Skip to content

High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (NIMV)for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS): a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study

High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation for Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01189162
Enrollment
80
Registered
2010-08-26
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2016-07-31
Last updated
2015-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

Primary treatment of RDS and treatment of RDS post extubation

Brief summary

The investigators hypothesize that while the extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants (\<1000 g) may need NIMV for the treatment of RDS, larger infants or the smaller ones post extubation may enjoy the comfort benefits associated with HFNC while getting coparable respiratory support to NIMV.

Interventions

DEVICENIMV with SLE ventilator vs HFNC via Vapotherm

Nasal respiratory support for RDS

Sponsors

Bnai Zion Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Minutes to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Gestational age between 24 to 34 and 6/7 weeks assessed by the obstetrical team from dating of last menstural period or ultrasound and weight \>1000 g for the initial treatment of RDS or \<35 weeks post extubation or for apnea of prematurity 2. Infants with RDS who will need NRS as initial therapy or after extubation and for apnea of prematurity, 3. written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Significant morbidity apart from RDS including: cardiac disease (not including patent ductus arteriosus \[PDA\]), congenital malformation, or if they had cardiovascular or respiratory instability because of sepsis, anemia or severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), 2. Parents refuse consent. 3. Unavailability of suitable ventilator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The percent of infants who will fail NRS and need endotracheal ventilation or will be switched to another mode of NRS.1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical features on both methods1 yearBlood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry saturation, and respiratory status prior to mechanical ventilation if needed according to arterial blood gas (PaO2, PCO2, pH), and time to stop nasal support
% of infants with neonatal morbidities on both methods1 yearIncidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of BPD (oxygen at 36 weeks post conceptional age to keep saturation\>92%), time until full feeds, and length of stay.
% of infants with possible side effects on both methods1 yearNasal trauma due to NRS, rate of air leak (pneumothorax), gastrointestinal perforation, irritability and discomfort assessed by a validated score

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026