Substance Abuse
Conditions
Keywords
substance abuse, homeless mothers
Brief summary
Aim 1. Identify specific targets and processes of intervention among homeless substance abusing mothers with children between the ages of 2 and 6 years from information collected in focus groups and assessment interviews. Translate that information for the refinement of the ecologically based treatment manual. Aim 2. Test the efficacy of the treatment in a nonrandomized pilot study and revise the manual based upon those findings. Aim 3. Test the efficacy of the experimental intervention compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in a randomized pilot, with the goal to improve maternal substance abuse problems, social stability, and mental health. It is expected that the experimental intervention will be associated with lower substance use and related problem behaviors than TAU. Aim 4. Test whether intended change processes (mediators) associated with the intervention produce the desired change in mother's substance use, social stability, and mental health. It is expected that self-efficacy will mediate substance use outcomes. Aim 5. Explore how length of homelessness, age and ethnicity of the mother predict treatment response (moderators). Aim 6. Explore the impact of the experimental intervention (Ecologically-Based Therapy)on interpersonal stress and child's mental health.
Detailed description
Even with increased focus on those experiencing homelessness, the number of homeless families continues to rise, with the demand for temporary shelter so high that many cities are unable to meet the needs of these families. The majority of these families are headed by single mothers, many of whom struggle with substance use and mental health issues. These struggles are in addition to meeting the basic needs of themselves and their children. No study has documented an effective approach for intervening with homeless substance abusing mothers with children. Research attention towards identifying efficacious interventions for this population which address the multiple needs of these families is thus considered an important focus for reducing significant individual and social costs associated with substance use and homelessness. The current study utilizes an ecological systems approach as the theoretical base for the proposed treatment. The overarching goals of the current treatment development study are to first identify targets and processes of intervention desired by homeless mothers and then pilot test a novel manualized intervention focused on improving treatment success of this special population. In Stage 1a, information from the multi-method assessment and focus groups with N=30 homeless mothers will guide modifications to an integrated intervention that includes housing, case management and the Community Reinforcement Approach. The final manual resulting from this important study will address the multiple needs of homeless mothers, including basic needs and substance use/mental health problems. The intervention will be tested in a nonrandomized pilot (N = 15) in which interview and self-report methods will be used for data gathering. Follow-up will be conducted at 3 and 6 months post baseline and the intervention will be modified based upon the process and outcome analyses. Finally, the revised intervention will be tested in Stage 1b in a randomized pilot study involving 60 women and children assigned to the project intervention (N = 30) or treatment as usual (N=30) and followed at 3, 6, and 9 months post-baseline. In the randomized pilot study an effect size will be computed for use in informing a larger, randomized Stage II trial. This project utilizes existing efficacious models of drug abuse treatment to generate valuable new information critical to treatment services delivery for a special population of substance abusers. Since homeless substance abusing women and their children are at increased risk for a variety of adverse outcomes, improved maternal and child outcomes may produce substantial health-care benefits to the women, their children, and society at large. The findings from this study will serve as the foundation for the refinement and implementation of a promising intervention for drug-addicted homeless women and children that can then be tested for efficacy in a Stage II trial.
Interventions
Substance abuse treatment (the Community Reinforcement Approach), case management and housing.
Treatment/intervention as normally provided by community service agencies that service substance abusing homeless families.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* residing at a homeless shelter for families * meet diagnostic criteria for psychoactive substance use or alcohol disorder * has physical custody of a biological child between the ages of 2 to 6 years old
Exclusion criteria
* evidence of unremitted psychosis or other condition that would impair the mothers' ability to understand and participate in the intervention research.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months. | 3 months post-baseline measure |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BDI Depression Score | 3 months post-baseline measure | Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI - II) Range from 0 (no depression) to 63 (severe depression) |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ecologically-Based Behavioral Treatment Ecologically-Based Treatment was provided over a period of 6 months. The treatment integrated independent housing, case management services and substance abuse counseling. Specifically, the mothers were housed in an apartment of their choice and received three months of utility and rental assistance of up to $600 per month. | 30 |
| Treatment as Usual The Mothers were offered services provided through the family shelter. | 30 |
| Total | 60 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Treatment as Usual | Ecologically-Based Behavioral Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 30 Participants | 30 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Age Continuous | 27 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.46 | 25.60 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.54 | 26.30 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.01 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 30 participants | 30 participants | 60 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 30 Participants | 30 Participants | 60 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 30 | 0 / 30 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 30 | 0 / 30 |
Outcome results
Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months.
Time frame: 3 months post-baseline measure
Population: The analysis was conducted with all of the collected data. Discrepancies in number of participants between the Participant Flow Module and the analysis are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecologically-Based Behavioral Treatment | Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months. | 45.40 percent days of substance use | Standard Deviation 38.79 |
| Treatment as Usual | Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months. | 49.17 percent days of substance use | Standard Deviation 41.87 |
Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months.
Time frame: 6 months post-baseline measure
Population: The analysis was conducted with all of the collected data. Discrepancies in number of participants between the Participant Flow Module and the analysis are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecologically-Based Behavioral Treatment | Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months. | 34.55 percent days of substance use | Standard Deviation 39.09 |
| Treatment as Usual | Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months. | 46.84 percent days of substance use | Standard Deviation 36.29 |
Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months.
Time frame: 9 months post-baseline measure
Population: The analysis was conducted with all of the collected data. Discrepancies in number of participants between the Participant Flow Module and the analysis are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecologically-Based Behavioral Treatment | Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months. | 41.74 percent days of substance use | Standard Deviation 38.53 |
| Treatment as Usual | Percent Days of Substance Use in the Prior 3 Months. | 44.54 percent days of substance use | Standard Deviation 41.67 |
BDI Depression Score
Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI - II) Range from 0 (no depression) to 63 (severe depression)
Time frame: 3 months post-baseline measure
Population: The analysis was conducted with all of the collected data. Discrepancies in number of participants between the Participant Flow Module and the analysis are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecologically-Based Behavioral Treatment | BDI Depression Score | 15.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Treatment as Usual | BDI Depression Score | 13.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.03 |
BDI Depression Score
Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI - II) Range from 0 (no depression) to 63 (severe depression)
Time frame: 6 months post-baseline measure
Population: The analysis was conducted with all of the collected data. Discrepancies in number of participants between the Participant Flow Module and the analysis are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecologically-Based Behavioral Treatment | BDI Depression Score | 14.63 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.67 |
| Treatment as Usual | BDI Depression Score | 14.91 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.17 |
BDI Depression Score
Beck Depression Inventory - II (BDI - II) Range from 0 (no depression) to 63 (severe depression)
Time frame: 9 months post-baseline measure
Population: The analysis was conducted with all of the collected data. Discrepancies in number of participants between the Participant Flow Module and the analysis are due to missing data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecologically-Based Behavioral Treatment | BDI Depression Score | 13.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.46 |
| Treatment as Usual | BDI Depression Score | 13.38 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.06 |