Skip to content

Pilot Evaluation of a New Galyfilcon A Lens Prototype and Enfilcon A Lens

Dispensing Evaluation of a New Galyfilcon A Prototype and Avaira Lenses

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01192542
Enrollment
39
Registered
2010-09-01
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the visual acuity, limbal and bulbar redness of the new galyfilcon A prototype lenses against Avaira® lenses when worn as daily wear for seven (7) days.

Interventions

Prototype silicone hydrogel contact lens

DEVICEenfilcon A lens

Marketed silicone hydrogel contact lens

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 39 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The subject is a current spherical soft contact lens wearer and willing to wear the study lenses on a daily wear basis for the duration of the study. * The subject's optimal vertexed spherical equivalent distance correction must be between -1.00 and - 5.00D. * Any cylinder power must be ≤ -0.75D. * The subject must have visual acuity best correctable to 20/25+3 or better for each eye. * The subject must read and sign the Statement of Informed Consent. * The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.

Exclusion criteria

* Ocular or systemic allergies or disease which might interfere with contact lens wear. * Systemic disease or use of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear. * Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, or any other abnormalities of the cornea which would contraindicate contact lens wear. * Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection which might interfere with contact lens wear. * Any ocular infection. * Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear. * Pregnancy or lactation. * Diabetes. * Infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immuno-suppressive disease (e.g. HIV). * Habitual contact lens type is toric, multifocal, or is worn as extended wear.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Monocular Visual Acuity AssessmentPost lens insertion (baseline)Snellen monocular visual acutity (VA) assessed by the Investigator and was converted to the LogMAR scale.
Binocular Visual AcuityPost lens insertion (baseline)Snellen binocular visual acuity assessed by the Investigator and was converted to the LogMAR scale. A value \<0 implies clinically positive results, a value \>0 implies clinically negative results

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Limbal Redness of Grade 3 or AboveAfter 6-8 days of lens wearLimbal redness was assessed using a 5-point slit lamp classification scale (5-Worst, 0-None). Only those eyes with limbal redness grade \>= 3 were reported for purposes of this analysis. Grades 3 -5 are considered to be part of the adverse events reporting.
Bulbar Redness of Grade 3 or AboveAfter 6-8 days of lens wearBulbar redness was assessed using a 5-point slit lamp classification scale (5-Worst, 0-None). Only those eyes with bulbar redness grade \>= 3 were reported for purposes of this analysis. Grades 3 -5 are considered to be part of the adverse events reporting.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

There were 39 enrolled, with one screen failure prior to randomization, leaving 38 starting and completing the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects
All subjects who enrolled in the study.
39
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects
Age, Continuous28.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.58
Region of Enrollment
United States
39 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Binocular Visual Acuity

Snellen binocular visual acuity assessed by the Investigator and was converted to the LogMAR scale. A value \<0 implies clinically positive results, a value \>0 implies clinically negative results

Time frame: Post lens insertion (baseline)

Population: Analysis was conducted on subjects who enrolled, were randomized, and successfully complete the study per protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Galyfilcon A Prototype LensBinocular Visual Acuity-0.08 LogMARStandard Error 0.032
Enfilcon A LensBinocular Visual Acuity-0.08 LogMARStandard Error 0.032
Comparison: The alternative hypothesis is the binocular visual acuity of the galyfilcon A prototype lens is non-inferior to that of the enfilcon A lens.95% CI: [-0.018, 0.018]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Monocular Visual Acuity Assessment

Snellen monocular visual acutity (VA) assessed by the Investigator and was converted to the LogMAR scale.

Time frame: Post lens insertion (baseline)

Population: Analysis was conducted on subjects who were enrolled, randomized, and successfully completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Galyfilcon A Prototype LensMonocular Visual Acuity Assessment-0.05 logMARStandard Error 0.0317
Enfilcon A LensMonocular Visual Acuity Assessment-0.04 logMARStandard Error 0.0317
Comparison: The alternative hypothesis is the monocular visual acuity of the galyfilcon A prototype lens is non-inferior to that of the enfilcon A lens.95% CI: [-0.022, 0.003]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Bulbar Redness of Grade 3 or Above

Bulbar redness was assessed using a 5-point slit lamp classification scale (5-Worst, 0-None). Only those eyes with bulbar redness grade \>= 3 were reported for purposes of this analysis. Grades 3 -5 are considered to be part of the adverse events reporting.

Time frame: After 6-8 days of lens wear

Population: Analysis was conducted on subjects who successfully completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Galyfilcon A Prototype LensBulbar Redness of Grade 3 or Above0 Subject Eyes
Enfilcon A LensBulbar Redness of Grade 3 or Above0 Subject Eyes
Secondary

Limbal Redness of Grade 3 or Above

Limbal redness was assessed using a 5-point slit lamp classification scale (5-Worst, 0-None). Only those eyes with limbal redness grade \>= 3 were reported for purposes of this analysis. Grades 3 -5 are considered to be part of the adverse events reporting.

Time frame: After 6-8 days of lens wear

Population: Analysis was conducted on subjects who successfully completed the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Galyfilcon A Prototype LensLimbal Redness of Grade 3 or Above0 Subject Eyes
Enfilcon A LensLimbal Redness of Grade 3 or Above0 Subject Eyes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026