Skip to content

Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Recombinant Human C1 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acute HAE Attacks

A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study With an Open-label Extension Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Recombinant Human C1 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acute Attacks of Angioedema in Patients With HAE

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01188564
Enrollment
75
Registered
2010-08-25
Start date
2011-01-31
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2015-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hereditary Angioedema

Keywords

Hereditary Angioedema, HAE, Angioedema, Recombinant C1 Inhibitor, rhC1INH

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to confirm the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant human C1 inhibitor (rhC1INH) at a dose of 50 U/kg when used for the treatment of acute angioedema attacks in Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) patients.

Detailed description

HAE is characterized by recurrent localized angioedema caused by uncontrolled activation of the complement and contact systems due to a congenital deficiency of functional C1 inhibitor. rhC1INH has been developed to offer a more widely available therapeutic alternative to the existing plasma-derived C1INH (pdC1INH) products that have been used in the treatment of acute angioedema attacks patients with HAE. Patients who have qualified for enrollment in advance and who present to a study center within 5 hours of onset of an attack will be evaluated for eligibility. 75 eligible patients will be randomized (3:2) to receive an intravenous infusion of rhC1INH or saline in a double-blind fashion. Open-label rhC1INH may be provided as rescue medication to patients who do not experience the beginning of relief within 4 hours or who experience life-threatening oropharyngeal-laryngeal angioedema symptoms. Any patient having received a randomized treatment will be allowed to receive treatment with rhC1INH in an open-label fashion for subsequent eligible attacks.

Interventions

One i.v. injection of rhC1INH at the dose of 50 U/kg, for patients up to 84 kg; one i.v. injection of rhC1INH at the dose of 4200U (2 vials) for patients of 84 kg body weight or greater.

DRUGPlacebo (Saline)

One i.v. injection of saline (NaCl 0.9% w/v), equivalent in volume to the active treatment

Sponsors

Pharming Technologies B.V.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged at least 13 years * Signed written informed consent * Clear clinical and laboratory diagnosis of HAE with baseline plasma level of functional C1INH of less than 50% of normal * Willingness and ability to comply with all protocol procedures * Clinical symptoms of an eligible HAE attack with onset less than 5 hours before the time of initial evaluation

Exclusion criteria

* Medical history of allergy to rabbits or rabbit-derived products (including rhC1INH), or positive anti-rabbit dander IgE test (cut off \>0.35 kU/L; ImmunoCap® assay; Phadia or equivalent). * A diagnosis of acquired C1INH deficiency (AAE) * Pregnancy, or breastfeeding, or current intention to become pregnant * Treatment with any investigational drug in the past 30 days * Known or suspected addiction to drug and/or alcohol abuse * Suspicion for an alternate explanation of the symptoms other than acute HAE attack

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Beginning of Relief of SymptomsPatients observed for 24 hoursTime to beginning of relief is the time lapsed from the beginning of the infusion of study medication to the beginning of a beneficial effect based on patient's responses to the Treatmetn Effect Questionnaire (TEQ) for the primary attack location. The beginning of relief is defined as the first timepoint at which * The patient reports any of the following answers for TEQ question 1: A little better, Better or Much better; and; * The patient reports the following answer for TEQ question 2: Yes; and, * There is persistence in improvement at the next assessment time, i.e.either the same or a better response to Question 1 and Yes to Question 2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Minimal Symptoms24 hoursThe key secondary efficacy endpoint was the time to minimal symptoms at all locations. The time to achieving minimal symptoms was defined as an answer of Yes to TEQ question 3.

Countries

Bulgaria, Canada, Hungary, Israel, Italy, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

During the double blind phase of the study, patients were randomized once to receive rhC1INH or Saline in a ratio of 3:2. After the randomized treatment, patiënts with subsequent attacks could be trated with open-label rhC1INH.

Pre-assignment details

Patients could be enrolled into the open-label phase of the study after the initial randomized treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
rhC1INH
rhC1INH: One i.v. injection of rhC1INH at the dose of 50 U/kg, for patients up to 84 kg; one i.v. injection of rhC1INH at the dose of 4200U (2 vials) for patients of 84 kg body weight or greater.
44
Placebo (Saline)
Placebo (Saline): One i.v. injection of saline (NaCl 0.9% w/v), equivalent in volume to the active treatment
31
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-blind Phaserandomized not treated10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicrhC1INHPlacebo (Saline)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
42 Participants29 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants19 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants12 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 564 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 560 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Time to Beginning of Relief of Symptoms

Time to beginning of relief is the time lapsed from the beginning of the infusion of study medication to the beginning of a beneficial effect based on patient's responses to the Treatmetn Effect Questionnaire (TEQ) for the primary attack location. The beginning of relief is defined as the first timepoint at which * The patient reports any of the following answers for TEQ question 1: A little better, Better or Much better; and; * The patient reports the following answer for TEQ question 2: Yes; and, * There is persistence in improvement at the next assessment time, i.e.either the same or a better response to Question 1 and Yes to Question 2.

Time frame: Patients observed for 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
rhC1INHTime to Beginning of Relief of Symptoms90 minutes
Placebo (Saline)Time to Beginning of Relief of Symptoms152 minutes
Secondary

Time to Minimal Symptoms

The key secondary efficacy endpoint was the time to minimal symptoms at all locations. The time to achieving minimal symptoms was defined as an answer of Yes to TEQ question 3.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
rhC1INHTime to Minimal Symptoms303 minutes
Placebo (Saline)Time to Minimal Symptoms483 minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 21, 2026