Skip to content

Observational Non-Interventional Study With Enbrel (Etanercept) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

Observational Non-Interventional Study With Enbrel in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01188655
Enrollment
89
Registered
2010-08-25
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2011-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Keywords

Ankylosing Spondylitis

Brief summary

This observational study will be a documentation of the prescribing and administration practices of Enbrel® and their impact on ankylosing spondylitis patients outcome in a real life setting.

Detailed description

The study population will be described using standard descriptive statistics for demographic, clinical, medical, characteristics, as well as for standard health-related quality of life and functional disability questionnaires .

Interventions

DRUGEnbrel

The patients will be treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel® in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy is to be determined by the physician to meet the patients' individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose will be documented at baseline and any change will be documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Proven diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitisin accordance with local guidelines * Patients treated as an outpatient

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who suffer from hypersensitivity to the active substance Etanercept or to any of the excipients of Enbrel®. * Treatment with Enbrel® should not be initiated in patients with active infections including chronic or localised infections. * Patients with sepsis or risk of sepsis should not be treated.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 40 Response at Week 24Week 24BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Participants who achieved a decrease of 40 percent or more from baseline to the following visits are called as responders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the BASFI at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10 (0 = easy, 10 = impossible), participants answered 10 questions assessing their ability in completing normal daily activities or physically demanding activities. The BASFI score is a mean score of the 10 questions.
Participant's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 and Week 24Measured using a 100mm VAS ranging from 0=very good to 100=very bad.
Physician's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 and Week 24Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm= no disease activity.
Mean Duration of Morning StiffnessWeek 12 and Week 24Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes (If none was present = 0; If morning stiffness was continuing, average of duration of stiffness over the past 3 days was reported; If stiffness persisted the entire day, 1440 minutes (24h x 60 minutes) was recorded).
Change From Baseline in ASQoL at Week 12 and Week 24Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24ASQoL is a questionnaire that assesses disease-specific quality of life (QoL). It consists of 18 statements that are relevant to the physical and mental conditions for a participant with AS: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each statement is answered by the participant as a 'Yes' (scored as 1) or 'No' (scored as 0). All item scores are summed to give a total score. Total score can range from 0 (good QoL) to 18 (poor QoL).
Change From Baseline in BASDAI at Week 12 and 24Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10.
Percentage of Participants Without Peripheral ArthritisWeek 12 and Week 24
Mean Occiput-to-wall Distance at Week 12 and Week 24Week 12 and Week 24
Spine Agility Function by Schober TestWeek 12 and Week 24Schober test determines agility of lumbar spine. It measures participant's ability to flex the lower back. Examiner makes a mark at fifth lumbar vertebra (L5); places 1 finger 5 cm below and another 10 cm above the mark. Participant is asked to touch the toes. Examiner measures the increase in distance between 2 fingers.
Spine Agility Function by Ott TestWeek 12 and Week 24The Ott index determines the agility of the thoracic spine.
Percentage of Participants Without EnthesitisWeek 12 and Week 24

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Etanercept
Participants were treated in accordance with the requirements of the labeling of Enbrel in Austria. The dosage and duration of therapy was to be determined by the physician to meet participant's individual needs for treatment. To record complete dosing information, initial dose was documented at baseline and any change was documented with date, dose and reason at the subsequent visits.
89
Total89

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyOther11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEtanercept
Age Continuous41.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Scale (ASQoL) at baseline11.9 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) at baseline5.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) at baseline4.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
Duration of morning stiffness at baseline88.3 minutes
STANDARD_DEVIATION 67.5
Occiput-to-wall distance3.8 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Participant's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at baseline6.7 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Percentage of Participants Without Enthesitis57.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Without Peripheral Arthritis70.1 Percentage of Participants
Physician's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at baseline6.6 mm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants
Spine agility function by Ott test11.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
Spine agility function by Schober test6.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 89
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 89

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 40 Response at Week 24

BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10. Participants who achieved a decrease of 40 percent or more from baseline to the following visits are called as responders.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants Achieving BASDAI 40 Response at Week 2483.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASQoL at Week 12 and Week 24

ASQoL is a questionnaire that assesses disease-specific quality of life (QoL). It consists of 18 statements that are relevant to the physical and mental conditions for a participant with AS: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each statement is answered by the participant as a 'Yes' (scored as 1) or 'No' (scored as 0). All item scores are summed to give a total score. Total score can range from 0 (good QoL) to 18 (poor QoL).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in ASQoL at Week 12 and Week 24Week 12-6.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in ASQoL at Week 12 and Week 24Week 24-8.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BASDAI at Week 12 and 24

BASDAI is a validated self assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participant with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Utilizing a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participant's answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score range of 0-10.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASDAI at Week 12 and 24Week 12 (n= 70)-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in BASDAI at Week 12 and 24Week 24 (n= 68)-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the BASFI at Weeks 12 and 24

BASFI is a validated self assessment tool that determines the degree of functional limitation in AS. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10 (0 = easy, 10 = impossible), participants answered 10 questions assessing their ability in completing normal daily activities or physically demanding activities. The BASFI score is a mean score of the 10 questions.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in the BASFI at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 (n= 73)-2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
EtanerceptChange From Baseline in the BASFI at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24 (n= 70)-2.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Mean Duration of Morning Stiffness

Duration of morning stiffness is defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes (If none was present = 0; If morning stiffness was continuing, average of duration of stiffness over the past 3 days was reported; If stiffness persisted the entire day, 1440 minutes (24h x 60 minutes) was recorded).

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptMean Duration of Morning StiffnessWeek 12 (n= 54)34.2 minutesStandard Deviation 39.8
EtanerceptMean Duration of Morning StiffnessWeek 24 (n= 45)30.0 minutesStandard Deviation 46.3
Secondary

Mean Occiput-to-wall Distance at Week 12 and Week 24

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptMean Occiput-to-wall Distance at Week 12 and Week 24Week 24 (n= 56)3.2 cmStandard Deviation 5.2
EtanerceptMean Occiput-to-wall Distance at Week 12 and Week 24Week 12 (n= 58)3.2 cmStandard Deviation 5.5
Secondary

Participant's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24

Measured using a 100mm VAS ranging from 0=very good to 100=very bad.

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptParticipant's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 (n= 73)2.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
EtanerceptParticipant's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24 (n= 70)1.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Enthesitis

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants Without EnthesitisWeek 12 (n= 81)86.4 Percentage of Participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants Without EnthesitisWeek 24 (n= 78)85.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Peripheral Arthritis

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants Without Peripheral ArthritisWeek 12 (n= 81)81.5 Percentage of Participants
EtanerceptPercentage of Participants Without Peripheral ArthritisWeek 24 (n= 78)85.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Physician's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24

Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, with 0 mm= no disease activity.

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptPhysician's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24Week 24 (n= 78)1.7 mmStandard Deviation 1.3
EtanerceptPhysician's Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12 and 24Week 12 (n= 81)2.5 mmStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Spine Agility Function by Ott Test

The Ott index determines the agility of the thoracic spine.

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptSpine Agility Function by Ott TestWeek 12 (n= 40)13.6 cmStandard Deviation 14.8
EtanerceptSpine Agility Function by Ott TestWeek 24 (n= 43)13.3 cmStandard Deviation 14.6
Secondary

Spine Agility Function by Schober Test

Schober test determines agility of lumbar spine. It measures participant's ability to flex the lower back. Examiner makes a mark at fifth lumbar vertebra (L5); places 1 finger 5 cm below and another 10 cm above the mark. Participant is asked to touch the toes. Examiner measures the increase in distance between 2 fingers.

Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24

Population: Safety population: all participants who recieved at least one dose of study medication during the study period, n equals number of participants analyzed at the given time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EtanerceptSpine Agility Function by Schober TestWeek 12 (n= 50)7.6 cmStandard Deviation 5.7
EtanerceptSpine Agility Function by Schober TestWeek 24 (n= 49)7.7 cmStandard Deviation 5.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026