Skip to content

Physical Therapy Versus Steroid Injection for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

A Manual Physical Therapy Approach Versus Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection for Treatment of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01190891
Enrollment
104
Registered
2010-08-30
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2016-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

Rotator cuff tendonitis, Shoulder pain, Shoulder impingement

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the short and long-term effectiveness of two common interventions, manual physical therapy versus corticosteroid injection, for the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome.

Detailed description

Dysfunction in the shoulder has been reported to affect up to 33% of the general population and generate up to 5% of all consultations from general practitioners. Shoulder problems have been reported as the second highest musculoskeletal complaint for those seeking care from a physical therapist in a deployed environment. Impingement syndromes occur in nearly anyone who repeatedly or forcefully uses their upper extremity in an elevated position, which is very common in the active duty population, and is often characterized by pain during this motion. Managed improperly, this can lead to disruption in work performance and prolonged disability. Corticosteroid and analgesic injections are some of the most common procedures for orthopedists, rheumatologists, and general practitioners to use in the management of shoulder pain. Conflicting reports from systematic reviews questions the efficacy of corticosteroid injections over other interventions, including oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Additionally they are not without potential risk such as infection or deleterious effects of prolonged corticosteroid use to include tissue degeneration reported in animal studies as well as other regions of the human body. Manual physical therapy offers a non-invasive approach with negligible risk in as few as three to six sessions and has been shown to improve strength and function in this patient population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two interventions that are commonly used in the management of shoulder impingement syndrome. 1. Evaluate the effect that a subacromial corticosteroid injection has on a subject's function and pain as measured by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). 2. Evaluate the effect that manual physical therapy has on a subject's function and pain as measured by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). 3. Compare the effect sizes of the two different interventions in a patient population with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Interventions

Same as arm description

PROCEDURECorticosteroid Injection

Dose represents a glucocorticoid potency of 400 hydrocortisone equivalents/injection (mg).

Sponsors

University of Puget Sound
CollaboratorOTHER
Franklin Pierce University
CollaboratorOTHER
Madigan Army Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18-65 * Read, write, and speak English * Tricare beneficiary and eligible for healthcare at a military treatment facility * Primary complaint of shoulder pain * Meets diagnostic criteria for shoulder impingement (mentioned below) To be included in the study participants are required to have: 1. pain with one of the 2 tests in category I, and 2. pain with one test from either category II or category III. \* pain is defined as reproduction of the usual pain that the subject experiences that makes up the nature of their complaint. Category I: Impingement signs 1. Passive overpressure at full shoulder flexion with the scapula stabilized. 2. Passive internal rotation at 90 degrees of shoulder flexion in the scapular plane and in progressive degrees of horizontal adduction. Category II: Active shoulder abduction Active shoulder abduction Category Ill: resisted break tests 1. Abduction 2. Internal rotation 3. External rotation

Exclusion criteria

* History of shoulder injection in last 3 months * History of shoulder dislocation, subluxation, fracture, adhesive capsulitis of the glenohumeral joint, or cervical/shoulder/upper back surgery * Full-thickness rotator cuff tears * Presence of cervical radiculopathy, radiculitis, or referral from cervical spine * Total baseline SPADI score not less than 20% (to prevent a ceiling effect with treatment) * Prior OMPT treatment to the involved limb for the current episode of pain * Military service members pending a medical evaluation board, a physical valuation board, or equivalent discharge process, or in medical hold to determine long term disposition. For non-military personnel, anyone that is pending or undergoing any litigation for their injury. * Contraindication to receiving a corticosteroid injection (allergies, adverse reactions, history of multiple injections in that area even if not within last 30 days, etc) * Inability to fill out informed consent form * Unable to come into the clinic for regular treatment over the course of the following month.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index1 yearThe SPADI is a 100-point, 13 item self-administered questionnaire divided into two subscales (pain and disability), with higher scores indicating greater pain and disability. It is responsive to change and accurately discriminates between patients who are improving or worsening. It has high test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The minimal detectable change (MDC) is 18 and the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) is between 8-13 points. The validity and responsiveness to change of SPADI have been described in physical therapy, as well as primary and secondary care settings.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Rating of Change1 yearThe GROC questionnaire is an instrument that measures overall changes in the quality of life of the subject. The use of a GROC is a common, feasible, and useful method for assessing outcome, and has been shown to be a valid measurement of change in patient status in other pain populations. A change in score of three rating points has been established as a clinically significant in the patients perception of quality of life. The GROC has 15 possible choices, with 0 being equal to no change and -1 to -7 indicating a negative change and +1 to +7 indicating a positive change.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Manual Physical Therapy
Manual Physical Therapy: Same as arm description
46
Corticosteroid Injection (Subacromial)
Location: Subacromial space; Syringe: 10mL; Needle: 25 gauge, 1.5 inch; Anesthetic: 6 mL of 1% lidocaine or marcaine; Corticosteroid: 1.0 mL Triamcinolone Acetonide (Kenalog), 40 mg/mL Corticosteroid Injection: Dose represents a glucocorticoid potency of 400 hydrocortisone equivalents/injection (mg).
52
Total98

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicManual Physical TherapyCorticosteroid Injection (Subacromial)Total
Age, Continuous40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants52 participants98 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants14 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants38 Participants67 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 460 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

The SPADI is a 100-point, 13 item self-administered questionnaire divided into two subscales (pain and disability), with higher scores indicating greater pain and disability. It is responsive to change and accurately discriminates between patients who are improving or worsening. It has high test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The minimal detectable change (MDC) is 18 and the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) is between 8-13 points. The validity and responsiveness to change of SPADI have been described in physical therapy, as well as primary and secondary care settings.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Manual Physical TherapyShoulder Pain and Disability Index21.6 units on a scale
Corticosteroid Injection (Subacromial)Shoulder Pain and Disability Index23.1 units on a scale
Secondary

Global Rating of Change

The GROC questionnaire is an instrument that measures overall changes in the quality of life of the subject. The use of a GROC is a common, feasible, and useful method for assessing outcome, and has been shown to be a valid measurement of change in patient status in other pain populations. A change in score of three rating points has been established as a clinically significant in the patients perception of quality of life. The GROC has 15 possible choices, with 0 being equal to no change and -1 to -7 indicating a negative change and +1 to +7 indicating a positive change.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Manual Physical TherapyGlobal Rating of Change3 units on a scale
Corticosteroid Injection (Subacromial)Global Rating of Change3 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026