Skip to content

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. Therapy Effects and the Impact on the Patient's Quality of Life

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. Therapy Effects and the Impact on the Patient's Quality of Life

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01191567
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-08-31
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2017-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Wounds

Keywords

acute wounds, postoperative wounds

Brief summary

Wounds have long been a source of suffering for unfortunate victims and in recent years new complementary methods have been developed in areas where traditional wound treatment has been insufficient. Treating wounds with negative pressure, Vacuum assisted closure® \[VAC\], is a relatively new method of treatment and knowledge about its effect on patients is limited. Earlier studies haven't been able to answer the question about which groups of patients that are in most favour of the treatment and what impact the treatment has on the patient's quality of life. It is important with further research since an effective and mild wound treatment can decrease suffering and increase quality of life for the patient. Wound treatment that does not lead to an achieved treatment goal can lead to a risk for the patient and should be avoided. The project consists of 4 part studies: Study 1 and 2 are chart review studies of a consecutive series of patients treated with VAC at Södersjukhuset during a 3 year period. The patients are described on the basis of medical, surgical and demographical factors. Outcome is treatment results and risk factors for a treatment failure. Study 3 and 4 are clinical randomised studies with the aim of studying whether treatment with VAC provides a faster and more effective healing of acute and postoperative wounds, and in what way the treatment affect the quality of life and pain of the patients, compared to conventional treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVAC treatment

wound treatment with VAC-therapy

PROCEDUREConventional treatment

wound treatment with conventional treatment according to the hospitals local routines

Sponsors

Stockholm South General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* acute wounds with substance defect after primary suture demanding further treatment or wounds not primary sutured * wounds with osteosynthesis, bone or tendon visual regardless wound size * postoperative infections with wound and substance defect demanding further treatment. * fasciotomy on extremity

Exclusion criteria

* wound size \< 2 cm and depth \< 1 cm * pressure ulcers, open abdomen and chronic ulcers * patients with dementia or mental illness so severe that participation in the study is impossible * patients non in command of the swedish language * ongoing treatment with warfarin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
treatment results2 weekssuccessfully treated or non-successfully treated
wound size2 weeksmeassured with Visitrak
Quality of life2 weeksmeassured with EQ-5D form and a diary with content analysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability2 weeks
costs for treatment2 weeks

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026