Skip to content

A Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy (CBT) Self-Management Approach for Insomnia in Chronic Pain: A Randomized Control Trial

A Cognitive-Behaviour Therapy (CBT) Self-Management Approach for Insomnia in Chronic Pain: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01188460
Enrollment
48
Registered
2010-08-25
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2018-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Insomnia, Chronic Pain

Keywords

Insomnia, Chronic pain

Brief summary

This study will test the impact of a cognitive-behavioural self-management approach for the management of insomnia among patients with chronic pain. This self-management approach consists of a manual describing cognitive behavioural techniques for the management of insomnia. In terms of primary outcomes, it is anticipated that there would be improvements in sleep-related dimensions such as sleep quality, sleep efficiency, and night-time awakenings in the sample group receiving a copy of the self-help manual intervention to be implemented by participants in their home (intervention group), relative to the group receiving treatment as usual (control group). In terms of secondary outcomes, it is anticipated that the intervention group will show improvements in mood, fatigue, pain severity, and pain-related disability relative to the control group. The tertiary outcome variable of pre-sleep arousal is anticipated to have a moderating or mediating relationship with the sleep variables investigated.

Detailed description

In summary therefore, insomnia and other sleep difficulties have been reported to frequently occur in conjunction with other medical or psychiatric disorders, however insomnia co-occurring with other medical or psychiatric conditions has received less attention relative to primary insomnia with no such concurrent conditions (e.g., Lichstein, 2006; McCrae, & Lichstein, 2001; Taylor, Mallory, Lichstein, Durrence, Riedel, & Bush, 2007). In chronic pain, there have not been many well-controlled studies involving insomnia existing with a concurrent chronically painful condition. Research thus far has found multi-component cognitive-behavioural approaches to be successful in treating primary insomnia, and there have been some studies applying these approaches in the context of insomnia and concurrent medical conditions (Currie, Wilson, Pontefract, & deLaplante, 2000; Morin, 1993). Based on Morin's work (Morin, 1993; Morin, Beaulieu-Bonneau, LeBlanc, & Savard, 2005) involving a cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) protocol for patients with sleep problems related to chronic pain, a self-help format of such an intervention has also been developed (Currie & Wilson, 1997). However, this has thus far only been delivered within a group-based treatment programme (Currie, 1998; Currie & Wilson, 1997; Currie, Wilson, Pontefract, & deLaplante, 2000). From this context, and building on a prior study involving a group treatment format (Currie, 1998; Currie, Wilson, Pontefract, & deLaplante, 2000), the usefulness of a manualized self-management approach in manageing insomnia will be investigated, including the impact of this approach with regard to other salient measures of improved functioning (such as pain severity or pain-related disability) for individuals with chronic pain. The proposed study will involve a randomized control trial of this self-help treatment strategy for comorbid insomnia in chronically painful medical conditions among an adult outpatient sample at a hospital rehabilitation centre and pain clinic. This study thus seeks to investigate how successful a cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) self-help management approach is for manageing insomnia amongst people with chronic pain. Given the public health implications of the relationship of poor sleep to quality of life (e.g., Morin, Stone, McDonald, & Jones, 1994; Quesnel, Savard, Simard, Ivers, & Morin, 2003), a self-management approach to insomnia in the context of chronic pain may offer an accessible and cost-effective treatment option. The following hypotheses will be tested: The first hypothesis predicts that participants in the intervention group will show changes in their scores on psychological measures in terms of greater improvements in sleep-related dimensions, in comparison with controls between the baseline and post-treatment periods. The second hypothesis predicts that participants in the intervention group will show changes in their scores on psychological measures in terms of lower levels of anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain severity, and pain-related disability, in comparison with controls between the baseline and post-treatment periods. These secondary outcome variables are not directly targeted by the intervention, however it is proposed that if improvements in sleep are experienced, there would be subsequent improvements in the variables of mood, fatigue, pain severity, and pain-related disability among chronic pain patients who experience insomnia. The third hypothesis predicts that the variable of pre-sleep arousal will have a moderating or mediating influence on the sleep-related variables (which will be the primary outcome variables). The moderating or mediating variable of pre-sleep arousal is proposed to assess dimensions related to sleep that are not tapped into by the primary outcome, sleep-related variables, but that may be of salience in the context of insomnia that is comorbid with chronically painful conditions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSelf-help manual for insomnia

Implementation of chapters of self-help manual at home, and completion of sleep diary in terms of time in bed, hours of sleep, time to fall asleep, number of awakenings, and sleep quality

BEHAVIORALSleep diary

Sponsors

The Ottawa Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 65 years of age * Not in state of crisis * Able to read and understand English * Experiences sleep difficulties or insomnia * Has chronic pain

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 or over 65 years of age * In a state of crisis * Does not read or understand English * Does not experience sleep difficulties or insomnia * Does not have chronic pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation)Measures insomnia symptoms, scores range from 0-28 with higher scores (ranging from 15-28) indicating clinical insomnia and therefore worse outcomes
Sleep Diary- Total Sleep TimeTimepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures: Total Sleep Time in hours, higher scores indicate better outcomes
Sleep Diary- Time to Fall AsleepTimepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures: Time to Fall Asleep in minutes, higher scores indicate worse outcomes
Sleep Diary- Number of Nocturnal AwakeningsTimepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures: Number of Nocturnal Awakenings, higher scores indicate worse outcomes
Sleep Diary- Sleep EfficiencyTimepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures: Sleep Efficiency (percentage)- higher scores indicate better outcomes
Sleep Diary- Sleep QualityTimepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures: Sleep Quality (units on a scale from 0-10), higher scores indicate better outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Severity RatingTimepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures pain severity, rated on scale from 0-10, total scores range from 0-40, higher scores indicate worse outcomes
Pain Disability Index (PDI)Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures pain disability impact on various life domains, scores range from 0-70, higher scores indicate worse outcomes
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures symptoms of depression and anxiety, total scores range from 0-42, higher scores indicate worse outcomes
Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS)Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures pre-sleep hyperarousal, total scores range from 16-80, higher scores indicate worse outcomes
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).Measures symptoms of fatigue, total scores range from 9-63, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Group
Receive one weekly telephone follow-up call per week to monitor sleep progress, complete 7 weeks of sleep diaries only, complete questionnaires at three study timepoints Sleep diary: Completion of sleep diary in terms of time in bed, hours of sleep, time to fall asleep, number of awakenings, and sleep quality
25
Experimental Group
Receive one weekly telephone call to monitor sleep progress, complete 7 weeks of sleep diaries, implement one chapter per week of self-help manual for insomnia over 7 weeks at home, complete questionnaires at three study timepoints Self-help manual for insomnia: Implementation of chapters of self-help manual at home, and completion of sleep diary in terms of time in bed, hours of sleep, time to fall asleep, number of awakenings, and sleep quality
23
Total48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupExperimental GroupTotal
Age, Continuous44.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.55
47.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.21
46.09 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.94
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants15 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants8 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

Measures insomnia symptoms, scores range from 0-28 with higher scores (ranging from 15-28) indicating clinical insomnia and therefore worse outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI)19.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.14
Experimental GroupInsomnia Severity Index (ISI)16.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.16
Primary

Sleep Diary- Number of Nocturnal Awakenings

Measures: Number of Nocturnal Awakenings, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupSleep Diary- Number of Nocturnal Awakenings3 Number of nocturnal awakeningsStandard Deviation 1
Experimental GroupSleep Diary- Number of Nocturnal Awakenings3 Number of nocturnal awakeningsStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Sleep Diary- Sleep Efficiency

Measures: Sleep Efficiency (percentage)- higher scores indicate better outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupSleep Diary- Sleep Efficiency63.06 Percentage of efficiencyStandard Deviation 8.33
Experimental GroupSleep Diary- Sleep Efficiency67.09 Percentage of efficiencyStandard Deviation 8.37
Primary

Sleep Diary- Sleep Quality

Measures: Sleep Quality (units on a scale from 0-10), higher scores indicate better outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupSleep Diary- Sleep Quality4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Experimental GroupSleep Diary- Sleep Quality4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Sleep Diary- Time to Fall Asleep

Measures: Time to Fall Asleep in minutes, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupSleep Diary- Time to Fall Asleep0.46 minutesStandard Deviation 0.23
Experimental GroupSleep Diary- Time to Fall Asleep0.35 minutesStandard Deviation 0.15
Primary

Sleep Diary- Total Sleep Time

Measures: Total Sleep Time in hours, higher scores indicate better outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupSleep Diary- Total Sleep Time5.34 hoursStandard Deviation 1.12
Experimental GroupSleep Diary- Total Sleep Time5.46 hoursStandard Deviation 1.02
Secondary

Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

Measures symptoms of fatigue, total scores range from 9-63, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupFatigue Severity Scale (FSS)50.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.74
Experimental GroupFatigue Severity Scale (FSS)47.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.12
Secondary

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Measures symptoms of depression and anxiety, total scores range from 0-42, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)22.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.43
Experimental GroupHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)19.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.32
Secondary

Pain Disability Index (PDI)

Measures pain disability impact on various life domains, scores range from 0-70, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupPain Disability Index (PDI)48.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.46
Experimental GroupPain Disability Index (PDI)46.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.76
Secondary

Pain Severity Rating

Measures pain severity, rated on scale from 0-10, total scores range from 0-40, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupPain Severity Rating27.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.19
Experimental GroupPain Severity Rating25.35 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.93
Secondary

Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS)

Measures pre-sleep hyperarousal, total scores range from 16-80, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Time frame: Timepoint 2 (week 7 of study participation).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control GroupPre-Sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS)44.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.52
Experimental GroupPre-Sleep Arousal Scale (PSAS)35.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.14

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026