Skip to content

Radiation Planning Study for High Grade Brain Tumors

3T Versus 1.5T MR Approaches in Target Definition for Malignant Gliomas: Is There a Significant Difference in Tumor Extent and Radiation Treatment Volume?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01191346
Enrollment
24
Registered
2010-08-30
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2017-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High Grade Glioma

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to see if a higher strength MRI procedure provides better images to use in planning radiation treatments for patients with brain tumors in the future.

Interventions

OTHER3T MRI

3T MRI in addition to standard 1.5T MRI for treatment planning

Sponsors

University of Cincinnati
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed Grade III-IV glioma * Planning to undergo radiation therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Grade I or II glioma * Patients unable to undergo MRI imaging

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment volume1 year averageTo assess the difference in treatment volume for radiation planning in gliomas as calculated using 1.5T versus 3T magnets

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026