorst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction-3.8 percent ejection fractionStandard Deviation 6.93
Orteronel 400 mg + Prednisone 5 mgWorst Change From Baseline Over Time in Cardiac Ejection Fraction-4.8 percent ejection fractionStandard Deviation 7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026