Skip to content

Pramipexole Extended Release Versus Pramipexole Immediate Release for 18 Weeks in Chinese Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients

A Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Parallel-group Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Pramipexole Extended Release Versus Pramipexole Immediate Release Administered Orally for 18 Weeks in Chinese Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients Who Can be Concomitantly Treated With Levodopa

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01191944
Enrollment
475
Registered
2010-08-31
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2014-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

The objective of this trial is to evaluate non-inferiority of pramipexole Extended release to Immediate release at 18 weeks on the primary efficacy endpoint (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale II+III) in Chinese PD patients who can be concomitantly treated with Levodopa .

Interventions

DRUGpramipexole immediate release tablet

0.375mg-4.5mg(daily dose), three times a day

DRUGpramipexole extended release tablet

0.375mg-4.5mg, once a day

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female Chinese patient with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) confirmed by at least two of the following signs: resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity. 2. Parkinson's disease diagnosed for at least 2 years. 3. Patients 30 years of age or older at the time of diagnosis. 4. Modified Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2 to 4 at on-time. 5. If a patient is treated with standard or controlled release Levodopa combined with a Dopa-Decarboxylase-inhibitor or with Levodopa combined with a Dopa-Decarboxylase-inhibitor/entacapone, the dosage should be optimised according to investigator's judgement, and stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline visit. 6. If a patient treated with Levodopa combined with a Dopa-Decarboxylase-inhibitor has motor fluctuations, he should not have more than 6 hours of off-time every day during waking hours (documented on a patient diary completed for 2 consecutive days before baseline visit). 7. Patient willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures (in particular, after training, the patient should be able to recognise the off-time and on-time periods during waking hours and to record them accurately in the patient diary). 8. Signed informed consent obtained before any study procedures are carried out (in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice guidelines and local legislation).

Exclusion criteria

Medical exclusions: 1. Atypical parkinsonian syndromes due to drugs (e.g., metoclopramide, flunarizine), metabolic disorders (e.g., Wilson's disease), encephalitis or degenerative diseases (e.g., progressive supranuclear palsy). 2. Dementia, as defined by a Mini-Mental State Exam score \< 24 at screening visit \[R96-2656\]. 3. Any psychiatric disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edition)criteria that could prevent compliance or completion of the study and/or put the patient at risk if he/she takes part in the study. 4. History of psychosis, except history of drug induced hallucinations (provided the investigator considers that participation to the trial would not represent a significant risk for the patient). 5. History of deep brain stimulation 6. Clinically significant electrocardiogram abnormalities at screening visit, according to investigator's judgement. 7. Clinically significant hypotension (i.e. supine systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg) and/or symptomatic orthostatic hypotension (i.e. clinical symptoms of orthostatic hypotension associated with a decline \>=20 mmHg in systolic blood pressure and a decline \>= 10 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure, at one minute after standing compared with the previous supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure obtained after 5 minutes of quiet rest) at screening or baseline visit. 8. Malignant melanoma or history of previously treated malignant melanoma. 9. Any other clinically significant disease, whether treated or not, that could put the patient at risk or could prevent compliance or completion of the study. 10. Pregnancy (to be excluded by urine pregnancy test at screening visit) or breast-feeding. 11. Sexually active female of childbearing potential (less than 6 months post-menopausal and not surgically sterilised) not using a medically approved method of birth control (i.e. oral contraceptives, intrauterine device, or double-barrier) for at least one month prior to the screening visit and throughout the study period (up to the follow-up visit). 12. Serum levels of Aspartate Aminotransferase, Alanine Aminotransferase , alkaline phosphatases or total bilirubin \> 2 Upper Limit of Normal (on screening lab test). 13. Patients with a creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min/1.73m2 (estimated by the local lab / the investigator using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and calculated on screening lab test)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II+III Score at Week 18Baseline and week 18UPDRS total score ranges from 0 (best) to 160 (worst) and was calculated as the sum of Part II (activities of daily living, ranges from 0 to 52) and Part III (motor examination, ranges from 0 to 108). Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18Baseline and week 18Percentage off-time during waking hours based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). Off-time describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease). Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Change From Baseline in Duration of Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18Baseline and week 18Duration of off-time during waking hours based on patient diary data. Off-time describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease). Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Responder in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18Baseline and week 18Percentage off-time based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). Off-time describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease). Reduction over time represents an improvement. Responders were defined as patients with at least a 20 percent improvement relative to baseline.
Change From Baseline in Percentage On-time Without Dyskinesia at Week 18Baseline and week 18Percentage on-time without Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Increase in the percentage represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Change From Baseline in Percentage On-time With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18Baseline and week 18Percentage on-time with non-troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as non-troublesome if it did not interfere with function or did not cause meaningful discomfort. Increase in the percentage represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Change From Baseline in Percentage On-time Without or With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18Baseline and week 18Percentage on-time without or with non-troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as non-troublesome if it did not interfere with function or did not cause meaningful discomfort. Increase in the percentage represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Change From Baseline in Percentage On-time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18Baseline and week 18Percentage on-time with troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as troublesome if it interfered with function or caused meaningful discomfort. Decrease in the percentage represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Change From Baseline in Duration of On-time Without Dyskinesia at Week 18Baseline and week 18Duration of on-time without Dyskinesia based on patient diary data. On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Increase in the duration represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Change From Baseline in Duration of On-time With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18Baseline and week 18Duration on-time with non-troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as non-troublesome if it did not interfere with function or did not cause meaningful discomfort. Increase in the duration represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Change From Baseline in Duration of On-time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18Baseline and week 18Duration of on-time with troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as troublesome if it interfered with function or caused meaningful discomfort. Decrease in the duration represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at Week 1818 weeksCGI-I was used to assess the overall status of Parkinsons disease (PD) after interviewing the patient about the various aspects of the PD and after evaluating adverse events and concomitant treatments. Ranging from 1 point=very much improved to 7 points=very much worse. Responders were defined as patients having score 1 or 2 (at least much improved) when comparing the past week to the assessment at baseline.
Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Responder at Week 1818 weeksThe PGI-I scale is a patient-rated instrument which was used to measure the improvement of a patients PD symptoms throughout the study. Ranging from 1 point=very much better to 7 points=very much worse. Responders were defined as patients having score 1 or 2 (at least much better) when comparing the past week to the assessment at baseline.
Responder in UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Week 18Baseline and week 18Responders were defined as patients with at least a 20 percent improvement of UPDRS II+III score relative to baseline. UPDRS II+III ranges 0-160 scores from best to worst and was calculated as the sum of Part II (activities of daily living, ranges from 0 to 52) and Part III (motor examination, ranges from 0 to 108).
Change From Baseline in UPDRS II Score Separately at Week 18Baseline and week 18UPDRS Part II (activities of daily living) ranges from 0 to 52. Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Change From Baseline in UPDRS III Score Separately at Week 18Baseline and week 18UPDRS Part III (motor examination) ranges from 0 to 108. Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.
Levodopa (L-Dopa) Introduction During the Study18 weeksNumber of patients without concomitant L-Dopa treatment at baseline which required L-Dopa supplementation during the study.
Levodopa (L-Dopa) Dose Change During the Study18 weeksAlthough the number of patients who began the study with concomitant L-dopa supplementation and required a change in dosage was not analysed for this study, the change from baseline in L-dopa dose is presented.
Change From Baseline in Duration of On-time Without or With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18Baseline and week 18Duration of on-time without Dyskinesia or with non-troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as non-troublesome if it did not interfere with function or did not cause meaningful discomfort. Increase in the duration represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 18 WeeksBaseline and week 18ESS is a patient-report scale with 8 items rating how likely one is to fall asleep during passive and inconsequential situations such as watching television, more active situations such as sitting and talking to someone, or consequential situations such as sitting in a car, while stopped for a few minutes in traffic. The likelihood of dozing off is rated from 0 points (no chance) to 3 points (high chance). The overall rating scale is scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep).

Countries

China

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Whilst 475 patients were enrolled only 473 were treated, since one patient was not compliant to protocol and did not take any trial drug and another refused to take trial medication.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pramipexole ER
Pramipexole Extended Release (ER). Tablets of 0.375 mg and 1.5 mg administered once daily (qd) to achieve daily doses of 0.375 mg, 0.75 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.25 mg, 3.0 mg, 3.75 mg or 4.5 mg
234
Pramipexole IR
Pramipexole Immediate Release (IR). Tablets of 0.125 mg, 0.25 mg and 1.0 mg administered 3 times daily to achieve a total daily dose of 0.375 mg, 0.75 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.25 mg, 3.0 mg, 3.75 mg, or 4.5 mg
239
Total473

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1112
Overall StudyOther13
Overall StudyProtocol Violation12
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPramipexole ERPramipexole IRTotal
Age, Continuous62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.03
62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.06
Sex: Female, Male
Female
80 Participants95 Participants175 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
154 Participants144 Participants298 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
93 / 23490 / 239
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 23413 / 239

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II+III Score at Week 18

UPDRS total score ranges from 0 (best) to 160 (worst) and was calculated as the sum of Part II (activities of daily living, ranges from 0 to 52) and Part III (motor examination, ranges from 0 to 108). Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) with last observation carried forward (LOCF). FAS is defined as all randomised patients which received at least one dose of study drug and provided any post baseline efficacy assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II+III Score at Week 18-13.807 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6547
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II+III Score at Week 18-13.047 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6434
Comparison: The null hypothesis (H0) states that the mean change from baseline to Week 18 (or last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]) in the UPDRS II+III score for the treatment group pramipexole ER is inferior to the mean change for the treatment group pramipexole IR.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.047, 2.566]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Duration of Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18

Duration of off-time during waking hours based on patient diary data. Off-time describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease). Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Duration of Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18-1.044 hoursStandard Error 0.2256
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Duration of Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18-1.098 hoursStandard Error 0.23
p-value: 0.869895% CI: [-0.699, 0.592]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Duration of On-time With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18

Duration on-time with non-troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as non-troublesome if it did not interfere with function or did not cause meaningful discomfort. Increase in the duration represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Duration of On-time With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18-0.044 hoursStandard Error 0.174
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Duration of On-time With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 180.518 hoursStandard Error 0.1773
p-value: 0.026395% CI: [0.067, 1.057]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Duration of On-time Without Dyskinesia at Week 18

Duration of on-time without Dyskinesia based on patient diary data. On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Increase in the duration represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Duration of On-time Without Dyskinesia at Week 181.026 hoursStandard Error 0.3076
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Duration of On-time Without Dyskinesia at Week 180.496 hoursStandard Error 0.3134
p-value: 0.233895% CI: [-1.405, 0.345]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Duration of On-time Without or With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18

Duration of on-time without Dyskinesia or with non-troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as non-troublesome if it did not interfere with function or did not cause meaningful discomfort. Increase in the duration represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Duration of On-time Without or With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 180.982 hoursStandard Error 0.2583
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Duration of On-time Without or With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 181.013 hoursStandard Error 0.2632
p-value: 0.933795% CI: [-0.704, 0.766]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Duration of On-time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18

Duration of on-time with troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as troublesome if it interfered with function or caused meaningful discomfort. Decrease in the duration represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Duration of On-time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18-0.000 hoursStandard Error 0.0553
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Duration of On-time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 180.031 hoursStandard Error 0.0564
p-value: 0.699595% CI: [-0.127, 0.188]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18

Percentage off-time during waking hours based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). Off-time describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease). Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced Parkinsons Disease (PD). Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18-6.962 Percentage off-timeStandard Error 1.5072
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18-7.443 Percentage off-timeStandard Error 1.5362
p-value: 0.826195% CI: [-4.787, 3.826]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage On-time With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18

Percentage on-time with non-troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as non-troublesome if it did not interfere with function or did not cause meaningful discomfort. Increase in the percentage represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Percentage On-time With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18-0.235 Percentage of on-timeStandard Error 1.0807
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Percentage On-time With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 183.275 Percentage of on-timeStandard Error 1.1013
p-value: 0.025495% CI: [0.437, 6.583]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage On-time Without Dyskinesia at Week 18

Percentage on-time without Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (worst case) to 100 (best case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Increase in the percentage represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Percentage On-time Without Dyskinesia at Week 187.028 Percentage of on-timeStandard Error 1.9274
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Percentage On-time Without Dyskinesia at Week 184.265 Percentage of on-timeStandard Error 1.9643
p-value: 0.322395% CI: [-8.255, 2.729]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage On-time Without or With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18

Percentage on-time without or with non-troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as non-troublesome if it did not interfere with function or did not cause meaningful discomfort. Increase in the percentage represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Percentage On-time Without or With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 186.855 Percentage of on-timeStandard Error 1.5672
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Percentage On-time Without or With Non-troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 187.476 Percentage of on-timeStandard Error 1.5973
p-value: 0.784395% CI: [-3.848, 5.09]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percentage On-time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18

Percentage on-time with troublesome Dyskinesia based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). On-time describes a period during which a patient was relatively free of Parkinsons symptoms (e.g. mobile or capable of moving with relative ease and independence). Dyskinesia qualified as troublesome if it interfered with function or caused meaningful discomfort. Decrease in the percentage represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Percentage On-time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 18-0.142 Percentage of on-timeStandard Error 0.3398
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Percentage On-time With Troublesome Dyskinesia at Week 180.226 Percentage of on-timeStandard Error 0.3463
p-value: 0.452995% CI: [-0.598, 1.335]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in UPDRS III Score Separately at Week 18

UPDRS Part III (motor examination) ranges from 0 to 108. Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in UPDRS III Score Separately at Week 18-10.068 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5048
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in UPDRS III Score Separately at Week 18-9.440 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.4962
p-value: 0.37695% CI: [-0.765, 2.021]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in UPDRS II Score Separately at Week 18

UPDRS Part II (activities of daily living) ranges from 0 to 52. Reduction over time represents an improvement. Means are adjusted for treatment, centre and baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in UPDRS II Score Separately at Week 18-3.750 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2235
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in UPDRS II Score Separately at Week 18-3.596 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2197
p-value: 0.623795% CI: [-0.463, 0.771]ANCOVA
Secondary

Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at Week 18

CGI-I was used to assess the overall status of Parkinsons disease (PD) after interviewing the patient about the various aspects of the PD and after evaluating adverse events and concomitant treatments. Ranging from 1 point=very much improved to 7 points=very much worse. Responders were defined as patients having score 1 or 2 (at least much improved) when comparing the past week to the assessment at baseline.

Time frame: 18 weeks

Population: FAS (LOCF). Only patients with on-treatment CGI-I evaluation were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole ERClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at Week 18Responder125 Participants
Pramipexole ERClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at Week 18Non-Responder99 Participants
Pramipexole IRClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at Week 18Responder138 Participants
Pramipexole IRClinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Responder at Week 18Non-Responder95 Participants
p-value: 0.317Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Levodopa (L-Dopa) Dose Change During the Study

Although the number of patients who began the study with concomitant L-dopa supplementation and required a change in dosage was not analysed for this study, the change from baseline in L-dopa dose is presented.

Time frame: 18 weeks

Population: FAS. Only patients with concomitant L-Dopa treatment at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERLevodopa (L-Dopa) Dose Change During the Study-5.17 mgStandard Deviation 51.563
Pramipexole IRLevodopa (L-Dopa) Dose Change During the Study-11.22 mgStandard Deviation 101.913
Secondary

Levodopa (L-Dopa) Introduction During the Study

Number of patients without concomitant L-Dopa treatment at baseline which required L-Dopa supplementation during the study.

Time frame: 18 weeks

Population: FAS. Only patients without concomitant L-Dopa treatment at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole ERLevodopa (L-Dopa) Introduction During the Studywith L-Dopa introduction1 Participants
Pramipexole ERLevodopa (L-Dopa) Introduction During the Studywithout L-Dopa introduction24 Participants
Pramipexole IRLevodopa (L-Dopa) Introduction During the Studywith L-Dopa introduction0 Participants
Pramipexole IRLevodopa (L-Dopa) Introduction During the Studywithout L-Dopa introduction40 Participants
Secondary

Patient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Responder at Week 18

The PGI-I scale is a patient-rated instrument which was used to measure the improvement of a patients PD symptoms throughout the study. Ranging from 1 point=very much better to 7 points=very much worse. Responders were defined as patients having score 1 or 2 (at least much better) when comparing the past week to the assessment at baseline.

Time frame: 18 weeks

Population: FAS (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole ERPatient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Responder at Week 18Responder119 Participants
Pramipexole ERPatient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Responder at Week 18Non-Responder109 Participants
Pramipexole IRPatient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Responder at Week 18Responder127 Participants
Pramipexole IRPatient Global Impressions of Improvement (PGI-I) Responder at Week 18Non-Responder109 Participants
p-value: 0.4756Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Responder in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18

Percentage off-time based on patient diary data, percentage ranging from 0 (best case) to 100 (worst case). Off-time describes a period when the patient experiences increased parkinsonian symptoms (e.g. immobility or inability to move with ease). Reduction over time represents an improvement. Responders were defined as patients with at least a 20 percent improvement relative to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF) reduced to patients with advanced PD. Advanced PD patients were those reporting at least 2 hours of off-time daily during each of the two days before baseline, as recorded in the patient diary.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole ERResponder in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18Responder58 Participants
Pramipexole ERResponder in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18Non-Responder52 Participants
Pramipexole IRResponder in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18Responder59 Participants
Pramipexole IRResponder in Percentage Off-time During Waking Hours at Week 18Non-Responder47 Participants
p-value: 0.7902Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Responder in UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Week 18

Responders were defined as patients with at least a 20 percent improvement of UPDRS II+III score relative to baseline. UPDRS II+III ranges 0-160 scores from best to worst and was calculated as the sum of Part II (activities of daily living, ranges from 0 to 52) and Part III (motor examination, ranges from 0 to 108).

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: FAS (LOCF)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Pramipexole ERResponder in UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Week 18Responder164 Participants
Pramipexole ERResponder in UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Week 18Non-Responder64 Participants
Pramipexole IRResponder in UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Week 18Responder154 Participants
Pramipexole IRResponder in UPDRS Parts II+III Score at Week 18Non-Responder82 Participants
p-value: 0.1051Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 18 Weeks

ESS is a patient-report scale with 8 items rating how likely one is to fall asleep during passive and inconsequential situations such as watching television, more active situations such as sitting and talking to someone, or consequential situations such as sitting in a car, while stopped for a few minutes in traffic. The likelihood of dozing off is rated from 0 points (no chance) to 3 points (high chance). The overall rating scale is scored from 0 (no daytime sleep) to 24 (worst daytime sleep).

Time frame: Baseline and week 18

Population: Observed cases (OC). Only patients with ESS assessment at baseline and at 18 weeks were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Pramipexole ERChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 18 Weeks0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.43
Pramipexole IRChange From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Total Score at 18 Weeks-0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.38

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026